Means in armed conflict legal framework - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

Means in armed conflict legal framework

Description:

II: Mines, Booby-traps etc. (1980 and 1996) III: Incendiary Weapons (1980) ... or Restrictions on the Use of Mines, Booby-Traps and Other Devises as amended 3 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: Gro
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Means in armed conflict legal framework


1
Lecture 6
  • Means in armed conflict legal framework

2
Prohibited weapons and ammunition
  • Point of departure
  • The principle of distinction (between combatants
    and civilians)
  • The principle of military necessity (unnecessary
    suffering by combatants)

3
AP I, art. 35, 48, 51
  • Art.35 (2) It is prohibited to employ weapons,
    projectiles and material and methods of warfare
    of a nature to cause superfluous injury or
    unnecessary suffering.
  • Art.48the Parties to the conflict shall at all
    times distinguish between the civilian population
    and combatants and between civilian objects and
    military objectives
  • Art.51 (4) Indiscriminate attacks are prohibited.

4
ICJ, Advisory Opinion on the Legality of the
Threat of Use of Nuclear Weapons (1996)
  • States must never make civilians the object of
    attack and must consequently never use weapons
    that are incapable of distinguishing between
    civilian and military targets.
  • ..it is prohibited to cause unnecessary
    suffering to combatants..

5
  • In conformity with the aforementioned
    principles, humanitarian law, at a very early
    stage, prohibited certain types of weapons,
    either because of their indiscriminate effects on
    combatants and civilians or because of the
    unnecessary suffering caused to combatants, that
    is to say, a harm greater than that unavoidable
    to achieve legitimate military objectives.

6
ICC Statute, Article 8 (2)(b)(xx)
  • Example of war crime
  • Employing weapons, projectiles and material and
    methods of warfare which are of a nature to cause
    superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering or
    which are inherently indiscriminate

7
Explicit prohibitions/restrictions
  • The two main principles do apply but
  • If in doubt better with explicit prohibitions
  • The fact that there is a list of prohibited
    weapons does not mean that all other weapons are
    legal

8
Overview
  • Exploding ammunition (1868)
  • Expanding bullets (1899)
  • Gas (1925)
  • Non-proliferation Treaty (1968)
  • Biological Weapons (1972)
  • ENMOD (1977)
  • CCW (Inhuman Weapons) (1980 2003)
  • Chemical Weapons (1993)
  • Antipersonnel landmines (1997)

9
The Petersburg Declaration, renouncing the use of
Explosive Projectiles Under 400 Grammes Weight
(1868)
  • Unnecessary suffering of combatants
  • Aimed at drawing a line between explosive
    artillery shells and rifle ammunition
  • Not prohibited to use against hard targets

10
The Hague Declaration Concerning Expanding
Bullets (1899)
  • Unnecessary suffering of combatants
  • Not prohibited to use in law enforcement

11
The Geneva Gas Protocol (1925)
  • Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use of
    Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of
    Bacteriological Methods of Warfare.
  • Consumed by the Conventions on biological and
    chemical weapons

12
The Non-Proliferation Treaty (1968)
  • The States concluding this Treaty,
  • Considering the devastation that would be visited
    upon all mankind by a nuclear war and the
    consequent need to make every effort to avert the
    danger of such a war and to take measures to
    safeguard the security of peoples,
  • Believing that the proliferation of nuclear
    weapons would seriously enhance the danger of
    nuclear war,

13
  • Article I
  • Each nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty
    undertakes not to transfer to any recipient
    whatsoever nuclear weapons or other nuclear
    explosive devices or control over such weapons or
    explosive devices directly, or indirectly and
    not in any way to assist, encourage, or induce
    any non-nuclear-weapon State to manufacture or
    otherwise acquire nuclear weapons or other
    nuclear explosive devices, or control over such
    weapons or explosive devices.
  • Article II
  • Each non-nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty
    undertakes not to receive the transfer from any
    transferor whatsoever of nuclear weapons or other
    nuclear explosive devices or of control over such
    weapons or explosive devices directly, or
    indirectly not to manufacture or otherwise
    acquire nuclear weapons or other nuclear
    explosive devices and not to seek or receive any
    assistance in the manufacture of nuclear weapons
    or other nuclear explosive devices.

14
ICJ on the legality of nuclear weapons
  • the threat or use of nuclear weapons would
    generally be contrary to the rules of
    international law applicable in armed conflict..
  • However, in view of the current state of
    international lawthe Court cannot conclude
    definitely whether the threat or use of nuclear
    weapons would be lawful in an extreme
    circumstance of self-defence, in which the very
    survival of a State would be at stake.

15
Biological Weapons Convention (1972)
  • Convention on the Prohibition of the
    Development, Production and Stockpiling of
    Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons
    and on their Destruction.
  • Contains no clear definition of biological
    weapons

16
Article 1 Each State Party to this Convention
undertakes never in any circumstances to develop,
produce, stockpile or otherwise acquire or
retain
  • 1. microbial or other biological agents, or
    toxins whatever their origin or method of
    production, of types and in quantities that have
    no justification for prophylactic, protective or
    other peaceful purposes2. weapons, equipment or
    means of delivery designed to use such agents or
    toxins for hostile purposes or in armed conflict.

17
ENMOD (Environmental Modification) (1977)
  • The Convention on the Prohibiting of Military or
    other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification
    Techniques
  • Came after the Vietnam war made it prohibited
    to use environmental modification as means of
    warfare
  • AP I art.35 (3)

18
Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (1980)
  • Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW)
    -also called the UN Convention on inhumane
    weapons.
  • Full title Convention on Prohibitions or
    Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional
    Weapons Which May be Deemed to be Excessively
    Injurious or to have Indiscriminate Effects

19
CCW Protocols
  • I Non-Detectable Fragments (1980)
  • II Mines, Booby-traps etc. (1980 and 1996)
  • III Incendiary Weapons (1980)
  • IV Blinding Laser Weapons (1995)
  • V Explosive Remnants of War (2003)

20
Protocol I
  • Protocol on Non-Detectable Fragments (1980)
  • Reflects the prohibition against unnecessary
    suffering and superfluous injury in AP I, art.35
    (2)

21
Protocol II
  • On Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of
    Mines, Booby-Traps and Other Devises as amended 3
    May 1996 (1980 and 1996)
  • Much of its content consumed by the Mine Ban
    Treaty of 1997
  • Reflects the distinction principle, AP I, art.48
    and 51

22
Protocol III
  • On Prohibitions or restrictions on the Use of
    Incendiary Weapons (1980)
  • Contains a definition of Incendiary Weapons and
    restricts the use of such weapons
  • Reflects the principle of distinction, AP I,
    art.48 and 51

23
Protocol VI
  • On Blinding Laser Weapons (1995)
  • Contains a prohibition of the use of weapons that
    have a a combat function to cause permanent
    blindness.
  • Reflects the principle of proportionality and
    military necessity, art.35 (2), API

24
Protocol V
  • On Explosive Remnants of War (2003)
  • Contains an obligation to take feasible
    measures to mark and clear up minefields and
    other UXOs
  • An attempt to reflect the principle of
    distinction

25
Chemical Weapons Convention (1993)
  • Art. I (1). Each State Party to this Convention
    undertakes never under any circumstances
  • (a) To develop, produce, otherwise acquire,
    stockpile or retain chemical weapons, or
    transfer, directly or indirectly, chemical
    weapons to anyone
  • (b) To use chemical weapons

26
  • Art. I (2) Each State Party undertakes to destroy
    chemical weapons it owns or possesses, or that
    are located in any place under its jurisdiction
    or control, in accordance with the provisions of
    this Convention.
  • Art. I (3) Each State Party undertakes to destroy
    all chemical weapons it abandoned on the
    territory of another State Party, in accordance
    with the provisions of this Convention.
  • Art. I (4) Each State Party undertakes to destroy
    any chemical weapons production facilities it
    owns or possesses, or that are located in any
    place under its jurisdiction or control, in
    accordance with the provisions of this Convention.

27
Definition of a Chemical Weapon
  • Art. II (1) "Chemical Weapons" means the
    following, together or separately
  • (a) Toxic chemicals and their precursors, except
    where intended for purposes not prohibited under
    this Convention, as long as the types and
    quantities are consistent with such purposes

28
Chemical weapons delivery devices
  • Art.II (1) (b) Munitions and devices,
    specifically designed to cause death or other
    harm through the toxic properties of those toxic
    chemicals specified in subparagraph (a), which
    would be released as a result of the employment
    of such munitions and devices
  • Art.II (1) (c) Any equipment specifically
    designed for use directly in connection with the
    employment of munitions and devices specified in
    subparagraph (b).

29
Definitions of precursor and toxic chemical
  • Art. II (3) "Precursor" means
  • Any chemical reactant which takes part at any
    stage in the production by whatever method of a
    toxic chemical. This includes any key component
    of a binary or multicomponent chemical system.
  • Art. II (2) "Toxic Chemical" means
  • Any chemical which through its chemical action on
    life processes can cause death, temporary
    incapacitation or permanent harm to humans or
    animals.
  • .

30
Exceptions - Purposes Not Prohibited Under the
Convention
  • Art. II (9) (a) Industrial, agricultural,
    research, medical, pharmaceutical or other
    peaceful purposes
  • Art. II (9) (b) Protective purposes, namely those
    purposes directly related to protection against
    toxic chemicals and to protection against
    chemical weapons
  • Art. II (9) (c) Military purposes not connected
    with the use of chemical weapons and not
    dependent on the use of the toxic properties of
    chemicals as a method of warfare
  • Art. II (9) (d) Law enforcement including
    domestic riot control purposes.

31
Law enforcement including domestic riot control
purposes
  • Article II (7) "Riot Control Agent" means
  • Any chemical not listed in a Schedule, which
    can produce rapidly in humans sensory irritation
    or disabling physical effects which disappear
    within a short time following termination of
    exposure.
  • Article I (5) Each State Party undertakes not to
    use riot control agents as a method of warfare.

32
  • Definition of chemical weapon Any chemical which
    through its chemical action on life processes can
    cause death, temporary incapacitation or
    permanent harm to humans or animals.
  • Definition of Riot Control Agent Any chemical
    which can produce rapidly in humans sensory
    irritation or disabling physical effects which
    disappear within a short time following
    termination of exposure.
  • RCAs are included in the first definition.
  • Both are explicitly prohibited to use as a method
    of warfare (Art. I (1) and (5)

33
Mine Ban Treaty (1997)
  • Convention on the Prohibition of the Use,
    Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of
    Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction, 18
    September 1997

34
General obligations
  • Article 1 (1) Each State Party undertakes never
    under any circumstancesa) To use
    anti-personnel minesb) To develop, produce,
    otherwise acquire, stockpile, retain or transfer
    to anyone, directly or indirectly, anti-personnel
    minesc) To assist, encourage or induce, in any
    way, anyone to engage in any activity prohibited
    to a State Party under this Convention.

35
Destruction of stockpiles and minefields
  • Article 1 (2) Each State Party undertakes to
    destroy or ensure the destruction of all
    anti-personnel mines in accordance with the
    provisions of this Convention.

36
Definition of an anti personnel mine
  • Article 2 (1) "Anti-personnel mine" means a mine
    designed to be exploded by the presence,
    proximity or contact of a person and that will
    incapacitate, injure or kill one or more persons.

37
Anti vehicle mines are not prohibited
  • Article 2 (1) (Second sentence) Mines designed to
    be detonated by the presence, proximity or
    contact of a vehicle as opposed to a person, that
    are equipped with anti-handling devices, are not
    considered anti-personnel mines as a result of
    being so equipped.

38
Cluster weapons (not prohibited)
  • A weapon (air or surface delivered) which
    contains more than one sub-munition
  • Everything between
  • High tech missiles. Each sub-munition is target
    seeking, and self destructs if target is not
    found. Relatively few (6-12) sub-munitions in
    each bomb (Advanced Munitions)
  • Area weapons (covers footprints) with large
    numbers of sub-munitions. Non-guided
    sub-munitions. Failure rates from 1 - up to 70.

39
ICTY, Trial Chamber I, Judgement 12 June 2007,
Milan Martic
  • Para 463 ..the Trial Chamber notes the
    characteristics of the weapon, it being a
    non-guided high dispersion weapon. The Trial
    Chamber therefore concludes that the M-87 Orkan,
    by virtue of its characteristics and the firing
    range in this specific instance, was incapable of
    hitting specific targets. For these reasons, the
    Trial Chamber also finds that the M-87 Orkan is
    an indiscriminate weapon,

40
  • Para 472 Having regard in particular to the
    nature of the M-87 Orkan and the finding that
    Milan Martic knew about the effects of this
    weapon, the Trial Chamber finds that Milan Martic
    willfully made the civilian population of Zagreb
    the object of this attack. Milan Martic therefore
    incurs individual criminal responsibility under
    Article 7(1) of the Statute for Count 19, attacks
    on civilians under Article 3.

41
The relationship between the general rules and
the specific rules
  • The fact that a weapon is not subject to specific
    prohibition does not necessarily mean that the
    weapon is allowed One must always assess weapons
    with regard to the basic principles of
    distinction and unnecessary suffering.

42
Obligation to Review New Weapons
  • Art.36, AP I
  • In the study, development, acquisition or
    adoption of a new weapon, means or method of
    warfare, a High Contracting Party is under an
    obligation to determine whether its employment
    would, in some or all circumstances, be
    prohibited by this Protocol or by any other rule
    of international law applicable to the High
    Contracting Party.

43
Non-lethal /less lethal weapons
  • Difficult to distinguish between lethal and
    non-lethal weapons (AP mines are designed to be
    non-lethal)
  • If a weapon is categorised as non-lethal this
    does not have any impact on whether the weapon is
    prohibited - for example tear gas is prohibited
    as a means of warfare

44
  • Exploding ammunition (Unnecessary suffering)
  • Expanding bullets (Unnecessary suffering)
  • Nuclear weapons (Distinction environment)
  • Biological Weapons (Distinction)
  • ENMOD (Environment)
  • Non-detectable fragments (Unnecessary suffering)
  • Incendiary weapons (Unnecessary suffering)
  • Blinding laser (Unnecessary suffering)
  • Chemical Weapons (Distinction)
  • Antipersonnel landmines (Distinction)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com