Speed, aggression, surprise - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 46
About This Presentation
Title:

Speed, aggression, surprise

Description:

Pharmaceutical out-sourcing to highly specialized biotechs ... FIPCO Fully integrated pharmaceutical company ... business model 'extremophile' companies ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 47
Provided by: Nex8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Speed, aggression, surprise


1
Speed, aggression, surprise
  • IP in biotech
  • Christian Hansen, PhD, MBA
  • Partner, Nordic Biotech
  • December 5, 2002

2
Speed, aggression, surpriseMotto of the Special
Air Services (SAS)
How a small, agile, and highly efficient unit
can strike with great impact at key positions of
much larger forces
3
Agenda
  • Kort personlig baggrund hvorfor er jeg her nu?
  • Hvad er biotech?
  • Hvad er det økonomiske rationale i biotech?
  • Typisk relateret til lægemidler
  • Andre slags biotech
  • Hvorfor er patenter særligt vigtige i biotech?
  • Praksis mht patenter og biotech

4
Hvorfor er jeg her nu ?
  • Studerende (1984-92)
  • Cand. polyt. Kemi
  • Ph.D. molekylær biologi/biokemi
  • MBA
  • Funktionær (1992-99)
  • Chef for patentstrategi i Novo Nordisk
  • Entreprenør (1999-2001)
  • Adm. dir./grundlægger ProFound Pharma/Maxygen
  • Investor (2001-02)
  • Partner/grundlægger Nordic Biotech
  • Patenter i biotek 1992-2002

5
Hvad er biotech industri?
6
Hvad er biotech industri ?
  • Virksomheder,
  • som anvender life sciences
  • til at frembringe nye produkter eller processer
  • indenfor lægemidler, fødevarer, materialer,
    planter, o.l.,
  • hvor denne aktivitet ikke finansieres af en
    løbende forretning.

7
The attraction of pharmaceuticalsNo other
industry deals with products with greater impact
on human health and wealth
  • Unique importance
  • Saving, prolonging and improving the lives of
    more people who get older
  • Unique economics
  • Potential for gt1 billion/year products
  • 90 gross margins
  • 10-15 years of market exclusivity

8
The complexity and danger of investing in drug
development
  • Average development cost of bringing a new drug
    to the market is now 860 mill.
  • It takes 12 years from idea to market
  • Most drug development projects fail

9
Market driversChanging demographic profile
Source Danmarks Statistik
10
Biotech driversPharma pipelines do not support
their current growth scenarioBig pharma must
launch 3 times more products than they do
Assumed target growth rate of 8 - 10
Sales
Assumed natural decay of 50 over 10 years
In the next ten years, the pharma industry will
see patent expiries of drugs currently generating
some 80 bill. of about 300 bill. sales
(Jan Leschly, Former CEO of SmithKline Beecham,
2001)
Source Mr J. Leschly, former CEO of SmithKline
Beecham
11
Patent expiry exposure
12
Biotech drivers pressure on FIPCO Defragmentat
ion and specialization of the value
chain Pharmaceutical out-sourcing to highly
specialized biotechs Big pharma specializing in
global marketing and distribution
FIPCO Fully integrated pharmaceutical company
Source BCG Report, 1999, Parexels
Pharmaceutical RD Statistical Sourcebook 2000
13
Fragmentering af værdikæden chancen for biotech
  • Lægemiddelfirmaer er typisk fuldt integrerede med
    snævre fokus på bestemte sygdomsområder
  • Biotech kan fokusere/specialicere indenfor
  • Bestemt teknologi på tværs af værdikæde/sygdomsomr
    åde/marked
  • Et enkelt opportunistisk udviklingsprojekt

14
Biotech drug and vaccine approvals
PEG-Intron
Herceptin
35
Rituximab
30
Avonex / Interferon beta
25
Betaseron / Interferon beta
20
G CSF/ filgrastim
EPO
15
TPA, Activase
10
5
0
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
Source Biotechnology Industry Organisation
(BIO), 2001 and Handelsbanken
15
The Global Biotech Pipeline
16
Men der er andre væsentlige anvendelser af biotech
  • Planter
  • Fødevarer
  • Fødevareingredienser
  • Finkemikalier
  • Materialer
  • Energi
  • Miljø

17
Speed, aggression, surpriseMotto for pursuit of
opportunity in biotech vis-à-vis the established
industries
  • Speed Decions can be taken and executed
    instantly
  • Aggression 100 of a biotech company can be
    dedicated to a single new opportunity (e.g.
    recombinant DNA)
  • Surprise No one knows what the new company is
    doing for a while

18
Venture kapital i biotech
19
Nordic countriesBiotech centres
  • Medicon Valley facts
  • Population of app. 3 million people
  • 30,000 people work in the medical industry in
    Medicon Valley
  • 26 hospitals, 11 universities and 5 science parks
  • More than 135,000 students and 4,000 researchers
    in total

Helsinki and Turku (10)
Stockholm, Uppsala and Linköping (30)
Medicon Valley (60)
Percentages represent approximate proportion of
total biotech industry in the Nordic countries
20
Medicon ValleyLeading position in European
biotechnology
  • Main Scandinavian biotech/pharma growth centre
    (about 60 of total)
  • Strong pharmaceutical industry presence
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Lundbeck
  • AstraZeneca
  • 100 biotech/biomedical companies
  • Genmab (just started phase III)
  • Neurosearch (several phase II projects)
  • Q-med
  • Medivir

21
Comparison USA, Europe and Nordic
countries Number of medical publications per 1000
inhabitants
Source PubMed and Handelsbanken
22
Building the company
Log (Company value)
Compounds
VC round
Expansion
Infra-structure Recruitment Project start
Seed financing
Management
Business plan Best projects
Idea Patents Founders
Log (Time)
23
Investment and company criteria
  • Global potential
  • High Pipeline efficiency (cost / output)
  • Sustainable business model extremophile
    companies
  • A balanced mix between innovation and lower-risk
    approach

24
Examples of ideal candidates
  • 2nd generation drugs small incremental
    improvements with new patent life
  • New uses of known compounds
  • Orphan drugs
  • Replacement therapy
  • Drug delivery
  • Very few important technology concepts, that
    change cost/time/probability
  • Regional commercialization rights
  • Under-loved failed technologies now ready to
    succeed
  • And in 2-3 yearsGENOMICS !!

25
Case Story Genmab A/S
DKK
6000
5000
4000
Genmab A/S is a biotechnology company that
creates and develops human antibodies for the
treatment of life-threatening and debilitating
diseases.
3000
2000
1000
0
1998
1999
2000
Valuation
Cash infusion
26
ProFound Pharma
DKK
600
500
400
300
ProFound/Maxygen is focused on the development of
improved second- generation protein
pharmaceutical products
200
100
0
1999Q2
1999Q2
2000Q2
27
Patenter i biotech
28
Hvorfor er patenter særligt vigtige for biotech ?
  • En person kan udtænke/opfinde den essentielle
    komponent af et produkt, som kan sælges for
    milliarder
  • Denne essentielle komponent kan nemt
    identificeres og kopieres af andre
  • Det er nødvendigt at kunne fastholde
    markedseksklusivitet (værdien!) for at sikre
    finansiering af udviklingsforløbet
  • Tidshorisonten for udvikling og liv på markedet
    passer godt med patenters løbetid (ca. 20 år fra
    indlevering)

29
Hvad kan patenteres ? nyt stofEvnen til
kvalitativt og kvantitativt at beskrive stof og
processer i biotech har muliggjort patentering
frem for hemmeligholdelse
  • DNA-molekyler (bestemte sekvenser og homologer)
  • Proteiner (sekvenser, funktionalitet, etc.)
  • Små molekyler (struktur)
  • Celler
  • Populationer af celler
  • Kombinationer af stoffer
  • Bestemte kombinationer af stoffer
  • Bestemte fysiske former af stoffer
  • Formuleringer
  • Opløsninger
  • Krystaller

30
Hvad kan patenteres ? Nye anvendelser
  • Producere noget under anvendelse af noget andet
  • Opdage noget under anvendelse af en bestemt
    proces
  • Lave et lægemiddel til behandling af sygdom X ved
    at tage et stof, som virker på receptor Y og slå
    det til piller
  • Anvende stof X (eller proces Y) til formål Z

31
Novo Nordisk the enzyme business
32
Novo Nordisk in the early 1980s
  • Used to protecting microbial inventions by
    secrecy
  • Value-creation was in isolation and mutation of
    rare microorganisms
  • Spying was on-going between enzyme
    manufacturers trying to isolate producer
    organisms from enzyme product, or even sending in
    agents to take samples
  • Patenting was inefficient due narrow strain
    protection

33
The world in the early 1980s
  • Recombinant DNA technology being applied by
  • academics for therapeutics
  • other enzyme manufacturers for developing
    production organisms
  • by NN in exploratory, low-priority projects run
    by academics

34
The opportunity lost
  • NN had the muscle to have taken all important key
    technologies and key patents for recombinant
    manufacture of industrial enzymes as well as most
    protein engineering
  • NN was reluctant to invest the sufficient
    resources, lacked the technological vision and an
    aggressive patent counsel willing to test the
    frontiers of an un-marked territory

35
The consequences by the early 1990s
  • By serious investment, the worlds largest RD
    organization in recombinant enzymes had been
    built
  • Massive freedom-to-operate issues
  • Bacterial and fungal expression hosts
  • Transformation systems
  • Promoter systems
  • Having mapped the extent of threats, top
    management decides in 1993 to make it a strategic
    priority to solve FTO (CH responsible)

36
The solution
  • 6 years later of work, tension and diversion from
    main focus
  • About 10 major cross-licensing deals among the
    competitive players
  • Sale of various business units
  • Consolidation of the entire enzyme industry
  • Initiation and settlement of multiple litigations
    in US, EU and JP
  • Spending a nine-digit number in DKK
  • Diverting enormous efforts towards circumventory
    technology development
  • Could have been avoided with vision, speed,
    aggression and surprise

37
Speed, aggression, surpriseMotto for IP strategy
in early stage biotech
  • Speed in hypothetically conceiving, and
    contiuously filing applications reduce to
    physical practice later
  • Aggression broadness of claims across multiple
    dimensions with step-wise retreat positions,
    testing new claim types
  • Surprise secrecy, patent applications are only
    published 18 months after filing

38
ProFound PharmaExecuting speed, aggression,
surprise
39
The world in 1999
  • Protein-based pharmaceuticals are 10 of global
    drug sales,
  • There are several protein-based drugs in the
    market and in development,
  • Most of the important products in the area were
    developed and patented in the early 1980s and
    faced patent expiry in 2005-2010,
  • The problems and desired improvements of 1st
    generation protein drugs were known as well as
    technologies addressing those short-comings,
  • The owners of several major 1st generation
    products had not efficiently thought of and
    patented 2nd generation versions of their
    products,
  • There is (was) an opportunity for creating and
    patenting those 2nd generation products in a new
    entity - ProFound.

40
Conceiving like mad and patenting
  • Combining well-known protein modification
    technology like PEGylation and glycosylation to
    solve the specific short-comings of individual
    pharma-proteins
  • Everything made in silico and in gray matter ab
    initio, and subsequently in the lab
  • gt50 patent applications filed in 1st year
  • Speed, aggression, surprise in the back of
    everyones mind
  • Lots of patent resources lots of management
    attention

41
Hindsight
  • It worked
  • We did not know which of the 20 potential
    projects would be alive after 3 years
  • We did not know what competition (Amgen, Biogen,
    Serono, etc.) had filed within the preceding 18
    months
  • We can now see that some of the applications were
  • Too late
  • Directed at hopeless proteins
  • Addressing wrong or un-important medical needs
  • Providing wrong solutions
  • But the sheer volume allowed for enormous degrees
    of protection and potential future royalty
    revenue from the entire protein pharma industry
  • Company was sold for 20x the amount spent within
    1 year
  • 3 products originating in ProFound Pharma will
    enter clinical testing soon

42
Patentstrategi
43
Similar minds get similar input to formulate
similar ideas at similar points in time.
44
Patentstrategi
  • Hemmelighed så længe som muligt
  • Pas på publicering også uformelt/semiformelt
  • Patentér nu tænk og udvikl senere
  • Licensér nu betal senere
  • Royalties
  • Milestones
  • Optioner
  • Ubegrænset kreativitet mht parallelle/alternative
    løsninger og patentering af disse

45
Konklusion
  • Patenter er vigtige for at fastholde værdier i
    biotech
  • Den enkelte persons/lille firmas vigtigste aktiv
    er patenter, da alt kan analyseres og genskabes
  • Hastighed, hemmeligholdelse, ambition og
    kreativitet er nøglen til brede patenter

46
Tak for i dag !
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com