Assessment and Interviewing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 55
About This Presentation
Title:

Assessment and Interviewing

Description:

(13) chills or hot flushes. Agoraphobia ... train in years but I go on some trains if my husband or a good friend is with me. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:50
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 56
Provided by: andre251
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Assessment and Interviewing


1
Assessment and Interviewing
2
(Page Stritzke, 2006)
3
Matching
  • Linking a client to the appropriate treatment
    option
  • Screening and problem description (in which a
    decision is made about the need for further
    assessment and the presenting problems are
    identified)
  • Treatment matching (in which specific information
    is collected that aids the clinical
    decision-making process).

4
Measurement
  • Pre, post, and follow-up assessments of a
    variable(s) to determine the amount of change
    that has occurred as a result of an intervention.

5
Monitoring
  • Use of periodic assessment to intervention
    outcomes to permit inferences about what has
    produced the observed change.
  • Progress monitoring is aimed at determining
    deviations from the expected course of
    improvement whereas
  • Outcomes monitoring focuses upon the aspects of
    the intervention process that bring about change
  • Andrews Page (2006)

6
Management
  • Ongoing assessment and evaluation of clinical and
    administrative processes involved in the delivery
    of care.
  • The role of psychological testing has expanded
    beyond client assessment and includes the
    management context.
  • Total Quality Management (TQM)
  • Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)
  • Health increasingly viewed as an industry
  • offer effective services in an efficient manner
  • demonstrate client satisfaction
  • demonstrate to each patient how much they have
    changed as a result of contact with a service
  • Psychologists have expertise in assessment and
    measurement

7
Consumer Outcome Measures
  • (Andrews et al., 1994)

8
Criteria for Selection
  • Applicability
  • Acceptability
  • Practicality
  • Reliability
  • Validity
  • Sensitivity to change

9
Theory-Based Assessment of Panic Disorder
  • Page (1998). Current Opinion in Psychiatry.

10
Diagnostic Interviewing
  • DSM-IV ICD-10

11
DSM-IV Multiaxial Assessment
  • Axis I Clinical Disorders
  • gt1 Axis I disorder, all reported principal
    diagnosis or reason for visit indicated by
    listing it first.
  • Principal diagnosis or reason for visit assumed
    to be Axis I unless Axis II diagnosis is followed
    by "(Principal Diagnosis)" or "(Reason for
    Visit)."
  • No Axis I disorder, code V71.09.
  • Axis I diagnosis deferred, pending additional
    information, code 799.9.

12
DSM-IV Multiaxial Assessment
  • Disorders 1st Diagnosed in Infancy, Childhood, or
    Adolescence (not MR)
  • Delirium, Dementia, Amnestic Other Cognitive
    Disorders
  • Mental Disorders Due to a General Medical
    Condition
  • Substance-Related Disorders
  • Schiz. Other Psychotic Disorders
  • Mood Disorders
  • Anxiety Disorders
  • Somatoform Disorders
  • Factitious Disorders
  • Dissociative Disorders
  • Sexual Gender Identity Disorders
  • Eating Disorders
  • Sleep Disorders
  • Impulse-Control Disorders NEC
  • Adjustment Disorders
  • Other Conditions

13
DSM-IV Multiaxial Assessment
  • Axis II Personality Disorders Mental
    Retardation
  • Paranoid Personality Disorder
  • Schizoid Personality Disorder
  • Schizotypal Personality Disorder
  • Antisocial Personality Disorder
  • Borderline Personality Disorder
  • Histrionic Personality Disorder
  • Narcissistic Personality Disorder
  • Avoidant Personality Disorder
  • Dependent Personality Disorder
  • Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder
  • Personality Disorder Not Otherwise Specified
  • Mental Retardation

14
DSM-IV Multiaxial Assessment
  • Axis III Medical Conditions
  • Axis IV Psychosocial and Environmental Problems
  • Problems with primary support group
  • Problems related to the social environment
  • Educational problems
  • Occupational problems
  • Housing problems
  • Economic problems
  • Problems with access to health care
  • Problems related to interaction with the legal
    system/crime
  • Other PE problems
  • Axis V Global Assessment of Functioning

15
ICD-10
  • The official coding system is the International
    Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision,
    (ICD-10 WHO, 1992)
  • Most DSM-IV-TR disorders have a numerical ICD-10
    code
  • ICD-10 does not use a multiaxial system of
    diagnosis, although there is discussion of a
    triaxial system in which there are the clinical
    diagnoses on Axis I, Disabilities on Axis II, and
    contextual factors on Axis III.
  • The first volume includes the clinical
    descriptions and the diagnostic guidelines

16
ICD Structure
  • (i) Organic, including symptomatic, mental
    disorders (e.g., dementia in Alzheimer's disease)
  • (ii) Mental and behavioral disorders due to
    psychoactive substance use (e.g., harmful use of
    alcohol)
  • (iii) Schizophrenia, schizotypal and delusional
    disorders
  • (iv) Mood (affective) disorders
  • (v) Neurotic, stress-related and somatoform
    disorders (e.g., generalized anxiety disorder)
  • (vi) Behavioral syndromes associated with
    physiological disturbances and physical factors
    (e.g., eating disorders)
  • (vii) Disorders of adult personality and behavior
    (e.g., transsexualism)
  • (viii) Mental retardation
  • (ix) Disorders of psychological development
    (e.g., childhood autism)
  • (x) Behavioral and emotional disorders with onset
    usually occurring in childhood and adolescence
    (e.g., conduct disorders).

17
Panic Attack
  • Discrete period of intense fear or discomfort,
    gt4 developed abruptly and peaked within 10
    minutes
  • (1) palpitations, pounding heart, or accelerated
    HR
  • (2) sweating
  • (3) trembling or shaking
  • (4) sensations of shortness of breath or
    smothering
  • Cont

18
Panic Attack
  • (5) feeling of choking
  • (6) chest pain or discomfort
  • (7) nausea or abdominal distress
  • (8) feeling dizzy, unsteady, lightheaded, or
    faint
  • (9) derealization or depersonalization
  • (10) fear of losing control or going crazy
  • (11) fear of dying
  • (12) paresthesias
  • (13) chills or hot flushes

19
Agoraphobia
  • A. Anxiety about being in places or situations
    from which escape difficult (or embarrassing) or
    in which help may not be available in event of
    unexpected or situationally predisposed PA or
    panic-like symptoms.
  • B. Situations are avoided (e.g., travel is
    restricted) or else are endured with marked
    distress or with anxiety about having a Panic
    Attack or panic-like symptoms, or require the
    presence of a companion.
  • C. Not better accounted for

20
Panic Disorder Agoraphobia
  • panic attacks
  • avoidance of panic-related situations
  • worry about future attacks

21
Diagnostic Interviewing
  • Since your aim will be to assist a client discuss
    what could well be sensitive, distressing,
    private, and damaging issues, it is necessary
  • Good rapport is established
  • Courteous
  • Questioning open

22
Adapted from Andrews, et al. Best practice
guideline for Panic Disorder Agoraphobia.
  • An interview to diagnose panic disorder needs to
    clearly establish what it is that the individual
    is fearful of.
  • The clinician needs to gather details of
    symptomatology including information to aid
    differential diagnosis.

23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
Theories
  • Biological theories
  • Familial factors
  • Unique biological processes
  • Focus panic-related symptoms
  • Psychological theories
  • Particular cognitions
  • Cognitive processes
  • Focus panic-related cognitions

28
Symptom Groupings
  • Lovibond depression, anxiety stress (worry or
    tension)
  • Ormel depression, anxiety avoidance
  • Page anxiety and tension
  • Thus,
  • Anxiety / fear
  • Worry / stress / tension
  • Phobic avoidance

29
A Common Thread?
  • Zinbarg Barlow (see also Spence) A higher
    order general factor differentiated each of the
    patient groups from the no mental disorder group.
    Several lower order factors provided the basis
    for differentiation among the patient groups (p.
    181)
  • What is this common thread?

30
General Neurotic Syndrome
  • Andrews Common causes chief among these being a
    largely inherited tendency to arouse rapidly and
    excessively under stress (i.e., elevated trait
    anxiety or Neuroticism).

31
Assessment of the Nature of Panic Disorder
32
Assessing General Symptoms and Vulnerability
  • General Neurotic Syndrome implies that assessment
    should evaluate both the general and specific
    structures of neurotic symptoms and the
    underlying vulnerability
  • Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS)
  • Neuroticism subscale of Eysenck Personality
    Questionnaire

33
Diagnosing Syndrome-Specific Symptoms
  • Structured diagnostic interviews
  • ADIS-R
  • CIDI

34
Assessment of Panic-Related Symptoms General
Measures
  • panic frequency, severity, and duration
  • panic-related phobias
  • anticipatory anxiety
  • impairment and general quality of life
  • global problem severity

35
Assessment of Panic-Related Symptoms General
Measures
  • Panic and Agoraphobia Scale (PA)
  • Panic-Associated Symptoms Scale (PASS)

36
Assessment of Panic-Related Symptoms Specific
Aspects
  • Symptoms
  • Panic Attacks Symptom Questionnaire (PASQ)
  • Body Sensations Questionnaire (BSQ)
  • Cognitions
  • Agoraphobic Cognitions Questionnaire (ACQ) and
    BSQ
  • Anxiety Sensitivity Inventory (ASI)
  • Anxiety Control Questionnaire (ACQ)

37
Clinical Significance
  • Jacobson Truax Reliable Change
  • Change from pre to post-test for patient beyond
    1.96 times measurement error of instrument used
  • Clinically significant patient having
    significant RC score and moving into normal range
    on instrument (halfway between normal
    pathological)

38
Clinical Significance
  • Michelson
  • Complete BAT with min. / no anxiety
  • Score of 1-2 (5-pt scale) of clinician-rated
    global functioning
  • Score between 0 and 2 on 9-pt self rating of
    phobias
  • Score lt 4 on 9-point self-rating scale of phobic
    anxiety avoidance

39
Summary
40
Directing an Interview
  • Choice of direction remain with a discussion of
    the presenting problem and elicit general
    personal and historical information later
  • Advantages interview continues to flow naturally
    and the client keeps relating the details of the
    presenting problem until they have said
    everything they wish to say
  • Weakness clinician does not have a good picture
    of the client as a person, the social and
    historical background to the problems, a sense of
    other psychological problems, and so on.
  • Clinician could signal a change of direction by
    saying perhaps, Thank you. You have given me an
    idea of the difficulties that you are having. I
    would like to pursue them in more detail, but
    before we talk about these difficulties I was
    wondering if I could get some idea about you as a
    person?

41
Continuing the Interview
  • Assuming that the clinician has decided to pursue
    the former line, the interview will seek to
    extend the inquiry perhaps by signally such with
    the comment, I wonder if we could discuss the
    difficulty you have been mentioning in some
    detail. When did you first notice that something
    was not right?
  • This will direct the client to discuss the
    evolution of the problem acknowledging the fact
    that psychological difficulties exist in a
    dynamically evolving system. However, within the
    complexity, the clinician will be focused on
    trying to highlight the key milestones in the
    problem development.

42
Continuing the Interview
  • This history will lead the client towards the
    present, at which time it will be possible to get
    a clearer description of the difficulties and any
    associated behaviors
  • As a mental checklist, the clinician will be
    aiming to identify
  • (i) what the problem is
  • (ii) when it occurs
  • (iii) where it happens
  • (iv) how frequently the problem takes place
  • (v) with whom these difficulties arise
  • (vi) how distressing
  • (vii) impairing the problem is
  • The interview will evolve from a historical
    discussion to consideration of the problem in its
    current form. The clinician might ask, Could
    you please tell me about a typical day or
    occurrence of the problem? and then explore some
    of the maintaining factors
  • The clinician will also ask about the variability
    in the problem and factors associated with the
    fluctuations (i.e., moderating variables).

43
Integrating Background Details
  • After the clinician has a good sense of the
    presenting problem, its present manifestation,
    and its history, the interview can expand to
    provide a more complete picture of the person.
  • You have given me a good idea of the problems
    you are struggling with, but I dont think I have
    got a good idea about you as a person. Could you
    tell me something about you, apart from these
    difficulties?
  • The aim of this process is to be able to put
    yourself in the clients shoes and imagine what
    it must be like to experience the life that the
    client has had.
  • may be relevant to ask about family history
    (details of parents, other significant figures,
    brothers and sisters, as well as the childhood
    environment of family, school, and peers), a
    personal history (birth date and any significant
    issues, general adjustment in childhood, lifelong
    traits or behavioral patterns and tendencies,
    significant life events), schooling (duration and
    significant events), work history and present
    duties, relationships (current status, history
    and problems), leisure activities, living
    arrangements, social relationships, prior
    significant accidents, diseases and mental health
    problems, and personality (and particularly any
    changes).

44
Coping Resources
  • Enquire about coping resources and any assets in
    terms of personal strengths the individual
    possesses
  • Motivation for change is a critical dimension
  • identify the motivations intrinsic to the person,
    but identify any extrinsic motivators that are
    present or have been successful in the past
  • Identify the stage of change that the client is
    in
  • Prochaska, Norcross, and DiClemente, (1995
    Prochaska Norcross, 1998) see also Miller and
    Rollnicks (2002) book.

45
Finishing
  • At the end of the interview, the clinician will
    need to summarize and synthesize the material
    covered.
  • I will try to draw together many of the themes
    we have been discussing. If I miss something
    out, or show that I have got a point wrong,
    please let me know.
  • It is also wise to ask the client if there are
    any problems or issues which you have not asked
    them about or which there has not been time to
    discuss.

46
Useful Resources
  • Hersen, M., Turner, S. M. (2003). Diagnostic
    interviewing (Third Edition). New York Kluwer
    Academic/Plenum.
  • Sattler, D. N., Shabatay, V., Kramer, G. P.
    (1998). Abnormal psychology in context Voices
    and perspectives. New York Houghton Mifflin.
  • Meyer, R. G. (2003). Case studies in abnormal
    behavior (Sixth edition). Boston Allyn Bacon.
  • Oltmans, T. F., Neale, J. M., Davison, G. C.
    (2003). Case studies in abnormal psychology
    (Sixth edition). New York Wiley.
  • Rogers, R. (2001). Handbook of diagnostic and
    structured interviewing. New York Guilford.
  • Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., Skodol, A. E.,
    Williams, J. B.W., First M. B. (2001).
    DSM-IV-TR Casebook A Learning Companion to the
    Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
    Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision.
    Washington APA Press.

47
Useful References
  • Beck, J. S. (1995). Cognitive therapy Basics and
    beyond. New York Guilford. (Esp. chapters 3-5).
  • Miller, W. R., Rollnick, S. (Eds.). (2002).
    Motivational interviewing Preparing people for
    change (2nd ed.). New York, NY Guilford Press.
  • Norcross, J. C. (2002). Psychotherapy
    relationships that work Therapist contributions
    and responsiveness to patients. New York Oxford
    University press.

48
Structured and Semi-structured Diagnostic
Interviews
  • Structured diagnostic interviews are particularly
    helpful in
  • research (where replicablity is essential), in
    training (where the structure can assist a novice
    clinician)
  • practice (where use of a standardized instrument
    can increase the confidence in a diagnosis)
  • Evaluate the instrument in terms of
  • (i) coverage and content
  • (ii) the target population
  • (iii) the psychometric features of the instrument
  • (iv) practical issues (e.g., duration, training)
  • (v) administration requirements, and support
    (e.g., scoring algorithms, standardized manual).

49
Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV
(ADIS-IV)
  • The ADIS-IV (Brown, Di Nardo, Barlow, 1994) is
    a semi-structured interview that follows a
    structure similar to a clinical interview and
    relies of the clinician to ask additional
    questions to follow up issues of relevance
  • Although its primary focus is the DSM-IV Anxiety
    Disorders, it also assesses Mood, Substance Use,
    and Somatoform Disorders due to their high rates
    of comorbidity with anxiety
  • The whole interview assessing current and
    lifetime disorders takes 2-4 hours in clinical
    samples.
  • Reliability of the instrument is acceptable and
    the limited validity data upon its predecessor
    are supportive (e.g., Rapee, Brown, Antony,
    Barlow, 1992)
  • Suitable as a primary diagnostic measure when
    used by trained mental health professionals.

50
Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) Composite
International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI)
  • The DIS-IV (Robins, Cottler, Bucholz, Compton,
    1995) is a structured diagnostic interview that
    is suitable for use by lay interviewers as well
    as mental health professionals
  • The CIDI (Robins et al., 1988) is compatible with
    both DSM-IV and ICD-10
  • Modular format to permit customization of the
    interview and the structured format has permitted
    computerization
  • Administration time is 2-3 hours with clinical
    samples and they yield both current and lifetime
    diagnoses
  • Useful in large scale epidemiological studies,
    but the level of agreement with clinical
    diagnoses is poor thus, not suitable as a primary
    diagnostic instrument in a psychiatric setting.

51
Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview
(MINI)
  • The MINI (Sheehan, Janavus, Baker,
    Harnett-Sheehan, Knapp, Sheehan, 1999) is a
    clinician-administered structured diagnostic
    interview that assesses both DSM-IV and ICD-10
    criteria
  • Valid structured interview for clinical and
    research contexts, it covers a broad range of
    disorders, but does so in around 15 minutes
  • Reliability and validity promising (Sheehan et
    al., 1998).

52
Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders
(PRIME-MD)
  • PRIME-MD is a brief (10-20 min or 3 mins using
    the more recent Patient Health Questionnaire
    Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams, 1999)
    clinician-administered interview to permit
    primary care physicians to rapidly identify the
    mental disorders commonly seen in medical
    practice (Spitzer et al., 1995)
  • 25-item page self-report questionnaire asking
    about general physical and mental health issues
    and a semistructured interview to follows up on
    items that the patient has endorsed, the
    instrument provides a quick assessment of DSM-IV
    mood, anxiety, somatoform, eating, and
    alcohol-related disorders
  • In terms of validity, its sensitivity and
    specificity are good, although the correspondence
    with DSM-IV was only moderate.
  • Fraguas et al (2006) found a kappa with SCID of
    .42 for SD and .32 for MDD, but low frequency of
    depression in sample
  • Another instrument suitable for use in primary
    care is the Symptom-Driven Diagnostic System for
    Primary Care (SDDS-PC Broadhead et al., 1995).

53
Schedule for Affective Disorders and
Schizophrenia (SADS)
  • The SADS (Endicott Spitzer, 1978) is a
    clinician-administered semistructured interview
    developed to assess the research diagnostic
    criteria.
  • assesses current (i.e., past year) and past
    symptoms, with other versions assessing symptoms
    across the whole lifetime (SADS-L Lifetime), and
    changes in symptoms (SADS-C Change), SADS-LA-IV
    (SADS Lifetime Anxiety for DSM-IV Fyer,
    Endicott, Mannuza, Klein, 1995 cited in
    Summerfeldt Antony, 2002) also assesses DSM-IV
    criteria in addition to expanded coverage of
    anxiety disorders
  • SADS interview takes an hour with non-clinical
    samples, and this short duration, given to its
    breadth of coverage, is achieved by a structure
    that permits clinicians to skip sections that are
    not relevant because the respondent fails to
    endorse screening questions or they are not
    germane to the interview purpose
  • Reliability excellent, when compared with the
    other structured diagnostic interviews (Rogers,
    1995) and the validity is very good (see Conoley
    Impara, 1995), particularly in the area of mood
    disorders, making it well-suited as a primary
    diagnostic screening measure.

54
Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis-I
Disorders (SCID)
  • The SCID versions
  • brief clinical (SCID-CV First, Spitzer, Gibbon,
    Williams, 1997)
  • research (SCID-I First, Spitzer, Gibbon,
    Williams, 1996)
  • Axis II Personality Disorders
  • SCID-CV - brief interview that provides coverage
    of the disorders commonly seen in a mental health
    practice
  • version designed for individual already
    identified as psychiatric patients (SCID-I/P) -
    extensive coverage of mental health disorders of
    all available instruments, with interviews taking
    at least an hour
  • Reliability is good (Segal et al., 1994) and
    validity studies of previous versions have also
    been supportive of the instrument (Rogers, 1995
    2001).

55
Schedule for Clinical Assessment in
Neuropsychiatry (SCAN)
  • The SCAN (WHO, 1998) seeks to describe key
    symptoms
  • semistructured clinical interview
  • a glossary to rate the experiences endorsed by
    respondents
  • a checklist to rate information provided by third
    parties
  • a schedule to assess the respondents clinical,
    social, and developmental history
  • data can be scored to generate DSM-IV and ICD-10
    diagnoses.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com