Kant, What Is Enlightenment? (1784) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 7
About This Presentation
Title:

Kant, What Is Enlightenment? (1784)

Description:

From Monarch to People. a monarch has no right to impose a ... the monarch's legislative authority rests on the will of the people. rejection of censorship ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:574
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: friedel
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Kant, What Is Enlightenment? (1784)


1
Kant, What Is Enlightenment? (1784)
  • A
  • running commentary
  • by
  • Friedel Weinert

2
Kant, Enlightenment
  • Kants Definition
  • Enlightenment emergence from self-inflicted
    immaturity.
  • Immaturity inability to use ones own reason,
    without external guidance.
  • Self-inflicted immaturity often due to laziness
    and cowardice of individuals. Motto for the lazy
    Sapere Aude!
  • Kant proposes a Categorical Imperative of
    Thinking Examine yourself whether any particular
    idea, reason and rule can be generalised. This
    should free us from prejudices and superstitions.
  • This is only the first aspect Self-emancipation

3
Kant, Enlightenment
  • There is a second aspect Political/social
    emancipation
  • Sometimes immaturity is due to shackles imposed
    by society lack of political freedom
    dictatorship, social and intellectual
    inhibitions religious tyranny/ideologies
  • Freedom to use ones reason, not political
    revolution, allows an entire public to enlighten
    itself.
  • Private use of reason is restricted
  • in professional functions
  • disobedience would destroy order
  • does not hinder public enlightenment
  • Public use of reason must be free
  • in learning
  • in reading public
  • helps enlightenment

4
Kant, Enlightenment
  • There is a third aspect Cultural Emancipation
  • Enlightenment is not a one-off, unique effort
  • The emergence from immaturity is a historical
    process
  • a) on personal level sapere aude
  • b) on society level education and culture

progress
The obstruction of - political and cultural
-progress would be against human nature.
Test for laws and decrees which can be imposed on
a people would a people impose such a law/decree
upon itself?
5
Kant, Enlightenment
  • From Generation to Generation
  • It is impermissible to agree, even for a single
    lifetime, to a permanent religious constitution
    which no-one might publicly question.
  • Renouncing enlightenment - shaking off of
    ignorance, increase in empirical knowledge -
    either for ones own person or for later
    generations would be a violation of the sacred
    rights of mankind.

Perfectibility
6
Kant, Enlightenment
  • From Monarch to People
  • a monarch has no right to impose a halt in the
    enlightenment process on his people
  • the monarchs legislative authority rests on the
    will of the people
  • rejection of censorship
  • Does Kant live in an enlightened Age?
  • No, but in an age of Enlightenment
  • Towards religious freedom and tolerance

7
Kant, Enlightenment
  • Focal Points of the Enlightenment
  • Religious Matters
  • Legislation
  • The old tension between
  • public and private use of reason
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com