Some important points on Regulatory Issues discussed at the second meeting of the Subworking Group o - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Some important points on Regulatory Issues discussed at the second meeting of the Subworking Group o

Description:

... 3 of the Report of the WP RPG (i.e. administrations shall seek the agreement of ... Some important points on Regulatory Issues Sub-working Group of RPG ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: con53
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Some important points on Regulatory Issues discussed at the second meeting of the Subworking Group o


1
Some important points on Regulatory Issues
discussed at the second meeting of the
Sub-working Group of RPG
  • 1. Regulatory text for the new regional Agreement
  • The Group reviewed Contributions proposing draft
    example regulatory texts for the new regional
    Agreement, .
  • A new draft example regulatory text for Articles
    4 and 5 has been developed under the following
    assumptions
  • a) Article 4 procedures are based on Option 3 of
    the Report of the WP RPG (i.e. administrations
    shall seek the agreement of other administrations
    either directly or, when this is not possible, by
    applying the procedure contained in this
    Article).
  • Advantage(s) The new Article 4 will benefit
    from all positive elements and aspects of ST61
    and GE89 agreements.

2
Some important points on Regulatory Issues
Sub-working Group of RPG
  • b) Identification of affected administrations
  • Approach 1
  • With regard to the protection of the
    broadcasting service, the identification by the
    BR of administrations affected either by a
    modification to the Plans or by a new or modified
    assignment to other primary terrestrial services
    is based on their territory (i.e. when the
    protection thresholds are exceeded at any point
    of the territory of this Administration) and not
    on their broadcasting assignments/allotments.

3
Some important points on Regulatory Issues
Sub-working Group of RPG
  • Effect of the approach
  • - This will preserve the right of
    administrations to whom the coordination
    requested has been addressed in allowing these
    administrations to further develop their
    broadcasting networks within their territory
    consequently, it is proposed that no time limit
    apply for the bringing into use of modifications
    to the Plans.
  • - A coordination request could be rejected by an
    Administration even if it has no affected
    assignments or allotments in the Plan or under
    the procedure of Article 4.
  • - Conservative criteria for the identification
    of affected administrations (e.g. by not taking
    into account any terrain profile) could have more
    impact in requiring unnecessary coordinations

4
Some important points on Regulatory Issues
Sub-working Group of RPG
  • Approach 2
  • With regard to the protection of the
    broadcasting service, the identification by the
    BR of administrations affected either by a
    modification to the Plans or by a new or modified
    assignment to other primary terrestrial service
    is based on their assignments/allotments together
    with a time limit for the bringing into use of
    the new or modified assignments/allotments.

5
Some important points on Regulatory Issues
Sub-working Group of RPG
  • Effect of the approach
  • - Objection to a request for coordination will
    be based on technical sound reasons.
  • - It may not preserve the right of all
    administrations to further develop their
    broadcasting networks within their territory.

6
Some important points on Regulatory Issues
Sub-working Group of RPG
  • 3. The digital plan is self-compatible, i.e. all
    the allotments/assignments in the digital Plan
    are compatible with one another, either
    technically or by administrative declarations.

7
Some important points on Regulatory Issues
Sub-working Group of RPG
  • Effect of this assumption
  • - Incompatible digital requirements which will
    not be coordinated at the Conference will not be
    included in the Plan (or in a list attached to
    the Plan) and thus will not hamper forthcoming
    modifications of the Plan (it is understood that
    Article 4 may also apply for these incompatible
    digital requirements).
  • - Limiting the digital Plan to compatible
    allotments/assignments would encourage
    administrations not to request excessive
    requirements at the Conference (equitable
    access).
  • - Administrations may not be able to complete
    the coordination of incompatible digital
    requirements at the Conference.

8
Some important points on Regulatory Issues
Sub-working Group of RPG
  • 4. Use of broadcasting assignments with
    characteristics within the envelope of an entry
    in the Plans (e.g. with a reduced effective
    radiated power, or a reduced effective antenna
    height, or with other changes which would not
    increase the level of interference to nor require
    more protection from services of other countries
    is dealt with in Article 5.
  • 5. Proposing a time limit to complete the
    coordination procedure in order to avoid
    continuous/multiple modifications without any
    intention to complete coordination.
  • 6. Protection of the Plans and its evolution from
    BSS and MSS will be ensured through appropriate
    regulatory provisions/procedures.
  • 7. Use of assignments stemming from an allotment
    is dealt with in Article 5.

9
Some important points on Regulatory Issues
Sub-working Group of RPG
  • 8. Article 5
  • Approach 1
  • To have a notification Article containing a
    cross reference to Article 11 of the RR and
    addressing the conversion of an allotment into
    one or several assignments. Under this approach,
    only successfully coordinated assignments or
    assignments within the envelope of a Plan entry
    are considered as in conformity with the
    Agreement and thus can be recorded in the MIFR
    with a favourable finding. Consequently, there
    may be a need for RRC-06 to resolve that the Rule
    of Procedure on No. 11.34 does not apply with
    respect to the GE06 Agreement.
  • For the sake of minimizing the actions by WRC-07
    and to avoid a possible inconsistency until
    modifications of Article 11 may be adopted by
    WRC-07, it is proposed that Article 5 refer to
    Article 11 of the Radio Regulations.

10
Some important points on Regulatory Issues
Sub-working Group of RPG
  • 8. Article 5 (contd)
  • Approach 2
  • To have a self contained Article addressing the
    conversion of an allotment into one or several
    assignments

11
Some important points on Regulatory Issues
Sub-working Group of RPG
  • 9. Digital allotments/assignments in the Plan
    that are incompatible with existing or planned
    analogue assignments and with existing or planned
    assignments to other primary terrestrial
    services, as determined by RRC-06, will bear a
    remark in the digital Plan indicating that
    coordination needs to be effected before the
    digital station is brought into use.
  • 10. Only coordinated assignments/allotments with
    all concerned administrations can be brought into
    use however no agreement has been reached on
    this assumption.

12
Some important points on Regulatory Issues
Sub-working Group of RPG
  • The draft example regulatory text doesnt
    reflect, at this stage, the views of all
    administrations. Other alternative example texts
    could be developed under different assumptions,
    e.g.
  • - Use of broadcasting assignments with
    characteristics within the envelope of an entry
    in the Plans (e.g. with a reduced effective
    radiated power, or a reduced effective antenna
    height, or with other changes which would not
    increase the level of interference to nor require
    more protection from services of other countries)
    is dealt with in Article 4.
  • - Use of assignments stemming from an allotment
    is dealt with in Article 4.
  • Some administrations made a reservation on the
    principle of an implicit agreement in general,
    therefore they do not agree to a modification to
    the Plan if no response is given within a certain
    period of time, as proposed in 4.1.4.6 and
    4.3.4.6 of the draft example text for Article 4.

13
Some important points on Regulatory Issues
Sub-working Group of RPG
  • 11. Revision of the ST61 and GE89 Agreements
  • SWG-1 reviewed Document 6 developed by the
    Bureau, in close cooperation with the Legal
    Affairs Unit of the ITU, which provides a
    possible version of the draft Final Acts of the
    Conference for the revision of the Stockholm 1961
    Agreement, limiting the revision to the minimum
    necessary, i.e. the abrogation of the relevant
    parts of ST61. A draft example text is proposed
    in Attachment 2 to this report.
  • Similar approach will be used to develop the
    draft Final Acts of the Conference for the
    revision of the Geneva 1989 Agreement
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com