Title: WRF Model Forecast Track Sensitivities of Tropical Cyclone Ernesto (2006) to Various Parameterizations and Grid Spacing
1WRF Model Forecast Track Sensitivities of
Tropical Cyclone Ernesto (2006) to Various
Parameterizations and Grid Spacing
Nick P. Bassill Michael C. Morgan 2006
This work was supported by the National Science
Foundation Grant ATM-0125169
2National Hurricane Center Discussion for Ernesto
from 15 UTC 26 August 2006
- THE FORECAST TRACK IS MORE PROBLEMATIC AFTER 72
HR. THE LARGE-SCALE MODELS AGREE THAT THE
MID-LEVEL RIDGE OVER THE GULF OF MEXICO WILL
WEAKEN AS A SHORTWAVE TROUGH DIGS SOUTHEASTWARD
THROUGH THE MISSISSIPPI VALLEY. HOWEVER ... THERE
ARE DIFFERENCES IN HOW MUCH WEAKENING WILL OCCUR.
THE ECMWF AND NOGAPS CALL FOR ERNESTO TO RECURVE
OVER THE EASTERN GULF OF MEXICO ... WHILE THE
UKMET SHOWS ENOUGH RIDGE TO KEEP ERNESTO MOVING
WEST-NORTHWESTWARD
3WRF Model Configuration
- ARW core (January 2006 release)
- YSU boundary layer scheme (bl_pbl_physics1)
- 2nd order diffusion (diff_opt1, km_opt4)
- Rapid radiative transfer model (RRTM) longwave
radiation scheme (ra_lw1) - Dudhia shortwave radiation scheme (ra_sw1)
- Five-layer thermal diffusion land-surface model
(sf_surface_physics1) - Monin-Obukhov similarity theory based surface
layer (sf_sfclay_physics1)
4Changeable WRF Variables
- Grid Spacing
- Horizontal 30km, 45km, or 60km
- Vertical 31 or 54 levels
- Cumulus Parameters
- (1) Kain-Fritsch (cu_physics1)
- (2) Betts-Miller-Janjic (2)
- (3) Grell-Devenyi ensemble (3)
- Microphysics Parameters
- (1) Kessler (warm rain) (mp_physics1)
- (2) Eta-Ferrier (time efficient) (5)
- (3) WSM6 (most complex of these) (6)
5Continued
- 180 hour forecasts are created with every
possible combination (48 forecasts) - Forecasts are initialized with GFS 0.5 x 0.5
forecast valid 12 UTC 26 August 2006 - The goal is to attempt to determine the relative
importance of modifying grid spacings and
parameterizations - Any combinations including 54 vertical levels
and the Betts-Miller-Janjic scheme fail due to
unknown boundary condition problems
6There are two primary tracks
North across Cuba and Florida
West across the Yucatan Peninsula
7- Both are 30km x 30km x 31 levels and use
Kain-Fritsch CP - Blue run uses WSM6 MP
- Red run uses Kessler MP
- Future plots show blue minus red (i.e. west -
north)
180
150
120
90
150
60
120
180
90
60
30
30
8300-700 hPa Thickness Differences (Blue - Red)
TC John
Fli Version
9West minus North 90 hour total precipitation in
inches
10Difference in 300-700 hPa steering flow (blue -
red)
Average magnitude is 5 knots
Fli Version
11- Is this simply the result of forcing by the
boundary? - 9 additional runs were done using
- This larger domain
- 60 km grid spacing
- 31 vertical levels
- All possible combinations of previously used
microphysics and cumulus parameterizations
Answer No, the results show tracks which are
essentially identical to their respective smaller
domain versions
12Observations (1)
- Choice of MPs and CPs are most important in
determining forecast track - Choice of horizontal and vertical grid spacing
modifies intensity, but not track philosophy - Larger domain does not alter forecast track
philosophy - At these grid spacings, the Kessler MP scheme
performs best - Westward moving TCs prevent realistic formation
of Hurricane John - Eta/Ferrier microphysics scheme is generally
unable to intensify Ernesto - Example Average minimum central pressure of
storms entering the Bay of Campeche
Eta/ Ferrier WSM6 ?SLP
30 km 989 952.5 36.5mb
45 km 1001 981.3 19.7mb
60 km 1002.7 991.3 11.4mb
13- Will a smaller grid spacing allow
- the Eta/Ferrier scheme to intensify the cyclone
similarly to the other schemes? - any models the potential to more accurately
forecast the future path of the cyclone?
14- 4 km grid spacing over this domain
- 31 vertical levels
- No cumulus parameterization
15Observations (2)
- Smaller grid spacing allows WSM6 MP scheme to
perform best - Smaller grid spacing does not allow Eta/Ferrier
scheme to comparably deepen the cyclone
16Future Work
- Use different sets of initial conditions to
determine if these conclusions remain valid (ex.
Eta ICs, 1 x 1 GFS ICs, different
initialization times, etc.) - Test additional microphysics schemes
- Test these results with other TCs