Perinatal HIV Transmission in the Post HAART Era - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 75
About This Presentation
Title:

Perinatal HIV Transmission in the Post HAART Era

Description:

Perinatal HIV Transmission in the Post HAART Era – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 76
Provided by: informat235
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Perinatal HIV Transmission in the Post HAART Era


1
Perinatal HIV Transmission in the Post HAART Era
  • Norma Tejada RN, MSN, MPH, FNP-C
  • Theresa Aldape, LMSW
  • Celine Hanson, M.D.

2
Pediatric HIVTransmission
  • Longitudinal Pediatric
  • AIDS Data

3
(No Transcript)
4
United States Perinatal HIV infection
EpidemiologyPast to Present
  • Perinatal HIV transmission can occur during
    pregnancy, labor and delivery, or with
    breastfeeding.
  • In 1991 peak incidence of perinatal HIV
    transmission was 1,650 cases.
  • Incidence declined to an estimated range of
    144-236 in 2002 due to
  • HIV testing
  • Antiretroviral use
  • Avoidance of breastfeeding
  • Scheduled cesarean delivery

5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
Pediatric HIVTransmission
  • National AIDS and HIV Data
  • 2006

9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
Pediatric HIVTransmission
  • Regional Data
  • Texas Childrens Hospital
  • 1998 - 2008

15
Texas Childrens Hospital All HIV Infected
Children
N54
N26
16
Texas Childrens HospitalHIV Infected Children
Transmission Risk
17
Texas Childrens HospitalPerinatal HIV
TransmissionMaternal Risk Factors
18
Texas Childrens HospitalPerinatally HIV
Infected Children Race/Ethnicity
19
(No Transcript)
20
2003-2008 Perinatal HIV Infection Case Studies
  • History, Demographics,
  • HIV Testing, Treatment

21
Case Study 1Baby A History
  • Full term female infant born to 16 year old
    Hispanic mother. Born vaginally unknown length
    of rupture of membranes.
  • Mother initiated prenatal care 1 week prior to
    delivery.
  • Delivered at small hospital outside of a large
    metropolitan city.
  • Mother was Elisa/Western Blot positive at
    prenatal visit days prior to delivery. Lab
    results available to hospital at time of
    delivery.
  • Maternal testing repeated at delivery.
  • Infant/mother discharged from hospital 1 day post
    delivery before lab results were available.
  • Mother attempted breastfeeding but was
    unsuccessful.

22
Case Study 1Baby A Demographics
  • Mother and baby are Hispanic. Both are US
    citizens.
  • Mother is unemployed and high school drop out.
  • Mother speaks English and Spanish, primary
    language is English.
  • Mother is a teenager and has little social
    support. Her mother is in prison and her father
    is unknown to her. Has sister who is close in
    age to her and provides some support. Has
    estranged maternal grandmother that she has some
    contact with.
  • Babys father was incarcerated.
  • Mother/infant lived with infants paternal
    grandmother but then displaced when biologic
    father returned to his mothers home with new
    women.

23
Case Study 1Baby A HIV Testing
24
Case Study 1Baby A HIV Treatment
25
Case Study 2Baby B History
  • 37 week gestational age Hispanic female born
    vaginally with unknown length for rupture of
    membranes to a 30 year old woman.
  • Unintended pregnancy. Mother considered
    termination which delayed seeking prenatal care.
  • Pregnancy occurred 3 months after giving birth to
    previous HIV-exposed male child (maternal HIV
    diagnosis made during this pregnancy) who
    received full ARV prophylaxis.
  • Mother first sought prenatal care at 5th month of
    pregnancy but started ARV treatment in 7th
    month.
  • Mother had 5 prenatal visits throughout her
    pregnancy.
  • Baby tested at birth, positive HIV DNA PCR.
  • Mother denies breastfeeding.

26
Case Study 2 Baby B Demographics
  • Mother and baby are Hispanic. Both parents were
    born in El Salvador. Primary language is
    Spanish.
  • Mother has high school education from country of
    origin.
  • Baby lives with her mother, father and older
    toddler brother.
  • Mother stays at home and cares for baby and older
    sibling. Father works as day laborer doing such
    work as painting and construction.
  • Mother has 3 older children by different father
    in country of origin.

27
Case Study 2 Baby B HIV Testing
28
Case Study 2Baby B HIV Treatment
29
Case Study 3 Baby C History
  • 39 week small for gestational age Black male
    infant delivered by C-section due to breech
    presentation/nuchal cord to a 33 y/o woman.
  • Unintended pregnancy. Mother did not initiate
    prenatal care until 8th month of pregnancy.
    Could not find Ob/Gyn to provide care in her
    small town.
  • Mother with known positive HIV status since 1996.
    Did not initially tell local Ob/Gyn of her HIV
    status.
  • HIV test performed as part of routine prenatal
    care and positive. Patient transferred to HIV Ob
    specialist in large metro area where she
    delivered.
  • Baby hospitalized until 3 weeks of age for poor
    feeding and low birth weight.
  • Baby tested at birth, positive HIV DNA PCR.
  • Mother denies breastfeeding.

30
Case Study 3 Baby C Demographics
  • Mother and baby are Black.
  • Mother is a US citizen.
  • Mother is employed and has 3 years of college.
  • Mother and baby reside in small town about 120
    miles from large Metro area. Moved to small town
    prior to pregnancy.
  • Babys maternal grandmother provides support to
    baby and mother. Father of the baby is
    intermittently involved. Mother is primary care
    taker of child.
  • No other pregnancies.

31
Case Study 3Baby C HIV Testing
32
Case Study 3 Baby C HIV Treatment
33
In Utero vs Intrapartum HIV Perinatal Transmission
  • In Utero Transmission
  • Purported to occur in 30-40 of mother-to-child
    HIV transmission (MTCT) post HAART availability.
  • Postpartum and L/D ARV prophylaxis not likely to
    impact infant HIV outcome status.
  • ? Transmission of resistant virus
  • Association with intermittent maternal ARV use in
    pregnancy and with previous pregnancies.
  • Intrapartum Transmission
  • Likely most common perinatal transmission route.
  • Preventable with ARV prophylaxis
  • In utero, peripartum, postpartum ZDV and other
    ARV as indicated

34
In Utero vs Intrapartum HIV Transmission
Importance of Infant HIV DNA PCR Testing
  • In Utero HIV Transmission
  • HIV DNA PCR positive at
  • 0-48 hours or birth
  • 1 week of age
  • Intrapartum HIV Transmission
  • HIV DNA PCR negative at birth and 7 days of age
    or less
  • HIV DNA PCR positive after
  • 1-2 months of life

No data to support more rapid disease
progression for in utero MTCT
35
Summary of Cases A-CHIV Infected Infants
36
Case Management Challenges of Continued Perinatal
HIV Transmission
37
Social Issues Impacting Perinatal HIV
Transmission
  • Disclosure of HIV
  • Significant other
  • Family members
  • Healthcare provider
  • Denial of Diagnosis
  • Inhibits access to education and treatment
  • Access to Healthcare
  • Continual HIV care is inadequate
  • Interruption of healthcare benefits or providers
    hinders state of the art healthcare for HIV

38
Social Issues Impacting Perinatal HIV
Transmission
  • History of Substance Abuse
  • History of Mental Health Illness
  • Transient or Unstable Living Situation

39
Social Issues Impacting Perinatal HIV Transmission
  • CASE A
  • Adolescent (16 year old/Hispanic) HIV
    mother/HIV newborn
  • Access to Care
  • Difficulty Keeping Appointments
  • Consent for Treatment
  • The CDC reports that women and young people of
    color are at an increasing risk of acquiring HIV.
    The risk increases if youth or young adults are
    exchanging sex for drugs or money.
  • Immaturity
  • Youth who drop out of school are at risk of
    becoming sexually active, pregnancy at an early
    age, drug use, poverty, and lack of access to
    healthcare services.
  • Research has shown that a large proportion of
    young people are not concerned about becoming HIV
    positive.

40
Social Issues Impacting Perinatal HIV Transmission
  • CASE A
  • Limited Support
  • Fear of seeking health care for STDs and
    pregnancy.
  • Due to lack of emotional support, adolescents are
    left to navigate the social and medical systems
    on their own.
  • Nearly 1 in 5 Hispanic youth live in poverty
    leading to the lack of access to high quality
    health care
  • Missed Opportunities
  • Access to treatment HIV/STD testing.
  • Unintended pregnancy often leads to denial and
    inadequate prenatal care
  • Access to Comprehensive Medical Case Management
  • Access to information and education regarding
    HIV, STDs and social services in the community
    to facilitate HIV testing, treatment and general
    well-being
  • Education for physicians and healthcare staff in
    all hospitals and clinics

41
Summary of Cases A-CHIV Infected Infants
Inadequate prenatal Care
No case management
42
Social Issues Impacting Perinatal HIV Transmission
  • CASE B
  • 30 year old Hispanic HIV mother-known DX/HIV
    newborn
  • Denial of HIV
  • Families often require intensive medical case
    management.
  • Testing, diagnosis, counseling and follow-up is
    critical throughout the helping process with
    young women and adolescents.
  • Ambivalence about pregnancy
  • Consider terminating the pregnancy
  • Non-Compliance with Prenatal Care

43
Social Issues Impacting Perinatal HIV Transmission
  • CASE B
  • Spiritual/Religious Considerations
  • Being HIV / shame / fear/ blaming oneself
  • Considering permanency planning/termination of
    pregnancy
  • Missed Opportunities
  • Access to healthcare services/follow-up when
    patients move or transfer to a new physician or
    healthcare setting
  • Patients are in denial of their diagnosis
  • Unintended pregnancy/counseling and follow-up is
    critical
  • Ongoing case management services
  • RAPID Testing in physicians offices

44
Case Management Summary of Cases A-C
Cultural/spiritual conflicts
Lack of adherence support
45
Social Issues Impacting Perinatal HIV Transmission
  • CASE C
  • 34 year old Black HIV mother-known DX/HIV
    newborn
  • The CDC reports that women (especially women of
    color) have a higher incident of HIV.
  • Immature
  • Not aware of pregnancy
  • Facing an unintended pregnancy and termination
  • Transition
  • Changes in housing and socioeconomic status,
    families may move from Houston to smaller
    rural areas.
  • Interruption of HIV Care
  • Changes in healthcare coverage.

46
Social Issues Impacting Perinatal HIV Transmission
  • CASE C
  • Denial/Stigma
  • Inhibits the ability and may affect the decision
    to inform the healthcare provider about their HIV
    diagnosis.
  • Patient privacy is more apt to be violated in a
    small town vs. a large metropolitan area
  • Missed Opportunities
  • Follow-up and referrals to healthcare facilities
    in rural areas to continue treatment, adherence
    to medications and follow-up
  • Counseling regarding termination and unintended
    pregnancies
  • Access to education and information regarding the
    prevention of HIV from mother to baby.
  • Communication must be part of the
    patient/provider relationship
  • Case managers, social workers and counselors can
    be a role model and talk about different
    scenarios and ways to disclose their HIV
    diagnosis to individuals who need to know .
  • Rapid testing must be available at all sites

47
Case Management Summary of Cases A-C
Denial, stigma
Case management failure
48
Model for Prevention of Perinatal HIV Transmission
49
Perinatal HIV Prevention Cascade(CDC model,
April 2008)
  • Missed Opportunities
  • HIV infected women
  • HIV-infected pregnant women
  • Inadequate prenatal care
  • No/Late HIV testing
  • No/Late ARV prophylaxis
  • Infected child

50
Prevention Opportunities(CDC Model, April 2008)
  • Missed Opportunities
  • HIV women
  • Prevention Options
  • Primary prevention for women
  • Pre-conceptual counseling and care
  • Discussion of unplanned/unintended pregnancy
    with HIV women

51
Prevention Opportunities(CDC Model, April 2008)
  • Missed Opportunities
  • HIV pregnant women
  • Prevention Options
  • Discussion of unplanned vs unintended pregnancy
  • Continued pregnancy
  • Access to obstetrical care
  • Method of delivery
  • ARV use, access, adherence
  • Pregnancy
  • Delivery
  • Postpartum
  • Breastfeeding counseling
  • Family support during pregnancy and post partum

52
Estimated Number of HIV Pregnant Women in the US
  • Incident data unavailable in the US
  • Unlinked anonymous sero-survey discontinued in
    the US in 1994
  • Texas with no funding to support these efforts
  • locally
  • Ethical issues
  • Estimate HIV pregnancy/year in the US
  • Modeling system (last calculated in 2000, uses
    1995 data in women) predicts
  • 6,075-6,422 exposed infants/year

53
Estimated Number of HIV/AIDS Cases and Rates for
Female Adults and Adolescents, by Race/Ethnicity
2006-33 States
54
Inadequate Prenatal Care for HIV Pregnant Women
  • Prevention Options
  • Enhanced medical case management
  • Improved coordination and communication of
    services across all case managers during all
    stages of the HIV womans life
  • Part D HRSA
  • Part B HRSA
  • Other funded case management
  • Identification of affordable, non-judgmental
    prenatal care
  • Evaluation of adequacy of local care to assist
    with prevention options
  • Timely local access to ARV therapy
  • Specialized HIV care

55
Medical Care for Pregnant HIV-Infected Women and
Their Exposed Infants
  • National surveillance data of HIV infected
    infants reports 41 of their HIV pregnant
    mothers lacked prenatal visit care.
  • 8 of HIV-exposed infants in 24 sites (EPS
    includes Texas) had no prenatal care.
  • All of our 3 mother/infant cases lacked access
    to optimal prenatal care.
  • One mother did not know her HIV status at
    delivery.

56
MTCT Cesarean Section in Pregnancy
  • Scheduled C-section recommended for delivery at
    38 weeks gestation in
  • HIV women with unknown HIV virologic status at
    delivery
  • HIV women with HIV RNA PCR gt1,000 copies/ml
  • Efficacy of C-section obviated following
    prolonged rupture of membranes (ROM).
  • Unknown efficacy of C-section for HIV women on
    HAART and HIV RNA PCR lt1,000 copies/ml.
  • Scheduled C-section with greater maternal/infant
    morbidity than risk of vaginal delivery BUT
    lesser morbidity than urgent/emergent C-section.

57
MTCT HIV Transmission and Breastfeeding
  • US recommendations are to avoid breastfeeding
  • Many safe and available commercial formulas
  • Existing support for acquisition of formulas
    (WIC, etc)
  • Studies from Africa suggest that breastfeeding
    increases MTCT HIV by 8-14 in some settings but
    mortality risks without BF must be considered.
  • CDC (Cote dIvoire)
  • ZDV vs placebo study
  • 26 MTCT with placebo and breastfeeding
  • 16.5 MTCT with ZDV for 3 mos and breastfeeding
  • Centre for HIV/AIDS Networking (South Africa)
  • MTCT risk for exclusive BF, formula, mixed
    feeding and NVP at birth
  • MTCT 14.1 for exclusive breastfeeding by 6 weeks
  • MTCT 19.5 for exclusive breastfeeding by 6
    months
  • MTCT risk accentuated with maternal CD4
    lt200cells/mm3
  • Mortality risk (at 3 mos of age) for exclusive
    BF, formula, mixed feeding and NVP at birth
  • Exclusive BF 6.1
  • Replacement feedings 15.1

58
Prevention Opportunities(CDC Model, April 2008)
  • Missed Opportunities
  • No/Late HIV testing during pregnancy
  • Prevention Options
  • Current Texas Health and Safety Code
  • Mandates opt-out testing at centers (including
    L/D) providing healthcare to pregnant women
  • First visit and at L/D
  • Enhancing Existing Prevention What are the
    options?
  • Expand opt-out testing to 2nd and/or 3rd
    trimester?
  • Initiation of rapid testing at all delivering
    hospitals?
  • JCAHO mandate for HIV status to be on pregnant
    woman records?
  • gt95 of pregnant women deliver at Texas hospitals

59
In Utero versus Intrapartum HIV Perinatal
Transmission
  • In utero HIV transmission
  • Increasing transmission (30-40) risk post HAART
    availability
  • Postpartum and L/D ARV prophylaxis not likely to
    impact infant outcome
  • ? Transmission of resistant virus
  • Intermittent maternal ARV use
  • Intrapartum HIV transmission
  • Most common timing for perinatal HIV Transmission
    in US
  • Preventable with ARV use
  • WITS 1990 epidemiologic study defined MTCT risk
    with/without treatment.
  • NO ARV use 20 MTCT
  • ZDV use alone 10.4 MTCT
  • Combination therapy (NO PI use) 3.8 MTCT
  • Combination therapy with PI use 1.2 MTCT

60
In Utero vs Intrapartum HIV Transmission
Importance of Infant HIV DNA PCR Testing
  • In Utero Perinatal HIV Transmission
  • HIV DNA PCR positive
  • Birth
  • 7 days of age
  • Intrapartum HIV Transmission
  • HIV DNA PCR negative at birth or 7 days
  • HIV DNA PCR positive after 1-2 months of life

61
Rapid HIV Testing for Pregnant Women
  • ELISA (EIA)
  • 99 sensitivity/specificity for HIV-1
  • Requires confirmation with WB or IFA
  • Turnaround time for test results lengthy
  • 24-96 hours in some settings
  • Rapid HIV Testing
  • Rapid antibody testing using whole blood, oral
    secretions, plasma or serum
  • All reactive tests require confirmation with
    WB/IFA
  • Sensitivity/specificity for HIV-1 dependent upon
    population HIV prevalence
  • Turnaround time for test results dependent upon
    location of test performance
  • Bedside results can be 45 minutes
  • Laboratory processing can be 3-4.5 hours

62
Percent Sensitivity/Specificity of HIV Testing by
Population Prevalence
63
Key Elements for Successful Implementation of
Rapid HIV Testing at Delivery
  • Ensure confidentiality of testing individuals
  • Standing order for HIV test result
  • Mechanism to report HIV test
  • Similar to RPR, rubella testing
  • Opt-out rapid HIV test for women without previous
    testing or unknown HIV status
  • Standardization of selected tests
  • Results to patient in real or relevant time
  • Impact MTCT perinatal prevention options
  • Maximal success prior to delivery
  • Results MUST be given prior to patient discharge
  • Linkage to case management for individuals
    without known HIV status at delivery

64
Resistance Testing in Pregnancy
  • HIV drug resistance testing recommendations
  • Pregnant women no currently receiving ARV
  • Prior onset treatment or prophylaxis
  • Pregnant women with prior ARV use and virologic
    failure
  • Detectable HIV RNA level on treatment
  • Suboptimal viral suppression following ARV use

65
ARV Resistance During Pregnancy
  • Factors unique to pregnancy increase risk
  • ARV used intermittently for prophylaxis of
    perinatal transmission
  • NVP concerns
  • Pregnancy-associated nausea/vomiting may
    compromise adherence
  • General population incidence of ARV resistance
  • Increase in resistance
  • 3.4 in 1995 12.4 in 1999
  • Limited data suggest same incidence ARV
    resistance for pregnant HIV-infected women as in
    general population
  • Potential for transmission of resistant virus

66
Case Management Summary of Cases A-C
Unknown HIV status, inadequate hospital reporting
Unintended pregnancy
Unintended pregnancy
67
Prevention Opportunities(CDC Model, April 2008)
  • Missed Opportunities
  • No ARV Prophylaxis
  • Prevention Options
  • Access to medications upon identification of
    pregnant HIV status
  • Pharmacy coordination of services in rural
    locations
  • Role of ADAP for rural deliveries?
  • Education of case managers, nursing and medical
    staff regarding need for earliest intervention
  • During pregnancy
  • At L/D
  • Postnatal newborn prophylaxis

68
Identifying Delivery Facility Adequacy for MTCT
PreventionCHECKLIST
  • Availability to provide HIV testing during labor
  • Adequate EIA turnaround time (prior to
    delivery/discharge)
  • Options for rapid testing
  • Access to ARV in real time
  • Oral dosing, IV dosing, pediatric dosing
  • Access to providers versed in HIV perinatal
    prevention
  • Rupture of membranes
  • C-section options
  • Linkage options to case management
  • Breastfeeding education
  • Linkage to infant care and testing
  • Linkage to post partum maternal care and testing

69
Prevention Opportunities(CDC Model, April 2008)
  • Missed Opportunities
  • HIV infected child
  • Prevention Options
  • Comprehensive services for infected mother
  • Comprehensive services for infected child
  • Evaluation of family for additional HIV infection
    (siblings, father)
  • IMPORTANCE of medical case management
  • Access to services
  • Assistance with daily living
  • Assistance with medication adherence support

70
HIV-Exposed Infants Represent Family Sentinel
Event
  • Testing of family imperative
  • Counseling
  • Linkage to case management for affected FAMILY
  • Address postpartum education regarding future
    pregnancy planning
  • Address other HIV risk factors
  • Youth and access to care
  • Drug use
  • Cultural obstacles to care
  • Travel needs if local facility cannot support care

71
HIV-Infected Infant Represents Missed Opportunity
Sentinel Event
  • Statewide review of each perinatally HIV-infected
    infant in the post HAART era
  • Define missed opportunities
  • Systematic approach to identify new
    intervention options
  • Report of missed prevention opportunities to
    health departments, hospitals and care
    providers

72
References
  • Epidemiology
  • 1.http//www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/resou
    rces/slides/pediatric/
  • 2. MMWR Twenty-five Years of HIV/AIDS- United
    States, 1981-2006 June 2, 2006/Vol. 55/ No. 21
  • 3. Hanson, I.C.,  Shearer, W. T. et al. (2004) 
    Lentiviruses (Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1
    and Acquired Immunodeficiency Symdrome), In
    Feigin et al (Ed), Textbook of Pediatric
    Infectious Diseases (pp. 2455-2481), 5th ed.
    Vol 2.  Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Saunders.

73
References
  • Case Management Challenges
  • 1. CDC HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report, 2004. Vol.
    16, Atlanta US Department of health and Human
    Services, CDC 20051-46.
  • 2. CDC. HIV Prevention in the Third Decade.
    Atlanta US Department of Health and Human
    Services, CDC2005.
  • 3. CDC. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance
    United States, 2003. MMWR 200453(SS-2)1-29.

74
Missed Opportunities/ HIV Prevention References
  • 1. United States Public Health Service Task
    Force Public Health Service Task Force
    recommendations for use of antiretroviral drugs
    in pregnant HIV-- infected women for maternal
    health and interventions to reduce perinatal
    HIV-1 transmission in the United States. November
    2, 2007 (cited May 20, 2008) Available from
    http//AIDS info.nih.gov.
  • 2. Fleming P, et al. Estimated number of
    perinatal HIV infection, US 2000 in 14th
    International AIDS Conference, 2002 Barcelona,
    Spain.
  • 3. M.M.W.R. Reduction in perinatal
    transmission of HIV infection---United States,
    1985-2005. June 2, 2006.

75
Thank you for your attention!
  • Questions?
  • Questions?
  • Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com