Title: The Aryl hydrocarbon (Ah) Receptor: Comparative Toxicology and Possible Role as a Biomarker of Dioxin Susceptibility
1Toxicology I Principles Mechanisms
Marine Mammal Toxicology Spring 2004 Mark
Hahn Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
2Exposure
1. Absorption/route of entry
Dose
1. Distribution/toxicokinetics
2. Biotransformation
3. Excretion
Tissue concentration
1. Molecular mechanism
2. Pathogenesis
Effect (individual)
3Approaches to studying toxicological
mechanisms in marine mammals
- Direct exposure?
- Semi-field studies (feeding studies)
- Extrapolation
- Biomarkers of exposure, effect, susceptibility
- Field associations (chemicals and effects)
- in vitro studies - tissues and subcellular
fractions - cloned, in vitro expressed proteins
- tissue/cell culture
4Dose-Response
- shapes of curves thresholds
- timing of exposure and effects (acute vs
chronic) (algal toxins versus POPs) (exposure
and effects separated in time) - low-dose extrapolation
5Distribution/toxicokinetics
- hydrophobicity and lipid content
- protein binding
- effect of physiological condition (fasting,
pregnancy) - compartmental analysis
- physiologically based pharmacokinetic models
6Biotransformation (Metabolism)
- Phase I (add functional group) - cytochrome
P-450s (CYP) (hydroxylation) - flavin
monooxygenases (N-, S-oxidation) -
esterases,hydrolases, dehydrogenases - Phase II (conjugation) - glutathione
transferases (GSH g-glu-cys-gly) -
sulfotransferases - UDP-glucuronosyl
transferases - acetylases methylases
7Cytochrome P450 (CYP)
- multiple forms (57 in humans)
- mostly in endoplasmic reticulum (microsomal)
- hemoproteins
- require NADPH and O2
- tissue-, sex-, and stage- specific expression
- broad substrate specificity (endogenous and
xenobiotic) - some inducible
- nomenclature (family-subfamily-gene e.g.
CYP1A1)
8(No Transcript)
9Human P450 enzymes
10Regulation of CYP gene expression by soluble
receptors
11Reactions - PAH metabolism
EH
CYP1A1
CYP1A1
DHD-DH
12(No Transcript)
13Reactions - PCB metabolism Differential
susceptibility to biotransformation Preferential
loss of 3,4-unsubstituted congeners
2,2,5,5-TCB
2,2,4,5,5-PCB
2,2,3,4,4,5-HCB
2,2,4,5,5,6-HCB
2,2,4,4,5,5-HCB
Rob Letcher, Univ. of Windsor
14Reactions - PCB metabolism
Rob Letcher, Univ. of Windsor
15Reactions - PCB metabolism
CYP2B
GST
NAT
CYP FMO
MeT
b-lyase
Rob Letcher, Univ. of Windsor
16OH-PCBs
- Formed by CYP1A and CYP2B
- Less hydrophobic than parent PCBs
- Most readily excreted some persist in blood (m-
and p-hydroxy w/ o-Cl) - Poor substrates for conjugation (glucuronidation
and sulfation) - Multiple effects- displace T4 from
transthyretin- inhibit sulfotransferase (T4,
E2, 3-OH-BaP)- inhibit glucuronosyl transferase
(3-OH-BaP) - agonists for estrogen receptors
17OH-PCBs as inhibitors of T4 transport by
transthyretin (TTR)
Brouwer et al 1998
18Methylsulfonyl-PCBs
- Formed by sequential enzymatic reactions
- Less hydrophobic than parent PCBs but still
persistent - Bioaccumulate and persist in tissues (m- and
p-MeSO2 w/ 2,5,(6)-Cl) (liver, lung gt fat)-
likely role for CYP2B epoxidation as initial step - adipose MeSO2-PCB/PCB .01-.25(highest in
Baltic ringed and grey seal) - Protein interactions- uteroglobin
(progesterone-binding protein)- glucocorticoid
receptor antagonist- estrogen receptor
antagonist? - Induce CYP2B,C and CYP3A enzymes
19Biotransformation in marine mammals
- What is the capacity for xenobiotic metabolism
in MM? Are there species differences in
xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes? - diversity
- expression - inducibility - catalytic
function (rates and specificity) - Direct measurement of metabolites
- Inferences from contaminant patterns in MM
tissues - Direct assessment in vitro - immunochemical
detection - in vitro catalytic assay (model
substrates correlations inhibitors) -
cloning, expression, characterization
20Biotransformation capacity inferred from patterns
of PCB congeners(Dalls porpoise vs human)
Tanabe et al (1988) Capacity and mode of PCB
metabolism in marine mammals
212,3,4,4-TCB
2,2,5,5-TCB
22Relative ratios (Rrel) vs food for PCB congeners
harbor seal
otter
1 m,p H 2-3 o Cl (CYP2B)
0 m,p H 2 o Cl
0 m,p H 1 o Cl (CYP1A)
Boon et al (1997)
common dolphin
harbor porpoise
23Immunochemical characterization of hepatic
microsomal cytochromes P450 in beluga
antibody to CYP forms band in beluga hepatic
microsomes MAb fish 1A1 PAb rodent
1A1/2 (1) PAb fish 2B - PAb rat 2B1 - MAb
rat 2B1 - PAb rabbit 2B4 PAb dog 2B11 PAb
rat 2E1 PAb rat 2E1 (2)
White, et al. (1994) Catalytic and
immunochemical characterization of hepatic
microsomal cytochromes P450 in beluga whales
(Delphinapterus leucas). Toxicol. Appl.
Pharmacol. 126 45-57.
24(No Transcript)
25Immunochemical detection of CYPs in marine mammals
26(No Transcript)
27Letcher, et al (1996) Immunoquantitation and
microsomal monooxygenase activities of hepatic
cytochromes P4501A and P4502B and chlorinated
hydrocarbon contaminant levels in polar bear
(Ursus maritimus). Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 137
127-140.
28CYPs in marine mammals Immunochemical evidence
and cDNA cloning
29Catalytic characterization of hepatic microsomal
cytochromes P450 in beluga
White, et al. (1994) Catalytic and
immunochemical characterization of hepatic
microsomal cytochromes P450 in beluga whales
(Delphinapterus leucas). Toxicol. Appl.
Pharmacol. 126 45-57.
30Rates of PCB metabolism by hepatic
microsomes (pmol/min/mg protein)
White et al. (2000) Compar. Biochem Physiol. 126,
267
31Fig. 9. (White et al. (2000)) Proposed pathways
for the metabolism of 3,3',4,4'-TCB in beluga
whale liver microsomes. The thickness of the
arrows reflects the significance of an indicated
pathway. The 4-hydroxy-3,3',4',5-TCB reflects a
positional shift of a Cl.
32StL
HB
R.J. Letcher, et al. (2000). Methylsulfone PCB
and DDE metabolites in beluga whale
(Delphinapterus leucas) from the St. Lawrence
river estuary and western Hudson Bay, Canada.
Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 19(5), 1378-1388.
33(No Transcript)
34Molecular mechanisms of toxicity
- covalent binding to protein or DNA
- oxidative stress (e.g. via Reactive Oxygen
Species) - lipid peroxidation - oxidative DNA
damage - oxidative damage to proteins (-SH) - enzyme inhibition (e.g. OP pesticides AChE)
- interference with ion channels - e.g.
saxitoxin, brevetoxin - interference with receptor-dependent signaling
- membrane bound receptors (neurotransmitter) -
intracellular receptors (hormone)
35Soluble receptors involved in xenobiotic effects
Receptor Endogenous Xenobiotic ligands Target
genes ligands Aryl hydrocarbon (Ah) receptor
(AHR) ? dioxins, PCBs, PAHs CYP1A,B GST
UGT Constitutive androstane androstanes, barbitur
ates PCBs CYP2 (CYP3), UGT, GST, receptor (CAR)
bile acids OAT, MRP Pregnane X receptor
(PXR) bile acids, organochlorine
pesticides CYP3 (CYP2) UGT pregnenolone PCBs P
eroxisome-proliferator- fatty acids
fibrates,phthalates CYP4 activated receptor
(PPAR) and metabolites Farnesoid X Receptor
(FXR)/ bile acids, CYP7, ABC-A1Liver X
Receptor (LXR) oxysterols Retinoid receptors
retinoids methoprene (RAR, RXR) Estrogen
receptors (ER) 17-?-estradiol OC pesticides
CYP19, Vtg alkylphenols others Androgen
Receptors (AR) testosterone OC pesticides Glucocor
ticoid receptor (GR) glucocorticoids MeSO2-PCBs (
CYP3)
36Definitions
- Receptor (P. Erlich, 1913 J.N. Langley, 1906)A
macromolecule with which a hormone, drug, or
other chemical interacts to produce a
characteristic effect.Two essential features - chemical recognition
- signal transduction
- Ligand A chemical that exhibits specific
binding to a receptor.
37Definitions
- Specific binding (SB) High-affinity, low
capacity binding of ligand to receptor - Non-specific binding (NSB) Low-affinity, high
capacity binding of ligand to other proteins - Agonist A ligand that binds to a receptor,
increasing the proportion of receptors that are
in an active form and thereby causing a
biological response. - Antagonist A ligand that binds to a receptor
without producing a biological response, but
rather inhibits the action of an agonist. - Partial agonist An agonist that produces less
than the maximal response in a tissue, even when
all receptors occupied. Partial agonists have
properties both of agonists and of antagonists.
38Definitions
- Potency The concentration or amount of a
chemical required to produce a defined effect.
Location along the dose axis of dose-response
curve (property of ligand and tissue). - Efficacy The degree to which a ligand can
produce a response approaching the maximal
response for that tissue (property of ligand and
tissue). - Affinity The tenacity with which a ligand binds
to its receptor (property of ligand). - Intrinsic Efficacy Biological effectiveness of
the ligand when bound to the receptor e.g.
ability to activate receptor once bound
(property of ligand).
39Affinity, Efficacy, and Potency
Ligand Receptor I
AFFINITY Kd
Ligand-Receptor I
INTRINSIC EFFICACY
POTENCY EC50
Ligand-Receptor A
EFFICACY KE
TISSUE COUPLING
RESPONSE
Hestermann et al. 2000
40nucleus
hsp90
pRb
Ara9
AHR
?
E2F
TCDD
ARNT
cell cycle
XRE
nuclear export
proteasomal degradation
Co-act
mRNA
BTF
XRE
cytoplasm
TATA
e.g. CYP1A1
41Evidence for role of Ah receptor in effects of
dioxins / planar PCBs
- Genetics inbred strains of mice (responsive
and non-responsive) - Pharmacology Structure-activity
relationships for AHR binding and toxicity - Cell Biology
- Mouse hepatoma cell mutants
- Molecular biology
- AHR-null mice
42Structure-activity relationships
The toxic potencies of many halogenated aromatic
hydrocarbons are related to their AHR-binding
affinities.
Data from Safe, S. (1990) CRC Crit. Rev. Toxicol.
21 51-88.
433D Structure of PCBs Calculated Dihedral Angle
Hans-Joachim Lehmler, Univ. of Iowa
44post-AHR mechanisms of dioxin/PCB toxicity
- induction of CYP1A (metabolism of endogenous
compound release of ROS) - altered expression of other target genes (cell
proliferation/differentiation) - recruitment of AHR away from endogenous function
- competition for factors required for other
signaling pathways (ARNT, coactivators HIF, SIM) - cross-talk with other signaling pathways
(estrogen, progesterone)
45PAH vs PCB as agonists for the AHR
46Mechanisms of toxicity of PCBs and their
metabolites
47Toxic equivalency (TEQ) approach using toxic
equivalency factors (TEFs) (AHR-dependenteffects
only)
48TCDD toxic equivalency (TEQ) approachusing toxic
equivalency factors (TEFs)
Calculated TEQs versus Bioassay-derived TEQs
49TEQ approach Assumptions
- compounds act via common mechanism
- additivity (no synergism, antagonism)
- no differences in intrinsic efficacy (all full
agonists) - similar structure-activity relationships for
endpoints of concern and endpoints used to
generate TEF values - similar structure-activity relationships for
species of concern and species used to generate
TEF values
50Ross et al (2000)
51(No Transcript)
52Receptor-dependent mechanisms of toxicity in
marine mammals
- Species differences in receptor
characteristics? - diversity - expression -
function (affinity, SAR, target genes)
53Differential Sensitivity to Dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD)
- Mammals - laboratory species 5000-fold
variability (lethality) - humans ? - marine
mammals ? - Birds up to 1000-fold variability among
species - Reptiles ?
- Amphibians - anurans 1000-fold less sensitive
than fish - other amphibians ? - Bony fishes 40-fold variability among species
54Ligand-binding assays
High affinity, low capacity binding(Specific
Binding)
Total 3H-TCDD
Free (loosely bound)
Bound (Total)
Specific binding
Non-specific binding
55Analysis of AHR specific binding on sucrose
density gradients
AHR 3HTCDD
AHR 3HTCDD TCDF (100x)
10 sucrose
Total binding
Non-specific binding
30 sucrose
Fractions
- Incubate
- Spin for 2 hours
- Fractionate
- Count
56Sucrose gradient analysis of in vitro-expressed
and tissue-derived AHR proteins
cloned, in vitro expressed
tissue-derived
Beluga Liver Cytosol
Beluga AHR
1600
1600
1200
TB
1200
dpm
800
800
NSB
400
400
0
0
0
10
20
30
40
0
10
20
30
40
Mouse AHR
Mouse Liver Cytosol
2500
2500
2000
2000
1500
dpm
1500
1000
1000
500
500
0
0
0
10
20
30
40
0
10
20
30
40
fraction number
fraction number
Jensen Hahn (2001)
57Saturation binding analysis of in vitro-expressed
AHR proteins
beluga AHR
mouse AHR
human AHR
TB
SB
NSB
35Smethionine- labeled proteins
58Equilibrium Dissociation Constants (Kd) for in
vitro-expressed AHR proteins
plt0.05 versus human AHR plt0.01 versus human
AHR
Beluga express a high-affinity (low Kd) AHR
59In vitro binding affinity vs. In vivo tissue
burdens
KD for TCDD 0.43 nM in vitro
TCDD-Eqs in liver of St. Lawrence beluga
0.13 nM (adult male) (Muir et al. 1996 Environ.
Pollut.)
Result 23 AHR occupancy ( Maximum response
depends on receptor concentration)
Jensen Hahn (2001)
60Relative Potencies or Toxic Equivalency Factors
(TEFs) for dioxin-like compounds in wildlife
TEF values
congener IUPAC rodent marine PCDD/PCDF mammal
s 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1 1 2,3,7,8-TCDF
0.1 ? non-ortho PCB 3,3,4,4,5-PeCB 126
0.1 ? 3,3,4,4,5,5-HCB 169 0.01 ? 3,4,4,5-TC
B 81 0.0001 ? 3,3,4,4-TCB 77
0.0001 ? mono-ortho PCB 2,3,3,4,4-PeCB 105
0.0001 ? 2,34,4,5-PeCB 118 0.0001 ? 2,3,3,4,
4,5-HCB 156 0.0005 ?
Source van den Berg, et al. (1998) Environ.
Health Persp. 106 775-792.
61Competitive binding of PCB congeners using in
vitro expressed AHRs and 3HTCDD
IC50 One-site competition model (Prism) KI
From IC50, 3HTCDD (Cheng and Prusoff)
Jensen Hahn (2001)
62Correlation between beluga and mouse AHR binding
affinities
105
xy
104
118
Mono-ortho PCBs
103
156
105
Di-ortho PCB
128
102
81
beluga KI (nM)
77
101
169
Non-ortho PCBs
100
126
TCDF
10-1
PCDD/F
TCDD
10-2
10-1
100
102
101
103
104
105
mouse KI (nM)
63Harbor seal versus mouse AHR
35Smethionine-labeled proteins
3HTCDD-binding
Kim Hahn (2002)
64TB
SB
mouse AHRKD 1.70 0.26 nM
NSB
TB
seal AHRKD 0.93 0.19 nM
SB
NSB
Kim Hahn (2002)
65Trainer Baden (1999) High affinity binding of
red tide neurotoxins to marine mammal brain.
Aquat Toxicol. 46 139-148.
66(No Transcript)
67(No Transcript)
68Weight of evidence approachfor assessing impact
of contaminants on marine mammals
- Epidemiological and observational studies in
wildlife species
Comparative mechanistic studies
Mechanistic studies in laboratory animals