Surgical treatment of oral cavity cancer - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 191
About This Presentation
Title:

Surgical treatment of oral cavity cancer

Description:

Surgical treatment of oral cavity cancer – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:2765
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 192
Provided by: hun109
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Surgical treatment of oral cavity cancer


1
Surgical treatment of oral cavity cancer
  • Tod C. Huntley, MD FACS
  • Center for Ear Nose Throat Allergy,
    Indianapolis, Indiana
  • tod.huntley_at_centadocs.com
  • 800-283-1056
  • Statewide Campus System of Michigan State COM
  • Genoa Woods Conference Center
  • January 19, 2008

2
Surgical treatment of oral cavity cancer
  • Introduction
  • Multidisciplinary team approach
  • Surgical approaches
  • Reconstructive options
  • Algorhythms and case examples

3
Oral CA
  • Unique challenges for treatment
  • Integral part of upper aerodigestive tract
  • Multiple functions
  • Speech, swallowing, immune, respiration
  • Wide range of behaviors and presentations
  • Diverse treatment options
  • Prevention and early diagnosis crucial
  • Serious health problem

4
Oral CA treatment Multidisciplinary approach
5
Oral CA treatmentMultidisciplinary approach
  • Surgeons
  • Cancer resection
  • Reconstruction
  • Speech and swallowing therapist
  • Prosthodontist
  • Oral Surgeons
  • Medical oncologist
  • Radiation oncologist
  • Dentist
  • Social worker
  • Specialized nurses

6
Oral CA
  • Incidence
  • 390,000 new cases per year worldwide
  • Highest South Central Asia, South Africa, Europe
  • U.S. 11.9/100,000 39,000 new cases/yr.
  • Increasing faster than any other HN site
  • Increases with age
  • Men gt women by 31 margin

7
Oral cancer
Surgical considerations
8
Surgical considerations
  • Goals
  • Adequate exposure
  • Wide negative margins
  • Preserve normal functions
  • Proper incision planning
  • Neck dissection frequently needed
  • Avoid the tracheotomy site
  • Reconstruction to optimize cosmesis function

9
Surgical considerations
  • Difficult anatomy
  • Inferior and posterior oropharynx difficult to
    expose
  • Proximity of mandible
  • Complex vascular and neural anatomy of the
    parapharyngeal space
  • Narrow oropharyngeal introitis

10
Oral cavity Surgical approaches
  • Transoral
  • Mandibular swing
  • Visor flap
  • Lateral pharyngotomy
  • Suprahyoid
  • Any of the above approaches can also include
    mandibular resection

11
Oral cavity Surgical approaches
  • Transoral approach

12
Oral cavity Transoral approach
  • Small to moderate sized lesions
  • Oral cavity (palate, tonsils), orophx, tongue
    base, larynx
  • Good exposure mouth gags
  • Laser, electrocautery, cold knife

13
Oral cavity Transoral approach
  • Advantages
  • Least invasive, no external incisions
  • Sparing of pharyngeal nerves
  • sensation, function
  • Earlier swallowing
  • Less chance for fistula
  • Less need for flap for reconstruction
  • Disadvantages
  • Limited exposure
  • Poorer visualization of deeper structures

14
Oral cavity Transoral approach
15
Oral cavity Transoral approach
16
Oral cavity Transoral approach
17
Oral cavity Transoral approach
18
Oral cavity Surgical approaches
  • Lip/mandibular split approach

19
Oral cavity Lip/mandibular split
  • Mandibulotomy with preservation of bone
  • Advantages
  • Widest exposure of oropharynx--Extensive tumors
  • Disadvantage
  • Cosmesis
  • Wound breakdown over chin/lip

20
Oral cavity Lip/mandibular split
21
Oral cavity Lip/mandibular split
  • Mandibulotomy
  • Parasymphyseal
  • Stair-stepped
  • Plate fixation
  • Avoid damage to
  • Tooth roots
  • Nerves mental, lingual, XII
  • TMJs

22
Oral cavity Lip/mandibular split
23
Oral cavity Surgical approaches
  • Visor flap approach

24
Oral cavity Visor flap approach
  • Similar to mandibular swing approach
  • Advantages over lip split
  • Improved cosmesis by avoiding external incision
  • Avoids notching of lower lip
  • Disadvantages compared to lip split
  • Access limited by mental nerves may drill out
    for improved access
  • Lip chin ptosis if chin not carefully fixed to
    mandible or reconstruction plate

25
Oral cavity Visor flap approach
26
Oral cavity Visor flap approach
27
Oral cavity Visor flap approach
28
Oral cavity and oropharynx Surgical approaches
  • Lateral pharyngotomy approach

29
Biopsy techniques
  • Fine needle aspiration (FNA)
  • Cup forceps
  • Excision
  • Brush biopsy

30
Biopsy-brush
Not recommended
31
Biopsy-FNA
32
Biopsy-FNA
Dont traumatize the cells!
33
Biopsy-FNA
34
Biopsy-cup forceps
35
Biopsy
36
Oral pathology examples
37
Leukoplakia
38
Leukoplakia
39
Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia
40
Lichen planus
Erosive
Atrophic
Reticular
41
Aphthous stomatitis
42
Candidiasis
Angular cheilitis
Acute erythematous
Pseudomembranous (thrush)
Candidal leukoplakia
43
Herpes
Primary gingivostomatitis
Recurrent--neurotropic
Recurrent intraoral
Recurrent labialis
44
Melanoma
45
Melanoma look-alikes
Focal smokers melanosis
Melanotic macules
Amalgam tattoo
46
Lip cancer
47
Lip cancer
48
Lip cancer
49
Buccal cancer
50
Buccal cancer
51
Buccal cancer
52
Floor of mouth cancer
53
Floor of mouth cancer
54
Palate cancer
55
Palate cancer
56
Palate cancer
57
Palate cancer
58
Palate--tori
59
Mandible--tori
60
Mandible cancer
61
Mandible cancer
62
Mandible cancer
63
Mandible cancer
64
Mandible cancer
65
Mandible cancer
66
Mandible cancer
67
Mandible cancer
68
Mandible cancer 3-D CT images
69
Tongue cancer
70
Tongue cancer
71
Tongue cancer
72
Tongue cancer
73
Tongue cancer
74
Tonsil cancer
75
Cancer of everything
76
Cancer resectionsExamples
77
Cancer resectionExamples
  • Tongue
  • and
  • floor of mouth

5
78
Tongue and FOM resectionsTransoral
79
Tongue and FOM resectionsTransoral
80
Tongue and FOM resectionsTransoral
81
Tongue and FOM resectionsTransoral
82
Tongue and FOM resectionsTransoral
83
Cancer resectionsExamples
  • Tongue,
  • floor of mouth, mandible

84
Mandibular resections
Marginal resection
Segmental resection
85
Tongue, FOM, mand resectionTransoral
86
Tongue, FOM, mand resectionTranscervical
87
Cancer resectionsExamples
  • Palate

88
Palate resections
89
Maxillectomy
90
Maxillectomy
91
Maxillectomy
92
Cancer resectionsExamples
  • Neck dissections

93
Neck dissection
94
Neck dissection
95
Reconstruction
  • Skin grafts
  • Local flaps
  • Regional flaps
  • Microvascular free flaps

96
Reconstruction ladder
97
Reconstruction ladder
  • Considerations
  • Size and type of defect
  • Bone, mucosa, tongue, etc.
  • Functional considerations
  • Articulation
  • Deglutition
  • Oral competence
  • Cosmesis
  • Prior treatments (surgery, XRT)
  • Comorbidities

98
Reconstruction ladder
  • Considerations
  • Keep it simple when possible
  • Multidisciplinary approach
  • Oral surgery
  • Maxillofacial prosthodontics
  • Good communication with resection team
  • Big picture
  • Comorbidities
  • Goals

99
Primary closure
  • Examples
  • Anterior mobile tongue
  • Marginal mandibulectomy defects
  • Floor of mouth
  • Advantages
  • Quick and easy
  • No additional dissection
  • Drawbacks
  • Tethering
  • Dehiscence (XRT, tension)

100
Skin grafting
  • Examples
  • Tongue, floor of mouth, buccal
  • Skin vs. Alloderm
  • Advantages
  • Quick and easy
  • Disadvantages
  • Non-irradiated tissue beds only
  • Sloughing bone exposure, granulations
  • Correct insetting is tedious.
  • Need for bolster / tissue immobilization
  • Buccal scarring with trismus
  • Donor site of STSG painful

101
Skin grafting
102
Skin grafting
103
Flaps factors affecting choice
  • Tissue needs
  • Bone
  • Muscle
  • Skin or fascia
  • Vascularity
  • Pedicled
  • Free
  • Other factors
  • Prior treatment (XRT, surgery)
  • Pt health (comorbidities, obesity, etc.)

104
Flaps types
  • Localimmediate vicinity blood supply left
    intact flap is still attached to the donor site
  • Regionaloutside of local vicinity blood supply
    still uninterrupted
  • Free--flap is disattached, blood vessels cut and
    hooked up to vessels in head and neck

105
Local flaps
  • Donor site considerations
  • Limited to non-irradiated donor sites
  • Donor site functional morbidity
  • Limited choices

106
Local flap techniques
Bilateral advancement flaps
Pedicle advancement flap
Rotational flap
Interpolated flap
107
Local flap techniques
Transposition flap
B
A
V-Y advancement flaps
108
Local flap examplesLip reconstruction
5
109
Local flap examplesLip reconstruction
110
Local flap examplesLip reconstruction
111
Local flap examplesLip reconstruction
112
Local flap examplesGreater palatine flap
113
Local flap examplesGreater palatine flap
114
Other local and regional flaps of interest
  • Pedicled flaps
  • Pectoralis Major (PM)
  • Deltopectoral (DP)
  • Sternocleidomastoid (SCM)
  • Temporalis
  • Greater Palatine
  • Trapezius

115
Regional flaps
116
Pectoralis major
117
Pectoralis major
118
Pectoralis major
  • Uses and advantages
  • Reliable workhorse
  • Bulk
  • Oropharynx, lateral defects
  • Disadvantages
  • Bulk
  • Limited length
  • Donor site chest wall weakness
  • No bone

119
Deltopectoral
  • Primary use external neck
  • Disadvantages
  • Limited arc of rotation
  • Unreliable if prior PM flap used
  • Donor site skin graft needed

120
Sternocleidomastoid
  • Use precluded by
  • Prior neck dissection
  • Neck XRT
  • Concurrent neck dissection in level IIB
  • Limited arc or rotation
  • No bone

121
Trapezius system
122
Trapezius systemsuperiorly based
  • Uses
  • Lateral neck
  • Temporal bone, parotid region
  • Unaffected by neck dissection
  • Disadvantages
  • Donor site skin graft
  • Positioning
  • Limited arc or rotation

123
Trapezius systemlower island
  • Uses
  • Neck and intraoral soft tissue
  • Disadvantages
  • Positioning
  • Neck dissection can put transverse cervical
    vessels at risk
  • Bone unreliable

124
Temporalis
125
Microvascular free flaps
126
Microvascular free flaps
127
Microvascular free flaps
  • Advantages
  • Multiple tissue choices
  • size, type of tissue, donor site
  • Non irradiated
  • 2 teams
  • Disadvantages
  • Time and expertise

128
Free flaps
129
Radial forearm
  • The new workhorse?
  • Thin, pliable tissue
  • Reliable anatomy
  • Internal or external defects or both
  • Donor site morbidity minimal
  • Ideal for 2 teams

130
Radial forearm
131
Radial forearm
  • Uses
  • Tongue
  • Phayrnx
  • Floor of mouth
  • Sensation
  • Bone?
  • Risk of pathologic fracture of radius
  • Cannot osteointegrate
  • Allen test to assess ulnar system

132
Rectus abdominus
133
Rectus abdominus
Bulk advantageous and disadvantageous Total
glossectomy or extensive external soft tissue
defects No pt. repositioning needed
134
Latissimus dorsi
135
Latissimus dorsi
  • Advantages
  • Large amount of soft tissue
  • Multiple paddles
  • Reliable anatomy
  • Can also be used as pedicled flap
  • Disadvantages
  • Patient positioning

136
Fibula
  • Advantages
  • Greatest bone length of any flaps angle to angle
  • Multiple osteotomies
  • Can be osteointigrated
  • 2 teams without repositioning
  • Minimal donor site morbidity
  • Disadvantages Limited soft tissue paddle arc of
    rotation, may require site graft to donor site
  • Need to assess peroneal arterial system
    radiographically

137
Fibula
138
Fibula
139
Fibula
140
Fibula
141
Fibula
142
Fibula
143
Fibula
144
Fibula
145
Iliac crest
146
Iliac crest
  • Advantages
  • Thickest bone stock of any free flap
  • Easily osteointigrated
  • Disadvantages
  • Donor site morbidity
  • Bulk
  • Cannot osteotomize as much as fibula

147
Jejunum
  • Uses
  • Cervical esophagus
  • Mucosal defects
  • Disadvantages
  • Mucus production
  • Short pedicle
  • Serosa prevents
  • neovascularization

148
Free flap salvage
149
Oral and oropharyngeal defects
  • Our preferences

150
Segmental lateral mandible
  • Issues
  • Bone reconstruction less critical than with
    anterior defects
  • Less chance of plate erosion
  • Choices
  • Primary closure without bone reconstruction
  • Reconstruction plate with PM flap
  • Nonvascularized bone if no XRT
  • Composite free flap fibula, iliac crest

151
Segmental anterior mandible
  • Issues
  • High chance of plate erosion if no bone
  • Cosmesis Andy Gump
  • Choices
  • Recon plate with PM poor long term choice
  • Bone free flap best option
  • Fibula 1 choice

152
Anterior mandibleanchor the chin!
Lip ptosis
153
Mandible defects
  • Marginal mandibulectomy
  • Primary closure usually OK
  • Later need for vestibuloplasty?
  • Dental rehabilitation
  • Tissue borne denture
  • Neo-alveolus Vestibuloplasty
  • Save anchoring teeth
  • Osteo-integrated implants
  • Expense, extrusion

154
Tongue
  • Primary closure when possible
  • Skin graft/Alloderm when no XRT
  • Larger subtotal defects
  • RFFF best choice for form, function
  • PM flap bulky
  • Total glossectomy
  • Aspiration laryngectomy, laryngeal stent?
  • RFFF, rectus, PM flap

155
Buccal mucosa
  • Primary closure, skin graft
  • Scarring, contracture
  • Trismus
  • RFFF best choice

156
Oropharynx, tonsil
  • RFFF
  • Best choice
  • PM flap

157
Palate
  • Prosthesis generally best choice
  • If need to resect ½ soft palate then resect
    entire soft palate
  • RFFF advantages over prosthesis not enough to
    justify cost and risk
  • Bone free flap for hard palate difficult

158
Palate
159
Oral oropharyngealfree flap reconstructionexam
ples
  • Mandibular defect
  • Mandibular, lip, cheek defect
  • Maxillary and palatal defect
  • Maxillary defect
  • Tongue and tonsillar fossa defect

160
Patient 1
  • Right lateral floor of mouth squamous cell
    carcinoma
  • Invaded mandibular body, lateral tongue, and
    tonsil
  • Palpable neck metastases
  • Reconstructed with fibular free flap

161
Mandibular defectFibula free flap
162
Mandibular defectFibula free flap
163
Mandibular defectFibula free flap
164
Patient 2
  • Large buccal cancer with involvement of
  • Lateral oral commissure
  • Full thickness of cheek to overlying skin
  • Mandible
  • Failed prior reconstruction with pectoralis major
    myocutaneous flap and titanium reconstruction
    plate
  • Reconstructed with fibula free flap and local
    rotational flaps for oral commissure

165
Complex oral defectFibula and local flaps
166
Complex oral defectFibula and local flaps
167
Complex oral defectFibula and local flaps
168
Complex oral defectFibula and local flaps
169
Complex oral defectFibula and local flaps
170
Complex oral defectFibula and local flaps
171
Complex oral defectFibula and local flaps
172
Complex oral defectFibula and local flaps
173
Patient 3
  • Large maxillary alveolar sarcoma
  • Involved premaxilla and ventral alveolus
  • Facial soft tissues uninvolved
  • Reconstructed with fibula free flap

174
Complex maxillary defectFibula free flap
175
Complex maxillary defectFibula free flap
176
Complex maxillary defectFibula free flap
177
Complex maxillary defectFibula free flap
178
Complex maxillary defectFibula free flap
179
Complex maxillary defectFibula free flap
180
Patient 4
  • No cancer
  • Multiple failed oral surgical procedures (gt 30!)
    for cosmetic dental rehabilitation
  • Complete loss of premaxilla, ventral hard palate,
    support to nose
  • Large oro-nasal fistula
  • Reclusive
  • Reconstructed with fibula free flap

181
Maxillary and palatal defectFibula free flap
182
Maxillary and palatal defectFibula free flap
183
Maxillary and palatal defectFibula free flap
184
Patient 5
  • Large right tongue CA
  • Ant. tongue to base
  • Right tonsillar fossa
  • Palpable neck mets
  • Prior XRT and chemo
  • Lip/mandibular split
  • Reconstructed with radial forearm free flap

185
Large tongue cancer
186
Large tongue cancer
187
Large tongue cancer
188
Large tongue cancer
189
Large tongue cancer
190
The end
  • Questions?

191
Surgical treatment of oral and oropharyngeal
cancer
  • Tod C. Huntley, MD FACS
  • Center for Ear Nose Throat Allergy,
    Indianapolis, Indiana
  • tod.huntley_at_centadocs.com
  • 800-283-1056
  • Statewide Campus System of Michigan State COM
  • Genoa Woods Conference Center
  • January 19, 2008
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com