Title: Power to detect QTL Association
1Power to detect QTL Association
- Lon Cardon, Goncalo Abecasis
- University of Oxford
- Pak Sham, Shaun Purcell
- Institute of Psychiatry
F\lon\2001\Assocpower
2Association Power
In principle, power to detect association
involves same mechanics as linkage
We are interested in a significance
thresholds 1-b the probability of rejecting the
null when it is false N the number of individuals
required to do it
3Association Power
What are the important variables/parameters?
- Linkage
- Study design
- QTL effect size
- recombination fraction
- Association
- Study design
- QTL effect size
- Linkage disequilibrium
- allele frequencies of marker and QTL
4Association Power
In general, power is greater for association
than for linkage ie., fewer individuals
required, can detect smaller effects (h2 5
vs. 20) But, more markers may be tested,
false positives are (or may be) more relevant
5Effects of Linkage Disequilibrium
- Key question for positional cloning and
candidate gene analysis - LD expected to decay ? (1-q)G
- How far does it extend?
- Debates 3 kb 100 kb (Kruglyak rest of
world). - Population-specific (depends on ancestral
demographics) - Genomic region-specific (ie., depends on
sequence features) - Marker-specific (ie., depends on markers
considered)
Variation dominates data
6Extent of Disequilibrium
7Pair-wise Disequilibrium
8Sensitivity to Disequilibrium
Power for ?0.001, h² .1, s² .3, ?
0. Average additive genetic value estimated at
the marker.
9Influence of Family Size
For robust tests (TDT, QTDT) class, Best
design includes parental genotypes, but they are
not mandatory As sibship size increases, missing
parental data becomes less important
10Effect of Family Structure
350 sib-pair parents 1400 genotypes 500
sib-pairs no parents 1000 genotypes 260
sib-trios no parents 780 genotypes
11Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms
- Common disease-common variant hypothesis Common
diseases have been around for a long time.
Alleles require a long time to become common
(frequent) in the population. Common diseases are
influenced by frequent alleles. - The SNP Consortium (TSC)
- Collection of 10 pharmaceutical companies
Wellcome Trust - Identified gt 1 million SNPs across the genome
- public databases now have 1.5 million
non-redundant SNPs (relatively few verified) - SNPs detected on basis of common disease common
variant hypothesis (caucasian, african american,
asian) - Should be preponderance of common alleles
12Extent of Disequilibrium
13Effects of Allele Frequency
Key question is not just frequency of QTL, but
frequency of marker in LD with it More important
that marker-QTL allele frequencies are the same
than that QTL is common i.e., CD-CV hypothesis
not as relevant as SNP map
14Trios For Genome-Wide Scan
ls 1.5, a 5 x 10-8, Spielman TDT
(Müller-Myhsok and Abel, 1997)
15Effect of Allele Frequencies
16Phenotypic Selection
- Efficiency gains for genotyping
- Well characterized for linkage mapping ...
- ... Association mapping gaining prominence
- Selection tresholds
- A priori versus Post hoc
- Common variant hypothesis
- Effect of allele frequency
17Selection Strategies
- Selection based on one tail
- Affected Proband, Affected Pairs
- Selection from either tail
- Extreme Proband
- Concordant Pairs
- Discordant Pairs
- Discordant and Concordant
18Selection Tresholds
- Hard definition
- A priori
- Treshold defined before sample collection
- Eg, pairs with both sibs in top decile
- Adaptable selection
- Post hoc
- Tresholds defined after sample collection
- Eg, subselection from large twin registries
19Intensity of a priori selection
20Selection of Triads
21(No Transcript)
22Post hoc Selection
23Effect of Allele Frequencies
24Effect of Selection
25Summary
- Power for association generally greater than
linkage - Power greatly influenced by D, selection
strategy, - allele frequency
- Optimal linkage strategies not necessarily best
for - association
- Allele frequency of (unobserved) QTL is
important, - but more important that marker-QTL match