Controversies in Shock and Trauma Management - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 87
About This Presentation
Title:

Controversies in Shock and Trauma Management

Description:

... cardiac standstill on bedside electrocardiogram do not survive to ... to have cardiac standstill on the bedside emergency department electrocardiogram' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:578
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 88
Provided by: gatew297
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Controversies in Shock and Trauma Management


1
Controversies in Prehospital Trauma
Management
Chief Will Chapleau EMT-P, RN, TNS Chicago
Heights Fire Department wchapleau_at_aol.com
2
Controversy Has Always Been a Part of Prehospital
Care
  • The increasing emphasis on Evidence Based
    Medicine will dispel some controversies, and
    stir up others.

3
Overview
  • Pneumatic Anti-Shock Garment
  • Time on scene
  • Fluid resuscitation
  • ALS in Trauma
  • Spinal immobilization
  • Withholding or cessation of resuscitation

4
The M.A.S.T. Suit
  • Developed from G-suit concept
  • Used extensively in combat
  • Fell into disfavor despite the absence of
    scientific data to suggest or support its demise.

5
M.A.S.T in the U.S.
  • Use expanded greatly after introduction
  • At one time or another used for everything from
    fracture control to cardiac arrest

6
What does it do?
  • Increases peripheral vascular resistance
  • Increases cardiac output
  • Autotransufusion occurs to a limited degree
  • Increases cerebral perfusion pressure
  • Assists in controlling internal bleeding

7
NAEMSP Position Paper
  • Collective review of literature by Dr. Robert E.
    OConner and Dr. Robert Domeier January/March
    1997 Prehospital Emergency Care Journal
  • Over 100 studies cited

8
NAEMSP Position Paper
  • Ironically..widespread condemnation of the PASG
    took place in the absence of scientific
    validation that it was detrimental in all
    situations. Negative outcomes in a limited number
    of restricted applications have been extrapolated
    to the broad gamut of clinical situations.

9
NAEMSP Position Paper
  • .EMS providers should still be taught that the
    PASG is an acceptable treatment modality, and
    that medical direction may or may not elect to
    use it.

10
Is PASG Harmful?
  • Studies seem to support that PASG may be
    potentially harmful in treating patients with
    thoracic injuries, particularly penetrating chest
    trauma

11
Head Injured Patients
  • For a long time head injured patients were listed
    as contraindications for PASG.
  • Studies show no significant change in ICP with
    PASG
  • In fact, the improvement in cerebral perfusion
    more than compensated for the rise in ICP.(Not
    evaluated in patients with elevated ICP)

12
When is the PASG useful?
  • Pelvic injuries with hypotension
  • Hypotension due to rupture of AAA
  • Severe traumatic hypotension
  • Uncontrollable hemorrhage of lower extremities
  • Anaphylactic shock (unresponsive to standard
    therapy)

13
PASG May be Useful
  • Penetrating Abdominal Trauma
  • PSVT
  • Hypotension due to hypothermia
  • Septic shock
  • Urologic shock (otherwise uncontrolled)
  • Uncontrolled gynecological hemorrhage
  • Ruptured ectopic pregnancy

14
PASG may not be appropriate in cases of
  • Penetrating Chest Trauma
  • Diaphragmatic rupture
  • Cardiogenic shock
  • Cardiac Tamponade
  • Cardiac arrest
  • Bleeds above the diaphragm
  • To splint lower extremity fractures

15
Time on Scene
  • What do the studies tell us?
  • How much time do we have?
  • How should we use the time we do have?

16
Studies
  • Dr. R.A.Cowley and the Golden Hour
  • Time to surgery

17
How much time do we have on the scene?
  • Golden Hour
  • Platinum ten minutes
  • 8 minute standard

18
Time in the Literature
  • Osterwalder 2002 Prehosp Disaster Med 1775
  • Swiss Study 254 patients
  • Compared trauma patients with total prehospital
    time 60 minutes with those whose time was gt 60
    minutes
  • Group I ( 60 mins.) mortality 14
  • Group II (gt 60 mins.) mortality 10
  • No statistical difference

19
The 8 Minutes or Less Benchmark
  • Non-traumatic cardiac arrest
  • Study from Seattle
  • Survival from medical cardiac arrest was better
    when BLS arrived within 4 minutes and ALS arrived
    within 8 minutes.
  • This was then applied to all EMS responses.

20
The 8 Minutes or Less Benchmark
  • Fiedler et al 1986, Arch Surg 121902
  • Response time and outcome from abdominal gunshot
    wounds
  • No difference in RT for survivors and fatalities
  • Grossman et al 1997 J Trauma 42723
  • 459 major trauma patients
  • Compared urban to rural setting
  • Urban RT 7 minutes
  • Rural RT 14 minutes
  • Rural patients were 7x more likely to die if RT
    was gt 30 minutes.

21
The 8 Minutes or Less Benchmark
  • Pons et al 2002, J Emerg Med 2343
  • Does the 8 minute RT affect outcome after
    trauma?
  • 3490 patients, 2 groups based on RT
  • No difference in survival
  • Pons et al 2005, Acad Emerg Med 12594
  • - 9559 patients (all complaints)
  • - 3 groups low, moderate, high risk of death
  • - No survival benefit based on 8 mins.
  • - Survival benefit for RT lt 4 minutes for
    patients in moderate and high risk groups

22
The 8 Minutes or Less Benchmark
  • Smith et al 1985 J Trauma 2565
  • 52 trauma patients with BP lt 100 mm Hg
  • Scene Time Transport Time
  • BP unable 16 8
  • BP lt 70 17 9
  • BP 70-100 15 11

23
Fluid Resuscitation
  • Studies
  • How much do we need?
  • What should we use?
  • Whats next

24
Argument Against IVs in the Field
  • Solomonov et al.
  • University research laboratory using adult male
    rats with massive splenic injury
  • Rats were divided into 4 groups evaluating
    aggressive and non-aggressive fluid therapy
  • Conclusion vigorous infusion of saline resulted
    in increased intra-abdominal bleeding and
    decreased survival time

25
Argument Against IVs in the Field
  • Bickell et al.
  • 598 adult patients, penetrating torso trauma,
    systolic lt90 _at_ presentation, predominate fluid
    Ringers lactate
  • Immediate Resuscitation group (IR) with 238
    patients
  • Delayed Resuscitation group (DR) with 289

26
Immediate Resuscitation Group
  • Received standard fluid therapy
  • Average 870 mL before reaching hospital and 1608
    mL in the ED
  • Systolic pressure averages 79
  • Hemoglobin and platelet counts were lower
  • Hemodynamic improvements on arrival did not last
    into operating theater
  • 62 survival/increased hospital stay

27
Delayed Resuscitation Group
  • Cannulated, no specific fluid infusion until OR
  • Averaged 92 mL and 283 mL at corresponding stages
  • Systolic pressure averages 72
  • 70 survival rates/shorter hospital stays

28
How much should we use?
  • Fluid should be administered to replace volume
    until blood is available.
  • The rule of thumb is that blood should follow 3
    liters of IV fluid.
  • If blood is not available you may need to use
    more.
  • Keep in mind, IV fluid does not carry oxygen.

29
What should we use?
  • Lactated Ringers
  • Normal Saline
  • Hypertonic
  • Blood Substitutes

30
Protective Hypotensive Resuscitation
  • How high must the systolic pressure be to perfuse
    adequately?
  • Resuscitate to lower pressures slowing the rate
    of blood loss while still perfusing vital
    tissues.

31
Whats next?
  • More science and development of colloid and
    plasma substitutes.
  • PolyHeme trials

32
Spinal Clearance or Spinal immobilization
protocols
  • 23 EMS agencies 17 Hospitals
  • All used their standard immobilization protocol
  • Filled out questionnaire asking for the presence
    or absence of specific clinical criteria
  • Domeier 2002 J Trauma 5374

33
Spinal Clearance or Spinal immobilization
protocols
  • Evaluated 8975 trauma patients
  • - Spine pain
  • - Spine tenderness
  • - Altered mental status
  • - Evidence of Intoxication
  • - Focal neurologic deficits
  • - Suspected extremity fracture
  • Identified 280 of 295 spinal injuries

34
NEXUS Study
  • Criteria for low probability of injury
  • No midline spine tenderness
  • No focal neurologic deficit
  • Normal alertness
  • No intoxication
  • No painful distracting injury
  • Reviewed 34,069 trauma patients
  • 21 different centers
  • Cervical spine injury was present in 818
  • Missed only 8 patients, 2 considered significant

35
Who doesnt need immobilization?
  • Blunt Trauma, if all of the following are
    present
  • - No neck pain
  • - No neck tenderness
  • - No distracting injury
  • - No alteration in mental status
  • (either from head injury or intoxication)
  • - No neurologic complaints or findings

36
ALS In Trauma
37
(No Transcript)
38
(No Transcript)
39
Arguments against ALS
  • Extended scene times
  • limited or poorly documented benefit to patients

40
Arguments for ALS
  • Some studies show benefit when adequate personnel
    is available
  • Improved outcome may be possible with ALS care
    delivered enroute to Hospital
  • There is a point at which prehospital must end
    and intrahospital must begin for the patient to
    receive definitive care

41
Airway and Ventilation
  • Intubation
  • Ventilation

42
DELAYED SCENE TIME
  • Annals of Surgery
  • Vol. 237, No.2, 2003
  • Study shows an overall higher mortality rate
    by advanced level providers on-scene.
  • Includes ET intubation.

43
INCREASED MORBIDITY MORTALITY RATES WITH ETI
  • The Journal of Trauma, Vol. 54,
  • 2, 2003.
  • Study shows pts who
  • were intubated in the
  • field had significant
  • higher morbidity,
  • nearly double the
  • mortality rate.

44
INCREASED MORBIDITY MORTALITY RATES WITH ETI
  • The Journal of Trauma Vol. 54,
  • 2, 2003.
  • Study shows pts who were intubated in the
    field had longer hospital stays more
  • nosocomial infections.

45
Prehospital Emergency Care2005 April/June
9(2)163-6Garza AG, Algren DA, Gratton MC, Ma OJ
  • Populations at risk for intubation nonattempt and
    failure in the prehospital setting.
  • In Kansas City they did a retrospective
    analytical study analyzing oral endotracheal
    intubations on pediatric cardiac arrest, adult
    traumatic arrest and adult cardiac arrest
    patients over 66 months.

46
Prehospital Emergency Care2005 April/June
9(2)163-6Garza AG, Algren DA, Gratton MC, Ma OJ
  • 2,669 intubations were included.
  • Conclusions
  • There was a significant risk of intubation
    nonattempt and intubation failure in the
    pediatric cardiac arrest and adult traumatic
    arrest cohorts compared with the adult cardiac
    arrest population with the pediatric cohort being
    at particularly high risk for failure and the
    adult traumatic arrest cohort for higher risk for
    nonattempt.

47
J Trauma 2005 May, 58(5)933-9Davis DP, Peay J,
Sise MJ, Vilke GM, Kennedy F, Eastman AB, Velky
T, Hoyt DB
  • The impact of prehospital intubation on outcome
    in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury
  • In San Diego, patients with moderate to severe
    TBI were identified from their trauma registry.

48
J Trauma 2005 May, 58(5)933-9Davis DP, Peay J,
Sise MJ, Vilke GM, Kennedy F, Eastman AB, Velky
T, Hoyt DB
  • Results
  • 13,625 patients were identified from five trauma
    centers. Overall mortality was 22.9 and 19.3
    underwent prehospital intubation. Logistic
    regression revealed an increase in mortality with
    prehospital intubation. With the exclusion of
    aero medical transports, patients intubated in
    the field had worse outcomes.

49
J Trauma 2004 Mar, 56(3)531-6Stockinger ZT,
McSwain NE Jr.
  • Results
  • Of 5,773 patients, 316 (5.5) had ETI and 217
    (3.8) had BVM. Patients receiving ETI were
    significantly more likely to die (88.9 vs.
    30.9).

50
More Intubation Studies
  • A variety of studies show prehospital success
    rates in the 85 range while anecdotal reports
    can be lower.
  • Seems to be at least some coloration between
    frequency of opportunity and performance.

51
Withholding Resuscitative Measures
52
Obvious signs of death
  • Dependant livido
  • Rigor Mortis
  • Algo Mortis (steady lowering of body temperature
    after death)
  • Injuries incompatible with life

53
DNRs Living Wills
  • Know your state laws and system protocols for
    recognizing DNRs Living Wills and Advance
    Directives
  • Participate in local education about patients
    rights to determine their own destiny

54
Trauma
  • Injuries not compatible with life
  • Pulse less and non-breathing blunt trauma victims

55
Trauma NAEMSP ACS COT Position Paper
  • Resuscitation efforts may be withheld in any
    blunt trauma patient who, based on out of
    hospital personnels primary survey is found
    apneic and pulseless upon arrival of EMS at scene

56
Trauma NAEMSP ACS COT Position Paper
  • Victims of penetrating trauma found apneic and
    pulseless by EMS based on their patient
    assessment, should rapidly be assessed for the
    presence of other signs of life such as pupillary
    reflexes, spontaneous movement or organized ECG
    activity.

57
Trauma NAEMSP ACS COT Position Paper
  • If any of these are present the patient should
    have resuscitation performed and be transported
    to the nearest emergency department or trauma
    center. If these signs of life are absent
    resuscitation efforts may be withheld.

58
Trauma NAEMSP ACS COT Position Paper
  • Resuscitation efforts should be withheld in
    victims of penetrating or blunt trauma with
    injuries obviously incompatible with life such as
    decapitation or hemicorporectomy.

59
Trauma NAEMSP ACS COT Position Paper
  • Resuscitation efforts should be withheld in
    victims of penetrating or blunt trauma with
    evidence of a significant time lapse since
    pulselessness including dependent lividity, rigor
    mortis, and decomposition.

60
Trauma NAEMSP ACS COT Position Paper
  • Cardiopulmonary arrest patients in whom the
    mechanism of injury does not correlate with
    clinical condition, suggesting a nontraumatic
    cause of the arrest, should have standard
    resuscitation initiated.

61
Trauma NAEMSP ACS COT Position Paper
  • Termination of resuscitation efforts should be
    considered in trauma patients with EMS witnessed
    cardiopulmonary arrest and 15 minutes of
    unsuccessful resuscitation and CPR.

62
Trauma NAEMSP ACS COT Position Paper
  • Traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest patients with a
    transport time to an emergency department or
    trauma center of greater than 15 minutes may be
    considered nonsalvageable and termination should
    be considered.

63
Trauma NAEMSP ACS COT Position Paper
  • Guidelines and protocols for TCPA patients who
    should be transported must be individualized for
    each EMS system. Consideration should be given to
    factors such as the average transport time within
    the system, and the definitive care capabilities
    (ie., trauma centers) within the system. Airway
    management and IV placement should be
    accomplished during transport when possible.

64
Trauma NAEMSP ACS COT Position Paper
  • Special consideration must be given to victims of
    drowning, lightning strike, and in situations
    where significant hypothermia may alter prognosis.

65
Trauma NAEMSP ACS COT Position Paper
  • EMS providers should be thoroughly familiar with
    guidelines and protocols affecting the decision
    to withhold or terminate resuscitative measures.

66
Trauma NAEMSP ACS COT Position Paper
  • All termination protocols should be developed and
    implemented under the guidance of the system EMS
    medical director. On-line medical control may be
    necessary to determine the appropriateness of
    termination of resuscitation.

67
Trauma NAEMSP ACS COT Position Paper
  • Policies and protocols for termination of
    resuscitation efforts must include notification
    of the appropriate law enforcement agencies and
    notification of the medical examiner or coroner
    for final disposition of the body.

68
Trauma NAEMSP ACS COT Position Paper
  • Families of the deceased should have access to
    resources including clergy, social workers, and
    other counseling personnel as needed. EMS
    providers should have access to resources for
    debriefing and counseling as needed.

69
Trauma NAEMSP ACS COT Position Paper
  • Adherence to policies and protocols governing
    termination of resuscitation should be monitored
    through a quality review system.

70
The Data on Trauma
  • In TCPA patients, Shimazu et al report that 2.3
    of blunt trauma and 4 of penetrating trauma
    survived. 3 of the 5 blunt trauma patients had
    isolated head trauma.

71
The Data on Trauma
  • Rosemurgy et al looked at 410 TCPA patients.
    After excluding patients with injuries
    incompatible with life, 96 blunt and 42
    penetrating trauma patients remained, non of
    which survived.

72
The Data on Trauma
  • Stratton et al looked at 1,051 patients with
    prehospital TCPA. After excluding 116 patients
    who were pronounced dead in the field or met
    other exclusionary criteria such as primary
    cardiac arrest, 879 unconscious and pulseless
    were urgently transported. 4 or.08 survived, one
    of which was neurologically devastated.

73
The Data on Trauma
  • There is some evidence that the initial ECG
    rhythm obtained by EMS may predict survival. In a
    study by Barttistella et al, none of the
    asystolic or bradycardic (less than 40) patients
    survived out of 134. The 16 survivors all had
    initially detectable systolic pressures with
    subsequent loss of vital signs and PEA between 80
    150 bpm. They argued that PEA with HR less than
    40 may be a reliable discriminator.

74
Cessation of Resuscitation efforts
  • Asystole most frequently represents the end of
    life
  • Except in extreme situations, there is no
    evidence to support transporting an asystolic
    patient to the hospital.
  • Electrocution Hypothermia

75
Science
  • Blaives M, Fox JC
  • Journal of the Academy of Emergency Medicine
  • Concluded that patients presenting with cardiac
    standstill on bedside electrocardiogram do not
    survive to leave the ED regardless of their
    electrical rhythm. This finding was uniform
    regardless of downtime

76
Cessation of Resuscitation efforts
  • Since 1992, AHA has recommended resuscitation
    cessation and non-transport protocols for
    patients receiving continuing CPR

77
Fixed Criteria for cessation?
  • Devita MA
  • Progressive Transplant
  • Rejects fixed notion of irreversibility

78
More Science
  • Prehospital Emergency Care Jan-Mar 2001
  • Regardless of medical futility criteria,
    specialized training of EMS providers and
    targeted related testing of operational issues
    need to precede field implementation of on-scene
    pronouncement policies.

79
So what do we do?
  • Know our own state laws local rules about DNRs,
    Living Wills and Advanced Directives
  • Educate ourselves and our communities about DNR,
    Living Wills and Advanced Directives

80
So what do we do?
  • Recognize obviously dead patients
  • Respect properly documented patients wishes

81
References
  • American Heart Association ACLS guidelines and
    course materials, 2001
  • Devita MA, Progressive Transplant, 2001Mar
    11(1)58-66 The Death Watchcertifying death
    using cardiac criteria

82
References
  • Pepe PE, Swor RA, Ornato JP, Racht EM, Blanton
    DM, Griswell JK, Blackwell T, Dunford J, Turtle
    Creek Conference II, Prehospital Emergency Care
    2001 Jan-Mar 5(1)79-87 Outcome in cardiac
    arrest patients found to have cardiac standstill
    on the bedside emergency department
    electrocardiogram
  • Blaivas M, Fox JC, Academy of Emergency Emergency
    Medicine Journal 2001 Jun8(6)616-21,
    Resuscitation in the out of hospital setting
    medical futility criteria for on-scene
    pronouncement of death

83
Pre-Hospital Science
  • Whats been done?
  • Whats needed?

84
A single study contributes to a body of
knowledge. It is not the final word
85
www.phtls.org
  • PHTLS Symposium
  • Research that drives the program
  • 6th edition information
  • International faculty

86
Questions?
87
  • Will Chapleau EMT-P, RN, TNS
  • Chief
  • Chicago Heights Fire Department
  • Chicago Heights, Illinois
  • Chairman PHTLS Division
  • of NAEMT
  • Board of Directors NAEMSE
  • Board of Directors
  • Society of Trauma Nurses
  • wchapleau_at_aol.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com