Title: Achiam CC, Fernandes CMB, McLeod SL, Salvadori M, John M, Seabrook JA, Theakston KD, Milburn S, Huss
1What Is the Prevalence of Methicillin-Resistant
Staphylococcus aureus in Skin and Soft Tissue
Infections presenting to the Emergency
Departments of a Canadian Academic Health Care
Center?
- Achiam CC, Fernandes CMB, McLeod SL, Salvadori M,
John M, Seabrook JA, Theakston KD, Milburn S,
Hussain Z
June 7, 2009
2Disclosure
X I do not have an affiliation (financial or
otherwise) with any commercial organization that
may have a direct or indirect connection to the
content of my presentation.
3Background
- 1960s Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus
aureus (MRSA) identified as a nosocomial pathogen - 1981 First Canadian case of MRSA reported
- More recently, infections caused by MRSA have
been identified in persons who have no known
traditional risk factors, such as exposure to a
health care facility - Community-acquired (CA) MRSA
4CA- MRSA in the Emergency Department
- Recent studies have shown
- In United States, MRSA has emerged in many cities
as the most common pathogen in skin and soft
tissue infections (SSTIs) - 2003 Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance
Program (CNISP) - Data suggested that, in Canada, MRSA remains
primarily a HA pathogen - Only 8 of cases community-acquired
5CA- MRSA Canadian Emergency Departments
- Borgundvaag, et al (2008) CJEM
- 7 hospitals in the Greater Toronto Area
- Of purulent SSTI caused by S. aureus 18 MRSA
- No published study that prospectively examines
the importance of CA-MRSA in managing purulent
and non-purulent skin and soft tissue infections
of all etiologies in the Canadian ED setting
6Study Objectives
- Primary Objective
- Prospective observational study
- Estimate the city-wide prevalence of MRSA and
CA-MRSA - Adult patients (gt18yrs old)
- Presenting with skin or soft tissue infections
(SSTIs) - Emergency departments (EDs) of a Canadian
academic tertiary care center
7Study Objectives
- Secondary Objectives
- Identification of demographic and clinical
variables associated with MRSA - Characterization of MRSA antimicrobial
susceptibilities and genotypes
8Methods
- Prospective prevalence study
- Approved by the Ethics Review Board at The
University of Western Ontario - 3 Emergency departments in London, Ontario
- 150,000 visits annually
- Estimated sample size of 138 patients
9Methods
- Inclusion Criteria
- gt 18 years of age
- Diagnosed with any of the following skin or soft
tissue infections - Cellulitis, necrotizing soft tissue infection,
wound infection, ulcer, septic bursitis, acute
lymphadenitis, pilonidal cyst without abscess,
impetigo, or abscess (including furuncle,
carbuncle, superficial skin abscess, paronychia,
hordeolum, or pilonidal abscess) - Written, informed consent
10Methods
- Exclusion Criteria
- Previously enrolled
- Diagnosed with
- Bartholin gland abscess, odontogenic infection,
or perianal abscess
11Methods
- At enrolment, the following were obtained from
each participant - Standardized health history and lifestyle
questionnaire - Anterior nares and throat cultures
- Infection site cultures
12Statistical Analysis
- Descriptive statistics were used to summarize
patient characteristics and prevalence of MRSA - Patient characteristics associated with MRSA
colonization or infection were determined with a
backwards stepwise multivariate logistic
regression model
13Results
- During 6 weeks from July to August 2008
- 205 subjects enrolled
- Mean (standard deviation) age was 45.3 (17.9)
years - 52.2 Male
14Results
- Primary Outcome
- 35 patients (17.1) were found to be infected or
colonized with MRSA - 27 (13.2) patients were found to be infected /-
colonized with MRSA - 8 (3.9) patients were found to be colonized with
MRSA
15Results
- Primary Outcome
- MRSA isolates were present in
- 27 (13.2) infection site cultures
- 21 (10.2) of the nares cultures
- 12 (5.8) of the throat cultures
- S aureus grew in 38.0 of infection site cultures
- 34.6 MRSA
16Results
- Secondary Outcomes
- Genotype
- All 35 patients infected or colonized with MRSA
had at least one isolate genotyped - Twenty-seven (77) had isolates identified as
CMRSA 10 (USA 300), a recognized
community-acquired strain of MRSA
17Results- Antimicrobial Susceptibilities
18Results Univariate Analysis of Predictor
Variables
- Variables associated with colonization
- Currently homeless
- Variables associated infection
- Currently homeless
- Age 18-44 years
- Incarcerated in past yr
- Physical contact with incarcerated person in last
year - Know anyone else with skin infection
- Competitive sports
- Known exposure to MRSA
- Previous abscess within past year
- IV drug user
- Purulent skin infection currently
19Results Table 2
20Results Table 3
21Limitations
- Prevalence and clinical predictors of MRSA may
lack of external validity to other times of year,
practice settings and communities - Estimated prevalence of MRSA can not be
generalized to our overall ED population - Definitive conclusions about the pathogenic
etiology of participants with pure cellulitis can
not be drawn from our data
22Implications
- In appropriate patients with SSTIs
- MRSA coverage should be considered when choosing
empiric antimicrobial therapy
23Implications
- Cultures of purulent SSTI are not part of routine
care in many EDs - Recommended by The Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention - We suggest that all SSTI with purulent drainage
should be sent for culture to - Definitively identify the pathogenic organism
- Track the changing epidemiology and antimicrobial
susceptibility of MRSA in the community - Reduce nosocomial infections
24Thank you
25(No Transcript)
26Future Areas of Research
- External validation of patient characteristics
identified as risk factors for MRSA
carriage/infection - May lead to a clinical algorithm to guide
empirical antibiotic therapy - Best practice for empiric antimicrobial therapy
in patients suspected of being infected with MRSA
27Sample Size Estimate
- Sample Size Estimate
- n Z2 P (1-P)
- d2
- Assuming Power of 80
- Estimated MRSA prevalence of 10 based on a local
retrospective review - Desired precision level of 5
- To be 95 confident that the true proportion of
MRSA positive patients was between 5 and 15 - Estimated 138 patients needed to be enrolled in
the study - Decided to increase our sample size by 10 to
account for potential missing data from the
questionnaire
28Clinical Definition of CA-MRSA
- Community-dwelling persons without risk factors
for HA-MRSA - Hospitalization or surgery within the previous
year, residence in a nursing facility, dialysis,
or presence of an indwelling bladder catheter - 68.6 fit the clinical definition for CA-MRSA
- 11 patients did not meet the definition
- 10 hospitalized within last 12 months
- 1 indwelling bladder catheter
29Estimated Enrollment at Each Site
- University Hospital ED
- 96 patients diagnosed with SSTI
- 11 enrolled (11.5)
- Victoria Hospital ED
- 126 patients diagnosed with SSTI
- 81 enrolled (64.3)
- St. Josephs Health Care Urgent Care Center
- 244 Patients diagnosed
- 113 enrolled (46.3)
30Statistical Analysis
- Statistical Analysis of Patient Characteristics
- Descriptive statistics were used to summarize
patient characteristics and MRSA prevalence with
95 confidence intervals (CIs) - Using contingency tables, univariate analysis was
conducted for each independent variable collected
in the health history and lifestyle questionnaire - The likelihood ratio chi-square test with k-1
degrees of freedom was used to measure the level
of association between the dichotomous outcome
variable (whether or not a patient was MRSA) and
primary predictor variables. - In the univariate analysis, variables with a p
value lt 0.1 were found to be associated with
being colonized or infected with MRSA were
considered in the multivariate logistic
regression model - Likelihood ratio tests were then used to
determine the appropriate inclusion of variables
in the model. - Backwards stepwise logistic regression (using a
likelihood ratio removal criterion of 0.1) was
used to obtain odds ratios with 95 confidence
intervals for the final model
31Types of SSTI with MRSA Isolates on Infection
Site Culture
32Genotypic Concordance
- 27 subjects with MRSA at infection site
- 15 (55.6) colonized with MRSA
- 13 (86.7) had genetic typing of a colonized site
infection site - 5 (38.5) had genetically identical clones in all
3 sites - 8 (61.5) had genetically identical clones in at
least 2 sites