Power to detect QTL Association - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Power to detect QTL Association

Description:

In principle, power to detect association involves same mechanics as ... 1-b the probability of rejecting the ... 10 pharmaceutical companies & Wellcome ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: LonCa3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Power to detect QTL Association


1
Power to detect QTL Association
  • Lon Cardon, Goncalo Abecasis
  • University of Oxford
  • Pak Sham, Shaun Purcell
  • Institute of Psychiatry

F\lon\2001\Assocpower
2
Association Power
In principle, power to detect association
involves same mechanics as linkage
We are interested in a significance
thresholds 1-b the probability of rejecting the
null when it is false N the number of individuals
required to do it
3
Association Power
What are the important variables/parameters?
  • Linkage
  • Study design
  • QTL effect size
  • recombination fraction
  • Association
  • Study design
  • QTL effect size
  • Linkage disequilibrium
  • allele frequencies of marker and QTL

4
Association Power
In general, power is greater for association
than for linkage ie., fewer individuals
required, can detect smaller effects (h2 5
vs. 20) But, more markers may be tested,
false positives are (or may be) more relevant
5
Effects of Linkage Disequilibrium
  • Key question for positional cloning and
    candidate gene analysis
  • LD expected to decay ? (1-q)G
  • How far does it extend?
  • Debates 3 kb 100 kb (Kruglyak rest of
    world).
  • Population-specific (depends on ancestral
    demographics)
  • Genomic region-specific (ie., depends on
    sequence features)
  • Marker-specific (ie., depends on markers
    considered)

Variation dominates data
6
Extent of Disequilibrium
7
Pair-wise Disequilibrium
8
Sensitivity to Disequilibrium
Power for ?0.001, h² .1, s² .3, ?
0. Average additive genetic value estimated at
the marker.
9
Influence of Family Size
For robust tests (TDT, QTDT) class, Best
design includes parental genotypes, but they are
not mandatory As sibship size increases, missing
parental data becomes less important
10
Effect of Family Structure
350 sib-pair parents 1400 genotypes 500
sib-pairs no parents 1000 genotypes 260
sib-trios no parents 780 genotypes
11
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms
  • Common disease-common variant hypothesis Common
    diseases have been around for a long time.
    Alleles require a long time to become common
    (frequent) in the population. Common diseases are
    influenced by frequent alleles.
  • The SNP Consortium (TSC)
  • Collection of 10 pharmaceutical companies
    Wellcome Trust
  • Identified gt 1 million SNPs across the genome
  • public databases now have 1.5 million
    non-redundant SNPs (relatively few verified)
  • SNPs detected on basis of common disease common
    variant hypothesis (caucasian, african american,
    asian)
  • Should be preponderance of common alleles

12
Extent of Disequilibrium
13
Effects of Allele Frequency
Key question is not just frequency of QTL, but
frequency of marker in LD with it More important
that marker-QTL allele frequencies are the same
than that QTL is common i.e., CD-CV hypothesis
not as relevant as SNP map
14
Trios For Genome-Wide Scan
ls 1.5, a 5 x 10-8, Spielman TDT
(Müller-Myhsok and Abel, 1997)
15
Effect of Allele Frequencies
16
Phenotypic Selection
  • Efficiency gains for genotyping
  • Well characterized for linkage mapping ...
  • ... Association mapping gaining prominence
  • Selection tresholds
  • A priori versus Post hoc
  • Common variant hypothesis
  • Effect of allele frequency

17
Selection Strategies
  • Selection based on one tail
  • Affected Proband, Affected Pairs
  • Selection from either tail
  • Extreme Proband
  • Concordant Pairs
  • Discordant Pairs
  • Discordant and Concordant

18
Selection Tresholds
  • Hard definition
  • A priori
  • Treshold defined before sample collection
  • Eg, pairs with both sibs in top decile
  • Adaptable selection
  • Post hoc
  • Tresholds defined after sample collection
  • Eg, subselection from large twin registries

19
Intensity of a priori selection
20
Selection of Triads
21
(No Transcript)
22
Post hoc Selection
23
Effect of Allele Frequencies
24
Effect of Selection
25
Summary
  • Power for association generally greater than
    linkage
  • Power greatly influenced by D, selection
    strategy,
  • allele frequency
  • Optimal linkage strategies not necessarily best
    for
  • association
  • Allele frequency of (unobserved) QTL is
    important,
  • but more important that marker-QTL match
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com