The Limitations and Advantages of Ultraviolet Light Sources in the Detection of Ignitable Liquids at - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

The Limitations and Advantages of Ultraviolet Light Sources in the Detection of Ignitable Liquids at

Description:

Various ignitable liquids used to calibrate the canine detection team ... Dawn detergent masks ignitable liquids from the canine teams but no affect on fluorescence ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:94
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: fami297
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Limitations and Advantages of Ultraviolet Light Sources in the Detection of Ignitable Liquids at


1
The Limitations and Advantages of Ultraviolet
Light Sources in the Detection of Ignitable
Liquids at Fire Scenes
  • Sarah Kunkel
  • 2006 MAAFS Annual Meeting
  • May 5, 2006

2
UV in Arson Investigation
  • Ultra violet lights marketed to arson
    investigators for decades
  • Very few reliable studies to support their claims

3
Ultraviolet Light Test Objectives
  • Determine capabilities of UV light source
  • Determine limitations of UV light source
  • Determine whether UV light source is a practical
    approach to ignitable liquids detection at fire
    scenes

4
Ultraviolet Light Source
  • Model UVSL-26P by UVP in California
  • Rechargeable
  • Three modes of operation
  • Short wave (254nm)
  • Long Wave (365nm)
  • Dual

5
Testing Performed
  • Amount of Ignitable Liquid
  • Time Exposure
  • Visualization of Various Ignitable Liquids
  • Visualization on Various Materials
  • Visualization on Various Burnt Materials

6
I. Amount of Ignitable Liquid
  • All amounts of gasoline tested on carpet and
    asphalt tile
  • 10 µL
  • 25 µL
  • 50 µL
  • 100 µL
  • 150 µL
  • 300 µL

7
I. Amount of Ignitable Liquid
  • All amounts detectable on carpet and asphalt tile

50 µL gasoline on asphalt tile
50 µL gasoline on carpet
8
I. Amount of Ignitable Liquid
10 µL gasoline on carpet
10 µL gasoline on asphalt tile
300 µL gasoline on asphalt tile
300 µL gasoline on carpet
9
I. Amount of Ignitable Liquid
Close-up 10 µL gasoline on carpet
10
II. Time Exposure
  • All tested on carpet and asphalt tile
  • 30 minutes
  • 60 minutes
  • 120 minutes
  • 180 minutes
  • 240 minutes
  • 300 minutes

11
II. Time Exposure
  • All amounts detectable on the tile and carpet at
    10 months

10 months later
1st Day
12
III. Ignitable Liquids Tested
  • All liquids tested at 10 µL and 50 µL on asphalt
    tile
  • Ignitable liquids tested
  • Gasoline (Unevaporated, 50, 75, and 90
    evaporated, and Base)
  • Diesel fuel
  • Lighter fluid
  • Linseed oil
  • Various ignitable liquids used to calibrate the
    canine detection team

13
III. Ignitable Liquids Tested
  • Only gasoline, diesel fuel, and linseed oil
    detectable on all material at all amounts
  • Weathered gasoline fluoresces brighter than
    non-weathered
  • 90gt75gt50gtnon-weathered
  • Base gasoline not detectable
  • Gasoline from various companies indistinguishable

14
III. Ignitable Liquids Tested
Weathered Gasoline
50
90
75
15
IV. Flooring Materials Tested
  • Carpet
  • Linoleum
  • Foam Carpet Padding
  • Fiber Filled Carpet Padding
  • Asphalt Tile
  • Wood Flooring

16
IV. Other Materials Tested
  • 100 White Cotton T-shirt
  • Jeans
  • Human Skin
  • Manila Folder
  • White Printer Paper
  • White Notebook Paper
  • Yellow Notebook Paper
  • Paper Towel

17
IV. Flooring Materials Tested
  • Must use only short wavelength on linoleum
  • Carpet and asphalt tile worked under long, short,
    and dual wavelength
  • Mostly questionable positives for fiber filled
    carpet padding and wood flooring

18
IV. Other Materials Tested
  • Negative results on jeans and cotton t-shirt
  • Skin
  • Remain detectable on skin between 8-9 hours
  • Canine team did not detect after 3 hours
  • Fluoresced after 5 hand washings
  • Paper products
  • Both liquids fluoresced on all paper products
  • Light absorbed when liquid was still wet

19
V. Burnt Materials Tested
  • Carpet
  • Linoleum
  • Foam Carpet Padding
  • Fiber Filled Carpet Padding
  • Asphalt Tile
  • Wood Flooring

20
V. Burned Materials Tested
21
V. Burnt Materials Tested
  • Only short and dual wavelengths visualized the
    ignitable liquids
  • Gasoline less visible than diesel fuel on all
    materials
  • Results varied from unburned materials
  • Less positive results
  • Carpet absorbed light

22
Additional Results
  • Dawn detergent masks ignitable liquids from the
    canine teams but no affect on fluorescence
  • Exposure to water does not affect fluorescence

23
Conclusions
  • UV light only useful in detection of gasoline and
    diesel fuel
  • Not affected by water, but burning of material
    does affect visibility
  • Useful with small volumes and at long exposure
    times
  • Fluorescence caused by dyes in ignitable liquids

24
Acknowledgements
  • Don Brucker, Allegheny County Fire Marshals
    Office
  • Bob Huston, Allegheny County Crime Laboratory
  • Dr. Graham Rankin, Marshall University

25
References
  • DeHaan, J. D. Kirks Fire Investigation 4th
    edition. Prentice Hall, 1997. 405-11.
  • Forestal, R. Use of Ultraviolet Light in
    Fire/Arson, Bomb, and Environmental
    Investigation. Firehouse Magazine September
    1994 48-50
  • Brucker, D. Chief Deputy Fire Marshal, Allegheny
    County Emergency Services. July 18-27, 2005.
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  • U.S. Fire Administration. Arson in the United
    States (Topical Fire Research Series). The
    Administration. January 2001. 1(8) 1-3
  • Ultra-Violet Products. Use of Ultraviolet Light
    in Arson Detection Application
    Bulletin-UVP-AB-107. 1997
  • Stauffer, Eric. Technical Working Group for Fire
    and Explosives Discussion. March 21, 2006.

26
Questions???
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com