What Colleges and Universities Can Do to promote Academic Integrity: The Kansas State University Mod - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

What Colleges and Universities Can Do to promote Academic Integrity: The Kansas State University Mod

Description:

56 presentations to Undergraduate and Graduate classes. ... Graduate Student Sanctions. XF as Standard Sanction. Appeal Issues ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: kst6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: What Colleges and Universities Can Do to promote Academic Integrity: The Kansas State University Mod


1
What Colleges and Universities Can Do to promote
Academic Integrity The Kansas State University
Model
  • David Allen, Kansas State University
  • Catherine Meriano, Quinnipiac University
  • Dennis Wiseman, Wofford College

2
KSU-Demographics
  • 23,000 Students
  • 11 Colleges-Two Campuses
  • Satellite Campus in Salina, KS (60 miles away)
  • College of Aviation and Technology
  • 1,000 undergraduate students
  • 1,000 Teaching Faculty and Staff
  • Predominantly Anglo, Mid-western Conservative
    Culture

3
History of the Honor Integrity System
  • Major Cheating Scandal 1994
  • Beginning Conversations 1995
  • First Year of System Implementation 1999
  • Where have we been?
  • Where are we now?
  • Where are we going?

4
Where have we been?
  • KSU-HI System the early years
  • Modified Honor System
  • Student majority on adjudicating body
  • Honor Code/Pledge
  • On my honor, as a student, I have neither given
    nor received unauthorized aid on this academic
    work.
  • Mandatory reporting (Not feasible for KSU)
  • Non-proctored exams (Not feasible for KSU)
  • Education System Vs. Punitive System
  • An Ongoing Struggle

5
Where have we been?
  • Issues of Support
  • Administration
  • Provost sponsored system
  • 54 Member Honor Council
  • Faculty Senate has approval power
  • Student Senate has approval power
  • ½ time Director
  • Full time Associate Director
  • ½ time Administrative Assistant

6
Where have we been?
  • Constitution and By-Laws Approved 1998
  • Honor Council (54 Member Adjudicating Body)
  • 22 Faculty
  • 22 Students
  • 10 Graduate Students (Graduate School added 2004)
  • By-Law Revisions needed based upon multiple
    versions posted on websites
  • Creation of Investigation and Adjudication
    Procedures 2005-2006

7
Where Have We Been?Stakeholders
  • Office of Student Life
  • Graduate School
  • KSU Extensions
  • Committee for Academic Planning (CAP)
  • Department Heads (68)
  • Graduate Student Council
  • KSU-Libraries
  • Faculty Senate
  • Student Senate
  • Greek Community
  • Athletics
  • Community Members
  • Administration
  • Division of Continuing Education
  • College Deans (11)

8
Where are we now?
9
Violation Categories
10
Where are we now?
  • 115 case reviews conducted (approx. 20 min each)
  • Honor and Integrity Peer Educators (HIPE)
  • 56 presentations to Undergraduate and Graduate
    classes.
  • Approximately 4,000 students reached through
    presentations on the Honor and Integrity System
    in 2006-2007
  • 120 GTAs, 28 presentations to faculty or
    departments
  • Shift in focus for new year to address department
    and divisions within colleges

11
Where are we going?
  • Current Issues
  • Investigation and Adjudication Procedures
  • Constitutional Changes
  • Graduate Student Sanctions
  • XF as Standard Sanction
  • Appeal Issues
  • Should our process match the appeals timelines as
    set by the Student Judiciary Panel
  • Definition of Academic Integrity Violations
  • Plagiarism
  • Fraud
  • Unauthorized Aid
  • University Wide Academic Tutoring Guidelines
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com