Why Levies Parents United for Public Schools Committed to quality public schools for ALL children A - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Why Levies Parents United for Public Schools Committed to quality public schools for ALL children A

Description:

Why Levies Parents United for Public Schools Committed to quality public schools for ALL children A – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: KimK86
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Why Levies Parents United for Public Schools Committed to quality public schools for ALL children A


1
Why Levies?Parents United for Public
SchoolsCommitted to quality public schools for
ALL children A Crossroads for Public
Education in MinnesotaParents United for
Public SchoolsCommitted to quality public
schools for all Minnesota children
2
The Legislatures Constitutional mandate
  • Section 1.UNIFORM SYSTEM OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
    The stability of a republican form of government
    depending mainly upon the intelligence of the
    people, it is the duty of the legislature to
    establish a general and uniform system of public
    schools. The legislature shall make such
    provisions by taxation or otherwise as will
    secure a thorough and efficient system of public
    schools throughout the state.

3
The first provision Per pupil formulaset by the
state legislature every two years.
  • Per pupil formula (Set by State Legislature)
  • x AMCPU (Adjusted Marginal Cost
    Pupil Unit)
  • District Operating
    Funds

4
Per Pupil Formula Analysis
5
But what happened with costs?
6
History of the per pupil formula
7
Tax changes in the 90s
  • State policies changing property tax
  • Lowered taxes on commercial property
  • Agricultural and recreational land removed from
    the equation for school taxes
  • The 2001 General Education Buy Down
  • The state picked up school costs once paid by
    local property taxes
  • Passed half of the legislationthe liability was
    accepted, without a stated revenue stream to
    support it.

8
Requirements for public schools grew while
revenue did not
  • Testing
  • Standards
  • Special education mandates
  • Transportation
  • English Language Learning
  • Health and safety mandates
  • Physical Education
  • HIV/AIDS Sex Education
  • Drug/Alcohol Abuse Education
  • Bus Safety
  • Title 1 programs
  • 100 Rule

9
How did schools survive?
  • Hoped for Growth
  • Spent fund balances down
  • Made cuts
  • Passed Local Levies

10
What Cuts?The effects of this decade to public
schools
  • Less administrationRD
  • Greater reliance on local levies
  • Fewer Art/Music programs
  • Fewer Gifted/Talented programs
  • Books older than the kids
  • Cutting or charging for transportation
  • Higher fees
  • Larger class sizes
  • Fewer enrichment programs
  • Fewer intervention programs
  • Deferring maintenance to facilities
  • Greater reliance on parent fund raising
  • Greater reliance on the classroom teacher
  • Fewer fund balances higher cost for districts to
    borrow money

11
So why levies? The second provision Local
levies
  • To fund schools, the state has made a
    provision for local taxpayers to provide up to
    26 of the per pupil formula in local levy
    authority or 1332 additional dollars for their
    local schools.

12
And where is Minnesota now with levies?
  • 1990 47 of school districts in the state of
    Minnesota had levies in place
  • 2000 that number rose to 88

13
  • Maybe we should just lower our expectations.

14
Minnesota Future Labor Force
Tom Gillaspy
15
By 2020 65 is Larger than K-12By 2030 65
Doubles Tom Gillaspy
16
  • So who will make up this future workforce?
  • Those sitting in our classroom today
  • and who are they?

17
Since the 70s we have made it a point to
educated ALL of our children.
  • 1975 Individuals with Disabilities Education
    Act (IDEA), Public Law 105-17
  • Brought 1 million children who were previously
    kept at home or in institutions into the public
    school system.
  • Federal government agreed to pay 40 of excess
    cost to educate these children. It has never
    provided 40
  • In 2004, Minnesota school districts reallocated
    378 million meant for regular education
    instruction to provide state and federally
    mandated special education programs

18
Population Change

Tom Gillaspy
19
Change In Minnesota School Enrollments 1999-00 to
2004-05 By Language Spoken At Home

Tom Gillaspy
20
Kids Count findings Childrens Defense Fund
  • Most recent data shows
  • About 1 in 10 MN children under 18 live in
    poverty
  • Estimated 7,000 more children living below
    poverty line than 5 years ago
  • 68,000 uninsured children
  • Greater participation in Food Support and Free
    and Reduced School Lunches

21
SoWho makes up our future workforce?
  • More children requiring Special Education
    services (SpEd)
  • More children needing English Language Learning
    services (ELL)
  • More children qualifying for Free and Reduced
    Lunches (FRL)

22
Yet Schools and Revenue in the 90s
  • Increases in new students
  • Increases in expectations
  • Increases in cost

Schools
Income tax reductions Property tax
reductions Business tax rate reductions
Revenue
23
Price of Government in Minnesota John
Gunyou



The Price of Government is the State of
Minnesotas
official
measure and is factored

as total revenue as a

percentage
of personal income.
24
So Why levies?
  • Because school funding is needed to
  • Prepare ALL students for 2020
  • Help students meet state and federal mandates.
  • Provide for the economic security of your
    district and the State of Minnesota
  • Its their future, but its our responsibility

25
Parents United
  • Working to engage concerned citizens in the
    conversation around public policy and its effect
    on our public schools
  • www.parentsunited.org
  • Advocates for
  • Minnesotas Public Schools
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com