Last Week in Review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Last Week in Review

Description:

What are Institutional Review Boards and why do we have them? ... Concept of independent review of research by qualified individuals not ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:149
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: listerhil
Category:
Tags: last | review | week

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Last Week in Review


1
Last Week in Review
2
Define ethics
3
Why are ethics necessary in research?
  • To insure the protection of human and animal
    subjects
  • To insure that research outcomes are achieved
    using moral and appropriate guidelines
  • For the purpose of clarifying that research
    contributes to the body of knowledge constituting
    the background of a discipline

4
Three Guiding Principles of Human Subject
Protection
  • Autonomy
  • Beneficence
  • Justice

5
Autonomy - the capacity of individuals to make
their own life decisions self- determination
6
Beneficence - the obligation to attend to the
well-being of individuals principle of do no
harm
7
Justice - fairness in the research process
equitable distribution of benefits and burdens
subject selection performed without bias
8
What are Institutional Review Boards and why do
we have them???
9
A Little History (unfortunately there is lots
more)
  • Tuskegee study
  • Failure to treat subjects
  • Failure to tell subjects they werent being
    treated
  • Subjects not chosen randomly
  • Failure to use successful treatments developed
    after the start of the study
  • World War II and Nazi Experimentation
  • subjects not allowed to choose whether to
    participate
  • subject selection biased
  • justice was ignored
  • treatments were not valid by any stretch of
    science

10
Actions Arising from Violations of Subjects
Rights
  • The Nuremburg Code of 1947
  • The Declaration of Helsinki and continuing
    revisions
  • The Belmont Report and continuing revisions

11
The Nuremburg Code of 1947
  • Occurred as a result of Nazi war crimes
  • emphasized that participants in research should
    voluntarily consent to participate
  • can consent only after being informed of the
    study procedures
  • studies can only be performed by qualified
    individuals

12
Declaration of Helsinki
  • The International Code of Ethics for Biomedical
    Research
  • Concept of independent review of research by
    qualified individuals not associated with the
    project
  • Right to refuse publication for work not done in
    accordance with the accords

13
The Belmont Report
  • Finalized report on the decisions made for the
    protection of human subjects starting in 1974
  • Standardizes requirements for informed consent
    and Institutional Review Board procedures
    intended to insure autonomy, beneficence, and
    justice

14
IRB Membership
  • Both genders must be represented
  • Multiple professional groups must be represented
  • One non-scientific member
  • One member separate from the institution
  • Committee members must be able to judge submitted
    studies

15
www.uab.edu/irb
16
Ethical Responsibilities of the Researcher
  • Honesty and integrity in every phase of research
  • To do clinical research that is meaningful
  • To be competent and have expertise in the area
    under investigation
  • Publication of research outcomes, being honest
    and thorough in the documentation of such
    outcomes
  • To give credit to collaborators
  • Conducting data analysis through procedures which
    are appropriate and to not manipulate the data to
    achieve results the investigator wants

17
Control Groups
  • What are they?
  • Why are they necessary?

18
Elements of Informed Consent
19
What ethical violations did you find in the UAB
study on the web page?
20
Violations in Dermatology Drug Study
  • Conflicts of interest
  • PI failed to take responsibility for the study
  • Falsification of data
  • Failure to tell subjects of other interventions
  • Failure to tell subjects when study results
    proved false
  • Falsification of information from PI to IRB
  • Failure of IRB to intervene when fraud was
    discovered
  • Failure of PI to insist on writing up results
    instead of letting the company do it
  • Competition between overseeing agencies at the
    federal level
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com