Rose-Hulman Archive Project - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Rose-Hulman Archive Project

Description:

Logan Library. Richard Bernier. John Robson. IAIT. Sonny Kirtley. The Project. Redo the web interface for the RHAP. Create a friendly user interface. Fix search ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:70
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: RHIT
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Rose-Hulman Archive Project


1
Rose-Hulman Archive Project
  • Team 2
  • JP Gonzalez
  • Jonathan Knez
  • Steven Gregory
  • Eric Lewandowski
  • Joseph Richey
  • Jeremy Barton
  • Todd Windler

2
Our Client
  • Logan Library
  • Richard Bernier
  • John Robson
  • IAIT
  • Sonny Kirtley

3
The Project
  • Redo the web interface for the RHAP
  • Create a friendly user interface
  • Fix search engine.

4
The Old System
5
Diagram of Old System
Query select from IAIT.OBJECT
Samuel 1985
Client
Web Server
Table of Results
Formatted Results
6
Dislikes of Old System
  • Too slow.
  • Client receives entire database then does its own
    searching
  • Memory intensive
  • Too complicated
  • Theme inconsistent with rest of Library page
  • Does not work!

7
Requirements of New System
  • It must work
  • It must use the existing database
  • Make it easily expandable
  • The rest is up to us

8
Essential things to finish
  • Fully implement basic search capability
  • Parse and display search results
  • Add advanced search support
  • Build the surrounding web pages
  • Check compatibility with different client
    environments

9
Extras
  • Implement a dynamic browsing tree
  • Sort search results by relevancy
  • Research better searching methods
  • Fully support streaming audio and video

10
Screen shot of prototype
11
Screen shot of prototype
12
Screen shot of prototype
http//www.rose-hulman.edu/Archives/Materials/Misc
/Test/mod_1977_faculty1.jpg
13
Perl Script Example
  • We will now see a search using our script

14
Diagram of New System
15
Time Analysis for Winter Quarter
16
Time Distribution for Spring Quarter
17
What We Have Learned
  • Use of Prototype to elicit requirements
  • Worked very well
  • Gave us requirements on more than UI
  • Communication with team
  • Missed meetings
  • Documents late
  • Wasted Time

18
What We Have Learned(cont.)
  • Communication with IAIT
  • Needed acess to existing files
  • Needed executable rights to our script
  • Working with a pre-existing system
  • There can be less work to do
  • There can be more work to do fixing it

19
Current Status
  • Interface Design is complete
  • Backend Design is complete
  • Ready to start implementing the system
  • Waiting for dev environment to be working

20
Risk Analysis Identification and Estimation
ID Risk Probability Impact
A Decision to change the DB field structure M H
B IAIT decides to stop supporting Perl L H
C We run out of time L H
D Client dislikes Interface L M
E Members abandon team L L
High Probability
Moderate Probability
A
Low Probability
E
D
B, C
Low Impact
Moderate Impact
High Impact
21
Risk Analysis Mitigation
  • A - Decision to change the DB field structure
  • Modify parsing script and searching script
  • Migrate records from old DB to new DB field
    structure
  • B - IAIT decides to stop supporting Perl
  • Re-write scripts in other languages IAIT
    supports
  • C - We run out of time
  • Request members to put more hours into the
    project, when delay is detected
  • Leave behind clear and concise documentation for
    next developer
  • D - Client dislikes Interface
  • Modify Interface to clients new specifications
  • E - Members abandon team
  • Remaining team members put more hours into the
    project
  • Recruit new members

22
Will we finish?
  • Yes
  • Currently ahead of schedule
  • Feel that we know the system really well
  • We have a smart hard working team
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com