EURISOL DS EUropean Isotope Separation On-Line Radioactive Ion Beam Facility - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

EURISOL DS EUropean Isotope Separation On-Line Radioactive Ion Beam Facility

Description:

Appointment of the Steering Committee Members by Contractors and election ... Mid September: MB and CB Meeting - 30th Nov-3rd Dec: Eurisol Ds week ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: rosellaba
Learn more at: https://www.nupecc.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: EURISOL DS EUropean Isotope Separation On-Line Radioactive Ion Beam Facility


1
EURISOL DS EUropean Isotope Separation
On-Line Radioactive Ion Beam Facility
EURISOL
Design Study
  • THE GOAL
  • Producing an engineering oriented study of the
    EURISOL Facility and developing prototypes of the
    most critical parts of the facility itself.
  • Starting point EURISOL RTD Recommendations

THE MANAGEMENT BOARD Graziano
Fortuna Project Leader Yorick
Blumfeld Peter Butler
Mats Lindroos

Management Support Team (core staff)
Technical Coordinator John Cornell Scientific
liaison Office A. Andrighetto
M. Comunian .
Administrative Office R. Battistella
V. Vandevoorde .
2
EURISOL
EURISOL DS EUropean Isotope Separation On-Line
Radioactive Ion Beam Facility IDENTITY CARD
Design Study
TASKS 12 (FOUR TOPIC AREAS)
PARTICIPANTS 21 GANIL (F), CNRS/IN2P3 (F),
INFN-LNL (I), INFN (I), CERN (UE), UCL (B), CEA
(F), NIPNE (RO), JYU (FI), LMU (G), FZJ (G), FI
(LT), UW (PL), SAS (SK), U- LIVERPOOL (UK), GSI
(G), USDC (E), CCLRC (UK), PSI (CH), IPUL (LV),
SU MSL (SE) (15 countries involved)
CONTRIBUTORS 21 U-FRANKFURT (G), BUDKER (RU)
,VNIIFT (RU), PNPI (RU), ORNL (USA), ANL (USA),
KAERI (SKR), TRIUMF (CA), JAERI (JP), SOREQ (IL),
U-MAINZ (G), VINCA (YU), KVI (NL), U-SURREY (UK),
U-YORK (UK), U-PAISLEY (UK), U-UPPSALA (SE), NSCL
(USA), FNAL (USA), INFN-LNS (I), HUG (CH) (13
countries involved from Europe, Asia and North
America)
PROJECT ESTIMATED TOTAL EFFORTS (k) 32.284,3
- FTE 490,45
EU CONTRIBUTION (k) 9161.9 - FTE
113,25
DURATION OF THE PROJECT 48 MONTHS
STARTING DATE END OF JANUARY-BEGINNING OF
FEBRUARY 2005
COORDINATING INSTITUTION GANIL (F)
3
TASKSAND RELATED FOUR TOPIC AREAS
EURISOL
Design Study
  • EURISOL DS Managemt (GANIL/INFN-LNL/CNRS-IN2P3/CER
    N)
  • Targets and ion sources (Synergies with neutron
    spallation sources and neutrino facilities)
  • Multi-MW target station mercury converter
    (CERN)
  • Direct target Several target-ion source
    prototypes (CERN)
  • Fission target UCx target (INFN-LNL)
  • Accelerators (Synergies with HIPPI (CARE))
  • Proton accelerator design the driver
    (INFN-LNL)
  • Heavy ion accelerator design the post
    accelerator (GANIL)
  • SC cavity development, prototypes and
    multipurpose cryomodule (CNRS-IN2P3-IPNO)
  • Physics, beams and safety (Synergies with EURONS)
  • Physics and instrumentation (U-LIVERPOOL)
  • Beam intensity calculations (GSI)
  • Safety and radioprotection (CEA)
  • Beta-Beams Aspects (Synergies with BENE (CARE))
  • Beam preparation breeders, 60 GHz ECR source
    (JYV)

4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
EURISOL
MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE
Design Study
9
Where have we got to?
EURISOL
Design Study
  • Annex I to the contract and CPF Forms submitted
    to EC
  • on 30th September, 2004
  • The magic words most frequently used in Annex
    I
  • 1. Objectives
  • 2. Milestones
  • 3. Deliverables

10
ANNEX I TO THE CONTRACT LIST OF CONTENTS
EURISOL
Design Study
  • 1. Project summary
  • 2. Project objectives
  • 3. List of participants
  • 4. Implementation plan for the full duration of
    the project
  • 4.1 List of tasks
  • 4.2 Implementation plan
  • 4.3 Description of tasks
  • 5. Consortium management activities
  • 5.1 Organisational structure and overall
    project management
  • 5.2 Potential impact and risks assessment
  • 5.3 Plan for use and dissemination of
    knowledge
  • 6. Project resources and budget overview
  • 6.1 Personnel effort for the full duration of
    the project
  • 6.2 Description of other resources needed
  • 6.3 Overall budget for the full duration of
    the project
  • Significant reshaping of the related original
    test of the proposal

11
TASK DESCRIPTION EXAMPLE
EURISOL
Design Study
Task number 5 Task title Safety Radioprotection
Start month 1 End month 46 End month 46 End month 46 End month 46 End month 46 End month 46 End month 46 End month 46 End month 46
Participant number 7 1 5 8 10 11 12 13
Participant short name CEA GANIL CERN NIPNE LMU FZJ FI UW Total
Person-months 66.00 33.00 66.00 96.00 78.00 78.00 108.00 36.00 561.00
Objectives Due to drastically increased
radioactive inventory compared to current
worldwide RIB facilities, the following list of
objectives has been identified that need
research and development 1. Calculation of
radiation production and activation. 2.
Methods for shielding against prompt radiation
and for the containment of activity. 3.
Handling of targets and in particular the
disposal of spent targets. 4. Conformity of the
proposed installation to the legislation. The
realization of this task is crucial for the
Design Study of the new generation RIB facility
in order to characterize the radioactive
inventory, to identify the technical challenges,
to characterize the safety approval procedures,
to estimate the impact of safety and
radioprotection issues on the final cost of the
installation.
12
TASK DESCRIPTION EXAMPLE
EURISOL
Design Study
Description of work The work includes 1. Radiation, activation, shielding doses - characterization of radiation from primary beam components, target-converter, RNB production target, beam dump, secondary beam lines - activation estimates of accelerator components, target-converter, RNB production target, beam dump, separator and ionizer, secondary beam lines, environment (building, air, soil, ground water) - characterization of radio-elements produced with respect to (2) - optimization of shielding against prompt radiation fields and activated structures - dose rate calculations. 2. Radioactivity control, safety risks - study of dispersion of radio-elements, contamination, migration - study of safety associated with oxidation of target materials - study of containment of volatile radioactivity - safety and risks associated with target preparation, handling, confinements and nuclear ventilation, flow of radioactive materials, etc. - prevention and limitation of personnel direct and indirect exposure risk and failure scenarios - prevention and limitation of waste production, radioactivity dispersion and rejections. 3. Decommissioning - storage and disposal of spent targets - characterization of radioactive waste produced - characterization of activated structures, their volumes, masses, specific activity, radio-elements - guidelines of the decommissioning and dismantling strategy - risk estimates. 4. Conformity to legislation - study of the licensing and permission procedures - guidelines on the technical options - guidelines on implementation and execution conditions - potential risk and delays estimates.
13
TASK DESCRIPTION EXAMPLE
EURISOL
Design Study
NO. Milestones and expected result of this task Months due
M1 Radiation, activation, dose
M1.1 Validation of code 6
M1.2 Radiation activation estimates 12
M1.3 Shielding guidelines 22
M2 Radioactivity control, safety and risk
M2.1 Dispersion of radioactivity 17
M2.2 Test of purification system 31
M2.3 Containment of radioactivity 17
M2.4 Activity transport in ground water 17
M2.5 Report 44
M3 Decommissioning issues
M3.1 Report 45
M4 Conformity to legislation
M4.1 Report 46
Deliverable number Deliverables Dissemination level1
D1 Radiation, activation, dose Shielding guidelines PU
D2 Radioactivity control, safety and risk Report PU
D3 Decommissioning issues Report PU
D4 Conformity to legislation Report PU
14
ANNEX I TO THE CONTRACTASSESSMENT OF RISKS
EURISOL
Design Study
Task Main deliverable Crucial milestones Type of risk Actions Consequences
2 Multi-MW liquid-Hg proton-to-neutron converter design Decisions on draft design parameters (14 months) Some challenging technical aspect(s) unsolved Further RD Use of high-Z solid converter Staging of the target station construction, delay of full power operation (1-2 years)
4 Design and test of a sizable(few kg) UCx target Target design and integration on the n-converter (36 months) Geometry and coupling to the converter and 1 source not optimized Need for further RD Degradation of RIB intensity, delay in reaching expected final RIB intensities (1-2 years)
5 Evaluation of the facility impact (safety and radioprotection aspects) on the environment and on the maintenance and running procedures Radiation and activation estimated (12 months) Need to reconsider layout of the very hot parts of the facility Redesigning the hot parts of the facility Reducing the beam power Increase of facility cost Facility performance degradation (partially recovered in long term by optimizing overall efficiency)
7,8 Design and test of prototypes related to the SC low-energy part of the driver linac Cold test of complete cryomodule (36 months) Beam tests of cryomodule and cavities too time- consuming Need more time for tests and problem solving Rely only on off-beam tests Minor impact on construction planning of the facility
9 Charge Breeder advanced performance in terms of high charge state and related efficiency Report on charge breeding RD (19 months) 132Sn25 produced with poor efficiency (below 10) Need for further RD, Use of stripping sections Increase of post-accelerator cost and/or size (10-20)
9 60-GHz pulsed ECR ion source Intermediate report on bunched efficiency (24 months) Source not reaching design specifications Need for further RD Use different approach to meet bunching requirement Delay Beta Beam (1-2) years Delay Beta Beam (3-4) years
15
The Beta-Beam concept
EURISOL
Design Study
16
TOPICS OF MAJOR CONCERN FOR THE MANAGEMENTThe
upper list regards topics already assessed in
Eurisol RTD but they need to be fully explored in
this design study
EURISOL
Design Study
  • Layout of the facility
  • Cost estimation of the facility (better then 20)
  • Site options (National Lab., Intergovernmental
    Institution, Less favorite countries new Lab.
  • Multi user capability
  • Cost/benefit of the different technical solutions
  • Comparison of CW and high duty cycle driver
    solution
  • 1. Global coherence
  • 2. Synergies with EURONS, CARE (HYPPI),
    SPALLATION NEUTRON SOURCES
  • 3. Dissemination of results
  • 4. EURISOL DS Web site
  • 5. Outreach activity

17
NEXT STEPS
EURISOL
Design Study
6. Tentative dates of the 2005 official
meeting - End of May MB and CB meeting
- Mid September MB and CB Meeting -
30th Nov-3rd Dec Eurisol Ds week
During the week the following meetings will take
place a) MB and CB b)
Annual participants meeting c) Steering
Committee meeting
  • Signature of the contract (within the end of the
    year - Ganil /EC)
  • Signature of the Consortium Agreement
    (Participants)
  • Access to the contract by participants (Ganil-
    Participants)
  • Appointment of the Steering Committee Members by
    Contractors and election
  • of the Chair person (kick-off meeting)
  • 5. Kick-off meeting date 3/2/2004 Afternoon
    MB-CB meeting 4/2/2005 SC meeting
  • Aim of the Eurisol week
  • Review and monitor the activities of the year,
    check the overall project planning, extend the
    discussion and the confrontation on the achieved
    results to all community, approve the general
    lines (technical, scientific and administrative
    matters) of the yearly reports, discuss and
    approve the activities planning for the incoming
    year taking into account the suggestion given by
    the community
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com