Findings from CEEs Research into Impact Terminology Advancing Consistency in Terminology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Findings from CEEs Research into Impact Terminology Advancing Consistency in Terminology

Description:

Provide the big picture of what CEE members are reporting and understand what ... Calendar year reported savings. First year savings. First year MWh Savings ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: jkr9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Findings from CEEs Research into Impact Terminology Advancing Consistency in Terminology


1
Findings from CEEs Research into Impact
Terminology- Advancing Consistency in Terminology
  • Johanna Krouk, CEE
  • Monica Nevius, CEE
  • January 17, 2008
  • CEE Program Meeting, Long Beach, CA

2
Purpose
  • Identify common terms and definitions among the
    CEE membership
  • Provide the big picture of what CEE members are
    reporting and understand what were dealing with
    as an industry

3
Research Design Response Rate
  • Telephone interview with CEE Members
  • 68 of CEE Members with Electric Programs
    Interviewed
  • 22 out of 26 states that reported impacts
  • 2 out of 2 provinces that reported impacts
  • CEE Members, including these types of
    organizations
  • Program Administrators (IOUs, munis/coops, state
    entities)
  • State regulators

4
The Questions
  • Does your organization report to EIA?
  • Does your organization report savings impacts to
    regulators? If you dont report impacts to
    regulators, to whom do you report them? What
    impacts does your organization report to each?
  • How does what your organization reports track
    with the EIA data categories? (incremental vs.
    annual). Does your organization use the same
    terms with the same meaning as EIA or some other
    terminology?

5
EIA Definition Incremental
  • Incremental Effects The changes in energy use
    (measured in megawatthours) and peak load
    (measured in megawatts) caused in the current
    reporting year by new participants in your
    existing DSM programs and all participants in
    your new DSM programs. Reported Incremental
    Effects should be annualized to indicate the
    program effects that would have occurred had
    these participants been initiated into the
    program on January 1 of the current reporting
    year.

Source EIA. http//www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electric
ity/forms/eia861/eia861instr.pdf
6
Results EIA Incremental
  • First year MWh Savings
  • First year of programs
  • Incremental annual
  • Incremental but not annualized
  • Installed savings for 2006
  • Terms Used
  • Annual
  • Incremental
  • Annual incremental
  • Annualized MWh Savings
  • Calendar year reported savings
  • First year savings

7
Results EIA Incremental

8
Definition EIA Annual
  • Annual Effects The total changes in energy use
    (measured in megawatthours) and peak load
    (measured in megawatts) caused in the current
    reporting year by all participants in all of your
    DSM programs. This includes new and existing
    participants in existing programs (those
    implemented prior to the current reporting year
    that were in place during prior reporting year),
    all participants in new programs (those
    implemented during current reporting year), and
    participants in programs terminated since 1992
    (those effects continue even though the programs
    have been discontinued). DSM programs have a
    useful life, and the net effects of these
    programs will diminish over time. To the extent
    possible, the Annual Effects should consider the
    useful life of efficiency and load control
    measures by accounting for building demolition,
    equipment degradation, and program attrition. The
    effects of new participants in existing programs
    and all participants in new programs should be
    based on their start-up dates (i.e., if
    participants enter a program in July, only the
    effects from July to December are to be
    reported). If start-up dates are unknown and
    cannot be reasonably estimated, the effects can
    be annualized (i.e., assume the participants were
    initiated into the program on January 1). Please
    note that Annual Effects are not a summation of
    12 monthly peaks, but are the total DSM program
    effects of all programs and all participants for
    the current reporting year.

Source EIA. http//www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electric
ity/forms/eia861/eia861instr.pdf
9
Illustration EIA Annual
10
Results EIA Annual
  • Cumulative Installed Efficiency
  • MWh Savings in year
  • Net Market Effects
  • Only track for EIA
  • Terms Used
  • Cumulative
  • Annual
  • Actual annual savings
  • Conservation History
  • Cumulative Annual

11
Results EIA Annual
12
Other Definitions
  • The NAPEE Model Energy Efficiency Program Impact
    Evaluation Guide DOE Impact Evaluation
    Framework for Technology Deployment Programs do
    not address these definitions in glossaries

13
Other Terms Lifetime savings
  • Some examples
  • Lifetime Savings (1) first year savings
    multiplied by a weighted average lifetime
    measure. (2) the savings to be accrued over the
    expected life of a measure installed or committed
    to during the program year
  • Cumulative Lifetime Savings the savings that
    will accrue during the expected life of all
    measures installed or committed to during the
    current and all previous program years.

14
Summary
  • The data show for EIA incremental that annual
    is the most common and would be the most logical
    term to use because over ½ of respondents use it.
  • The data show for EIA annual that annual is the
    most common, when it is reported, followed by
    cumulative.

15
Discussion
  • Do the data suggest a critical mass behind
    certain terms? Implications of getting behind
    certain terms?
  • Where we can all get behind certain terms
    definitions, how do we get traction both within
    and outside the membership? And with regulators
    and other stakeholders?
  • If time, begin to tackle other terms, as well as
    the question of, how much time is this likely to
    take, and how do we bound it to develop realistic
    goals and make it most useful to members?
  • What are the next steps? 

16
  • Contact Information
  • Johanna Krouk
  • Consortium for Energy Efficiency
  • jkrouk_at_cee1.org
  • 617-589-3949 x233
  • Monica Nevius
  • Consortium for Energy Efficiency
  • mnevius_at_cee1.org
  • 617-589-3949 x227
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com