RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE INTEGRATED NAFTA MARKET: LESSONS FROM THE CASE OF BSE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE INTEGRATED NAFTA MARKET: LESSONS FROM THE CASE OF BSE

Description:

Prior to CUSTA and NAFTA tariffs inhibited extensive integration ... Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy. Disease of the central nervous system in cattle ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: davidsp159
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE INTEGRATED NAFTA MARKET: LESSONS FROM THE CASE OF BSE


1
RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE INTEGRATED NAFTA
MARKETLESSONS FROM THE CASE OF BSE
  • Julie A. Caswell
  • and
  • David Sparling

NAAMIC - Cancun May 7, 2004
2
Organization
  • Integration of NAFTA beef industries
  • BSE as a case study
  • Impact of BSE on the NAFTA beef markets
  • Integrated markets integrated regulations?
  • Implications and challenges for policy

3
NAFTA Beef Integration
  • Prior to CUSTA and NAFTA tariffs inhibited
    extensive integration
  • 1989 CUSTA removed Canada/US barriers
  • 1994 NAFTA removed barriers to trade with
    Mexico
  • Extensive integration at every level

4
NAFTA Beef Cattle Trade Flows
United States
Canada
Mexico
0.59 M lbs. 0.68 M lbs
0.23 M lbs. 0.24 M lbs
0.74 M lbs. 1,091 M lbs
0.016 M lbs. 0.016 M lbs
Domestic Market
Domestic Market
Domestic Market
Processing
Processing
Processing
gt 700 lbs 439,016
1,259,536
Cow/Calf and Stocker
Feedlot
Feedlot
1,229,220 816,460
Stocker/ Backgrounder
Stocker/ Backgrounder
Legend Trade in Beef Trade in Cattle
lt 700 lbs 12,520 221,782
Cow/Calf
Cow/Calf
2003 values 2002 values
5
Production Shift
  • Source Canfax and Gracey 2002, The Cattle Cycle,
    p. 19.

6
Relative Sizes of NAFTA Industries
2002 Beef Production, Consumption and Trade (in '000 Metric Tons) 2002 Beef Production, Consumption and Trade (in '000 Metric Tons) 2002 Beef Production, Consumption and Trade (in '000 Metric Tons) 2002 Beef Production, Consumption and Trade (in '000 Metric Tons) 2002 Beef Production, Consumption and Trade (in '000 Metric Tons) 2002 Beef Production, Consumption and Trade (in '000 Metric Tons) 2002 Beef Production, Consumption and Trade (in '000 Metric Tons) 2002 Beef Production, Consumption and Trade (in '000 Metric Tons)
Consumption Consumption Consumption Exports Imports Net trade as a of consumption Net trade as a of consumption
Canada 992 992 992 610 307 30.54 30.54
Mexico 2409 2409 2409 10 489 -19.88 -19.88
US 12738 12738 12738 1110 1460 -2.75 -2.75
2002 Cattle Production, Slaughter, and Trade (in '000 Animals) 2002 Cattle Production, Slaughter, and Trade (in '000 Animals) 2002 Cattle Production, Slaughter, and Trade (in '000 Animals) 2002 Cattle Production, Slaughter, and Trade (in '000 Animals) 2002 Cattle Production, Slaughter, and Trade (in '000 Animals) 2002 Cattle Production, Slaughter, and Trade (in '000 Animals) 2002 Cattle Production, Slaughter, and Trade (in '000 Animals) 2002 Cattle Production, Slaughter, and Trade (in '000 Animals)
Slaughter Beef Cattle Exports Beef Cattle Exports Beef Cattle Imports Net trade as a of slaughter
Canada Canada 3753 1690 1690 138 41.35 41.35
Mexico Mexico 8310 948 948 206 8.93 8.93
US US 36970 244 244 2505 -6.11 -6.11
7
Percentage Flows-Beef Exports
10 of Canadian Exports
66 of U.S. Exports
2 of Mexican Exports
8
Production and Markets are Integrated Are the
systems?
Level of Integration Nature Final
Market End Products Production Intermediate
products Control systems Information,
planning Policy Regulations, programs,
planning
9
The Case of BSE?
  • Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy
  • Disease of the central nervous system in cattle
  • Origin uncertain but believed to be linked to
    ingesting feed containing rendered central
    nervous system material from contaminated animals
  • Thought to be linked to CJD fatal in humans

10
Why Study BSE?
  • Beef industry is integrated at every level
  • Integration interdependence
  • Smooth operation of NAFTA industry depends on
    flow of cattle and beef
  • Impact of a case of BSE is immediate and
    substantial
  • Management of BSE is an interesting mix of
    science and politics

11
Animal Health/Food Safety Events - Two Broad
Categories
  • Private Events
  • Risks and impacts limited to supply chains in
    which they occur
  • E. coli, Salmonella
  • Government response
  • Censure fines, closures
  • Additional monitoring
  • Industry wide initiatives to reduce risk

12
  • Public Events
  • Impacts reach outside supply chain
  • Impact may be
  • Regional Avian Influenza in British Columbia
  • National BSE, Foot Mouth Disease
  • Trade distorting
  • Government Response
  • Assessment of the impact and notification of
    trading partners and OIE
  • New regulations
  • Mitigation of impacts
  • Industry survival and recovery strategies

13
BSE and International Trade
  • BSE protocols managed by the OIE
  • Based on risk analysis - science based
  • 5 levels of BSE risk status
  • Guidance on import restrictions for cattle and
    beef for each risk status
  • Country goal - BSE free status
  • Importing countries response to BSE case in
    previously BSE free country, contrary to OIE
    guidance, is complete closure of borders for
    cattle and beef

14
BSE Reported 1989-2004
15
First NAFTA BSE Event
  • May 20, 2003 Canada
  • One animal found with BSE
  • Animal had already been removed from the food
    system
  • Trading partners notified
  • All borders closed immediately for cattle and beef

16
Impact Live Cattle Imports to U.S. from Canada
and Mexico, 2003
250,000
200,000
150,000
Mexico
Head
Canada
100,000
50,000
-
Dec-02
Jan-03
Feb-03
Mar-03
Apr-03
May-
Jun-03
Jul-03
Aug-03
Sep-03
Oct-03
Nov-03
Dec-03
17
Price Impacts
  • Canadian market oversupplied
  • Farm gate prices plummeted 50
  • Imports dropped 50
  • Already tight U.S. market undersupplied
  • Prices began to increase
  • By fall the Mexican market became tight and
    prices began to rise

18
Partial Reopening of the U.S. and Mexican Borders
  • September 2003
  • U.S. reviewed Canadian response to BSE event and
    risk of importing BSE from Canada
  • Gave Canada a special low risk status
  • Imports of de-boned beef from cattle under 30
    months allowed
  • Mexico took similar action

19
Canadian Beef Exports, 2002-2003
240
200
160
120
80
40
0
20
Second NAFTA BSE Event
  • Dec. 23, 2003
  • BSE found in U.S. dairy cow
  • Traced back to Canadian herd
  • Possibility that it was fed ruminant protein
    prior to total feed ban
  • Traceback could only locate half of animals which
    may have received the same feed

21
Impact
  • All exports halted
  • Redirected to already tight U.S. market
  • Prices eased back from record highs
  • Mexican market now short and prices increased by
    as much as 15 in early 2004

22
Prices for U.S. Cattle and Beef
23
Partial Border Reopening
  • In March-April 2004, Mexico and Canada reopened
    border to U.S. boneless beef cuts from animals
    under 30 months
  • No reopening yet for live animals

24
BSE in NAFTA
  • Dramatic example
  • Market integration exacerbating trade disruptions
    when problems occur
  • Importance of risk management systems
  • Drawbacks of market integration without
    regulatory integration

25
Managing Regulatory Integration
  • Country
  • Risk analysis
  • Choosing appropriate level of protection
  • Designing the regulatory program
  • Country to Country
  • Policy coordination
  • Equivalence agreements
  • Harmonization
  • Internationally
  • SPS Agreement of WTO
  • Disputes
  • International Standards Bodies
  • World Organization for Animal Health (OIE)

26
Origins of the BSE Trade Crisis
  • Inadequate risk management at country level
  • Inadequate regulatory integration within NAFTA
  • Breakdown of international discipline on import
    restrictions

27
International OIE Standards for BSE Risk
Management
  • Criteria for determining BSE status
  • 5 status levels
  • BSE free
  • BSE provisionally free
  • Minimal BSE risk
  • Moderate BSE risk
  • High BSE risk
  • OIE does not evaluate countries and assign them
    to a status
  • Importing countries judge the status of
    exporting countries

28
Imports Recommendations v. Reality
  • OIE recommends
  • Import restrictions that are appropriate for each
    risk status
  • KEY POINT in no case recommends complete
    prohibition of imports when BSE free status is
    lost
  • What countries do
  • Immediately close borders to imports from country
    with BSE case(s)
  • RESULT huge trade impacts

29
Impact of BSE on NAFTA Countries
  • Set up by failure of international discipline on
    BSE management
  • NAFTA countries were full partners
  • Aided by lack of regulatory integration within
    NAFTA to control internal impacts
  • Further abetted by inadequate risk management at
    the country level

30
Living with BSE Positive Status
  • Putting new regulations in place
  • Reopening borders
  • Encourage all to follow OIE standards, prove
    minimal BSE risk
  • Negotiate ad hoc border openings (perhaps based
    on OIE standards)
  • Accomplished within NAFTA for many beef products
    from younger animals
  • Not accomplished yet for live animals
  • Little progress with other trading partners
  • Being prepared for more cases

31
Lessons from BSE (1)
  • NAFTA is pursuing high level of market
    integration
  • E.g., with elimination of tariffs
  • But has a relatively low level of coordination in
    regard to nontariff barriers, such as regulations
  • Economic integration has outrun regulatory
    integration, leaving industries more vulnerable
    to disruption

32
Why Cant We Agree?
  • Same or very similar
  • Scientific assessment of risk
  • Choice of appropriate level of protection for
    human health
  • Different benefit-cost calculus due to
  • Uncertainties
  • Costs and acceptable level of costs
  • Market risks of problems (e.g., first or
    subsequent BSE cases)
  • Regulatory culture

33
Lessons from BSE (2)
  • There are legitimate reasons why countries are
    reluctant to harmonize regulatory policy
  • And market integration within NAFTA poses
    problems for exports to non-NAFTA countries

34
Rebuilding the NAFTA Market
  • Through ad hoc negotiation of border openings
  • Go further?
  • Integrated Risk Management System

35
What Would Needto be Harmonized?
Feed regulations
Production, shipping, slaughter standards
Testing regimes
Tracking regimes
Response to case(s)
Monitoring enforcement
Subsidies for investment, market relief
36
Lessons from BSE (3)
  • NAFTA currently has no mechanism to move toward
    regulatory integration except on a very ad hoc
    basis
  • Serviceable mechanisms exist for closer
    coordination of regulatory policy but they are
    limited
  • NAFTA countries will have to decide to what
    extent to take the next step toward policy
    harmonization

37
NAFTA Has Suffered from Poor Harmonization
  • Partly due to international breakdown in regard
    to BSE but
  • KEY POINT Bulk of trade impact was within NAFTA
    and could have been avoided through concerted
    effort before the fact (before BSE cases)

38
Lessons from BSE (4)
  • Harmonization itself depends on further
    development of risk management capabilities in
    each country
  • Failure to address regulatory integration will
    be
  • A continuing drag on market integration
  • Leave markets vulnerable to recurring disruptions

39
The Science and Politics of Managing BSE Risk
  • Integrated markets put a premium on good risk
    management
  • Integrated markets put a premium on integrated
    risk management
  • NAFTA trade disruptions as a result of BSE were
    unnecessarily large due to shortcomings in both
    these areas
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com