Ramsey%20Theory%20on%20the%20Integers%20and%20Reals - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Ramsey%20Theory%20on%20the%20Integers%20and%20Reals

Description:

Detour: Infinite numbers (Cardinals) We now assume the axiom of choice: ... Are there any cardinals between 0 and c? In other words, does c ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:160
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: jaco9
Learn more at: https://math.mit.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ramsey%20Theory%20on%20the%20Integers%20and%20Reals


1
Ramsey Theory on the Integers and Reals
  • Daniel J. Kleitman and Jacob Fox
  • MIT

2
Schurs Theorem (1916)
  • In every coloring of the positive integers with
    finitely
  • many colors, there exists x, y, and z all the
    same
  • color such that x y z.
  • The following 3-coloring of the integers 1,13
    does
  • not have a monochromatic solution to x y z
  • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
  • However, every 3-coloring of the integers 1,14
    has a
  • monochromatic solution to x y z.

3
Partition Regularity
  • A linear homogeneous equation
  • a1x1 a2x2 a3x3 0 (1)
  • with integer coefficients is called r-regular if
    every
  • r-coloring of the positive integers has a
  • monochromatic solution to Equation (1).
  • Equation (1) is called regular if it is r-regular
    for all
  • positive integers r.
  • Example Schurs theorem implies the equation
  • xyz is regular.

4
The Equation x1 2x2 5x3 0
  • Every 3-coloring of the integers 1,45 has a
  • monochromatic solution to x1 2x2 5x3 0.
  • Therefore, the equation x1 2x2 5x3 0 is
  • 3-regular.

Richard K. Guy, Unsolved problems in number
theory. Third edition. Problem Books in
Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2004.
5
The Equation x1 2x2 5x3 0(Continued)
  • If we color each positive integer n m5k where 5
    is
  • not a factor of m by the remainder when m is
  • divided by 5, then there are no monochromatic
  • solutions to x1 2x2 5x3 0 in this
    4-coloring of
  • the positive integers.
  • Therefore, the equation x1 2x2 5x3 0 is
  • 3-regular, but not 4-regular.

Richard K. Guy, Unsolved problems in number
theory. Third edition. Problem Books in
Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2004.
6
Rados Theorem (1933)
  • Richard Rados thesis Studien zur Kombinatorik
  • generalized Schurs theorem by classifying those
  • finite linear equations that are regular.

7
Studien zur Kombinatorik (1933)
8
Rados Theorem (1933)
  • The equation a1x1a2x2 anxn 0 is
  • regular if and only if some subset of the
  • non-zero coefficients sums to 0.

9
Rados Boundedness Conjecture (1933)
  • For every positive integer n, there exists an
  • integer kk(n) such that every linear
  • homogeneous equation a1x1a2x2 anxn0
  • that is k-regular is regular.
  • Rado proved his conjecture in the trivial cases
  • n 1 and n 2. Until recently, the conjecture
  • has been open for n gt 2.

10
Fox-Kleitman Theorem
  • Every 24-regular linear homogeneous equation
  • a1 ax2 ax3 0 is regular.

11
Partition Regularity over R
  • A linear homogeneous equation
  • a1x1 a2x2 a3x3 0 (1)
  • with real coefficients is called r-regular over R
  • if every r-coloring of the nonzero real numbers
  • has a monochromatic solution to Equation (1).
  • A linear homogeneous equation is called
  • regular over R if it is r-regular over R for all
  • positive integers r.

12
Rados Theorem over R (1943)
  • The equation a1x1a2x2 anxn 0 is
  • regular over R if and only if some subset of
  • the non-zero coefficients sums to 0.
  • Regular examples
  • x1 ?x2 - (1 ? )x3 0
  • ? x1 - ? x2 4x3 0
  • Nonregular example x1 2x2 - 4x3 0

13
The equation x1 2x2 - 4x3 0
  • Let T denote the statement
  • the equation x1 2x2 - 4x3 0 is 3-regular
    over R.
  • Jacob Fox and Rados Radoicic recently proved the
  • statement T is independent of the
    Zermelo-Fraenkel
  • axioms for set theory.
  • That is, no contradiction arises if you assume T
    is true
  • and no contradiction arises if you assume T is
    false.

14
Detour Infinite numbers (Cardinals)
  • We now assume the axiom of choice
  • for every family C of nonempty sets, there exists
    a
  • function f defined on C such that f(S) is an
    element
  • of S for every S from C.
  • Two sets A and B are said to have the same size
  • if there exists a bijective function f A ? B.
    The
  • cardinality of a set S is the size of S.
  • The cardinality of a,b,c,d is 4.
  • The cardinality of N is denoted by ?0.
  • The cardinality of R is denoted by c.

15
The cardinals
  • The cardinal numbers (in increasing order)
  • 0, 1, 2, , ?0, ?1, ?2, , ??, ??1,
  • In 1873, Cantor proved that c gt ?0.
  • So which one of the cardinals is c?

16
What is the Cardinality of the Continuum?
  • Are there any cardinals between ?0 and c?
  • In other words, does c ?1? This is known as
  • the continuum hypothesis. Cantor spent ten
  • years of his life unsuccessfully trying to prove
  • the continuum hypothesis. It is believed that
  • this contributed to his mental illness later in
    life.

17
The Cardinality of the Continuum
  • In 1937, Kurt Gödel proved that the continuum
  • hypothesis can not be proved false.
  • In 1963, Paul Cohen proved that the continuum
  • hypothesis can not be proved true.
  • In fact, for every positive integer n, it is
  • independent of ZFC (Zermelo-Fraenkel axioms for
  • set theory Axiom of Choice) that c ?n.

18
?Countable Regularity
  • A linear homogeneous equation
  • a1x1 a2x2 a3x3 0 (1)
  • with real coefficients is called ?0-regular
  • if every coloring of the real numbers by
  • positive integers has a monochromatic
  • solution to Equation (1) in distinct xi.

19
Countable Regularity
  • Paul Erdos and Shizuo Kakutani in 1943 proved
  • that the negation of the continuum hypothesis is
  • equivalent to the equation x1 x2 - x3 - x4 0
    being
  • ?0-regular.
  • Fox recently classified which linear homogeneous
  • equations are ?0-regular in terms of the
    cardinality
  • of the continuum.
  • For example, c ? ?4 is equivalent to the equation
  • x1 3x2 - x3 - x4 x5 x6 0 being
    ?0-regular.

20
Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com