What role does marine biology play on glacial interglacial CO2 cycles - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

What role does marine biology play on glacial interglacial CO2 cycles

Description:

Iron fertilisation of marine plankton. Increases in ocean nutrient content ... Change in dominant plankton type cannot explain the CO2 drawdown ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: earth5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: What role does marine biology play on glacial interglacial CO2 cycles


1
What role does marine biology play on glacial
interglacial CO2 cycles
  • Lap Ting Cheung
  • 4 February 2008

Kohfeld et al., Role of Marine Biology in
Glacial-Interglacial CO2 cycles, Science, 308,
74-78
2
Background
  • Causes to 80 100 ppm atmos CO2 fluctuation
    remained uncertain
  • Physical mechanisms alone was not enough to lower
    atmos CO2 during glaciation
  • Changes in marine biological pump could be a
    possible mechanism

3
Various hypotheses proposed on the impact of
marine biology on atmos CO2
  • Iron fertilisation of marine plankton
  • Increases in ocean nutrient content
  • Increases in ocean nutrient utilisation
  • Changes to dominant plankton type
  • Rain ratio
  • Silica leakage
  • ? They affect different parts of the ocean and
    leave information on the marine sediment record

4
1. Iron fertilisation hypothesis
  • Increase in aeolian Fe dust blown onto ocean
    during glaciation(higher dust deposition)?
    reduces Fe limitation in HNLC zone increases C
    fixation
  • Increase in biogenic fluxes to marine sediments
  • Affects N. Pacific / Southern Oceans /
    equatorial Pacific

5
2. Increased-nutrient hypothesis
  • Higher amt of C fixed per unit of NO3 and PO4
  • Whole ocean nutrient increases
  • ? carbon fixation and removal of surface water
    will increase
  • Increases C and biogenic fluxes to marine
    sediments (export production)
  • Affects Nutrient limited regions

6
Tests on the 2 hypotheses via sediment record
Kohfeld et al. 2005
  • Use of various export-production indicators (to
    avoid environmental influences on productivity
    and fluxes)
  • e.g. biogenic components (Organic C / opal /
    alkenone ) Radionuclides (231Pa and 10Be) Ba /
    U / Cd

7
4 different time periods for comparison
  • Late Holocene (last 5000 years) modern
  • Low dust flux
  • LGM (18kyrs 22kyrs BP)
  • High dust flux
  • MIS 5a-5d (80kyrs 110kyrs BP)
  • Beginning of glacial times
  • Atmos CO2 50 ppm lower than late Holocene
  • Dust composition comparable to modern times (i.e.
    low) ? allow study of export production on atmos
    CO2 w/o Fe fertilisation enhancement
  • MIS 5e (130kyrs BP)
  • Analog to modern times, with similar forcings and
    insolation patterns operating like today

8
A. Comparison between Stage 5a 5d with late
Holocene
Kohfeld et al. 2005
  • Overall global export production was lower than
    late Holocene
  • Increased production at E Atlantic and present
    day APF

9
B. Comparison between LGM with Stage 5a 5d
Kohfeld et al. 2005
  • Overall global export production was higher than
    Stages 5a 5d
  • Exception at southern ocean (near APF)

10
C. Comparison between LGM with late Holocene
Kohfeld et al. 2005
  • Overall global export production was higher than
    late Holocene
  • Exception at area S of modern APF, in which
    global export production was lower in both LGM
    and Stages 5a-5d than late Holocene

11
Test Implications
  • Export production changes
  • start from Stages 5a-5d (decreases)
  • then fully increased at LGM.
  • The 50 ppm drop in atmos CO2 during Stages 5a-5d
    cannot be explained by the 2. increased nutrients
    hypothesis
  • Part of the drop can be explained by 1. Fe
    fertilisation hypothesis
  • Timing of high export production (LGM) coincide
    with high dust influx
  • sediment record supports the Fe fertilisation
    hypothesis during glaciation

12
3. Increase in ocean nutrient utilisation
hypothesis
  • Particularly affects Southern Oceans due to the
    strong connections between the surface (with
    unused nutrients) and the bottom CO2 rich waters
  • To drive nutrient utilisation
  • Reduction in vertical mixing S of APF ? reduce
    supply of CO2 and nutrients to the surface water
  • Removes CO2 contact with surface ? drive down
    atmos CO2
  • Record from LGM

13
3. Increase in ocean nutrient utilisation
hypothesis
Author argues the reliability of d15N data hence
does not support this hypothesis will drive CO2
down S of APF
14
Kohfeld et al. 2005
15
4. Changes to dominant plankton typeA. Rain
ratio hypothesis
  • Changes in rain ratio (CaCO3 / Corg) via shifting
    to non-carbonate producing species ? result in
    reduced CaCO3 export from surface to deep oceans
  • This increases water alkalinity CO2 will be
    more soluble on surface waters ? reduce CO2 atmos
  • At deep waters, overall carbonate ion content
    should increase ? resulting in more carbonate
    preservation

16
4. Changes to dominant plankton typeA. Rain
ratio hypothesis
  • Evidences for rain-ratio hypothesis is not
    observed
  • Only small changes in carbonate ion level1. no
    deepened lysocline, 2. minor forams size
    changes, 3. minor changes to forams assemblage
    dissolution indices

17
4. Changes to dominant plankton typeB.
Silica-leakage hypothesis
  • Southern Ocean, Increase in d30Si and d15N
  • At high Fe situations, diatoms take on less
    silicic acid relative to nitrate
  • Unused silicic acid is transferred to Si-limited
    regions via SAMW ? increases diatoms production
    and reduces coccoliths production
  • Si boosts - Rain ratio drops
  • Lead to increase in export production in Southern
    Oceans
  • Affects Low latitude areas where SAMW mixes with
    thermocline

18
4. Changes to dominant plankton typeB.
Silica-leakage hypothesis
  • Export production S of APF was low during stages
    5a-d
  • Dust supply were low as well
  • Silica leakage hypothesis cannot explain the
    initial 50-ppm drop in atmos CO2
  • Change in dominant plankton type cannot explain
    the CO2 drawdown

19
Limitations
  • Poor data coverage
  • Nutrient utilisation can occur at places other
    than the S oceans
  • Vertical fluxes can be affected by other factors
    like sediment redistribution
  • Changes on carbonate-ion concentration in
    deepwater is poorly determined
  • Physical and Biological processes may interact

20
Conclusions
  • Low export production at Stages 5a -5d, but
    increases and peaks at LGM.
  • Observations does not support the marine
    biological pump as a dominant element on
    influencing atmosphere CO2 changes during
    glaciation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com