Minnesota - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Minnesota

Description:

'More so than any other state, the quality and quantity of water in Minnesota is ... MN Trout Unlimited. MN Turkey Growers Association. MN Waterfowl Association ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: mndep8
Category:
Tags: minnesota | trout

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Minnesota


1
Minnesotas Clean Water Cabinet
Recommendations forConservation in the 2007
Farm Bill
2
Where it all started Governors Clean Water
Initiative(launched June 2003)
  • More so than any other state, the quality and
    quantity of water in Minnesota is central to our
    way of life.  It helps define who we are and what
    we value. Governor Pawlenty

3
Minnesotas Clean Water VisionAs Minnesotans, we
expect our waters to be clean and plentiful, both
today and long into the future. This requires all
Minnesotans to
  • Guard their waters from present and future
    threats
  • Restore waters that are impaired
  • Maintain an accurate picture of waters for
    citizens, managers and policy-makers
  • Ensure adequate reserves of safe water to keep
    Minnesota prosperous and sustain healthy
    communities

4
Clean Water Vision Principles
  • Keep working lands working to achieve commonsense
    balance between economic advancement and
    environmental protection
  • Focus on priorities to achieve better results
  • One size does not fit all, so acknowledge
    regional differences
  • No one agency or organization can do it alone we
    must all be part of the solution and build
    partnerships

5
Minnesotas Clean Water Cabinet
http//cwc.state.mn.us
  • Clean Water Priorities
  • Impaired waters restoration
  • Safe drinking water
  • Fish Wildlife Habitat
  • Clean Water Cabinet member agencies
  • MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)
  • MN Department of Natural Resources (DNR)
  • MN Department of Agriculture (MDA)
  • MN Department of Health (MDH)
  • MN Board of Water Soil Resources (BWSR)
  • MN Environmental Quality Board
  • Metropolitan Council

6
Why the Clean Water Cabinetis Developing Farm
Bill ConservationPolicy Recommendations
  • Good fit between MN Clean Water priorities Farm
    Bill conservation objectives
  • 2002 Conservation Title has provided more for
    clean water activities than any other source
  • Largest Cons Title ever more programs,
    objectives, dollars than ever before (gt10
    billion authorized)
  • Minnesota 870 m ( 140 m/yr) by Dec 2007

7
Farm Bill Conservation Programs Fit Well with
Clean Water Cabinet Priorities
2002 Farm Bill Conservation Programs Clean Water Priorities Clean Water Priorities Clean Water Priorities
2002 Farm Bill Conservation Programs Impaired Waters Drinking Water Habitat
Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) ? ? ?
Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP) ? ? ?
Conservation Security Program (CSP) ? ? ?
Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) ? ?
Wetland Reserves Program (WRP) ? ?
Grassland Reserve Program (GRP) ? ?
Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program (WHIP) ? ?
Farm Ranch Land Protection Program (FRPP) ? ?
8
Cabinets 2007 Farm Bill Conservation Policy
Recommendations Will
  • Be sent to MN Congressional delegation USDA
  • Focus on the Conservation Title relative to
    Minnesotas clean water priorities
  • Be developed by a state agency work group (MDA,
    BWSR, DNR, MPCA) with stakeholder input
  • Not replace or supersede stakeholder positions
  • Not necessarily represent all Minnesota
    stakeholder viewpoints

9
Process Timeline for Developing the Cabinets
Recommendations
  • The goal is to complete recommendations by June
    or July 2006, but timeline isnt set in stone

10
Guiding Principles for Developing the Cabinets
Recommendations (adopted Dec 2005)
  • To meet national state environmental goals, the
    2007 Farm Bill should
  • Strengthen the economic viability of farming
  • Facilitate state local efforts to address
    environmental priorities
  • Implement long-term conservation plans

11
Strategy Areas Leading toSpecific
Recommendations
  • Technical Assistance
  • Conservation Planning
  • Financial Incentives
  • Results-Oriented Accountability
  • Strategic Targeting
  • Flexibility

12
Stakeholder Input
  • Letter inviting stakeholder input (sent Jan 2006)
  • Online forum (to be launched Feb 2006)
  • Meetings with stakeholder groups (as time allows)

13
Farm Bill Conservation Policy Stakeholders 
Ducks Unlimited Izaak Walton League MN Land
Stewardship Project Midwest Forage Association MN
Agri-Growth Council MN Association of Wheat
Growers MN Barley Growers Association MN
Conservation Federation / imember
organizations MN Corn Growers Association MN Deer
Hunters Association MN Environmental Partnership
/ member organizations MN Farm Bureau
Federation MN Farmers Union MN Impaired Waters
Stakeholder Policy Group (G-16) MN Milk Producers
Association MN Pork Producers Association MN Soil
Water Conservation Districts / individual
districts
  • MN Soybean Growers Association
  • MN State Cattlemens Association
  • MN State Technical Committee
  • MN Trout Unlimited
  • MN Turkey Growers Association
  • MN Waterfowl Association
  • MN Watershed Districts / individual districts
  • Pheasants Forever
  • Red River Valley Sugarbeet Growers Association
  • Southern MN Beet Sugar Cooperative
  • Sustainable Farming Association of MN
  • The Minnesota Project
  • The Nature Conservancy of MN
  • University of MN Extension Service / Water
    Resources Center
  • OTHER
  •  
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com