The CARS model for writing introductions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

The CARS model for writing introductions

Description:

The CARS model for writing introductions. John Morgan. Language and Learning Centre ... stem mainly from a recent ELT INSET project located within the state secondary ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1293
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: usersA
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The CARS model for writing introductions


1
The CARS model for writing introductions
  • John Morgan
  • Language and Learning Centre
  • University of Wales Aberystwyth

2
The shape of academic text
  • As you start to write, the ideas in your text
    should narrow in focus (cf. Davies, inverted
    pyramid intro, session 8)
  • from a general opening
  • to specific information

3
CARS (Create a Research Space)John Swales, 1990
  • Move 1 Establishing a territory
  • Step 1 Claiming centrality and/or
  • Step 2 Making topic generalizations and/or
  • Step 3 Reviewing items of previous research
  • Move 2 Establishing a niche
  • Step 1a Counter-claiming or
  • Step 1b Indicating a gap or
  • Step 1c Question-raising or
  • Step 1d Continuing a tradition
  • Move 3 Occupying the niche
  • Step 1a Outlining purposes or
  • Step 1b Announcing present research
  • Step 2 Announcing principle findings
  • Step 3 Indicating Research article structure

4
Move 1
  • Establishing a territory
  • Providing background information that previews
    the main issue or problem that you will discuss

5
Optional steps in Move 1
  • Step 1 Claiming centrality
  • and/or
  • Step 2 Making topic generalizations
  • and/or
  • Step 3 Reviewing items of previous research
  • As your text narrows from general to specific,
    the need to convince your reader of your claims
    is declining

6
Claiming Centrality
  • Many public opinion surveys confirm that
    Americans expect school leaders to focus on two
    top priorities keeping children safe and
    increasing student achievement. At a time when
    Internet usage among children and adults is
    rising dramatically, however, these priorities
    sometimes may seem contradictory. Is it possible
    for schools to protect students from
    inappropriate content without denying them access
    to engaging and valuable educational content? Can
    adults craft approaches that strike a balance
    between safe and smart Internet usage by
    children? These questions are at the crux of the
    dilemma we face with increasing frequency and
    urgency.
  • Safe and Smart Research and Guidelines for
    Childrens Use of the Internet http//www.nsbf.org
    /safe-smart/full-report.htm

7
Making topic generalizations
  • The Internet poses a singular challenge for
    public school leaders and parents
  • Safe and Smart Research and Guidelines for
    Childrens Use of the Internet http//www.nsbf.org
    /safe-smart/full-report.htm

8
Reviewing items of previous research
  • Several researchers 2 have reported that
    managers are wary of information technology (IT)
    and display considerable variation in the
    patterns and levels of microcomputer usage.
  • Lakhanpal, B. (1994). Assessing the Factors
    Related to Microcomputer Usage by Middle
    Managers. International Journal of Information
    Management, 14/1 (39-50).

9
Move 2
  • Establishing a niche
  • Identifying the main issue or problem area that
    you will discuss, from the perspective of your
    aims

10
Optional steps in Move 2
  • Step 1a Counter-claiming
  • or
  • Step 1b Indicating a gap
  • or
  • Step 1c Question raising
  • or
  • Step 1d Continuing a tradition
  • As you identify the main issue or problem in
    relation to the background information in your
    first move, you should be questioning or
    challenging existing claims to knowledge

11
Counter-claiming
  • This article argues that learner autonomy should
    not be seen as a goal only for highly committed
    students completing optional courses, or for
    students operating within selected educational or
    cultural contexts. Rather, it should be seen as
    an essential goal of all learning.
  • Cotterall, S. (2000). Promoting Learner
    Autonomy through the Curriculum Principles for
    Designing Language Courses. ELT Journal 54/2,
    Pp. 109-117.

12
Indicating a gap
  • Until now, this dilemma has been complicated by a
    dearth of credible information. There was a lack
    of good data about where children access the
    Internet, what they do once they're connected,
    what kinds of sites they visit, and how much
    adult supervision and guidance they receive,
    among many other basic issues. Nor did we know
    much about parents' perceptions of and
    expectations for their children's Internet usage.
    Without sound research, there is a tendency to
    react to the headlines and hype of the moment
    and that tack may not result in wise school
    policymaking and parental oversight.
  • Safe and Smart Research and Guidelines for
    Childrens Use of the Internet http//www.nsbf.org
    /safe-smart/full-report.htm

13
Question-raising
  • Given the increasingly heavy dependence on
    microcomputers within todays organizations, and
    the discretionary nature of their use, it is
    vitally important to examine the factors that
    influence the variation in managerial
    microcomputer usage.
  • Lakhanpal, B. (1994). Assessing the Factors
    Related to Microcomputer Usage by Middle
    Managers. International Journal of Information
    Management, 14/1 (39-50).

14
Continuing a tradition
  • The main task proposed here is centred on
    student-written reading logs. The original idea
    comes from Benton and Fox (1985 121), who were
    writing for first language contexts. Below is
    a rationale for reader response theory in
    general, and for reading logs as a practical
    application of the theory.
  • Carlisle, A. (2000). Reading Logs An
    Application of Reader-Response Theory in ELT.
    ELT Journal 54/1, Pp. 12-19.

15
Move 3
  • Occupying the niche
  • Indicating the contents, structure and/or aims of
    your paper in relation to the background
    information and main issue

16
Optional steps in Move 3
  • Step 1a Outlining purposes
  • or
  • Step 1b Announcing present research
  • Step 2 Announcing principle findings
  • Step 3 Indicating research article
    structure
  • In relation to the background information and
    main problem or issue you have presented in moves
    1 and 2, you should now be identifying the
    explicit focus of the paper

17
Outlining purposes
  • This paper tries to throw light on what a
    follow-up system of the kind Rudduck outlines
    might look like in Practice. Our ideas stem
    mainly from a recent ELT INSET project located
    within the state secondary school sector, but we
    feel that the principles involved are relevant to
    a wide variety of ELT settings.
  • Waters, A. Vilches, M.L.C. (2000).
    Integrating Teacher learning The School-based
    Follow-up Development Activity. ELT Journal,
    54/2, Pp. 126-134.

18
Announcing present research
  • Against this backdrop, the National School Boards
    Foundation worked with Grunwald Associates, a
    leading market research and consulting firm
    specializing in technology, to develop an
    unprecedented national survey of parents and
    children. The Dieringer Research Group conducted
    the survey and tabulated the data. With generous
    support from the Children's Television Workshop
    and Microsoft Corporation, we surveyed a
    significantly large random sample of 1,735
    households nationwide to learn about children's
    Internet usage. In telephone interviews, we asked
    parents of children aged two to 17 a number of
    questions about the role the Internet plays in
    their children's lives. We also asked children
    themselves, aged nine to 17, from the same
    households, for a reality check on the role of
    the Internet in their own lives.
  • Safe and Smart Research and Guidelines for
    Childrens Use of the Internet http//www.nsbf.org
    /safe-smart/full-report.htm

19
Announcing principle findings
  • There were 13 subjects in each group. When we
    compared our dyslexics with these other three
    groups on a range of cognitive and reading tasks
    we found that they differed in a number of
    respects.
  • Ellis, A.W., Mc Dougall, S.J.P. Monk, A.F.
    (1997). Are Dyslexics Different? III. Of Course
    They Are! Dyslexia, 3/1, Pp. 2-8.

20
Indicating research article structure
  • The article starts with an outline of the main
    approaches currently being applied to teach
    reading. This is followed by a pilot case study
    relating to kindergarten children, and an
    explanation of the results obtained. Finally,
    other groups of children are identified who would
    benefit if more emphasis were given to reading in
    the programmes they follow.
  • Dlugosz, D.W. (2000). Rethinking the Role of
    Reading in Teaching a Foreign Language to Young
    Learners. ELT Journal, 54/3, Pp. 284-290.

21
References
  • Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis English in
    Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge CUP.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com