Title: RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE INTEGRATED NAFTA MARKET: LESSONS FROM THE CASE OF BSE
1RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE INTEGRATED NAFTA
MARKETLESSONS FROM THE CASE OF BSE
- Julie A. Caswell
- and
- David Sparling
NAAMIC - Cancun May 7, 2004
2Organization
- Integration of NAFTA beef industries
- BSE as a case study
- Impact of BSE on the NAFTA beef markets
- Integrated markets integrated regulations?
- Implications and challenges for policy
3NAFTA Beef Integration
- Prior to CUSTA and NAFTA tariffs inhibited
extensive integration - 1989 CUSTA removed Canada/US barriers
- 1994 NAFTA removed barriers to trade with
Mexico - Extensive integration at every level
4NAFTA Beef Cattle Trade Flows
United States
Canada
Mexico
0.59 M lbs. 0.68 M lbs
0.23 M lbs. 0.24 M lbs
0.74 M lbs. 1,091 M lbs
0.016 M lbs. 0.016 M lbs
Domestic Market
Domestic Market
Domestic Market
Processing
Processing
Processing
gt 700 lbs 439,016
1,259,536
Cow/Calf and Stocker
Feedlot
Feedlot
1,229,220 816,460
Stocker/ Backgrounder
Stocker/ Backgrounder
Legend Trade in Beef Trade in Cattle
lt 700 lbs 12,520 221,782
Cow/Calf
Cow/Calf
2003 values 2002 values
5Production Shift
- Source Canfax and Gracey 2002, The Cattle Cycle,
p. 19.
6Relative Sizes of NAFTA Industries
2002 Beef Production, Consumption and Trade (in '000 Metric Tons) 2002 Beef Production, Consumption and Trade (in '000 Metric Tons) 2002 Beef Production, Consumption and Trade (in '000 Metric Tons) 2002 Beef Production, Consumption and Trade (in '000 Metric Tons) 2002 Beef Production, Consumption and Trade (in '000 Metric Tons) 2002 Beef Production, Consumption and Trade (in '000 Metric Tons) 2002 Beef Production, Consumption and Trade (in '000 Metric Tons) 2002 Beef Production, Consumption and Trade (in '000 Metric Tons)
Consumption Consumption Consumption Exports Imports Net trade as a of consumption Net trade as a of consumption
Canada 992 992 992 610 307 30.54 30.54
Mexico 2409 2409 2409 10 489 -19.88 -19.88
US 12738 12738 12738 1110 1460 -2.75 -2.75
2002 Cattle Production, Slaughter, and Trade (in '000 Animals) 2002 Cattle Production, Slaughter, and Trade (in '000 Animals) 2002 Cattle Production, Slaughter, and Trade (in '000 Animals) 2002 Cattle Production, Slaughter, and Trade (in '000 Animals) 2002 Cattle Production, Slaughter, and Trade (in '000 Animals) 2002 Cattle Production, Slaughter, and Trade (in '000 Animals) 2002 Cattle Production, Slaughter, and Trade (in '000 Animals) 2002 Cattle Production, Slaughter, and Trade (in '000 Animals)
Slaughter Beef Cattle Exports Beef Cattle Exports Beef Cattle Imports Net trade as a of slaughter
Canada Canada 3753 1690 1690 138 41.35 41.35
Mexico Mexico 8310 948 948 206 8.93 8.93
US US 36970 244 244 2505 -6.11 -6.11
7Percentage Flows-Beef Exports
10 of Canadian Exports
66 of U.S. Exports
2 of Mexican Exports
8Production and Markets are Integrated Are the
systems?
Level of Integration Nature Final
Market End Products Production Intermediate
products Control systems Information,
planning Policy Regulations, programs,
planning
9The Case of BSE?
- Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy
- Disease of the central nervous system in cattle
- Origin uncertain but believed to be linked to
ingesting feed containing rendered central
nervous system material from contaminated animals - Thought to be linked to CJD fatal in humans
10Why Study BSE?
- Beef industry is integrated at every level
- Integration interdependence
- Smooth operation of NAFTA industry depends on
flow of cattle and beef - Impact of a case of BSE is immediate and
substantial - Management of BSE is an interesting mix of
science and politics
11Animal Health/Food Safety Events - Two Broad
Categories
- Private Events
- Risks and impacts limited to supply chains in
which they occur - E. coli, Salmonella
- Government response
- Censure fines, closures
- Additional monitoring
- Industry wide initiatives to reduce risk
12- Public Events
- Impacts reach outside supply chain
- Impact may be
- Regional Avian Influenza in British Columbia
- National BSE, Foot Mouth Disease
- Trade distorting
- Government Response
- Assessment of the impact and notification of
trading partners and OIE - New regulations
- Mitigation of impacts
- Industry survival and recovery strategies
13BSE and International Trade
- BSE protocols managed by the OIE
- Based on risk analysis - science based
- 5 levels of BSE risk status
- Guidance on import restrictions for cattle and
beef for each risk status - Country goal - BSE free status
- Importing countries response to BSE case in
previously BSE free country, contrary to OIE
guidance, is complete closure of borders for
cattle and beef
14BSE Reported 1989-2004
15First NAFTA BSE Event
- May 20, 2003 Canada
- One animal found with BSE
- Animal had already been removed from the food
system - Trading partners notified
- All borders closed immediately for cattle and beef
16Impact Live Cattle Imports to U.S. from Canada
and Mexico, 2003
250,000
200,000
150,000
Mexico
Head
Canada
100,000
50,000
-
Dec-02
Jan-03
Feb-03
Mar-03
Apr-03
May-
Jun-03
Jul-03
Aug-03
Sep-03
Oct-03
Nov-03
Dec-03
17Price Impacts
- Canadian market oversupplied
- Farm gate prices plummeted 50
- Imports dropped 50
- Already tight U.S. market undersupplied
- Prices began to increase
- By fall the Mexican market became tight and
prices began to rise
18Partial Reopening of the U.S. and Mexican Borders
- September 2003
- U.S. reviewed Canadian response to BSE event and
risk of importing BSE from Canada - Gave Canada a special low risk status
- Imports of de-boned beef from cattle under 30
months allowed - Mexico took similar action
19Canadian Beef Exports, 2002-2003
240
200
160
120
80
40
0
20Second NAFTA BSE Event
- Dec. 23, 2003
- BSE found in U.S. dairy cow
- Traced back to Canadian herd
- Possibility that it was fed ruminant protein
prior to total feed ban - Traceback could only locate half of animals which
may have received the same feed
21Impact
- All exports halted
- Redirected to already tight U.S. market
- Prices eased back from record highs
- Mexican market now short and prices increased by
as much as 15 in early 2004
22Prices for U.S. Cattle and Beef
23Partial Border Reopening
- In March-April 2004, Mexico and Canada reopened
border to U.S. boneless beef cuts from animals
under 30 months - No reopening yet for live animals
24BSE in NAFTA
- Dramatic example
- Market integration exacerbating trade disruptions
when problems occur - Importance of risk management systems
- Drawbacks of market integration without
regulatory integration
25Managing Regulatory Integration
- Country
- Risk analysis
- Choosing appropriate level of protection
- Designing the regulatory program
- Country to Country
- Policy coordination
- Equivalence agreements
- Harmonization
- Internationally
- SPS Agreement of WTO
- Disputes
- International Standards Bodies
- World Organization for Animal Health (OIE)
26Origins of the BSE Trade Crisis
- Inadequate risk management at country level
- Inadequate regulatory integration within NAFTA
- Breakdown of international discipline on import
restrictions
27International OIE Standards for BSE Risk
Management
- Criteria for determining BSE status
- 5 status levels
- BSE free
- BSE provisionally free
- Minimal BSE risk
- Moderate BSE risk
- High BSE risk
- OIE does not evaluate countries and assign them
to a status - Importing countries judge the status of
exporting countries
28Imports Recommendations v. Reality
- OIE recommends
- Import restrictions that are appropriate for each
risk status - KEY POINT in no case recommends complete
prohibition of imports when BSE free status is
lost
- What countries do
- Immediately close borders to imports from country
with BSE case(s) - RESULT huge trade impacts
29Impact of BSE on NAFTA Countries
- Set up by failure of international discipline on
BSE management - NAFTA countries were full partners
- Aided by lack of regulatory integration within
NAFTA to control internal impacts - Further abetted by inadequate risk management at
the country level
30Living with BSE Positive Status
- Putting new regulations in place
- Reopening borders
- Encourage all to follow OIE standards, prove
minimal BSE risk - Negotiate ad hoc border openings (perhaps based
on OIE standards) - Accomplished within NAFTA for many beef products
from younger animals - Not accomplished yet for live animals
- Little progress with other trading partners
- Being prepared for more cases
31Lessons from BSE (1)
- NAFTA is pursuing high level of market
integration - E.g., with elimination of tariffs
- But has a relatively low level of coordination in
regard to nontariff barriers, such as regulations - Economic integration has outrun regulatory
integration, leaving industries more vulnerable
to disruption
32Why Cant We Agree?
- Same or very similar
- Scientific assessment of risk
- Choice of appropriate level of protection for
human health - Different benefit-cost calculus due to
- Uncertainties
- Costs and acceptable level of costs
- Market risks of problems (e.g., first or
subsequent BSE cases) - Regulatory culture
33Lessons from BSE (2)
- There are legitimate reasons why countries are
reluctant to harmonize regulatory policy - And market integration within NAFTA poses
problems for exports to non-NAFTA countries
34Rebuilding the NAFTA Market
- Through ad hoc negotiation of border openings
- Go further?
- Integrated Risk Management System
35What Would Needto be Harmonized?
Feed regulations
Production, shipping, slaughter standards
Testing regimes
Tracking regimes
Response to case(s)
Monitoring enforcement
Subsidies for investment, market relief
36Lessons from BSE (3)
- NAFTA currently has no mechanism to move toward
regulatory integration except on a very ad hoc
basis - Serviceable mechanisms exist for closer
coordination of regulatory policy but they are
limited - NAFTA countries will have to decide to what
extent to take the next step toward policy
harmonization
37NAFTA Has Suffered from Poor Harmonization
- Partly due to international breakdown in regard
to BSE but - KEY POINT Bulk of trade impact was within NAFTA
and could have been avoided through concerted
effort before the fact (before BSE cases)
38Lessons from BSE (4)
- Harmonization itself depends on further
development of risk management capabilities in
each country - Failure to address regulatory integration will
be - A continuing drag on market integration
- Leave markets vulnerable to recurring disruptions
39The Science and Politics of Managing BSE Risk
- Integrated markets put a premium on good risk
management - Integrated markets put a premium on integrated
risk management - NAFTA trade disruptions as a result of BSE were
unnecessarily large due to shortcomings in both
these areas