The Relationship between Exercise and Back Pain During Pregnancy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

The Relationship between Exercise and Back Pain During Pregnancy

Description:

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology., 183, 1484-1488. ... American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology186,142-147. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:126
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: hmil
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Relationship between Exercise and Back Pain During Pregnancy


1
The Relationship between Exercise and Back Pain
During Pregnancy
  • Jennifer Y. McElroy, D.O.
  • Sheila Dugan, M.D.

2
Objective
  • Investigate self-reported back pain and patterns
    of physical activity in the first and second
    trimester of pregnancy to evaluate the
    relationship between exercise and back pain
    during pregnancy
  • Demonstrate the applicability of published pain
    scale models to the pregnant population

3
Background
  • Studies have shown 50-90 of pregnant women
    experience back pain during pregnancy
  • Back pain cited as the most frequent reason for
    missed work days in pregnant population
  • Proposed etiologies range from biomechanical
    strain to altered hormonal influences

4
Background
  • ACOG recommends 30 minutes of moderate exercise
    on most days of the week for pregnant patients
  • Benefits of exercise during pregnancy include
    fetal and maternal benefits (decreased GDM,
    labor, general discomforts)

5
Hypothesis
  • An exercise program during pregnancy may prevent
    or minimize the intensity of low back pain during
    pregnancy
  • Little research has been published to support or
    debase this hypothesis

6
Materials and Methods
  • Power analysis performed 66 patients needed
  • Womens Health Care Resident Clinic population
    enrolled
  • Patients consented and enrolled through the
    months of November 2005 to April 2006.

7
Materials and Methods
  • Inclusion criteria 18-34 years of age, singleton
    gestation, and the ability to read and write
    English
  • Exclusion criteria
  • 45 women enrolled, 10 excluded based on criteria
  • Socioeconomic information, presence and severity
    of back pain and patterns of activity were
    evaluated

8
Trimester distribution of study participants
9
Respective Focus of each Pain Questionnaire
10
Results
  • Data collected from 35 women
  • Black 77.1
  • Hispanic 17.7
  • White 5.7
  • Four (11.4) participants reported a history of
    back pain prior to the current gestation
  • Three participants (8.6) reported back pain
    during the current gestation

11
Demographics and Reported Back Pain
12
Results
  • Higher than expected activity level in the
    enrolled population
  • Eighty percent of those enrolled reported walking
    at least twice a week (4.7x a week average)
  • Seventy-three percent of the study population
    reported that they engaged in regular strenuous
    activity

13
Reported incidence of Walking and Strenuous
Exercise
14
Discussion
  • Our hypothesis was that an exercise program may
    prevent or minimize the intensity of back pain
    during pregnancy
  • Collected data reveal a higher than expected
    level of physical activity in this study
    population, and coincidentally, a lower than
    expected incidence of back pain

15
Discussion
  • Pre-pregnancy levels of activity did not predict
    levels of activity during pregnancy
  • The low frequency of reported back pain precluded
    meaningful statistical analysis and
    identification of risk factors

16
Discussion
  • Given the low reported incidence of back pain in
    this active population it appears that a more
    active lifestyle may be protective against some
    of the discomforts experienced by pregnant
    patients.

17
Areas for Further Study
  • Evaluation of risk factors that may predispose
    pregnant women to back pain with respect to
    physical activity
  • Pregnancy conditioning regimens and outcomes with
    respect to back pain

18
Exclusion Criteria
  • Exclusion Criteria
  • Age lt18 or gt34
  • Multiple gestation
  • Unable to read/write English
  • History of back surgery
  • Considered to have high-risk pregnancy by health
    care provider. Examples include
  • History of one or more of the following
  • Prior neonatal death\
  • Two or more previous preterm deliveries lt34 weeks
  • A single preterm delivery lt30 weeks
  • Birth of a neonate with serious complications
    resulting in a handicapping condition
  • Recurrent spontaneous abortion or fetal demise
  • Family history of genetic disease
  • Incompetent cervix
  • Active chronic medical problems including
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Autoimmune disease
  • Reactive airway disease requiring treatment with
    corticosteroids
  • Selected obstetric complications which present
    prior to 34 weeks
  • Polyhydraminios
  • Oligohydramnios
  • Pre-eclampsia
  • Congenital viral disease
  • Maternal surgical conditions
  • Suspected fetal abnormality
  • Isoimmunization with antibody titers greater than
    18
  • Antiphospholipid syndrome
  • DES exposure
  • IDDM Class A2 and B
  • Selected chronic medical conditions with a known
    increase in perinatal morality
  • Cardiovascular disease with functional impairment
  • Respiratory failure requiring mechanical
    ventilation
  • Acute coagulopathy
  • Intractable seizures
  • Coma
  • Sepsis
  • Solid organ transplant

19
References
  • Fast, A., Shapiro, D., Ducommun, E.J., Friedmann,
    L.W., Bouklas, T., Floman, Y. (1987). Low-back
    pain in pregnancy. Spine, 12, 368-371.
  • 2 Noren, L., Ostgaard, S., Johansson, G.,
    Ostgaard, H.C. (2002). Lumbar back and posterior
    pelvic pain during pregnancy a 3-year follow-up.
    European Spine Journal, 11, 267-271.
  • 3 Ostgaard, H.C. Andersson, G.B. (1991).
    Previous back pain and risk of developing back
    pain in a future pregnancy. Spine, 16, 432-436.
  • 4 Kristiansson, P., Svardsudd, K., von
    Schoultz, B. (1996). Bak pain during pregnancy a
    prospective study. Spine, 21, 702-709.
  • 5 ACOG Committee Obstetric Practice (2002). ACOG
    Committee Opinion. (Rep. No. 267)
  • 6 Clapp, J.F., III, Kim, H., Burciu, B.,
    Lopez, B. (2000). Beginning regular exercise in
    early pregnancy effect on fetoplacental growth.
    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.,
    183, 1484-1488.
  • Clapp, J. F., III, Kim, H., Burciu, B., Schmidt,
    S., Petry, K., Lopez, B. (2002). Continuing
    regular exercise during pregnancy effects of
    exercise volume on fetoplacental growth. American
    Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology186,142-147.
  • Clapp, J. F., III Little, K.D. 91995). Effect
    of recreational exercise on pregnancy weight gain
    and subcutaneous fat deposition. Medicine
    Science in Sports Exercise., 27, 170-177.
  • Dye, T.D., Knox, K.L., Artal, R., Aubry, R.H.,
    Wojtowyz, M.A. (1997). Physical activity,
    obesity, and diabetes in pregnancy. American
    Journal of Epidemiology, 146, 961-965.
  • Clapp, J.F., III (1990). The course of labor
    after endurance exercise during pregnancy.
    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.,
    163, t-805.
  • Horns, P.N., Ratcliffe, L.P., Leggett, J.C.
    Swanson, M.S. (1996). Pregnancy outcomes among
    active and sedentary primiparous women. JOGNN-
    Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, Neonatal
    Nursing., 25, 49-54.
  • Peterson, A. M., et al. (2005). Exercise in
    pregnancy. Medicine Science in Sports
    Exercise, 37, 1748-53.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com