Title: Emergency Room Use by Individuals with Disabilities Enrolled in Marylands HealthChoice Program
1Emergency Room Use byIndividuals with
Disabilities Enrolled in Marylands HealthChoice
Program
- September 25, 2008
- Prepared for the
- Maryland Medicaid Advisory Committee
2Why Study Emergency Room Use?
- The ER is an inappropriate setting for routine
primary and specialty care. - Use of the ER for non-emergency treatment taxes
its capacity and may delay treatment for patients
who are seriously ill or injured. - Reliance on the ER as a medical home runs counter
to care continuity and makes delivery of
preventive care less likely. - ER use is expensive.
3Study Objectives
- Profile the use of ER services among non-elderly
HealthChoice enrollees, with an emphasis on
enrollees with disabilities. - Estimate the rate of potentially avoidable ER
use. - Identify factors associated with frequent ER
utilization.
4Study Design
- Study period calendar year (CY) 2006.
- Data source HealthChoice eligibility files,
Maryland Medicaid claims, and encounter data. - The cohort consists of any HealthChoice enrollees
who had any period of MCO enrollment in CY 2006. - The definition of an ER visit includes both
visits that resulted in an inpatient admission
and visits that did not. - Logistic regression was employed to model the
likelihood of an ER visit during the study period.
5Why Focus on HealthChoice Enrollees with
Disabilities?
6Enrollees with disabilities made up 12 of the
HealthChoice population but accounted for 28 of
ER visits in the HealthChoice program.
-6-
7About 45 of enrollees with disabilities visited
the ER at least once in CY 2006.
8Of all enrollees who had an ER visit, those with
disabilities had the highest average number of
visits (3.3 visits per user).
9ER visits by enrollees with disabilities were
more likely to result in an inpatient admission.
10- Demographic Characteristics of ER Users among
Enrollees with Disabilities
11African-American and White enrollees with
disabilities were more likely than other
racial/ethnic groups to use the ER.
- In CY 2006
- 92 percent of HealthChoice enrollees with
disabilities were either African American (57)
or White (35). - They also had the highest ER use rate 3.3 visits
per user for African Americans and 3.4 for Whites.
12Enrollees in Baltimore City were more likely than
enrollees in any other region of the state to
visit the ER.
- Enrollees with disabilities residing in Baltimore
City had the highest ER utilization rate (3.6
visits per user). - Southern Maryland and Washington suburbs had the
lowest rate of ER visits (2.8). - Overall, HealthChoice enrollees in the disabled
coverage group averaged 3.3 ER visits per user.
13Older enrollees with disabilities were more
likely than those aged 18 and under to visit the
ER.
14- Estimating Appropriate ER Utilization
15ER use does not appear to increase on weekends.
16Compared to other HealthChoice coverage groups,
enrollees with disabilities are more likely to
access ambulatory care before and after an ER
visit.
- 58 of ER visits by enrollees with disabilities
did not have an ambulatory care visit within 30
days before going to the ER (compared to 63 of
ER visits by enrollees in other HealthChoice
coverage groups). - 52 of ER visits by enrollees with disabilities
did not have an ambulatory care visit within 30
days after having an ER visit (compared to 54
of ER visits by enrollees in other HealthChoice
coverage groups).
17Methods of Identifying Potentially Avoidable ER
Visits
- CPT procedure codes as a crude indicator of
potentially preventable ER visits. - Methodology developed by researchers and
clinicians at NYU Center for Health and Public
Service Research.
18About 55 of ER visits by enrollees with
disabilities are self-limited or minor
(compared to 66 of ER visits by all other
HealthChoice coverage groups).
-18-
19Using the NYU algorithm, approximately 38.6 of
ER visits by enrollees with disabilities were
considered potentially avoidable (compared to
55.8 of ER visits for all the other HealthChoice
coverage groups).
- Non-emergent - The patient's initial complaint,
presenting symptoms, vital signs, medical
history, and age indicated that immediate medical
care was not required within 12 hours - Emergent/Primary Care Treatable - Based on
information in the record, treatment was required
within 12 hours, but care could have been
provided effectively and safely in a primary care
setting. The complaint did not require continuous
observation, and no procedures were performed or
resources used that are not available in a
primary care setting (e.g., CAT scan or certain
lab tests) - Emergent - ED Care Needed - Preventable/Avoidable
- Emergency department care was required based on
the complaint or procedures performed/resources
used, but the emergent nature of the condition
was potentially preventable/avoidable if timely
and effective ambulatory care had been received
during the episode of illness (e.g., the
flare-ups of asthma, diabetes, congestive heart
failure, etc.) - Emergent - ED Care Needed - Not
Preventable/Avoidable - Emergency department care
was required and ambulatory care treatment could
not have prevented the condition (e.g., trauma,
appendicitis, myocardial infarction, etc.)
20Predictors of frequent ER use among enrollees
with disabilities.
- The following characteristics were associated
with frequent ER use (5 or more visits in CY
2006) - Age 19-64
- Gender Female
- Race/ethnicity Whites and African Americans
- Location of residency Baltimore City
21Limitations
- Study relies on administrative data only.
- No information on time of day ER visit occurred
the time variable would indicate whether
physician offices were closed at time of ER use.
22Conclusion
- Enrollees with disabilities are more likely than
other HealthChoice enrollees to use ER services. - However, enrollees with disabilities
- Have the lowest rate of primary-care sensitive
(potentially preventable) ER visits among
HealthChoice coverage groups - Have the highest rate of ER visits that lead to
an inpatient admission, which suggests their ER
utilization may be more appropriate than that
of other HealthChoice populations
23About The Hilltop Institute
- The Hilltop Institute at the University of
Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC) is a nationally
recognized research center dedicated to improving
the health and social outcomes of vulnerable
populations. Hilltop conducts research, analysis,
and evaluation on behalf of government agencies,
foundations, and other non-profit organizations
at the national, state, and local levels.
24Contact Information
David Idala Research Analyst The Hilltop
Institute University of Maryland, Baltimore
County (UMBC) 410.455.6296 didala_at_hilltop.umbc.edu
www.hilltopinstitute.org