Therapy following Botulinum Toxin Injections - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 66
About This Presentation
Title:

Therapy following Botulinum Toxin Injections

Description:

Attributed to non-progressive disturbances in the developing fetal ... Physiotherapy after ... Physiotherapy after BTX-A. In practise. Occupational Therapy ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:428
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 67
Provided by: Rut16
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Therapy following Botulinum Toxin Injections


1
Therapy following Botulinum Toxin Injections
Jenny Lewis Senior Physiotherapist Kylie
Aroyan Senior Occupational Therapist Ruth
Evans Senior Occupational Therapist Rehabilitati
on Department The Childrens Hospital at Westmead
2
(No Transcript)
3
Presentation Outline
  • What is cerebral palsy?
  • Physical components of cerebral palsy
  • Spasticity (Stiffness)
  • Movement problems
  • weakness
  • Medical Treatments
  • Botulinum Toxin (BTX)
  • Therapy Interventions after BTX
  • 3 Case Studies Research into Practice

4
What is cerebral palsy?
  • Group of disorders problems with development of
    movement and posture
  • Causes activity limitations
  • Attributed to non-progressive disturbances in the
    developing fetal or infant brain.
  • The movement disorders of cerebral palsy are
    often accompanied by disturbances of
  • sensation, cognition, communication, perception
    and/or behaviour, and/or by a seizure disorder.
  • (Bax et al, 2005)

5
How common is cerebral palsy?
  • Most common childhood disability
  • World wide incidence estimated as 2 to 2.5 in
    1000 live births
  • MRI can determine gestational age at insult
    (Ashwal et al, 2004)
  • Cerebral Palsy can affect whole body, or one side
    or legs only

6
Cerebral Palsy affecting upper limb
7
Cerebral Palsy affecting predominantly lower limbs
8
Physical Aspects of CP Spasticity
  • Spasticity
  • muscle stiffness
  • result of brain sending less inhibitory signals
    to a muscle
  • is abnormal and results from damage to brain or
    spinal cord.
  • Velocity dependent resistance to passive
    stretch

9
Spasticity
10
Spasticity (Stiffness)
  • Spasticity can cause
  • pain
  • difficulties with movement
  • difficulties with care and hygiene
  • Spasticity can help with
  • muscle bulk
  • standing up and sitting tall
  • circulation

11
Physical Aspects Weakness
  • Weakness is often seen in CP
  • In particular muscle groups
  • Neurological basis
  • Strengthening can improve the weakness, but not
    to normal levels.

12
Physical Aspects Movement Problems
  • Movement control is the ability to physically
    move body as desired
  • Problems may include
  • Slow
  • Inaccurate
  • Tremor
  • Ataxia (uncoordinated movement)
  • Involuntary movements (dystonia)
  • We would estimate all children with CP have some
    movement control problem

13
CP Other problems
  • Approximately 50 use assistive devices (splints,
    wheelchairs)
  • 70 have other disabilities
  • Cognitive impairment hard to identify
  • some relation to the physical severity of
    cerebral palsy
  • If whole body afffected, more likely to have cog
    imp
  • If hemi, more likely to have normal IQ
  • Epilepsy approx 43 (study of 1918 children)
  • Vision Impairment 28
  • Speech Language disorders 38
  • Hearing Impairment 12
  • (Ashwal et al, 2004)

14
GMFCS level 1
15
GMFCS level 2
16
GMFCS Level 3
17
GMFCS level 4
18
GMFCS level 5
19
(No Transcript)
20
MACS 1
  • Handles objects easily
  • Some difficulty with tasks requiring speed and
    accuracy.
  • Independent in daily activities

21
MACS 2
  • Handles most objects reduced quality and speed.
  • Alternative ways of performing
  • Does not limit most activities of daily living

22
MACS 3
  • Handles objects with difficulty
  • Performance slow and limited success
  • Needs help to prepare and/or modify

23
MACS 4
  • Handles limited selection of objects with
    adaptations
  • Requires continuous support for even partial
    achievement

24
MACS 5
  • Does not handle objects
  • Severely limited ability

25
Treatments for Cerebral Palsy
  • No cure, no pre-birth test
  • Medical treatments aim to reducing spasticity,
    correcting deformity, decreasing pain.
  • Include injections, surgery and medication.
  • Therapy treatments aim to increase independence
    and ease of care through activities, exercise,
    stretch and use of assistive devices.

26
Medical Treatments Botulinum Toxin A
  • BTX is a nerve toxin, purified from the toxin
    that causes Botulism.
  • Not all muscles that are affected can be
    injected.
  • BTX stops the nerve signals being able to get to
    the muscles
  • The effect of BTX generally lasts 3-6 months
  • BTX is given by injection into the muscles that
    are affected by spasticity

27
Botulinum Toxin A (BTX-A)
28
Injection Techniques
  • EMLA cream
  • Nitrous oxide sedation
  • Muscle localisation confirmed with electrical
    stimulation in upper limb and some lower limb
    muscles

29
Practical Aspects of BTX-A
  • Used since the 1990s for children with cerebral
    palsy.
  • Generally require multiple injection sites for
    leg muscles to ensure adequate spread of BTX.
  • Children may have up to 16 injections per
    session.
  • Cost up to 1000 per child per set of injections
  • The cost of BTX-A is reimbursed by the government
    for some injection sites (legs only).

30
Side Effects of BTX-A
  • Current medical research and opinion article
    published in 2004 no major systemic side
    effects, minor side effects related to injection
    site (bruising, focal weakness).
  • Our experience at CHW some related to procedure
    (nausea, vomiting, bruising, pain at injection
    site), some related to medication (very low
    incidence of incontinence, and weakness)

31
Hamstring Muscle Injection
32
Botulinum Toxin Child Selection
  • Steps in selecting a child for BTX
  • Child must have spasticity
  • 2. Child must have goals that could be achieved
    if the effect of the spasticity is removed
  • There must be research and/or clinical experience
    that justifies the use of BTX in that child
  • Follow up therapy is available

33
Therapy after BTX-A injections
  • Goal For improved function and/or independence
  • Stretching
  • Strengthening
  • Retraining

34
Therapy after BTX-A injections
  • Goal For increased ease of care
  • Positioning
  • Splinting

35
Physiotherapy after BTX-AResearch
  • To date there is very limited objective evidence
    to support or refute use of therapy after BTX-A
    injections (Lannin et al, 2006).
  • Research has looked at lower limb serial casting
    /- orthotics, and physio after botox eg
    exercises, electrical stimulation (Boyd et al,
    2000 Detrembleur, 2002 Molenaers et al, 1999)
  • Further research is being conducted

36
BTX-A Role of the physiotherapist
  • Use BTX-A to achieve goals.
  • Serial casting for contracture management-
    increase range of motion
  • Home/school program eg standing, positioning
  • Stretching and strengthening
  • Functional retraining (gait)
  • Orthotics

37
Physiotherapy after BTX-AIn practise
38
Occupational Therapy After BTX-A Research
  • Research is still emerging in this field.
  • To date there is very limited objective evidence
    to support or refute use of therapy after BTX-A
    injections (Lannin et al, 2006).
  • Very recent studies now suggest that OT for
    children with cerebral palsy improves quality of
    movement, function and spasticity. The functional
    gains can be maintained (Lowe et al, 2006).

39
Occupational Therapy after BTX-AIn practice
  • Dependent on child family goals level of
    severity
  • Casting and splinting to stretch shortened
    muscles to enable better biomechanical alignment
  • Splinting and task adaptations to encourage
    success at tasks
  • Active strengthening and stretching through use
  • Retraining in tasks bi-manual training or
    constraint induced therapy (varying styles of
    constraint)

40
Occupational Therapy
41
Occupational Therapy
42
Occupational Therapy
43
Occupational Therapy
44
3 Case Studies
  • 3 children with spasticity, causing 3 different
  • problems
  • A child who cant lift up their hand to help hold
    something (OT)
  • A child whose legs cross when walking and sitting
    (PT and OT)
  • A child who walks on their toes (PT)

45
Case Studies
1. What do we want to achieve? 2. What does the
research prove? 3. What does clinical experience
show us? 4. What do we do in practice?
46
Case Study 1 Upper Limb BTX-A
  • 5 year old boy with CP who has difficulty
    reaching for an object
  • Goal
  • increase ease of reaching
  • better hand placement for grasp
  • Bonus better grasp of object
  • Can Botulinum Toxin assist to achieve this?

47
Case Study 1
48
BTX-A injections OT provide significant
improvements in UL function
  • Length of treatment effect
  • For 1 month (Fehlings et al 2002)
  • For 3 months (Yang et al, 1999)
  • Sustained at 6 months (Lowe et al, 2006)
  • For at least 9 months (Speth et al, 2005)
  • The upper limb functional outcomes are
  • Functional improvements are sustained after BTX
    has worn off (Wallen et al, 2004)
  • Fine motor skills (Yang et al, 1999)
  • Quality of movement (Lowe et al, 2006)
  • Range at elbow (Wallen et al, 2004)

49
Case Study Outcome Upper Limb BTX OT
  • Outcome of case study
  • Can reach more easily for objects
  • Hand placement improved
  • Grasp still weak

50
Case study 1
  • Clinical practice
  • Children who present with limitations in
  • reaching skills, whose goal is to increase
  • function, are offered Botulinum Toxin
  • injections

51
Case Study 2 Joint OT and PT
  • 4 year old boy with CP whose legs scissor
  • (adduct) when walking
  • Goal
  • to decrease scissoring when walking
  • to enable him to sit cross-legged
  • independently
  • Can Botulinum Toxin assist to achieve this?

52
Case Study 2
53
BTX-A into adductor muscle improves walking
sitting
  • Significant improvement in gross motor
    function
  • - 1 month following BTX injection (Mall et al
    2000)
  • - 3 months after injection with BTX (Yang
    et al 1999)
  • - 12 months after injection (however this study
    had no
  • comparison group) (Linder et al 2001)
  • Parents reported improvement in quality of
  • walking 3-4 months following BTX injection to
    the adductor
  • muscles (Heinen et al 1999)
  • More comfortable sitting position enabling
    increased
  • participation in activities (Heinen et al
    1999)

54
Case Study Outcome
  • Outcome of case study
  • Less scissoring when walking
  • Increased ease of getting into cross
  • legged sitting with assistance
  • Able to maintain cross legged sitting
  • independently

55
Case Study 2
Clinical Practice Children who present with
scissoring due to spasticity, whose goal is to
increase function, are offered Botulinum Toxin
injections
56
Case Study 3 Lower Limb BTX-A
  • 3 year old boy with spasticity who walks on
  • his toes
  • Goal
  • - to enable him to walk with feet flat
  • Can Botulinum Toxin assist to achieve this?

57
Case Study 3
58
BTX-A injections PT improves gait
Significant improvement in walking quality
- 1 month following BTX injection to the
calves (Galli et al 2001,
Dunsun et al 2002) - up to 2 years following
repeated injections with BTX to the calves (Koman
et al 2001)
59
Case Study Outcome
  • Child walks with feet flatter and is more able
  • to tolerate ankle splints

60
Case Study 3
Clinical Practice Children who present with
walking on their toes due to spasticity, whose
goal is to improve walking pattern, are offered
Botulinum Toxin injections
61
Summary
  • CP is common
  • BTX-A is a common treatment
  • BTX-A combined with therapy at home and at
    preschool makes significant improvements in
    functional abilities
  • PRACTICE, PRACTICE, PRACTICE!!

62
Contacting Us
  • Rehabilitation Department Ph 9845 2819
  • Jennifr5_at_chw.edu.au
  • KylieA_at_chw.edu.au
  • Ruthe2_at_chw.edu.au

Thanks to the Children and Families of the PDC
service at CHW CP PDC team ROCC team Rehab
Department at CHW
63
References
  • Ashwal S, Russman BS, Blasco PA, Miller G,
    Sandler A, Shevell M, Stevenson R (2004).
    Practice parameter Diagnostic assessment of the
    child with cerebral palsy. Neurology 62(6), 23
    March 2004, pp 851-863.
  • Bax M. Goldstein M. Rosenbaum P. Leviton A.
    Paneth N. Dan B. Jacobsson B. Damiano D. (2005).
    Executive Committee for the Definition of
    Cerebral Palsy. Proposed definition and
    classification of cerebral palsy, April 2005.
    Developmental Medicine Child Neurology
    47(8)571-6.
  • Graham K et al. (2000). Recommendations for the
    use of botulinum toxin type A in management of
    cerebral palsy. Gait and posture. 11 67-79.
  • Hoare B, Imms C (2004). Upper-limb injections of
    botulinum toxin-A in children with cerebral
    palsy a critical review of the literature and
    clinical implications for occupational
    therapists. American Journal of Occupational
    Therapy Jul-Aug 58(4) 389-397.
  • Boyd R et al (2000). Biomechanical transformation
    of the gatsroc-soleus muscle with botulinum toxin
    A in children with cerebral palsy. Developmental
    Medicine and child neurology 42(1)32-41

64
References
  • Heinen F, Linder M, Mall V, Kirschner J
    Korinthenberg R. (1999). Adductor muscle
    spasticity in children with cerebral palsy and
    treatment with botulinum toxin type A A parents
    view of functional outcome. European Journal of
    Neurology. 6 47-50
  • Law S, Leffers P, Janssen-Potten Y, Vles J.
    (2005). Botulinum toxin A and upper limb
    functional skills in hemiparetic cerebral palsy
    A randomised trial in children receiving
    intensive therapy. Developmental Medicine Child
    Neurology, 47 468-473
  • Lannin N, Scheinberg A, Clark K. (2006). AACPDM
    systematic review of the effectiveness of therapy
    for children with cerebral palsy after botulinum
    toxin A injections. Developmental medicine and
    child neurology 2006 48 533-539.
  • Lowe K, Noval, I Cusick A. (2006).
    Low-dose/high concentration localised botulinum
    toxin A improves upper limb movement and function
    in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy.
    Developmental Medicine Child Neurology. 48
    170-175.

65
References
  • Mall et al (2000). Evaluation of botulinum toxin
    A therapy in children with adductor spasm by
    gross motor function measure. J Child Neurology
    2000 15214-217
  • Reeuwijk A, Van Schie P, Becher J Kwakkel G.
    (2006). Effects of botulinum toxin type A on
    upper limb function in children with cerebral
    palsy a systematic review. Clinical
    Rehabilitation. 20 375-387.
  • Wallen M, OFlaherty S Waugh MC. (2004).
    Functional outcomes of intramuscular botulinum
    toxin type A in the upper limbs of children with
    cerebral palsy A phase II trial. Arch Phys Med
    Rehab. 85 192-200.
  • Galli M, Crivellini M, Santambrogio E, Motta F.
    (2001).Short-term effects of botulinum toxin A as
    treatment for children with cerebral palsy
    Kinematic and Kinetic aspects at the ankle joint.
    Functional Neurology 16317-323

66
Websites
  • www.wemove.org
  • www.ipsen.ltd.uk/products/dysport
  • www.chw.edu.au/rehabilitation
  • http//www.medtronic.com/neuro/spasticity/
  • http//www.thespasticcentre.org.au/index.htm
  • www.fhs.mcmaster.ca/canchild
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com