Photodynamic Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer Technology Implementation Project - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Photodynamic Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer Technology Implementation Project

Description:

Urology cancer centre. Part of comprehensive bladder cancer service ... Opportunity to liaise with other urology departments. Benefit to wider UK population ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:125
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: khurram7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Photodynamic Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer Technology Implementation Project


1
Photodynamic Diagnosis of Bladder
CancerTechnology Implementation Project
  • Khurram Akhtar,
  • Project Manager, NHS Technology Adoption Centre
  • Malcolm Crundwell,
  • Consultant Urologist, Royal Devon and Exeter
    Hospital

2
Delivery
  • Introduction to the project- Khurram Akhtar
  • The project at Royal Devon Exeter- Malcolm
    Crundwell

3
Why PDD
  • Evidence indicates benefit- increased detection
    rate of tumours- reduced need for subsequent
    resections
  • Step change to current, long-standing procedures
  • Not widely adopted in the NHS

4
Sites Selected
  • Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS
    Trust
  • Northern Lincolnshire and Goole Hospitals NHS
    Foundation Trust
  • Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust
  • Aim in selection
  • to explore the widest possible set of adoption
    issues,
  • in a variety of environments,
  • over a broad geographical area.

5
Current Situation
  • Initial post-selection meetings held
  • Determining optimal pathways, follow-up regimes
  • Defining data sets for implementation evaluation
  • Procurement and implementation to follow

6
What is PDD?
  • Supplement to standard white light cystoscopy
  • Instill Hexvix 1 hour prior
  • Illuminate with blue light
  • Bladder tumours fluoresce

cis
7
Advantages of PDD
  • Quality improvement
  • Improved diagnosis
  • More accurate and complete treatment
  • Less recurrence
  • Less need for additional procedures
  • Recommended in EAU and SIGN guidelines

TCC
8
Why is PDD not standard in NHS?
  • Additional cost of procedure and equipment
  • Long-term cost saving to NHS difficult to prove
  • Long-term improvements in
    survival unproven
  • Not yet assessed by NICE

9
Why RDE Applied
  • Previous attempts to
    introduce PDD failed
  • NTAC offered
    opportunities to
  • Re-apply for PDD
  • Review management of bladder cancer
  • Interest in wider involvement in NHS

10
Why implement PDD
  • Urology cancer centre
  • Part of comprehensive bladder cancer service
  • Benefit to
  • Patients
  • Staff
  • Status of department

TCC
11
Implementation 1
  • Drug and Therapeutics approval
  • Previously done
  • Business case for equipment and drug
  • Approved by NHS Trust
  • PCT to be approached re. tariff
  • Procurement
  • Standard NHS process underway

12
Implementation 2
  • Design protocols for use
  • Audit of last 1 years workload
  • Patient pathways
  • Data collection and re-audit
  • Staff training
  • Go live

TCC
TCC
13
Partnership with NTAC
  • NTAC partnership allows
  • Audit of implementation process
  • Advice on implementation
  • Opportunity to liaise with
    other urology departments
  • Benefit to wider UK population

Exeter
14
Adoption barriers
  • Difficult to measure quality improvement
  • May provide cost benefit to NHS overall
  • More effective treatment
  • Increased cost for Hospital Trust
  • Capital outlay
  • Ongoing cost
  • Decreased revenue

15
Conclusion
  • Advantages of PDD
  • PDD offers quality improvement in diagnosis and
    treatment of bladder cancer
  • May provide cost saving to NHS
  • Disincentives to implementation
  • Increased cost for individual Trusts
  • Lack of long term survival data
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com