Title: How Ready Are Health Responders for Terrorist Attacks
1How Ready Are Health Respondersfor Terrorist
Attacks?
Lois M. Davis, Ph.D. June 26, 2003
2How Prepared Local Health Responders Are
forTerrorist Attacks Has Been an Ongoing Concern
- The June 2001 Dark Winter exercisewhich
simulated intentional release of smallpox in
three U.S. citiesraised warning flags - Dark Winter further demonstrated how poorly
current organizational structures and
capabilities fit with the management needs and
operational requirements of an effective
bioterrorism response. Responding to a
bioterrorist attack will require new levels of
partnership between public health and medicine,
law enforcement, and intelligence. However,
these communities have little past experience
working together and vast differences in their
professional cultures, missions, and needs. - 9/11 attacks and anthrax attacks in Fall 2001
further called into question how prepared health
responders were
3Todays Focus
- How prepared are local health responders for
biological and chemical terrorism? - RAND nationwide surveys of state and local
responders prior to 9/11 and at the one-year
anniversary - Results of other survey efforts since 9/11
OIG/DHHS survey and GAO case studies - What role should the media play in informing the
public health response to terrorism?
4Questions and Answers
Questions
Answers
- How prepared are local health responders for
biological and chemical terrorism? - What role should the media play in informing the
public health response to terrorism?
- Preparedness efforts are improving since 9/11,
but fundamental readiness concerns persist
5Prior to 9/11, Only 1/3 of Local Public
HealthDepartments Had SOPs for Biological Attacks
Have Response Plans or SOPs for . . .
. . .Biological Incidents
. . .Chemical Incidents
Local public health
27 (4)
25 (4)
Overall
Hospitals
32 (7)
54 (7)
32 (11)
Large Metropolitan Counties
36 (11)
40 (15)
69 (12)
24 (5)
26 (5)
Other Counties
31 (7)
50 (8)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percent
Percent
6Prior to 9/11, Only 1/3 of Local Public
HealthDepartments Had SOPs for Biological Attacks
Have Response Plans or SOPs for . . .
. . .Biological Incidents
. . .Chemical Incidents
Local public health
27 (4)
25 (4)
Overall
Hospitals
32 (7)
54 (7)
32 (11)
Large Metropolitan Counties
36 (11)
40 (15)
69 (12)
24 (5)
26 (5)
Other Counties
31 (7)
50 (8)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percent
Percent
Slightly better for chemical attacks and among
large metropolitan counties
7Prior to 9/11, Very Few Organizations
HadExercised Their Response Plans for
Bioterrorism
Response Plans or SOPs Last Exercised for . . .
. . .Chemical Incidents
. . .Biological Incidents
Within Past 12 Months
16 (6)
37 (9)
10 (5)
36 (9)
Local public health
Hospitals
19 (7)
9 (5)
Between 12 Years Ago
27 (8)
7 (5)
18 (8)
20 (9)
2 or More Years Ago
34 (14)
15 (7)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percent
Percent
8Prior to 9/11, Very Few Organizations
HadExercised Their Response Plans for
Bioterrorism
Response Plans or SOPs Last Exercised for . . .
. . .Chemical Incidents
. . .Biological Incidents
Within Past 12 Months
16 (6)
37 (9)
10 (5)
36 (9)
Local public health
Hospitals
19 (7)
9 (5)
Between 12 Years Ago
27 (8)
7 (5)
18 (8)
20 (9)
2 or More Years Ago
34 (14)
15 (7)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percent
Percent
Better for chemical attacks
9Prior to 9/11, Only Half of Health
OrganizationsParticipated in WMD-Focused Task
Forces
Interagency Disaster Preparedness Task Force
Exists in Region
Task Force Addresses Planning for WMD-Related
Incidents
Local public health
61 (6)
53 (6)
Hospitals
Overall
76 (6)
53 (8)
77 (11)
Large Metropolitan Counties
73 (15)
90 (7)
88 (8)
50 (7)
59 (6)
Other Counties
72 (7)
44 (9)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percent
Percent
10Other Findings Showed Local Health/Medical
Response to Terrorism Inadequately Addressed
- Surge capacity that may be required
- Plans for communicating with other health
providers, emergency responders, media, or the
public - What role other responders, such as law
enforcement, may play in the response to, or the
investigation of, bioterrorist incidents
11OIG/DHHS Survey Showed Improvements inTerrorism
Preparedness Capabilities Since 9/11
- OIG Study Purposive sample of 12 states and 36
local health departments - All state health departments and nearly 89
percent of local ones were writing or had written
bioterrorism response plan - Local health departments have begun to integrate
public health preparedness activities with those
of other emergency response organizations - Most local health departments reported belonging
to terrorism-related task forces, working groups,
or committees
12GAO Case Studies at Sites in Seven Cities Show
Similar Improvements
- Most cities had undertaken steps to improve
coordination among local response organizations - Hospitals and other organizations that had not
been involved in local response planning
increased participation - State/local jurisdictions/response organizations
have begun to incorporate bioterrorism in overall
plans - However, plans for regional coordination were
lagging - Most states were in the process of undertaking
assessments of capacity - Applying for DHHS funding helped states identify
problems in bioterrorism preparedness and focus
planning efforts
13GAO Case Studies at Sites in Seven Cities Show
Similar Improvements
- Most cities had undertaken steps to improve
coordination among local response organizations - Hospitals and other organizations that had not
been involved in local response planning
increased participation - State/local jurisdictions/response organizations
have begun to incorporate bioterrorism in overall
plans - However, plans for regional coordination were
lagging - Most states were in the process of undertaking
assessments of capacity - Applying for DHHS funding helped states identify
problems in bioterrorism preparedness and focus
planning efforts
However, despite improvements, fundamental public
health readiness issues remain
14Written Comments from RAND Follow-up Survey
Highlight Local Health Organizations Concerns
- If additional funding is not provided to
hospitals, the cost of WMD preparedness will be
difficult if not impossible to meet. - We are a rural medical facility. Financial
survival is difficult in the current climate.
Funding is not available for training. . . . - Difficult to find balance between efforts for
preparedness vs. other public health priorities
in a shrinking resource environment. - Federal bioterrorism funding is just now
resulting in ability to recruit and hire
dedicated staff for bioterrorism preparedness.
15Funding of Bioterrorism Preparedness Activities
Remains a Fundamental Readiness Concern
- Post 9/11, federal funding for bioterrorism
preparedness has increased, esp. for public
health - However, wide variation across states in how
funding is being allocated - Much of the focus is on capacity building and
improving public health infrastructure - Some states are taking a comprehensive approach
to include coordination, response planning, etc. - Degree to which funding will reach local level is
a concern - Hospitals only now receiving bioterrorism funding
in any substantial amounts (complex incentives
for investing in preparedness) - Question of whether supplantation may occur in
current fiscal crisis
16Workforce Issues Are Another Fundamental
Readiness Concern
- Health officials have cited workforce shortages
as impediments that funding alone will not solve - Shortages of trained epidemiologists, lab
personnel, and hospital personnel - Manpower shortages limiting ability to implement
active surveillance systems - Health departments reluctant to hire new staff
without guarantees of sustained federal (or
state) funding
17Concern Over Effects of Increasing Focus
onBioterrorism Is Also a Fundamental Issue
- Some public health officials fear overemphasis on
bioterrorism to exclusion of other types of
public health threats/emergencies - State and local health officials concerned that
focus on bioterrorism may divert attention and
resources from other public health functions and
programs - Recent implementation of smallpox vaccination
program - Forcing cutbacks in other basic health services,
such as childhood immunizations and tuberculosis
prevention
18DHHS Review of States Bioterrorism Plans Also
Identified Shortcomings
- Some States workplans inadequately addressed
coordination - With the Metropolitan Medical Response System
(MMRS) cities - Between health departments and hospitals
- With bordering states or countries
- DHHS also requested priority be given to
development of plans for - Receiving materials from the National
Pharmaceutical Stockpile - Ensuring adequate surge capacity within hospital
regions - Provisions be made for isolation rooms in
hospital ERs
19At Most Fundamental Level Is Question of How to
Know How Much Readiness Is Enough
- Current metrics for assessing how prepared a
community really is for bioterrorism are
inadequate - CDCs list of critical benchmarks
- DHS Advisory Councils statewide template
initiative - Need to go beyond these efforts to develop
quantifiable performance measures and model of
preparedness that - DHS can use to assess how prepared U.S. is
- Communities can use to assess local preparedness
and inform resource allocation decisions - Individual health organizations can use to assess
where they stand relative to their peers
20Questions and Answers
Questions
Answers
- How prepared are local health responders for
biological and chemical terrorism? - What role should the media play in informing the
public health response to terrorism?
- Preparedness efforts are improving since 9/11,
but fundamental readiness concerns persist
- Media can help with public education and provide
input to communications plans being developed
21Communications with the Media and Public During
9/11 and Anthrax Attacks Was Poor
- There was a problem of health officials not
speaking with one voice - Spokespersons who contradicted guidance from
public health officials - Public health officials appeared unresponsive to
what citizens wanted to know - Individuals risk for contracting anthrax, need
for antibiotics, etc. - Lack of coordination between local, state, and
federal levels
22Evidence Suggests Such Problems Still Exist
After 9/11
- DHHS review of state risk communications plans
- Lacked sufficient details on communications with
the public or media - Several did not identify public information
officers - OIG survey found most health departments did not
have complete risk communication plan for
communicating with public and media - Only 25 of state health departments 33 of
local ones
23Evidence Suggests Such Problems Still Exist
After 9/11
- DHHS review of states risk communications plans
- Lacked sufficient details on communications with
the public or media - Several did not identify public information
officers - OIG survey found most health departments did not
have complete risk communication plan for
communicating with public and media - Only 25 of state health departments 33 of
local ones
Health departments are working to rectify
problems and develop communications plans
24Improving Communications About Preparednessand
Response to Bioterrorist Incidents
- Public health officials should undertake public
education component in advance - Provide frank assessment of where jurisdictions
stand on response planning, quarantine plans,
evacuation plans, etc. - Media can play a role in educating the public
- Media can help inform communications plans
- Make public health officials aware of what media
needs to know and is going to be asking during an
event - Make them aware that there must be a go-to
person among health officials to get information
when an incident occurs . . . or will go elsewhere