How does poaching affect the size of national parks - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 7
About This Presentation
Title:

How does poaching affect the size of national parks

Description:

Wildebeest and buffalo poached for meat by surrounding communities ... Water supply to Masai mara game park (Kenya) Tourist minibus drivers harass wildlife ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:110
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: andersen6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: How does poaching affect the size of national parks


1
How does poaching affect the size of national
parks?
  • Andy Dobson Laura Lynes
  • -Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol 23. No 4.

2
Introduction
  • About poaching in Serengeti NP, Tanzania (25 000
    km2).
  • Wildebeest and buffalo poached for meat by
    surrounding communities
  • Economic crisis in the mid 1980s, lead to
    economic motivated poaching for elephant tusks
    and rhino horns, rhinos locally extinct

3
How does poaching affect the size?
  • Geoff Kirkwoods effective size of a reserve
    is area probability of capture (of poachers)
    100 km2 0.01 1 km2
  • Investment in anti-poaching patrols increases the
    true size of a park
  • A variety of details that might modify the
    calculations local subsistence hunters-
    professionals, park area, law enforcement and
    punishment in different parts of the world
  • Trade-off between incentive and cost to poach

4
Incidental vs. Direct poaching
  • Example with overpasses resistance to
    construction of them, but.
  • when pointing on the safety benefits for
    speeding humans (collisions with deer), then
    accepted
  • Farms and illegal logging (indonesia)
  • Water supply to Masai mara game park (Kenya)
  • Tourist minibus drivers harass wildlife
  • ? tragedy of the commons

5
Incidental vs. Direct poaching
  • Hilborn poaching prevention is more dependent
    upon high rates of detection of offenders rather
    than upon the passing of increasingly harsher
    sentences on those who are caught
  • Anthropogenic activity (roads, railways,
    recreators) causes same demographic impact as
    poaching, but harder to calculate

6
Box 1
Cost-benefit models Blue lines represents the
elasticity between price and demand. Pale blue
elastic (a small change in price lead to a large
change in demand) Dark blue inelastic. Orange
private-property regimes Red Open-access
resource Between common-property regimes
Traditional population ecologists view of a
stock-recruitment relationship
Economists view of natural resource management
7
Discussion
  • Is this relevant for NP in Scandinavia?
  • Tourism/recreators in parks vs. wildlife (musk ox
    safaries, wild- and domestic reindeer)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com