WRF Model Forecast Track Sensitivities of Tropical Cyclone Ernesto (2006) to Various Parameterizations and Grid Spacing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

WRF Model Forecast Track Sensitivities of Tropical Cyclone Ernesto (2006) to Various Parameterizations and Grid Spacing

Description:

WRF Model Forecast Track Sensitivities of Tropical Cyclone Ernesto 2006 to Various Parameterizations – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: nickba6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: WRF Model Forecast Track Sensitivities of Tropical Cyclone Ernesto (2006) to Various Parameterizations and Grid Spacing


1
WRF Model Forecast Track Sensitivities of
Tropical Cyclone Ernesto (2006) to Various
Parameterizations and Grid Spacing
Nick P. Bassill Michael C. Morgan 2006
This work was supported by the National Science
Foundation Grant ATM-0125169
2
National Hurricane Center Discussion for Ernesto
from 15 UTC 26 August 2006
  • THE FORECAST TRACK IS MORE PROBLEMATIC AFTER 72
    HR. THE LARGE-SCALE MODELS AGREE THAT THE
    MID-LEVEL RIDGE OVER THE GULF OF MEXICO WILL
    WEAKEN AS A SHORTWAVE TROUGH DIGS SOUTHEASTWARD
    THROUGH THE MISSISSIPPI VALLEY. HOWEVER ... THERE
    ARE DIFFERENCES IN HOW MUCH WEAKENING WILL OCCUR.
    THE ECMWF AND NOGAPS CALL FOR ERNESTO TO RECURVE
    OVER THE EASTERN GULF OF MEXICO ... WHILE THE
    UKMET SHOWS ENOUGH RIDGE TO KEEP ERNESTO MOVING
    WEST-NORTHWESTWARD

3
WRF Model Configuration
  • ARW core (January 2006 release)
  • YSU boundary layer scheme (bl_pbl_physics1)
  • 2nd order diffusion (diff_opt1, km_opt4)
  • Rapid radiative transfer model (RRTM) longwave
    radiation scheme (ra_lw1)
  • Dudhia shortwave radiation scheme (ra_sw1)
  • Five-layer thermal diffusion land-surface model
    (sf_surface_physics1)
  • Monin-Obukhov similarity theory based surface
    layer (sf_sfclay_physics1)

4
Changeable WRF Variables
  • Grid Spacing
  • Horizontal 30km, 45km, or 60km
  • Vertical 31 or 54 levels
  • Cumulus Parameters
  • (1) Kain-Fritsch (cu_physics1)
  • (2) Betts-Miller-Janjic (2)
  • (3) Grell-Devenyi ensemble (3)
  • Microphysics Parameters
  • (1) Kessler (warm rain) (mp_physics1)
  • (2) Eta-Ferrier (time efficient) (5)
  • (3) WSM6 (most complex of these) (6)

5
Continued
  • 180 hour forecasts are created with every
    possible combination (48 forecasts)
  • Forecasts are initialized with GFS 0.5 x 0.5
    forecast valid 12 UTC 26 August 2006
  • The goal is to attempt to determine the relative
    importance of modifying grid spacings and
    parameterizations
  • Any combinations including 54 vertical levels
    and the Betts-Miller-Janjic scheme fail due to
    unknown boundary condition problems

6
There are two primary tracks
North across Cuba and Florida
West across the Yucatan Peninsula
7
  • Both are 30km x 30km x 31 levels and use
    Kain-Fritsch CP
  • Blue run uses WSM6 MP
  • Red run uses Kessler MP
  • Future plots show blue minus red (i.e. west -
    north)

180
150
120
90
150
60
120
180
90
60
30
30
8
300-700 hPa Thickness Differences (Blue - Red)
TC John
Fli Version
9
West minus North 90 hour total precipitation in
inches
10
Difference in 300-700 hPa steering flow (blue -
red)
Average magnitude is 5 knots
Fli Version
11
  • Is this simply the result of forcing by the
    boundary?
  • 9 additional runs were done using
  • This larger domain
  • 60 km grid spacing
  • 31 vertical levels

- All possible combinations of previously used
microphysics and cumulus parameterizations
Answer No, the results show tracks which are
essentially identical to their respective smaller
domain versions
12
Observations (1)
  • Choice of MPs and CPs are most important in
    determining forecast track
  • Choice of horizontal and vertical grid spacing
    modifies intensity, but not track philosophy
  • Larger domain does not alter forecast track
    philosophy
  • At these grid spacings, the Kessler MP scheme
    performs best
  • Westward moving TCs prevent realistic formation
    of Hurricane John
  • Eta/Ferrier microphysics scheme is generally
    unable to intensify Ernesto
  • Example Average minimum central pressure of
    storms entering the Bay of Campeche

Eta/ Ferrier WSM6 ?SLP
30 km 989 952.5 36.5mb
45 km 1001 981.3 19.7mb
60 km 1002.7 991.3 11.4mb
13
  • Will a smaller grid spacing allow
  • the Eta/Ferrier scheme to intensify the cyclone
    similarly to the other schemes?
  • any models the potential to more accurately
    forecast the future path of the cyclone?

14
  • 4 km grid spacing over this domain
  • 31 vertical levels
  • No cumulus parameterization

15
Observations (2)
  • Smaller grid spacing allows WSM6 MP scheme to
    perform best
  • Smaller grid spacing does not allow Eta/Ferrier
    scheme to comparably deepen the cyclone

16
Future Work
  • Use different sets of initial conditions to
    determine if these conclusions remain valid (ex.
    Eta ICs, 1 x 1 GFS ICs, different
    initialization times, etc.)
  • Test additional microphysics schemes
  • Test these results with other TCs
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com