Title: Health Care Systems Reform in Insurance vs Tax based System Australia
1Health Care Systems Reform in Insurance vs Tax
based SystemAustralia
- Florence Kwan
- Janice Yim
- Nora Kwok
- Molin Lin
- Rita Mak
2Initiatives
- Initiative that was introduced to meet challenges
- Health care Expenditure Case-mix funding
- Health care Expenditure PBS
- Viability of PHI Life time health cover, 30 tax
rebate - Strengthening the Medicare Medicare plus
- Workforce shortage workforce policy
3Casemix funding
4Casemix funding
- Public hospital funding model based on the level
and composition of output - Aiming at providing explicit incentives for
hospitals to improve efficiency - Rationalize health care expenditure
5Casemix funding
- Greater focus on cost and benchmarking
- Increased output to address waiting time concerns
- Increase shift of resources to efficient
hospitals from those less efficient
6Casemix funding Evaluation
- Efficiency
- Reduced length of stay
- Output
- Increased number of patients treated
- Decreased waiting time
- Quality
- No change in the readmission rate
7Casemix funding Evaluation
- Northern Territory
- Casemix funding implemented in 1996/97 fiscal year
8Casemix funding Evaluation
- Efficiency
- Length of stay is reduced through better
scheduling of tests, discharge planning and
review of need for hospitalization
Fiscal year 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97
ALOS (days) 4.35 4.28 4.10 3.73
9Casemix funding Evaluation
- Output
- Weighted separation
- The sum of no of separations x cost weights for
AN-DRGs - number of bed days
- Product of average length of stay and number of
separation
10Weighted separations
11No of bed-days
12Casemix funding Evaluation
- casemix funding has a substantial impact in
lifting total casemix-weighted separations - Decreased the total number of bed-days
13Casemix funding Evaluation
- Quality
- Reduced quality premature discharge lead to
higher readmission rate - No impact on readmission rates
14Readmission rates
15Casemix funding Evaluation
- Victoria 1992/93 vs 1993/94 (before and after
introduction of casemix funding) - No of patients increased 5
- Total expenditure decreased 5
- Number of casemix weighted separations increased
by 4.4
16Casemix funding Evaluation
- Challenges
- Supply-side moral hazard
- Supplier induced demand
- Clinical diagnosis and procedures
17Casemix funding Evaluation
- Conclusion
- Casemix funding reduce inefficiencies among
hospitals and seek maximum returns for the health
dollar
18Private Health Insurance
- Initiatives in 2000
- Lifetime Health Cover Replace the community
rate. - Join the PHI lt 30 years of age and stay in PHI,
pay a lower premium throughout their lives - 30 Rebate Subsidy of 30 for all PHI fund
members by Government in 1999
19Private Health Insurance initiatives- Evaluation
- Membership increased from 30.5 to 42.9 of
Australian from 1998-2004 - 27 increase in PHI fund reserves in 12 months
- Minimal or no increases in PHI premiums
- Decrease in overall claim rate
- What about the long term effect ?
20PHI membership
21Private Health Insurance initiatives- Evaluation
- What about the long term effect ?
- Membership aging increases the overall claim rate
- highly affected by the birth rate and the aging
population. - Is the Low premium rate sustainable ?
22Private Health Insurance initiatives- Evaluation
- Is 30 rebate a huge cost to Government ?
- Government fund in total health expenditure
- 68.8 in 2001-2002
- 69.9 in 1990-2000
-
23Private Health Insurance initiatives- Evaluation
- These initiatives support the shift of Public
service to Private service
No. of Hospitals 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02
Public 760 749 748 749 746
Private 492 492 502 509 537
24Private Health Insurance initiatives- Evaluation
- These initiatives support the shift of Public
service to Private service
Beds per 1,000 population 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02
Public 3 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.6
Private 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4
25Private Health Insurance initiatives- Evaluation
- These initiatives support the shift of Public
service to Private service
Spending on hospital services / total expenditure 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02
Public Hospital 29.7 29.6 28.5 27.5 27.4
Private Hospital 8.1 8.2 8 7.8 8
26Private Health Insurance initiatives- Evaluation
- Total funding for health service through PHI (
in million )
98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02
Total Benefits paid by membersnet premium Government rebate 4,843 5,186 6,191 7,036
Government Rebate 30 - - 2,030 2,110
Net Benefits paid 4,843 5,186 4,161 4,926
27Private Health Insurance initiatives- Evaluation
- ? ?Private Service
- ? ? Choices of Service
- ? ?Appropriate level of Care
28Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) Background
- One of the major national subsidy
- Cover all Australians on the purchase of medicine
- Nearly 2/3 of prescriptions are subsidized
- Pay more if want patented / branded drug
- Two groups of consumers general concessional
- Safety net on annual expenses
29Evaluation
- PBS has been successful in suppressing drug
prices. - Compare with the OECD countries
- Leakage ( prescribing outside PBS condition )
30Price Ratio compare with OECD countries
31Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) - Initiatives
- 12.5 price reduction for new brands after 1
August 2005 - Generic drug already listed on PBS
- Price of medicines are linked in generic drugs
- Reduction flow on to all brands of that medicine
- Applied to combination medicines on a pro-rata
basis - Applied to the first new brand after 1 August
2005 only - (Once a patent medicine expires, other
manufacturers can produce equivalent products)
32Evaluation
- Newly implemented, no actual figure !!
- Presumption from Australian Consumers Association
- If competition was allowed to function, it could
be expected to reduce prices by 20 - 60 - Proposes tendering for generics.
33Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) - Initiatives
Per prescription in 2000 Per prescription in 2006
General consumers AUD 21.90 AUD 29.50
Concessional consumers AUD 3.50 AUD 4.70
34Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) - Initiatives
PBS Safety Net Threshold Contribution after reaching Threshold
General consumers 2000 AUD 669.70 2000 AUD 3.50
General consumers 2006 AUD 960.10 2006 AUD 4.70
Concessional consumers 2000 AUD 182 FREE
Concessional consumers 2006 AUD 253.80 FREE
35Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) - Initiatives
- Positive effect in a short run
- Reduce the cost of PBS. Maintain its
affordability - Decrease contribution from Government
- Increase contribution from customers
36Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) Increase
co-payment - Evaluation
- Intended to deter inappropriate use by patients
and raise revenue. - No effect on the those receiving sickness
allowance, older long term allowee - Pharmaceutical Allowance (PA) will be granted
150 per year
37Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) Increase
co-payment - Evaluation
- Will fail to greatly increase the patient
copayment because 80 of PBS expenditure is on
concession consumers. - The copayment for the remaining 20 would soon
become astronomical and would tend to drive
people away from necessary medical care. - It would not have changed the total cost of the
PBS.
38Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS)
initiatives - Evaluation
- Average growth of expenditures on pharmaceuticals
is 13.9 from 99/00-00/01 - Reasons suggested for growth
- Increasingly expensive new drugs being listed.
- Over-prescribing and leakage
- Consumer expectations
- Ageing of the population
- Aggressive marketing by the Pharmaceutical
Industry
39Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS)
initiatives - Evaluation
- Initiatives address the situation ?
- Increasingly expensive new drugs being listed
(-ve ) - Over-prescribing and leakage (- ve )
- Consumer expectations (-ve )
- Ageing of the population (-ve)
- Aggressive marketing by the Pharmaceutical
Industry - (-ve)
40Evaluation
- Economic efficiency (cheapness )
- Allocative efficiency ( allocate resources where
they are most needed ) - Dynamic efficiency ( flexibility to respond to
changing circumstances.
41MedicarePlus
42MedicarePlus Background Information
- Initiators
- Commonwealth Department of the Health and Ageing
(federal government) - Funding
- Commonwealth Government of Australia
- Beginning, expected end and duration
- Announced on 18/11/2003
- Began from 2/2004
- Duration 4-year package, intended to run
indefinitely
43MedicarePlusBackground Information
- Problems driving the reform
- Decrease in availability
- Primarily an issue for regional and rural areas
- Decrease in bulk billing rate
- Decline from 72 in 2000 to 68 in 2003
- Increase in cost to the user
44MedicarePlusInitiatives
- Bulk Billing incentive increases by 50 for
regional, rural and remote Australia and all of
Tasmania - increase in bulk billing rate, and on the other
hand, increase availability in RRMA - A more generous safety net will cover all other
individuals (threshold700) and families
(threshold 1000) - decrease cost from user
- Steps taken to increase the supply of doctors,
and encourage those overseas trained to work in
areas of shortage (regional and rural areas) - Increase in availability of doctors in rural
areas
45MedicarePlus Evaluation
- Bulk billing rate increase in 2004-2005
46Percentage of Services Bulk Billed,
Australia(Medicare Statistics, 2005)
47MedicarePlus Evaluation
- Bulk billing rate increase in rural and remote
areas in 2004-05
48Percentage of Services Bulk Billedby State or
Territory(Medicare statistics, 2005)
Bulk Billed
Change in Points
State or Territory December Quarter, 2005 December Qtr 2005 on Dec Qtr 2004
NSW 74.90 0.6
VIC 69.10 2
QLD 69.90 1.7
SA 69.70 2.4
WA 67.90 0.9
TAS 64.40 1.5
NT 74.40 0.8
ACT 56.10 1.2
Australia Total 71 1.3
Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, February 2006 Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, February 2006 Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, February 2006
49MedicarePlus Evaluation
- Number of GPs from overseas increase in 2004-2005
50GPs by place of basic qualification, 2003-04 to
2004-05
Australia Overseas Grand Total
GPs
2003-2004 11486 5385 16872
2004-2005 11661 5612 17273
change on previous year change on previous year change on previous year
2003-2004 -0.80 3.60 0.60
2004-2005 1.50 4.20 2.40
Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, February 2006 Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, February 2006 Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, February 2006 Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, February 2006 Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, February 2006
51MedicarePlus Evaluation
- Increase in availability in RRMA
52GPs by place of basic qualification and broad
RRMA, 2003-04 to 2004-05
Year Urban Rural Remote Rural Remote
Australia Overseas Australia Overseas
GPs
2003-2004 8758 3850 2728 1535
2004-2005 8836 4020 2825 1592
change on previous year change on previous year change on previous year
2003-2004 -1.10 1.40 0.40 9.60
2004-2005 0.90 4.40 3.50 3.70
Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, February 2006 Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, February 2006 Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, February 2006 Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, February 2006 Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, February 2006 Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, February 2006 Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, February 2006
53MedicarePlus Conclusion
- Major conditions for success
- Bulk billing rate increase
- Qualified health care professionals come from
overseas to work in regional and rural Australia - Increase in the availability of doctors in
regional and rural areas - Safety net is a key structural improvement to
Medicare, but still too fast to have statistics
to prove its result. But since 1/2004, more than
33,000 individuals and families were benefit from
this plan
54Health Workforce - Evaluation
55Increase in numbers of health workers between
1996 to 2001
- Australias Health Workforce Productivity
Commission Position Paper
56University intake (1996 2004)
- Medical school commencements of Australain
citizens and permanent residents increased by 78
(or more than 700 places) between 1996 2004
(AMWAC 2004) - Number of specialists training increased by
around 700 between 2000 and 2003 (rise in 14)
(AIHW 2005a) - Nursing School commencements in 2004 were around
8,800 (10 higher than in 2003)
57University Intake (2005)
- Significant boost to university places in 2005
- Nursing 1,494
- Allied Health Health Science 1,237
- Pharmacy 227
- Dentistry 78
- Medical School increase 246 in 2005
- But cant be seen in the workforce until 2008
58Immigration on Overseas Trained Doctors (OTDs)
- In the mid 1990s,
- No restriction on the no. entering AUS
permanently and no control on where they
practice. - -gt OTDs Maldistribution of workforce
- Recommended that the number of OTDs entering AUS
permanently be limited to 200 per 100,000
population (MWDRC, 1992)
59To reduce entry of OTDs for permanent stay
- Use Skilled migration categories, the points
awarded to doctors were reduced - Medical qualifications (including from UK,
Ireland, South Africa and Canada) were no longer
given automatic unconditional registration for
general practice - -gt Required to complete the AMC examination
605-Year Overseas Trained Doctor Scheme (OTDs)
- Developed in 2003, to provide assistance and
incentives to attract doctors to rural and remote
locations - Survey of Doctors Working in Rural and Remote
Locations Under Australias 5-Year Overseas
Trained Doctor Recruitment Scheme - No information given on the country of origin of
OTDs
Survey of Doctors working in rural and remote
locations under Australias Five-Year Overseas
Trained Doctor Recruitment Scheme AMWAC Report
2004.1
61- In 1998, 10,408 (21.3) were OTDs
- 39 qualified in UK,
- 28 Asia, 12 New Zealand, 21 Others
- Of 1,901 rural and remote OTDs
- 56 qualified in UK or Ireland,
- 15.6 Asia, 9.6 New Zealand, 18.8 Others
62Issue Highlighted
- Main Reasons for applying
- - Dissatisfied with lifestyle and/or medical
practitioner in - country of origin
- - To become a permanent resident or citizen of
Australia
63OTD Satisfaction on their working condition
64- Future Career plans of OTDs ?
- - 52.1 plan to stay at their present location
after 5-year contract completed, - 34.1 plan to move to another location
- 13.8 undecided
- Reasons for move- Family considerations (eg.
Childrens education, spouses career needs) - - Isolation and environmental factors (e.g.
social isolation, geographic location) - - Medical practice issues (e.g. poor location
facilities)
65- Suggestions for improving the Scheme
- - Streaming processes, provide more support to
newly arrived doctors and improved communication
systems - - More educational support, and supervision for
gaining fellowships - - Financial Considerations, e.g. assistance with
early-entry accommodation - - Increase program flexibility (e.g. ability to
change States within 5-year Contract)
66Conclusion
67Conclusion
- The Australian health system is widely regarded
as being world-class - Australians are satisfied with their health care
system - - enjoy good health
- - most have ready access to health services
- - high quality services
- - public make fair payments
- - share the fiscal risks of ill-health
- Podge and Hagan, 2000r
68Conclusion
- Three basic goals of health care system reform
- - equity fair payment, fair access to and use
of services and equity of outcomes - - efficiency value for money
- - quality high standards and good health
outcomes
69Conclusion (Contd)
- The health care system enjoys both political and
public support - There is dissatisfaction with particular parts of
the health care system and among particular
population groups - There is no strong demand for radical change
70Conclusion (contd)
- Health care system evolved slowly and
incrementally for several reasons - - a federal system of government
- - a bicameral Parliament
- - responsibility for health care divided
between - levels of governments
- - a pluralist health care field including a
large - private sector
- Ongoing process
71References
- www.medicareaustralia.gov.au
- www.aihw.gov.au
- www.health.gov.au
- www.healthinsite.gov.au
- www.aph.gov.au
- New challenges, new solutions, Australian
Consumers Association, July 2002 - http//www.reformmonitor.org/
- http//www.health.gov.au/internet/wcms/publishing.
nsf/Content/medicarestatistics-1 - www.buseco.monash.edu.au/centres/che/pubs/wp92.pdf
- http//www.health.vic.gov.au/discharge/paper.htm
- Xiao J, et al (2000) An assessment of the
effects of casemix funding on hospital
utilisation A Northern Territory perspective
Australian Health Review 23(1) 122-136.
72Thank you!