Neutrinos: From Cosmic Rays and Accelerators to Old Iron Mines and the Fate of the Universe - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 61
About This Presentation
Title:

Neutrinos: From Cosmic Rays and Accelerators to Old Iron Mines and the Fate of the Universe

Description:

Neutrinos: From Cosmic Rays and Accelerators to Old Iron Mines and the Fate of the Universe – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:113
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 62
Provided by: neutri9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Neutrinos: From Cosmic Rays and Accelerators to Old Iron Mines and the Fate of the Universe


1
Neutrinos From Cosmic Rays and Accelerators to
Old Iron Mines and the Fate of the Universe
  • Alec Habig
  • UMD Physics

2
Neutrinos what are they?
  • b decay appears to be a 2-body decay
  • So, if energy is conserved, the outgoing electron
    will always have the same energy simple
    freshman mechanics

3
The Silent Partner
  • 1930 Pauli proposes a silent partner
  • a 3rd body that doesnt interact
  • Allows both a continuous spectrum and
    conservation of energy
  • 1933 Fermi details b decay theory, names the
    neutrino

Solution
A 3-body decay!
4
they really do exist!
  • 1953 - Fred Reines and Clyde Cowan see inverse b
    decay at the Savannah River reactor
  • The positron was observed in a tank of
    scintillating fluid. Reines gets 1995 Nobel
    Prize.

5
More flavors of n
  • 1949 Powell et al infer the presence of another
    n in p decay and of two more in m decay
  • Add in the more recently observed t decay, and
  • a n exists for each lepton
  • and their anti-particles

6
The bookkeeping particle
  • Cataloging all the reactions, neutrinos are used
    to account for
  • Conservation of Energy
  • Conservation of lepton and flavor
  • Conservation of angular momentum (spin)

7
Neutrino properties
  • These balancing acts work if the n has the
    following properties
  • No electrical charge
  • ns only interact via the weak force
  • All ns are left-handed
  • Spin -½
  • Both by direct observation, and following from
    spin lefthandedness
  • mn 0

8
No Mass?
  • Direct experimental results say
  • Mass of ne lt 3eV!
  • Compare to
  • Mass of e 511 thousand eV
  • Mass of p 938 million eV

n.b. 1eV 1.8x10-33 g!
9
Oscillations!
  • But, if neutrinos have any mass, quantum
    mechanics tells us they should oscillate
    between flavors
  • The probability that a nm will change to a nt
    after traveling distance L is

10
(No Transcript)
11
How to make a n?
  • ne come from radioactive b decay and decay of m
  • nm come from decays of m and p
  • nt come from t decay
  • Observed directly for the first time recently!
    (by the DONUT experiment)
  • In practice, to get nm
  • ms come from p decay
  • ps come from high energy nucleon collisions
  • So smack together some protons!

12
Cosmic Rays
  • Mother Nature sends the high energy protons to us
    from space
  • Collisions with the atmosphere make particle
    showers

For more, see Scientific American, August 1999
issue
13
Super-Kamiokande
  • 50kT ultra-pure water
  • 22.5kt fid. Volume
  • 85m att. length
  • 11134 50cm PMTs
  • 40 coverage by photocathode
  • 2ns timing
  • 1800 20cm PMTs in veto shield
  • Located in zinc mine near Kamioka, Japan

40 m
1 km (2700 mwe)
40 m
http//www-sk.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/doc/sk/index.html
14
SK images courtesy of Institute for Cosmic Ray
Research, The University of Tokyo
15
Who is Super-K?
140 authors
35 insti- tutions
16
UMD_at_Super-K, Summer 2001
Dan Gastler (UMD), floating in top of OD
Alec Habig (UMD) and Jim Stone (BU), fixing Tyvek
in barrel of OD
17
UMD_at_Super-K, Summer 2001
Andrew Clough (UMD), making cable ends with Erik
Blaufuss (Maryland), Jeff Griskevich (UCI), and
Katy Mack (Caltech)
Dan and Erik replace a top OD PMT
(lots more pictures at http//neutrino.d.umn.edu/
superk)
18
How does it work?
Graphics by Ed Kearns, Boston Univ.
19
e, m, or t?
  • Two similar events
  • Seen in unrolled view
  • e-like event at top
  • Showers
  • Fuzzy ring
  • m-like event below
  • One particle
  • Crisp ring
  • m decays makes e
  • t cant see! Need very high energy to produce t

20
How far did the n go?
  • The ns come from cosmic rays hitting the
    atmosphere
  • The n travels
  • L 20km from above
  • L 500km from the side
  • L 10,000km from below

21
The Results
ne
nm
  • All ne data are consistent with expectations.
  • Lowest E nm all low
  • Higher E nm ok from above, low from below
  • Data match nmlt-gtnt oscillations!

22
Oscillation Parameters
  • nm oscillating to nt (thus disappearing) fits the
    data well
  • Values of parameters inside contours work
  • Best fit values
  • Dm2 2.1x10-3
  • sin22q 1
  • At 90 cl
  • 1.5x10-3 lt Dm2 lt 3.4x10-3 eV2
  • sin22q gt 0.92
  • ne not involved

23
Other Super-K ns
  • Low-energy ns from fusion in core of the Sun
    (dozens per day)
  • Very high-energy ns from Active Galactic Nuclei
    (black holes) or Gamma-Ray Bursts (if we were
    bigger or get lucky)
  • Low-energy ns from Supernovae in our galaxy (the
    next time one happens!)
  • Can also make statement about diffuse SN n
    background! (SN relics), probe star formation
    history of universe

24
SNEWS
Super-Kamiokande (Japan) 50kton
7000 inv. b decay, 410 on 16O, 300 elast.
scattering, 4o pointing
  • Supernova Early Warning System
  • Watches for coincidence from worlds n detectors
  • Issue SN alarm, hours before light breaks out!

Coincidence server securely hosted by Brookhaven
National Lab
SSL sockets
Server 10s coincidence window
PGP signed email
Email alarms to astronomers
(Mini-BooNE, KamLAND, Borexino, AMANDA, LIGO
also sensitive to nearby SN but not yet sending
alarms to SNEWS)
Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (Canada) 1.7kton
H2O, 1kton D2O
Sign up yourself to receive an alert at
http//snews.bnl.gov/
710 inv. b decay, 160 2H breakup, 45 elast.
scattering, 17o pointing
25
Experimental Disaster
  • After repairs, SK was slowly refilled with water
  • One PMT failed, imploded
  • Shock wave crushed neighbors
  • Chain Reaction
  • 2/3 of all PMTs crushed

26
Recovery Work
  • In the summer of 2002, 47 of ID tubes and all OD
    tubes were replaced
  • ID tubes with acrylic shields
  • UMD people worked all summer
  • SK is operational again
  • Data taking resumed in Dec. 2002!

27
Our Work in the OD (2002)
28
UMD_at_Super-K, Summer 2005
Rose Smith (UMD), with Tom Kreicbergs (Hawaii),
Aaron Herfurth (BU), and Kirsti Hakala (UMD)
John Eastman (UMD) , Photographer
Prepared 6,000 replacement PMTs (being installed
now!)
(lots more pictures at http//neutrino.d.umn.edu/
east0108)
29
Accelerators
  • Make our own high energy protons
  • Shoot them into a fixed target
  • Focus the resulting ps into a beam
  • Let the ps decay to ns

30
MINOS
  • Main Injector Neutrino Oscillation Search
  • A direct end-to-end n oscillation experiment
  • Make our own ns
  • Measure them at the source
  • Near Detector
  • Measure them again 735km away
  • Far Detector
  • Watch them change flavor!

http//www-numi.fnal.gov
31
Who is MINOS?
Argonne Athens Benedictine Brookhaven
Caltech Cambridge Campinas Fermilab
College de France Harvard IIT Indiana
ITEP-Moscow Lebedev Livermore
Minnesota-Twin Cities Minnesota-Duluth
Oxford Pittsburgh Protvino Rutherford Sao
Paulo South Carolina Stanford Sussex Texas
AM Texas-Austin Tufts UCL Western Washington
William Mary Wisconsin
32 institutions 175 physicists
32
A cross-country n beam
  • The ns start at Fermilab, aimed down a bit
    (3.3o)
  • ns pass under Wisconsin, Lake Superior, and
    Duluth, oscillating as they travel
  • Beam is observed again at the Soudan Mine

33
The Old Iron Mine
  • Soudan Iron mine has been a state historical park
    since the 1960s
  • A new cavern has been excavated at the bottom of
    the mine
  • Adjacent to Soudan2 expt. and Historical Tour
  • Crygenic Dark Matter Search (CDMS) in Soudan2 hall

34
Expanding the Lab
Spring 2000
  • Excavation complete 12/00
  • Experimental construction started August 2001
  • Tours started summer 2002
  • Come see us!
  • http//www.soudan.umn.edu

March 2001
December 2000
35
The MINOS Far Detector
  • Made of 1 x 8m steel octagons
  • Sandwiched with plastic scintillator
  • Steel is magnetized to 1-2 Tesla
  • 5.4kt total steel (3.3kt fiducial)
  • 486 layers 31m long
  • Near detector similar but smaller

½ Far Det. in cavern
The whole thing!
36
MINOS Starts to Grow
37
Current View of MINOS
  • Far Detector is finished!

38
Schedule
  • Far detector completed July 2003
  • Started taking Cosmic Ray data
  • Many atmospheric neutrino events have been seen!
  • Near detector finished mid 2004
  • n beam started beginning of 2005
  • Running beautifully now
  • 2-3 years data taking needed to meet
    expectations, 5-10 years hoped for
  • Achieved exposure equal to K2K in December 2005

39
Scintillator
  • Scintillator emits light when a charged particle
    passes through
  • MINOS uses plastic scintillator strips
  • 4cm wide, 8m long
  • Light carried out of the ends to Photomultiplier
    tubes via optical fiber
  • 192 strips per plane
  • Alternate planes at right angles to get 3D view

Scintillator graphics courtesy of Doug Michael,
Caltech
40
More Scintillator
A module
A blue LED lights up the Scintillator
An M16 PMT
41
Scintillator layout
  • 8 modules cover one far detector steel plane
  • Four 20-wide modules in middle (perp. ends)
  • Four 28-wide modules on edges (45 deg ends)
  • Two center modules have coil-hole cutout

42
Plane Assembly
  • MINOS planes are assembled from parts which can
    fit down the shaft
  • Two ½ layers of steel welded together to form 1
    thick, 12 ton plane
  • 1 ton scintillator attached to that
  • Plane hung like a file folder

43
Multiplexing
  • Light detected by 16 pixel PMTs
  • 8 fibers per pixel, ganged together to reduce
    electronics costs by 8x

One of 3 Ham. M16 PMTs in this Mux Box
44
Front End Electronics
  • Fibers from each strip end are multiplexed onto
    PMT pixels
  • Signals amplified, shaped, and trackedheld by
    VA chips
  • Hit and Timing information sent upstream from
    this Front End rack

45
Data Gathering
  • VME Master crate
  • VA Readout Controllers VARCs
  • Charge from PMTs digitized by 14-bit ADCs
  • Time stamped to 1.6ns by internal clock
  • 2/6 or 2/36 pre-trigger applied
  • Hits given absolute GPS time
  • Data read out over PVIC bus to computer room
  • 4/5 plane software trigger applied, hits time
    ordered
  • Data formatted in ROOT

1 of 16 VME crates Digitizes 72 mux boxes Each
w/3 16-pixel PMTs
46
De-multiplexing
  • If we read out eight fibers with one PMT pixel
  • How to figure out which strip a particle really
    went through?
  • Matching hits on both ends of a strip helps in
    the simplest track case
  • For multiple hits on a plane and showers
  • All the different possible hypotheses of which
    strip was really hit tested against the possible
    real physics
  • Best fitting hypotheses saved
  • Reconstructing close multiple muons is very
    difficult!

47
A Cosmic Ray De-multiplexed
  • Success rate for Cosmic Rays
  • 94 of hits correctly associated with their
    strips
  • 97 of CR events successfully sorted out

48
A Double Cosmic Ray m
  • A real event
  • Two Cosmic Ray ms, from same initial interaction

See live events at http//farweb.minos-soudan.org/
events/LiveEvent.html
49
n interactions in MINOS
  • First beam neutrino event!
  • In time with beam, coming from Fermilab
  • n interacts in rock or steel, resulting particles
    splash through detector
  • Charged particle curves in magnetic field (more
    at the end as it slows down)
  • Scintillation light read out of strips
  • Each pixel is a lit up strip!

50
3D reconstruction
  • 8.5 GeV electron
  • es make showers which quickly peter out
  • 16.5 GeV muon
  • s are single, penetrating particles

MINOS simulations courtesy of Brett Viren,
Brookhaven Natl. Lab
51
Expected MINOS results
  • Compare nm spectrum near and far
  • Here are expected results given 3 different sets
    of oscillation parameters
  • With same L (735km), lower E ns will oscillate
    to nt and disappear
  • With no ne originally in the beam, any ne
    appearing will be very interesting!

52
Comparative Resolution
  • MINOS can make very precise measurements of the
    oscillation parameters
  • MINOSs expected precision (green) is compared to
    SKs (yellow) for three different values of Dm2

53
So What?
  • ns change flavor as they go along, and thus have
    some small mass.
  • Big Deal.
  • Its something not predicted by the Standard
    Model!
  • Perhaps a hint towards a Grand Unified Theory
    theorists have new fundamental parameters their
    theories must explain.

54
Fate of Universe?
  • ns play a role
  • One n has a Very Small mass
  • (assuming m is comparable to Dm)
  • But there are incredible numbers of them sloshing
    about
  • They could be an appreciable fraction of the
    total mass of the universe!

55
Dark Matter
  • Galactic rotation curves luminous matter not
    enough
  • Disk stability also needs a Dark Matter halo

Galaxy M31 image by Jason Ware.
56
Rocks, dust, gas?
  • Big Bang Nucleosynthesis calculations limit total
    number of baryons (p, n i.e., normal stuff )
  • Not enough dark rocks etc. can exist without
    changing the cosmic ratio of H, He, Li
  • Need non-baryonic dark matter. ns qualify, and
    they have mass

57
Hot Dark Matter
  • ns are hot, i.e., have kinetic energy much
    larger than rest mass
  • If all DM is hot, universe is too runny
    matter too smoothly distributed for galaxies to
    form
  • Simulations say there can still be as much total
    mass in HDM as all the baryons but not enough
    to be all the DM needed!

58
Cold Dark Matter
  • Particles with large rest mass (compared to
    kinetic energy)
  • e.g. WIMPS or Axions
  • Alone, too lumpy at large scales, galaxy
    super-clusters dont form
  • But, ColdHot Dark Matter models reproduce
    large scale structure rather well - add in those
    ns!

59
Simulated Universe, ColdHot Dark Matter
Real Galaxy Survey
Courtesy of Margaret Geller and Emilio Falco,
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
Courtesy of Greg Bryan and Mike Norman, UIUC
60
Neutrinos
  • Elusive but numerous
  • Massive ns have both theoretical and cosmic
    consequences
  • We observe nmlt-gtnt flavor oscillations (and thus
    n mass) in cosmic rays with Super-K
  • MINOS is studying these oscillations using a
    precision man-made beam with before after
    measurements

This powerpoint is online at http//neutrino.d.um
n.edu/habig/Neutrinos.ppt
61
  • Neutrinos they are very small
  • They have no charge they have no mass
  • they do not interact at all.
  • The Earth is just a silly ball
  • to them, through which they simply pass
  • like dustmaids down a drafty hall
  • or photons through a sheet of glass.
  • They snub the most exquisite gas,
  • ignore the most substantial wall,
  • cold shoulder steel and sounding brass,
  • insult the stallion in his stall,
  • and, scorning barriers of class,
  • infiltrate you and me. Like tall
  • and painless guillotines they fall
  • down through our heads into the grass.
  • At night, they enter at Nepal
  • and pierce the lover and his lass
  • from underneath the bed. You call
  • it wonderful I call it crass.

-John Updike
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com