Inquiry and Blended Learning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Inquiry and Blended Learning

Description:

That inquiry-based learning approaches be at the centre of the undergraduate ... Brigham Young University. Redesigning its first-year writing course (3400 students) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: universit71
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Inquiry and Blended Learning


1
Inquiry and Blended Learning at the University
of Calgary
Dr. Randy Garrison, Professor Director, Learning
Commons garrison_at_ucalgary.ca Dr. Norm Vaughan,
Instructor Coordinator, ITBL nvaughan_at_ucalgary.ca
2
Learning Plan University of Calgary
  • That inquiry-based learning approaches be at the
    centre of the undergraduate learning experience.
  • All students must have the opportunity to
    participate in communities of inquiry
  • Learning technologies (i.e., eLearning) offer
    opportunities to enhance the campus experience
    and extend learning through the innovative use of
    on-line resources, asynchronous collaborative
    learning opportunities,

3
(No Transcript)
4
Inquiry Defined
  • Essential Features
  • problem or question driven,
  • involves critical discourse,
  • requires self-directioni.e. students take
    responsibility for their own learning,
  • incorporates research methods such as information
    gathering, synthesis of ideas, and communication,
  • evaluation of the student is appropriate to
    foster Inquiry Learningit must include
    reflection on the learning experience of the
    student, what they have learned, and why the work
    is relevant (to their discipline).
  • Inquiry Learning Action Group

5
Inquiry Defined
  • Enhancing features
  • small-group feature
  • multi-disciplinary.

6
IBL - Humanities
  • Involves shared exploration and encourages group
    discussion
  • Application or project focused
  • Focus on questions, issues
  • Learn how to ask good questions and challenge
    assumptions (discussion groups)
  • Give up anxiety about covering material
  • Inductive? Constructing schema? (RG)
  • Anne McWhir, English

7
IBL Sciences(Problem Based Learning)
  • Problem-based learning is intended to acquire
    specific knowledge and skills through the
    solution of genuine problems
  • Requires students to be self-directed, critical
    thinkers, and work collaboratively
  • Particularly applicable to professional practice
    contexts (e.g., project, case study).
  • Deductive? Applying principles?

8
Query
  • Is the lecture an anachronism?
  • What is the role of the lecture in inquiry
    learning approaches?
  • Role in blended learning?

9
Technology
  • The University community must consider how to
    redesign courses whereby the integration of
    communication technologies supports inquiry and
    enriches the teaching and learning enterprise.

10
President of Penn State
  • cites the convergence of classroom and online
    education as the single greatest unrecognized
    trend in higher education today
  • (Young, 2002).

11
Blended Learning
  • The thoughtful integration of face-to-face
    classroom (spontaneous verbal discourse) and
    Internet based (reflective text-based discourse)
    learning opportunities
  • An opportunity to enhance the campus experience
    and extend learning through the use of Internet
    information and communication
  • Traditional classroom contact hours are
    restructured to accommodate the properties of
    online learning and appropriate activities

12
Redesign Characteristics
  • Rethink the whole course
  • Integrate appropriate approaches (i.e.,
    capitalize on strengths of f2f and online)
  • Emphasize learner engagement and discourse (CoI)
  • Include strong facilitation

13
Why Blended Learning?
  • Poor performance
  • student-faculty interaction, active learning
    feedback, support sig. below the mean (NSSE)
  • Strategy to fundamentally redesign courses and
    programs
  • Enhanced student engagement
  • Focus on higher learning (e.g., CT)
  • Cost-effective

14
IBL Redesign Grants
  • Purpose to initiate innovative projects through
    the development of inquiry blended learning
    opportunities
  • Must be significant redesigns not normal course
    upgrades or add-ons
  • 10k for small course redesign 32 courses
    funded to date
  • 30K for large enrolment course redesign

15
Framework
  • The concept of a community of inquiry provides
    the framework to guide the research and practice
    of asynchronous online learning (i.e.,
    e-learning)

16
Community of Inquiry Model
Social Presence The ability of participants in a
community of inquiry to project themselves
socially and emotionally as real people
(i.e., their full personality), through the
medium of communication being used.
Cognitive Presence The extent to which learners
are able to construct and confirm meaning
through sustained reflection and discourse in a
critical community of inquiry.
Teaching Presence The design, facilitation and
direction of cognitive and social processes for
the purpose of realizing personally meaningful
and educationally worthwhile learning outcomes.
Garrison, Anderson and Archer (2000)
17
NEW APPROACHES
  • NEW METHODOLOGIES

18
ChemistryUniversity of Wisconsin
  • Redesigned its General Chemistry sequence to
    increase the level of active learning and student
    feedback
  • Eliminated one lecture and one discussion period
    per week and implemented a modularized, online
    system of diagnostic examples, tutorials, and
    quizzes
  • Controlled study found learning to be equivalent
    to that of students who were conventionally
    taught
  • UWM expects a cost-per-student reduction of 28
  • http//www.center.rpi.edu/PewGrant/rd1award/UWM.ht
    ml

19
EnglishBrigham Young University
  • Redesigning its first-year writing course (3400
    students)
  • The redesign will
  • reduce classroom time from three hours to one
    hour per week
  • make use of interactive multimedia lessons, more
    one-on-one time with faculty, and additional
    peer-to-peer sessions
  • Initial pilot revealed overall paper quality is
    higher in the online versus the traditional
    version of the course
  • A 41 cost savings estimated
  • http//www.center.rpi.edu/PewGrant/RD320Award/BYU
    .html

20
Spanish University of Tennessee
  • Increase active speaking via in-class interaction
  • Use technology to support skill practice
  • Provide immediate feedback online
  • Encourage collaborative learning, both online and
    in class

21
  • Traditional
  • 57 sections (27)
  • Adjuncts 6 TAs
  • 100 in class
  • 167,074 (2931/section)
  • 1529 students _at_ 109
  • Redesign
  • 38 sections (54)
  • Instructor-TA pairs
  • 50 in class, 50 online
  • 56,838 (1496/section)
  • 2052 students _at_ 28
  • Oral skills significantly better performance
  • Language proficiency language achievement
  • no significant difference

22
IMPROVED LEARNING
  • 25 of 30 have shown improvement
  • 5 have shown equal learning
  • PEW Grant Program in Course Redesign
  • http//www.center.rpi.edu/PewGrant.html

23
COST SAVINGS
  • Redesigned courses reduce costs by 40 on
    average, with a range of 20 to 77.
  • PEW Grant Program in Course Redesign
  • http//www.center.rpi.edu/PewGrant.html

24
More
  • National Center for Academic Transformation.
  • http//www.thencat.org/
  • PEW Program in Course Redesign
  • http//www.center.rpi.edu/PewGrant.html

25
Science 311U of C
  • Writing Reviewing Scientific Reports
  • Originally capped at 40 students BL used to
    increase cap and implement inquiry approaches
  • Students focus on writing instead of passively
    listening to lectures
  • Allows professor more time to engage with
    students in the writing process
  • Course material presented online weekly
    discussion drop-in tutorials with professor
  • Peer review document mgmt system facilitates
    anonymous feedback (reduced administration)

26
English 239U of C
  • No lectures some regular large class meetings
  • Team based inquiry (early English books)
  • Most of work done in small groups (f2f and
    online) learn to use library resources
  • Goal to create a web resource on a book
  • Present preliminary writings to team

27
Inquiry Through Blended Learning
  • Faculty member plans, designs, and develops their
    blended learning course (often in a team
    approach)
  • ITBL is a formal course with a combination of
    class meetings, labs, and web instruction
  • Course models the blended learning format (i.e.,
    f2f online)
  • Faculty learn from each other and web vets

28
ITBL Topics
  • Inquiry blended learning
  • Teaching approaches techniques
  • Assessment feedback
  • Student orientation and support
  • Piloting and course evaluation strategies

29
ITBL Options
  • Cohort participation in a set of specially
    designed, structured sessions
  • Series of stand-alone workshops
  • Website with tip sheets
  • Consulting
  • Technical Help

30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
CONCLUSION
33
UK Survey
  • 94 of lecturers stated that blended learning is
    more effective than classroom-based teaching
    alone
  • 85 of lecturers stated that online learning
    improves both teaching creativity and student
    learning
  • WebCT Survey, 2004

34
Blended Courses
  • 80 of U.S. institutions offer hybrid i.e.,
    blended learning courses
  • (Evolving Campus Support Models for E-Learning
    Courses, 2003)

35
Higher Education Survey
  • More American faculty teach online and hybrid
    courses 16 vs 11 24 vs 18 and more have
    course websites than Canadian HE institutions.
  • it seems that faculty in the United States are
    pulling well ahead of Canadian faculty in
    practice.
  • Technology and Student Success in Higher
    Education, 2003

36
Challenges
  • Awareness and understanding of true inquiry (too
    much focus on content lecturing too little
    effective use of collaboration)
  • Student orientation (resistance)
  • Commitment to fundamental redesign
  • Strategic plan covering all four undergraduate
    years
  • Teaching-research imbalance

37
Change ManagementLearning Commons
  • Est. May 1998 consolidated three units
  • Three directors in three years
  • Mistakes location, cappuccino bar, technology
    focus
  • Vision, implementation plan, approval ratings
  • Strategic plan, re-organization
  • Institutional learning plan, BL position paper
  • ITBL, redesign grants program mixed model

38
Following Up
  • Learning Commons Website

http//commons.ucalgary.ca/
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com