The Role of Pesticide Safety Education - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

The Role of Pesticide Safety Education

Description:

Different Viewpoints of Certification & Training ... Personal cost--too difficult/time consuming. Invincibility thinking. Perceived lack of relevance ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: joanneki
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Role of Pesticide Safety Education


1
The Role of Pesticide Safety Education
  • Joanne Kick-Raack
  • The Ohio State University Extension

2
Different Viewpoints of Certification Training
  • Means to get a job, keep a job or get a
    promotion/raise
  • Way to enhance companys credibility, marketing
    tool
  • Necessary/Unnecessary cost
  • Indoctrination-deliberately tell them what to
    think, believe and do.
  • Provide information and develop skills for good
    decision making and practices

3
  • Education plays a key role
  • In influencing human decisions, attitudes, and
    behavior in the real world by providing reliable
    information and developing critical
    decision-making skills
  • And ultimately reaching human and environmental
    protection goals

4
Integrated Pesticide Risk Reduction Program
  • Proper registration and labeling
  • Enforcement
  • Education

5
Importance of Training
  • One of the most important underlying
    philosophies of FIFRA relates to knowledge and
    competency. What really happened was that
    Congress had given formal endorsement to the
    principle that training is a reliable and
    workable ingredient in a regulatory process. It
    is the legal recognition of the essentiality of
    education and the competent person.
  • John Osmun, Professor Emeritus, Purdue University

6
  • Congress also amended FIFRA to clarify EPAs
    obligation to appropriate funds annually, on a
    matching basis, for training.

7
  • Less than 1 of federal funding provided for
    FIFRA related activities (registration,
    regulation, and enforcement) is used to train or
    educate the individual responsible for selecting,
    applying, storing, and disposing of a pesticide
  • AAPSE Strategic Plan

8
  • Laws and enforcement themselves do not
    necessarily teach correct action/practices
  • Set standards but may not always explain or help
    people meet those standards.
  • Applicators need knowledge not entirely
    conveyable through labeling.
  • Do not contaminate water on a label, storage
    and disposal
  • Recordkeeping regulations etc.

9
What is the end goal?
  • The applicator/worker is protected
  • The water is clean
  • Endangered species survive
  • Food is safe
  • Children are healthy
  • Labels, laws, enforcement and education are tools
    to achieve the goalnot the goal themselves

10
Exams/Training
  • Means to reach/influence every applicator who
    does come through the system
  • The opportunity to build and measure competence
  • Share enforcement actions in training
  • Enforcement is essential deterrent and can be
    educational but also can often be after the
    fact complaint driven
  • Drift has occurred
  • A spill wasnt handled
  • A worker is sick

11
Risk reduction needs to be proactive
  • TQAtotal quality assurance
  • You cant build in quality at the end of
    production by inspecting
  • The individuals involved in the production
    process have to be doing a quality job and know
    what they are doing
  • In other words, its ultimately the applicator
    who protects the environment and humans

12
Provide Consistency
  • Exams, manuals and teaching should be in
    alignment
  • Standards should reflect what a competent
    applicator NEEDS to know and address real world
    situations
  • Too many inconsistencies obscure the message

13
Balanced Viewpoint
  • Not the pro-pesticide view
  • Not the anti-pesticide view
  • Information in the public interest, based on
    science and based on values

14
Education in the Public Interest
  • Public perception generally is that universities
    are unbiased, most reliable source of information
  • Public more likely to trust risk mitigation
    efforts by public institutions--maintain
    credibility of pesticide regulation programs
  • Also need to collaborate with industry/environment
    al partners

15
A fundamental truth..
  • Learning is ultimately controlled by the learner
  • Ultimately protecting people and the environment
    is controlled by the applicator

16
Limits
  • People can know whats proper and legal and
    choose to do otherwisefor many reasons
  • Financial costgain may outweigh consequences
    like fines
  • Ex. Revenue generated or the cost of buying new
    equipment
  • Personal cost--too difficult/time consuming
  • Invincibility thinking
  • Perceived lack of relevance

17
Individual Responsibility
  • Plato argued that good people do not need laws to
    act responsibly and bad people will find a way
    around the law
  • Most people chose to do the right thing if they
    understand and agree with the consequences
  • Education promotes understanding
  • Always will be people who defy the law regardless
    of enforcement consequences and education

18
Performance measures/outcomes
  • Education can help achieve outcomes
  • Challenge--Things that are easy to measure often
    dont matter. and the things that really matter
    often arent easy to measure.
  • Ex. How many spills, poisonings etc. have been
    averted because of good education?

19
  • If you think education is costly, you havent
    priced ignorance
  • Ex. of lack of educationSuperfund methyl
    parathion cases.

20
Summary
  • Certification and training is the mechanism to
    reach every licensed applicator
  • Proactive approach not reactive
  • Key to individuals reaching competency,
    increasing competency and staying updated
  • Plays a key role in influencing human
    decisions in the real world
  • Although it is not the ONLY influence
  • Key component in reaching human health and
    environmental protection goals

21
students cannot be mere sponges, absorbing the
wisdom of a teachers lecture. Rather, they
must realistically engage subject matter and
actively practice the art of critical thinking
(Meyers, 1986, p.9)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com