Managing Global Climate Change European perspective and prognosis for the COP meeting in Copenhagen, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

Managing Global Climate Change European perspective and prognosis for the COP meeting in Copenhagen,

Description:

Frank J. Convery, Honorary President, European Association of ... Man is the only animal that makes bargains; one dog does not change bones with another dog. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:77
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: conv6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Managing Global Climate Change European perspective and prognosis for the COP meeting in Copenhagen,


1
Managing Global Climate Change - European
perspective and prognosis for the COP meeting in
Copenhagen, December 2009
  • Frank J. Convery, Honorary President, European
    Association of Environmental and Resource
    Economists and Heritage Trust Professor of
    Environmental Policy, University College Dublin
    (frank.convery_at_ucd.ie)
  • At University of California Berkeley, 223 Moses
    Hall
  • Center on Governance and Institutions. Institute
    of Government Studies (IGS)
  • 1600 Tuesday, August 18, 2009

2
Key References
  • Part 1
  • Available at http//ec.europa.eu/environment/clim
    at/pdf/future_action/part2.pdf
  • Part 2.
  • Available at http//ec.europa.eu/environment/clim
    at/pdf/future_action/part1.pdf

3
What Copenhagen is about
  • The United Nations Climate Change Conference
    (COP 15) meets December 7-18, 2009 in
    Copenhagen to agree on what will follow the Kyoto
    Protocol, which runs to 2012.

4
Four Essentials - Yvo de Boer, executive
secretary of the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
  • Industrialised countries how much reduction in
    emissions?
  • 2. How much are major developing countries such
    as China and India willing to do to limit the
    growth of their emissions?
  • 3. How is the help needed by developing
    countries to engage in reducing their emissions
    and adapting to the impacts of climate change
    going to be financed? 4. How is that money
    going to be managed?

5
Context
  • Global greenhouse gas emissions have continued to
    rise since the Kyoto Protocol was agreed in 1997,
    and ratified in 2005, with most of the growth
    arising in developing countries.

6
Table 1. GDP and Tonnes of CO2 per capita, CO2
intensity by energy mix and GDP, and percentage
Change in Total GHG Emissions, 1990-2005.
7
Scientific Context
  • Emerging scientific view that
  • Climate change is already underway, and may
    happen sooner and more dramatically than was
    anticipated earlier, mostly on the basis that
    negative feedback warmer oceans absorbing less
    CO2, shrinking ice caps reflecting less heat away
    etc. has been underestimated.
  • The most negative effects will be experienced by
    societies with limited or no resources to adapt
    to the change, with water scarcity and flooding
    being particularly notable impacts.

8
US Context
  • US did not ratify the Kyoto Protocol on the
    basis that
  • Its implementation would damage the US economy
  • It did not involve major action by developing
    countries.
  • With the opting out of the US, the European Union
    became the global leader in securing ratification
    of the Kyoto Protocol.
  • But the Obama administration is now playing a
    leading role in the evolution of global policy
    post Kyoto, and in particular on engaging with
    China.

9
European Context 1
  • Europe the incubator of the most horrific wars
    and pogroms in human history, driven by hatreds
  • European Union - never again war
  • But the impulse to global leadership and soft
    power ways of doing so remains..

10
Mutually beneficial interdependence a key idea
  • Donne, John (1573-1631). .(Devotions upon
    Emergent Occasions).
  • No man is an Island, intire of itself every man
    is a piece of the Continent, a part of the maine
    if Clod be washed away by the sea, Europe is the
    less, as well as if a Promonorie were there, as
    well as if a Mannor of thy friends or of thine
    owne were any man's death diminishes me, because
    I am involved in Mankinde And therefore never to
    send to know for whom the bell tolls It tolls
    for thee.

11
Wislawa Szymborska
  • See how efficient it still is,
  • How it keeps itself in shape-
  • Our centurys hatred.
  • How easily it vaults the tallest obstacles.
  • How rapidly it pounces, tracks us down.
  • Since when does brotherhood
  • draw crowds?
  • Has compassion
  • ever finished first?
  • Does doubt ever really rouse the rabble?
  • Only hatred has just what it takes.

12
European Context 2
  • 1. Supportive Popular sentiment
  • Climate Change in happening
  • That it can be very damaging
  • Danube Floods
  • Heat waves
  • Abraham Lincoln With public sentiment, nothing
    can fail without it, nothing can succeed.
  • 2. Farmers are special...
  • Pliny the Elder in regard to their Roman
    counterparts over 2000 years ago
  • The agricultural population, says Cato, produces
    the bravest men, the most valiant soldiers, and a
    class of citizens the least given of al to evil
    designs.

13
European Context 3
  • European Union has
  • Small budget which goes mainly to farmers and
    for regional development.
  • Very restricted capacity to raise taxes
    unanimous agreement of 27 Member States required
    carbon tax initiative (1992-97) failed.
  • Strong regulatory powers, and ability to create
    domestic emissions trading schemes
  • Single Market free movement of people, goods,
    finance, investment etc.

14
European Achievements if you build it they will
come
  • Philosophy
  • Developing countries will only come on board if
    rich countries move and are seen to move
    effectively.
  • Policy evolves step by step.
  • Quantified reduction Targets to be achieved by
    specified Dates
  • Limit rise to 2C
  • 1990 base line
  • medium target for developed countries 30
    reduction
  • 2050 Long term target for developed countries
    80 reduction
  • Carbon price to reflect scarcity essential
  • Carbon tax - failed
  • European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS)
    succeeded.

15
European Achievements 2
  • 1. Kyoto ratification in 2005
  • 2. Creation of carbon price via European
    emissions trading scheme (2005 indefinite)
  • 3. Free allocation to 2012, then auctioning of
    allowances.
  • 4. Animation of emission reduction projects in
    developing countries via CDM and use of ensuing
    credits to comply with trading obligations
  • 5. By 2020 Legally binding reductions
    (20-30)in emissions in the non trading sectors
    (agriculture, residential and commercial,
    transport, light industry), renewables (16),
    energy efficiency (-20), carbon capture and
    storage (demonstration projects)

16
Three categories of country
  • Responsiblity intensifies as income grows
  • Developed OECD
  • Developing 1 rapidly growing
  • Developing 2 very poor mainly Africa, parts
    of Asia

17
Developed Countries - Targets for Selected
Jurisdictions, by 2020, using weighting factors
18
Appropriate Mitigation Action by Developing
Countries
  • Reductions below business as usual of 15-30 are
    needed by 2020
  •  
  • National Low Carbon Development Plans to 2050,
    with milestones for 2020 are the heart of the EU
    proposals.

19
National Low carbon development Plans - features
  • Reductions below business as usual of 15-30 are
    needed by 2020
  •  Plans should identify  
  • Win-win opportunities need capacity building,
    policy assistance, awareness heightening
  • Further measures if targeted support financial
    and technical were made available
  • Expected emission reductions

20
Registry, and Monitoring, Reporting and
Verification (MRV)
  • Enter actions in an international registry - show
    the mitigation benefits, using transparent and
    robust measurement, reporting and verification
    methods.
  • Assessed by independent panel which will focus
    on
  • Feasibility
  • Proposals for further action and needs.

21
Strong Support for Sectoral Approaches steel,
cement, transport, power generation etc.
  • The following three options are identified, with
    the costs of mitigation and financial capability
    a part of all three options
  • Baseline and credit reductions below a
    specified baseline rewarded to value of reduction
    achieved.
  • National governments agree certain measures, and
    financial, technical and logistical support is
    provided to deliver these measures.
  • Bottom up approach for target setting determine
    technical potential of GHG reductions in each
    sector on the basis of high performance
    benchmarks (Japanese the main proponent of this
    approach)

22
Focus particular attention on achieving actions
and technologies for energy efficiency
  • Seen as the most effective means of achieving
    substantial reductions at relatively low cost in
    both developed and developing countries.
  • Power generation (combined cycle gas turbines,
    supercritical coal plants), and architecture of
    generation, transmission and distribution (smart
    grids, super conducting electric lines, power
    storage. Big co-benefits in terms of reduced air
    pollution and improved health.
  • Industry shift to secondary iron and steel,
    reduce clinker content of cement, use more
    recycled paper and glass, more sustainable
    building materials and insulation.
  • Final energy demand huge gains in heating and
    lighting, generalised use of low temperature
    solar thermal (domestic hot water)
  • Transport improvement in power train
    efficiency, lower weight, change in fuel mix

23
Research and development are essential
  • International Energy Agency
  • Over the last two decades, public energy RD
    spending in developed countries has dropped
    dramatically, on average to below half of 1984
    levels in 2004
  • Current levels of investment are very unlikely to
    achieve the sort of step change in technology
    that is needed to deliver the sought outcomes.
    Even a doubling of current levels of investment
    may not be enough. It concludes in its executive
    summary of the "2008 Energy Technology
    Perspectives" that 'While details are difficult
    to establish, independent studies have suggested
    that public sector RDD needs to increase by
    between two and ten times its current level.'

24
Technology the ultimate reality check
  • Richard Feynman, (Nobel Prize winning physicist)
    For a successful technology, reality must take
    precedence over public relations, for nature
    cannot be fooled.
  • And emissions trading guarantees a payoff..
  • Edison Anything that won't sell, I don't want to
    invent

25
European view on RD
  • A major boost to research, development and
    demonstration of low-carbon and adaptation
    technologies in all economic sectors and
    activities.
  • Build on the needs identified in national
    low-carbon development strategies and
    assessments.
  • Fund capacity building, science and
    technology-oriented cooperation, reducing market
    access barriers on environmental goods and
    services and improved global research
    coordination.
  • At least double energy-related RDD by 2012 and
    increase it to four times its current level by
    2020, with a significant shift in emphasis
    towards low-carbon technologies, especially
    renewable energy sources
  • Research on impacts, adaptation and other
    mitigation options to climate change need to be
    strengthened at the international level.

26
European Action on R, DD
  • Implementing the European Strategic Energy
    Technology Plan (SET-Plan).
  • Create one of its first Knowledge and Innovation
    Communities on climate mitigation and adaptation
    as part of the European Institute on Innovation
    and Technology (EIT), in line with the broader
    RDD policy objectives of the EU
  • Under the revised EU ETS, 300 million allowances
    are set aside to help stimulate the construction
    of carbon capture and geological storage
    demonstration plants as well as innovative
    renewable energy technologies.

27
Developing and linking Cap and trade Emissions
Schemes Developed countries
  • Adam Smith Man is the only animal that makes
    bargains one dog does not change bones with
    another dog.
  • A global carbon market can and should be built by
    linking comparable domestic emissions trading
    systems. This will promote cost-effective
    emission reductions.
  • EU should reach out to other countries to ensure
    an OECD-wide market by 2015 and an even broader
    market by 2020.

28
Trading and Developing Countries Sectoral
trading as a bridge
  • The Commission aims for the development of a new
    carbon market mechanism at sectoral level as an
    intermediate step towards the introduction of cap
    and trade systems. Such a new mechanism and a
    reformed CDM allows countries to participate in
    the global carbon market according to their
    different responsibilities and capabilities...A
    sectoral carbon market mechanism could be focused
    on key sectors where emissions are increasing
    most rapidly or that are part of competitive
    world markets and where data collection is
    relatively simple and straightforward.

29
Aviation and Maritime Transport
  • The EU has included CO2 emissions from aviation
    in its emissions trading system from 2012.
  • If at the end of 2010 there is no agreement in
    ICAO and IMO, emissions from international
    aviation and maritime transport will be counted
    towards national totals under the Copenhagen
    agreement which will ensure comparable action by
    all developed countries.

30
Project based Clean Development Mechanisms (CDM)
  • In the medium term CDM should only be continued
    for countries without a national low carbon
    development plan.
  • i.e. Confine to Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
  • A priority will be increasing energy efficiency
    in the electricity sector.
  • Sectoral Agreements a bridge for more developed
    countries.

31
Financing the reduction of emissions - needs
  • Requirement Net global incremental annual
    investments of 175 billion by 2020 required.
  • More than half will have to be invested in
    developing countries, including the forestry
    sector.
  • Investment in areas such as energy efficiency
    and low-carbon technologies will spur innovation
    and growth and enhance energy savings and
    security.
  • Investments in reduced deforestation will
    safeguard global biodiversity and ensure local
    long-term sustainable development.
  • National low-carbon development strategies will
    have to provide
  • Estimate of additional net investment costs for
    mitigation
  • Viable financing and mitigation policy options to
    leverage such investments.

32
Finance - sources
  • Public funding and the Use of carbon crediting
    mechanisms.
  • Options
  • 1. Offsets from sectoral agreements linked to
    trading schemes
  • 2. Agreed amounts based on polluter pays
    principle (emissions) and ability to pay (GDP) -
    emission rights could be withheld for those
    countries that do not provide the agreed amount.
  • 3. Certain percentage of the allowed emissions
    would be set aside from each developed country.
    These emissions are then auctioned to governments
    at the international level. This percentage could
    increase progressively in line with the per
    capita income
  • 4. Global instrument to address international
    aviation and maritime transport (e.g. the
    proceeds from auctioning allowances under a
    global cap and trade system applying to those
    sectors).
  • 5. Additional public revenue that will be
    generated by auctioning allowances in the EU ETS.
    From 2013. Member States could use some of this
    revenue to honour their international financial
    obligation under the future climate change
    agreement

33
Governance of international financial flows for
climate change
  • Sources of funding for adaptation and mitigation
    are likely to be multiple, coordination and
    cooperation will need to be improved.
  • A high-level forum on international climate
    finance should bring together key decision makers
    from the public and private sectors and
    international financial institutions. It would
    regularly review funding availability and
    expenditure and provide recommendations for
    improvements.
  • This forum should cooperate closely with the
    Facilitative Mechanisms for Mitigation Support.

34
Adaptation
  • Support to the most vulnerable and the poorest
    (LDCs)
  • All countries - comprehensive national adaptation
    strategies.
  • Improving the tools to define and implement
    adaptation strategies including
  • methodologies and technologies for adaptation,
    capacity building
  • strengthened role for the UNFCCC process by
    mobilising stakeholders, including international
    organisations
  • ensuring a more coordinated approach to risk
    management/disaster risk reduction.

35
Funding the Costs of Adaptation
  • Adaptation costs in all developing countries
    23-54 billion per year in 2030.
  • Early measures will generate a net benefit to the
    economy, e.g. measures to improve water use
    efficiency in areas that will suffer from water
    shortages.
  • Multilateral insurance pool to cover disaster
    losses should be explored to complement existing
    funding mechanisms
  • Based on the issuance of bonds, the proposed
    Global Climate Financing Mechanism (GCFM) would
    allow early spending on priority climate-related
    actions. These funds would in particular allow
    for an immediate reaction to urgent adaptation
    needs with a high return such as disaster risk
    reduction.

36
Land Use Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF)
  • Key mechanism
  • Global Forest Carbon Mechanism (GFCM) to achieve
    REDD (Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and
    forest degradation)  
  • Funded by Developed countries would have to
    contribute a fair share of finance to the Global
    Forest Carbon Mechanism (GFCM).
  • Operating Principles
  • Eligiblity - Developing countries that ratify
    the post-2012 climate agreement
  • Focus GFCM - REDD and support
    capacity-building activities
  • Financial support from GFCM provided on the
    basis of a countrys performance towards REDD
  • Beneficiary countries need to have effective
    forest governance structures in place and to
    respect the rights of forest-dependent people
  • Nationwide implementation involving the entire
    forestry sector will be required
  • GFCM will aim to secure the highest co-benefits
    possible (e.g. by protecting biodiversity and
    combating poverty)
  • Emission cuts must be assessed, monitored and
    accounted for at national level, with independent
    verification of the reductions achieved.

37
Funding for the GFCM
  • A major portion of EU funding for GFCM from
    proceeds from the auctioning of emission
    allowances under the EU Emissions Trading System
    (EU ETS).
  • Estimated that if 5 of auctioning revenue were
    made available to GFCM, this would raise 1.5 to
    2.5 billion in 2020

38
The Great Recession and Copenhagen history is
always a surprise....
  • And all economic and emission projections
    wrong....
  • An economic forecaster is like a cross-eyed
    javelin thrower. He doesnt win many accuracy
    contests, but he does keep the crowds attention.

39
Short term impacts
  • Will meet Kyoto obligation by 2012 (-8) and 2020
    obligations (-20 or -30) much easier.
  • Carbon price in EU ETS has fallen, but extent
    buffered by fact that allowances can be banked up
    to 2020.

40
Medium term impacts and Actions
  • Reduced investment in existing low carbon
    technologies more difficult to fund everything,
    including, e.g. Wind power
  • Reduced revenues available to governments
    revenues from EU ETS action likely to be used to
    make up growing public sector deficits .
  • Reduced support for transfers to LDCs, research
    and development etc.

41
The US and Europe
  • European Pride that we have led in spite of the
    truth of Edward Mortimers somewhat jaded view
    that A nation is a group of people united by a
    common dislike of their neighbours, and a shared
    misconception about their ethnic origins
  • Relief and angst in equal measure as US moves to
    centre stage....
  • Quiet nostalgia for Bush regime......
  • Cavafy (Waiting for the Barbarians)
  • And now, whats going to happen to us without
    barbarians?
  • They were, those people, a kind of solution.
  •  

42
Europe and California
  • Some key interfaces
  • Focus on energy efficiency
  • Low carbon development Plans as fulcrum for
    identifying and financing priorities
  • Independent monitoring, reporting and
    verification (MRV) as central requirement
  • Innovation and enterprise and RDD.

43
Thanks for your attention
44
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com