Foundations of Visual Perception - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Foundations of Visual Perception

Description:

Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney. The Visual System. ... Seen in tree shrew OP data: Bosking, Zhang, Schofield & Fitzpatrick (1997) The Binding Problem ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: dickhu2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Foundations of Visual Perception


1
Foundations of Visual Perception
  • Peter Robinson
  • School of Physics, University of Sydney
  • Brain Dynamics Center, Westmead Hospital
  • University of Sydney
  • Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney

2
Overview
  • The Visual System.
  • The Binding Problem and Gamma Oscillations.
  • Brain Modeling.

3
Primary Visual Pathways
Kandel, Schwartz, Jessell (1995)
4
Eye Retina LGN V1
Kandel, Schwartz, Jessell (1995)
  • retinal connections highlight edges, etc.
  • 100 million cells, only 1 million fibers
  • in optic nerve.
  • LGN has 6 layers
  • 3 ipsilateral (I), 3 contralateral (C).
  • 2 magnocellular (movement, depth).
  • 4 parvocellular (color, form).

5
Retinotopic mapping
  • 1-1 primary mapping from retina to V1.
  • Central field (fovea) is disproportionately
    represented.
  • Demonstrated by primate experiments.
  • Ocular dominance (OD) columns are seen

de Valois de Valois (1990)
6
Ocular Dominance and Orientation Preference
  • Orientation preference (OP) varies with
  • position in each OD band.
  • Singularities, or pinwheels, occur mostly
  • near OD band centers.
  • V1 is tessellated into hypercolumns.
  • Each hypercolumn corresponds to a
  • discrete visual field (VF).

Kandel, Schwartz, Jessell (1995)
7
Patchy connections in V1
  • Mid-range (few mm) cells in V1 have patchy
    connections.
  • Preferentially connect similar feature
    preferences.
  • Seen in tree shrew OP data

Bosking, Zhang, Schofield Fitzpatrick (1997)
8
The Binding Problem
  • Scenes are broken down and analyzed via many
    pathways, each with
  • different feature preference.
  • How are these disparate features bound into a
    single percept?
  • How are different objects distinguished?

Shadlen et. al. (1999)
Dworetzky (1994)
9
Gamma Oscillations
  • Firing of cells in visual cortex can be highly
    correlated.
  • Correlation functions (CFs) measure commonality
    of
  • firing.
  • CFs are highest for nearby cells with similar
    feature
  • preference and fall off with separation and
    disparity.
  • Do gamma oscillations mediate binding,
  • or are they epiphenomena?

Engel, Konig, Kreiter, Schillen, Singer (1992)
10
Modeling
  • We use a continuum model at scales of 0.1 mm to
    whole brain
  • Cortex is approximated as 2D.
  • 1-1corticothalamic mapping.
  • Include neural and anatomical properties on
    scales from synapses to whole brain.
  • Average over scales below about 0.1 mm.
  • Seek equations for resulting neural activity.
  • Such models date from 1970s on Nunez, Wilson,
    Cowan, Lopes da Silva, Freeman,
  • Wright, Liley, Jirsa, Haken, Sydney group, and
    others.

11
Neurons
  • Neural firing underlies all emergent phenomena.
  • Excitatory (e) neurons excite others.
  • Inhibitory (i) neurons suppress others.
  • Inputs via synapses on dendrites.
  • Voltage spikes fired when a threshold is
    reached.
  • Spikes travel to other neurons via axon
    terminals.
  • Cortex contains
  • Long-range (several cm) excitatory neurons.
  • Mid-range (several mm) excitatory neurons.
  • Short-range (lt 1 mm) excitatory neurons.
  • Short-range (lt 1 mm) inhibitory neurons.

Kandel, Schwartz, Jessell (2000)
12
Overview of Model Outcomes
  • Steady states, linear properties, nonlinear
    dynamics

13
Gamma Correlations
  • 1 long bar crossing different VFs produces a
  • stronger correlation than 2 separate short bars.
  • No correlation for oppositely moving short bars.
  • Consistent with summation over subfeatures.
  • Consistent with infill of missing contours.

Dworetzky (1994)
Engel, Konig, Kreiter, Schillen, Singer (1992)
14
Scene Segmentation
S1S2
  • How do spikes know theyre related.
  • Conflicting stimuli presented to 4 sites
  • 1 and 2 have vertical OP.
  • 3 and 4 have horizontal OP.
  • Correlations segment the scene into objects
  • Theory explains this effect

S1
S2
S3
Engel, Konig, Singer (2002)
15
Summary
  • Each stage in visual processing extracts
    higher-order information, but in multiple
  • channels.
  • Binding must occur to interrelate these
    features.
  • V1 exhibits gamma correlations between cells
    stimulated by related features.
  • Physiologically-based brain modeling has been
    verified against multiple experiments.
  • Modeling patchy connections explains numerous
    gamma phenomena, including
  • frequencies, wavelengths.
  • correlation properties.
  • scene segmentation.
  • gamma waves obey the Schroedinger equation.
  • Longer talk ANU Res. School Phys. Sci. Eng.,
    Thu. 20 July.

16
Further Visual Pathways
  • Deal with motion, color, depth, form, etc. in
    more detail.
  • Link with memory, learning, motor outputs, etc.

Koch (2004)
Koch (2004)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com