Title: Some important points on Regulatory Issues discussed at the second meeting of the Subworking Group o
1Some important points on Regulatory Issues
discussed at the second meeting of the
Sub-working Group of RPG
- 1. Regulatory text for the new regional Agreement
- The Group reviewed Contributions proposing draft
example regulatory texts for the new regional
Agreement, . - A new draft example regulatory text for Articles
4 and 5 has been developed under the following
assumptions - a) Article 4 procedures are based on Option 3 of
the Report of the WP RPG (i.e. administrations
shall seek the agreement of other administrations
either directly or, when this is not possible, by
applying the procedure contained in this
Article). - Advantage(s) The new Article 4 will benefit
from all positive elements and aspects of ST61
and GE89 agreements.
2Some important points on Regulatory Issues
Sub-working Group of RPG
- b) Identification of affected administrations
-
- Approach 1
- With regard to the protection of the
broadcasting service, the identification by the
BR of administrations affected either by a
modification to the Plans or by a new or modified
assignment to other primary terrestrial services
is based on their territory (i.e. when the
protection thresholds are exceeded at any point
of the territory of this Administration) and not
on their broadcasting assignments/allotments.
3Some important points on Regulatory Issues
Sub-working Group of RPG
-
- Effect of the approach
- - This will preserve the right of
administrations to whom the coordination
requested has been addressed in allowing these
administrations to further develop their
broadcasting networks within their territory
consequently, it is proposed that no time limit
apply for the bringing into use of modifications
to the Plans. - - A coordination request could be rejected by an
Administration even if it has no affected
assignments or allotments in the Plan or under
the procedure of Article 4. - - Conservative criteria for the identification
of affected administrations (e.g. by not taking
into account any terrain profile) could have more
impact in requiring unnecessary coordinations
4Some important points on Regulatory Issues
Sub-working Group of RPG
- Approach 2
- With regard to the protection of the
broadcasting service, the identification by the
BR of administrations affected either by a
modification to the Plans or by a new or modified
assignment to other primary terrestrial service
is based on their assignments/allotments together
with a time limit for the bringing into use of
the new or modified assignments/allotments.
5Some important points on Regulatory Issues
Sub-working Group of RPG
- Effect of the approach
- - Objection to a request for coordination will
be based on technical sound reasons. - - It may not preserve the right of all
administrations to further develop their
broadcasting networks within their territory.
6Some important points on Regulatory Issues
Sub-working Group of RPG
- 3. The digital plan is self-compatible, i.e. all
the allotments/assignments in the digital Plan
are compatible with one another, either
technically or by administrative declarations.
7Some important points on Regulatory Issues
Sub-working Group of RPG
- Effect of this assumption
- - Incompatible digital requirements which will
not be coordinated at the Conference will not be
included in the Plan (or in a list attached to
the Plan) and thus will not hamper forthcoming
modifications of the Plan (it is understood that
Article 4 may also apply for these incompatible
digital requirements). - - Limiting the digital Plan to compatible
allotments/assignments would encourage
administrations not to request excessive
requirements at the Conference (equitable
access). - - Administrations may not be able to complete
the coordination of incompatible digital
requirements at the Conference.
8Some important points on Regulatory Issues
Sub-working Group of RPG
- 4. Use of broadcasting assignments with
characteristics within the envelope of an entry
in the Plans (e.g. with a reduced effective
radiated power, or a reduced effective antenna
height, or with other changes which would not
increase the level of interference to nor require
more protection from services of other countries
is dealt with in Article 5. - 5. Proposing a time limit to complete the
coordination procedure in order to avoid
continuous/multiple modifications without any
intention to complete coordination. - 6. Protection of the Plans and its evolution from
BSS and MSS will be ensured through appropriate
regulatory provisions/procedures. - 7. Use of assignments stemming from an allotment
is dealt with in Article 5.
9Some important points on Regulatory Issues
Sub-working Group of RPG
- 8. Article 5
- Approach 1
-
- To have a notification Article containing a
cross reference to Article 11 of the RR and
addressing the conversion of an allotment into
one or several assignments. Under this approach,
only successfully coordinated assignments or
assignments within the envelope of a Plan entry
are considered as in conformity with the
Agreement and thus can be recorded in the MIFR
with a favourable finding. Consequently, there
may be a need for RRC-06 to resolve that the Rule
of Procedure on No. 11.34 does not apply with
respect to the GE06 Agreement. -
- For the sake of minimizing the actions by WRC-07
and to avoid a possible inconsistency until
modifications of Article 11 may be adopted by
WRC-07, it is proposed that Article 5 refer to
Article 11 of the Radio Regulations.
10Some important points on Regulatory Issues
Sub-working Group of RPG
- 8. Article 5 (contd)
- Approach 2
-
- To have a self contained Article addressing the
conversion of an allotment into one or several
assignments
11Some important points on Regulatory Issues
Sub-working Group of RPG
- 9. Digital allotments/assignments in the Plan
that are incompatible with existing or planned
analogue assignments and with existing or planned
assignments to other primary terrestrial
services, as determined by RRC-06, will bear a
remark in the digital Plan indicating that
coordination needs to be effected before the
digital station is brought into use. - 10. Only coordinated assignments/allotments with
all concerned administrations can be brought into
use however no agreement has been reached on
this assumption.
12Some important points on Regulatory Issues
Sub-working Group of RPG
- The draft example regulatory text doesnt
reflect, at this stage, the views of all
administrations. Other alternative example texts
could be developed under different assumptions,
e.g. - - Use of broadcasting assignments with
characteristics within the envelope of an entry
in the Plans (e.g. with a reduced effective
radiated power, or a reduced effective antenna
height, or with other changes which would not
increase the level of interference to nor require
more protection from services of other countries)
is dealt with in Article 4. - - Use of assignments stemming from an allotment
is dealt with in Article 4. - Some administrations made a reservation on the
principle of an implicit agreement in general,
therefore they do not agree to a modification to
the Plan if no response is given within a certain
period of time, as proposed in 4.1.4.6 and
4.3.4.6 of the draft example text for Article 4.
13Some important points on Regulatory Issues
Sub-working Group of RPG
- 11. Revision of the ST61 and GE89 Agreements
-
- SWG-1 reviewed Document 6 developed by the
Bureau, in close cooperation with the Legal
Affairs Unit of the ITU, which provides a
possible version of the draft Final Acts of the
Conference for the revision of the Stockholm 1961
Agreement, limiting the revision to the minimum
necessary, i.e. the abrogation of the relevant
parts of ST61. A draft example text is proposed
in Attachment 2 to this report. - Similar approach will be used to develop the
draft Final Acts of the Conference for the
revision of the Geneva 1989 Agreement