Quality and impact of Social Science and Operations Research by the Special Programme in Human Reproduction Department of Reproductive Health and Research World Health Organization - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Quality and impact of Social Science and Operations Research by the Special Programme in Human Reproduction Department of Reproductive Health and Research World Health Organization

Description:

by the Special Programme in Human Reproduction Department of ... An independent Scientific and Technical Advisory Group (STAG) Regional Advisory Panels ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:281
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Quality and impact of Social Science and Operations Research by the Special Programme in Human Reproduction Department of Reproductive Health and Research World Health Organization


1
Quality and impact of Social Science and
Operations Researchby the Special Programme in
Human Reproduction Department of Reproductive
Health and Research World Health Organization
2
Plan of presentation
  • Background to reproductive health research at WHO
  • Social science and operations research
  • Review procedures for quality of research
  • Evaluating the impact of research

3
Original (1971) goals of the Programme
  • Increase understanding of the human reproductive
    process
  • Develop a variety of safe, acceptable and
    effective methods for the regulation of human
    fertility

4
Original objectives
  • Improve the quality and expand the quantity of
    multi-disciplinary research
  • Conduct collaborative clinical studies of
    fertility regulating agents on a global basis
  • Organise multi-centred research teams
  • Improve communication and collaboration among
    scientists
  • Increase the number of scientists in the field of
    human reproduction

5
Current mandate
66. The World Health Organization in
co-operation with other relevant United Nations
bodies is urged to fulfil its leadership role
within the United Nations system in assisting
countries, in particular developing countries, to
put in place standards for the care and treatment
for women and girlsand to advise on functions
that health facilities should perform to help
guide the development of health systems to reduce
the risks associated with pregnancy (ICPD5 Key
actions)
6
Objectives
  • To promote, facilitate and conduct research to
    improve reproductive health
  • To support countries with knowledge and tools to
    formulate policies and strategies to implement
    appropriate interventions to improve reproductive
    health
  • To strengthen the capacity for reproductive
    health research in developing countries

7
Priority Areas of Work
Adolescent reproductive health
Unsafe abortion
Maternal health
Fertility regulation
8
The Programmes Research
Type of research Bio-medical epidemiological
and social science and operations
research Coverage Global and regional Topics
Related to priorities in reproductive
health Conducting research Through
collaborating centres or individual national
researchers
9
Major Social Science research initiatives since
1990
  • Determinants Consequences of Induced Abortion
    27 Projects
  • Sexual Behaviour Reproductive Health 38
    projects
  • Reproductive Health in South Asia 14 projects

10
Major Social Science research initiatives since
1990
  • Role of Men in Reproductive Health 17 projects
  • Pregnancy Prevention in the era of HIV/STIs 7
    projects
  • Adolescent sexual and reproductive health 31
    projects
  • Quality of care in reproductive health on-going

11
Number of projects, by topic, 1990-2000
12
Guiding principles for support
  • Research is to be of high relevance to country
    needs with potential for impact
  • Research in partnership with local institution(s)
    and the Government

13
Guiding principles for support
  • By local researcher(s)
  • Scientifically sound and ethically acceptable
  • Focussed, in-depth and small scale

14
Procedures to ensure quality of research proposals
  • Scientific review by an independent Panel of
    scientists
  • Projects approved by the Panel are reviewed by an
    independent Scientific and Ethical Review Group
    (SERG)

15
Monitoring the quality of the research programme
and assessing progress
  • An independent Scientific and Technical Advisory
    Group (STAG)
  • Regional Advisory Panels
  • Gender Advisory Panel
  • Policy and Co-ordination Committee (PCC)
  • Occasional evaluation

16
Impact evaluation 1989
  • Review team 6 internationally renowned
    scientists with no affiliation to the Programme
  • Criteria for evaluation Relevance to developing
    countries impact of research capacity-building
  • Procedures
  • Review of published material
  • Interviews with stake holders
  • Site-visits to selected countries

17
Impact evaluation 2001
  • Criteria Relevance to developing countries
    impact of research and capacity-building
  • Process Open for bids

18
Searching for the impact!
19
The focus on impact
  • Who is asking?
  • Donors to the Programme
  • World Health Assembly
  • Other stake holders
  • Programme Committees/Panels
  • Staff (from investigators)

20
Review Form for proposals
  • Overall assessment and feasibility Please
    comment on the overall quality of this project.
  • Policy relevance Does the project - including
    its objectives and expected outcomes - have
    potential policy relevance?
  • Other objectives, study design, sampling,
    conceptual framework, field procedures, and
    analysis plans

21
  • Ethical considerations Please comment briefly
    on the ethical aspects of this proposal,
    including any problem you foresee with the
    informed consent procedures and forms.

22
Mechanisms to promote impact of Social Science
Operations Research
  • Support and encouragement to investigators
  • Policy briefs Press release
  • Developing guidelines, incorporating findings
  • Publication and dissemination

23
Expectations Process Indicators
  • Policy formation and change (reference to project
    or project findings)
  • Changes in service provision
  • IEC material for local communities
  • Publication and dissemination of information

24
When research is likely to produce impact?
  • Addressing a local issue of high priority with
    involvement of Government agency/officials (e.g.,
    provision of IUDs by midwives in Turkey)
  • Dealing with sensitive issues (e.g., abortion in
    Mauritius and sexual behaviour in Argentina)
  • When local investigator(s) is committed (e.g., in
    Argentina, Colombia, Kenya, Nepal)

25
When research is likely to produce impact?
  • Part of a research initiative or of a
    collaborative research (e.g., abortion research
    initiative and many epidemiological studies on
    IUDs DMPA oral contraceptives)

26
Quality of research and the impact of research
  • Difficult to attribute the impact to research,
    let alone to the quality of research
  • Quality research is essential, but may have no
    bearing on policies/programmes

27
Just tell me what is the most important factor in
making an impact!
28
The INVESTIGATOR is by far the most important in
the set of facilitating factors.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com