Role of CT in Acute Pancreatitis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Role of CT in Acute Pancreatitis

Description:

Sherman S. GI Endoscopy. 1994; Cavallini G. NEJM, 1996 ... Low dose LMW Heparin: i risk of Acute Pancreatitis (Endoscopy 2000 ) ... Bordas et al, GI Endoscopy 1998 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: subrata70
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Role of CT in Acute Pancreatitis


1
Post-ERCP acute pancreatitis
Most common and dreaded serious complication. It
is a clinical syndrome Post ERCP hserum amylase
75 pts. Clinical pancreatitis in 1 - 40
diverse definitions. gt 3 5 times h
amylase Abdominal Pain Pancreatic
Swelling
Sherman S. GI Endoscopy. 1994 Cavallini G.
NEJM, 1996
2
Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis
  • Trigger for acute pancreatitis starts at the time
    of cannulation of P.D.
  • Potential triggers - Papillary edema
  • - Increased Hydrostatic Pressure
  • - Thermal Injury etc.
  • Initiating event is premature intracellular
    activation of the proteolytic enzyme Trypsinogen
  • ?
  • Trypsin
  • ?
  • Other Proteolytic Enzymes
  • ? Exocrine Pancreatic Secretions

3
Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis
  • Implication of these observations is
  • ?
  • Severe acute pancreatitis sets in very early
  • To modify the sequence of events.
  • Start prophylaxis - Early
  • - Preferably before noxious insult occurs

4
Low dose LMW Heparin i risk of Acute
Pancreatitis (Endoscopy 2000 ) Corticosteroids
No role (A.J.G. 1998, GI Endoscopy 2002
May) Gabexate i risk of AP (NEJM 1996)
5
Somatostatin and octreotide
Potent suppressors of pancreatic
secretions Conflicting results, probably because
of small numbers studied, therefore low
statistical power
6
Trials using Somatostatin for preventing
pancreatic injury after ERCP
7
Prophylactic effect of Somatostatin on post ERCP
Pancreatitis randomized controlled trial
  • The elevations of amylase, lipase in patients who
    develop AP was similar to those who just develop
    ? enzymes
  • The clinical AP so developed was mild, recovery
    was uncomplicated amylase ? to normal in 3 days
  • Similar result with one bolus inj. of
    somatostatin
  • AP ? sig in ES ERCP 18 vs 0 plt0.05
  • NS difference in ERCP gr. 6 vs 4

Bordas et al, GI Endoscopy 1998
8
Pharmacological treatment can prevent pancreatic
injury after ERCP a meta - analysis
Angelo Andriulli , GI Endoscopy 2000
9
Clinical trials Somatostatin for preventing
pancreatic injury after ERCP-I
10
Clinical trials Somatostatin for preventing
pancreatic injury after ERCP-II
11
Clinical trials Octreotide for preventing
pancreatic injury after ERCP - I
minutes, before(b) or after(a)
12
Clinical trials Octreotide preventing pancreatic
injury after ERCP - II
minutes, before(b) or after(a)
13
Pharmacological treatment can prevent pancreatic
injury after ERCP a meta - analysis
Andriulli A, GI Endoscopy 2000
14
Pharmacological treatment can prevent pancreatic
injury after ERCP a meta - analysis
Andriulli A, GI Endoscopy 2000
15
Pharmacological treatment can prevent pancreatic
injury after ERCP a meta - analysis
Andriulli A, GI Endoscopy 2000
16
Somatostatin
  • A bolus injection 250 mg at the time of
    cannulation
  • - Short ½ life 1 2 min
  • - Prolonged action 4 6 hours
  • Practical for out patient procedures
  • Equal reduction in AP if bolus / IV 24 infusion
  • iv infusion - Start 30min before ERCP
  • - Continue for 24 hrs
  • gt Cost
  • Hospitalization for all
  • Not suited for out patients ERCP

17
Should all patients undergoing ERCP be given SS?
  • No, because
  • Severe AP is rare 5 / 210 2.4 (NEJM 1996)
  • Most AP are mild uncomplicated
  • May not be cost effective.

18
Should all patients undergoing ERCP be given SS?
  • Yes, because
  • All serious AP as complication not reported, not
    being part of a study
  • Recent Danish report (Endoscopy 1999)
  • Severe AP 20, - Death 7 National
    insurances registry
  • Max suits against endoscopists for post ERCP AP
    23/39 claims
  • Expertise ? i post ERCP complications
  • i Expertise ? h attempts at cannulation,
    inadvertent PD cannulation, repeated PD
    injection of dye
  • Even if given to high risk pts, we cant predict
  • - Small CBD Size
  • - Repeated CBD cannulation attempts
  • - Repeated PD entry
  • By new less experienced endoscopists

19
Why do all endoscopists not accept that
somatostatin is good prophylactic therapy?
  • One or two equivocal studies reduce enthusiasm
  • Somatostatin and octreotide are considered the
    same drugs, which is not true
  • 5 Somatostatin receptors equal affinity for SS
    14, SS 28
  • Variable affinity for octreotide
  • Sphincter of Oddi somatostatin relaxes
  • octreotide constricts, therefore
  • more attempts at cannulation
  • difficult cannulation

Binmoeller et al, 1992
20
Should prophylactic somatostatin be given for all
ERCPS ?
  • Once cascade of initiation of AP starts by
    triggers, It is difficult to control it by post
    ERCP Rx of SS
  • Recommendation for prophylactic somatostatin
  • - Less experienced endoscopists ? all patients
  • Experienced endoscopists ? use for high risk
    patients

21
Acute severe pancreatitis
  • Acute pancreatitis is severe in 20 patients of
    all AP
  • gt 40 early overall mortality
  • gt Morbidity - SIRS
  • - Infection in necrosis
  • - Need for surgery
  • - ARDS
  • - Shock
  • Can somatostatin prevent or mitigate the on going
    high morbidity ?

22
Clinical studies of somatostatin in acute
pancreatitis
23
Acute pancreatitis
M. Planas et al., Intensive Care Med (1998) 24
37-39
24
Acute pancreatitis
Mitrovic M et al, Br. J. Surgery 1998
25
Octreotide in acute pancreatitis conflicting
reports
26
Octreotide vs placebo in the prevention of post
ERCP acute pancreatitis Multi-center RCT
  • Octreotide does not prevent post-ERCP AP or
    hospital stay
  • Post ERCP AP 9.8 vs 13
  • Hospital stay 3.6 days vs 4.3 days

S. Manolakopoulos, GI Endosc 2002
27
Meta-analysis of somatostatin-octreotide in the
therapy of acute pancreatitis
  • In mild AP no agent proved of value
  • In severe AP overall improvement in mortality
  • Both SS OCT odds ratios
  • 0.36 (95 CI 0.20 0.64, p0.02
  • and 0.57 (95 CI 0.35 0.88, p0.006

- Complication - Complication rate Not
effected - Need for surgery
Andriulli, Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1998
28
Somatostatin-octreotide in acute pancreatitis
  • All studies published so far lack in the
    following points
  • Not randomized controlled trials
  • Only severe acute pancreatitis included
  • Timing of start of S.S. / OCT
  • All parameters of morbidity / mortality
  • Recommendations present data shows that
  • Somatostatin and octreotide reduce mortality
  • Somatostatin reduces surgical interventions
  • More studies are required to use these in
    patients of severe acute pancreatitis
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com