Nonmotorized Transportation Pilot Program Marin County - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Nonmotorized Transportation Pilot Program Marin County

Description:

... and jurisdictions such as bike racks, striping/stenciling, and signage ... Engineer's bike/ped facility design training courses. Share the Road. Booths at Events ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: danda6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Nonmotorized Transportation Pilot Program Marin County


1
Nonmotorized Transportation Pilot ProgramMarin
County
  • WalkBike California Conference
  • September 12, 2007

2
What is the Pilot Program?
  • Component of SAFETEA-LU, the six-year federal
    transportation bill (Section 1807)
  • 100 million allocated to four communities
    nationwide, one of which is Marin County, for
    bicycle and pedestrian improvements and programs.
  • Pilot Program runs through September, 2010, at
    which time a report on its outcomes is due to
    Congress.

3
Purpose of the Pilot
  • To demonstrate the extent to which bicycling and
    walking can carry a significant part of the
    transportation load and represent a major portion
    of the transportation solution within selected
    communities

4
Program Highlights
  • Marin receives 25 million from the program,
    along with Minneapolis, Minnesota Columbia,
    Missouri and Sheboygan County, Wisconsin.
  • The program targets mode shift, or whether
    bicycling and walking can account for more of the
    overall number of trips to work, school, or
    errands.

5
What it means locally
  • Focus on motor-vehicle trip reduction strategies
    rather than recreational opportunities
  • Given the list of suggested projects and
    programs, what are the most critical and what can
    be accomplished during the period of the program

6
Measuring Success
  • Travel habits survey conducted in Fall, 2006 and
    to be conducted again in Fall, 2010 in all four
    communities
  • Localized counts and/or surveys for selected
    projects/programs in Marin before and after
    implementation

7
Project and Program Selection
  • Project and program suggestions identified
    through review of existing planning documents,
    meetings with local agency staff, and public
    input through community workshops over 220
    million in ideas.
  • This comprehensive list represents buildout of
    the network, a goal of the federal program
  • 19-member advisory committee appointed

8
Advisory Committee
  • Role was to assist the Department of Public Works
    with ranking of projects and programs
  • The Advisory Committee met six times and was
    comprised of
  • Marin County Office of Education
  • Bicycle and Pedestrian Groups
  • City Manager
  • Public Works Directors
  • Planning Director
  • Business Representative
  • Environmental Representative
  • Accessibility Representative
  • Marin County Transit District
  • Health Representatives
  • Metropolitan Transportation Commission
  • Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transit
  • Caltrans
  • Transportation Authority of Marin
  • Federal Highway Administration

9
(No Transcript)
10
Screening and Categorization
  • Criteria adopted by advisory committee
  • Key filters are
  • Meets objectives of legislation
  • Is sufficiently scoped to implement
  • Can be implemented in timely fashion
  • Has local support
  • Ideas sorted into one of six categories
  • Primary Network Projects
  • Local/Feeder Network Projects
  • Countywide Projects
  • Planning Projects
  • Programs
  • Redirected to other funding programs

11
Project/Program Ranking
  • Ranking criteria developed by advisory committee,
    such as
  • Impact in achieving modal shift
  • Complements existing transportation network
  • Ability and timeliness of implementation
  • Cost-Benefit determination
  • Improves safety
  • Presents a unique opportunity
  • Ability to provide measurable results
  • Criteria vary between funding categories, as
    relevant and appropriate

12
Project/Program Ranking
  • Under each criterion, specific measures
    identified to evaluate a proposals merits
  • Advisory committee assigned weights to each
    criterion
  • Projects and programs are scored based on the
    criteria and then the weighting is applied to
    arrive at a numerical score.
  • Projects and programs are ordered in each funding
    category by numerical score highest to lowest.

13
(No Transcript)
14
Funding Allocation
  • For the five funding categories, the advisory
    committee recommends a funding allocation to each
    category, or slice of the funding pie
  • With the amount recommended for each category,
    projects are included for funding until the funds
    allocated to that category are exhausted, using
    the scored and ranked lists as prioritization
    tools.
  • Draft recommended projects and program lists
    adopted by advisory committee

15
Funding Allocation (contd)
  • Advisory Committee recommendations submitted to
    Department of Public Works
  • Public Works Director submits funding
    recommendations to the Board of Supervisors,
    based on Advisory Committee recommendations.
  • Board of Supervisors adopts funding plan on April
    17, 2007

16
Funding Categories
  • Countywide Typically smaller, dispersed
    projects in many neighborhoods and jurisdictions
    such as bike racks, striping/stenciling, and
    signage
  • Projects in this category will be determined
    through a separate process this fall

17
Funding Categories
  • Primary Network infrastructure improvements on
    the major north-south or east-west corridors
  • Funded projects include
  • Cal Park Tunnel Pathway (Class I)
  • Puerto Suello Hill Pathway (Class I)
  • Commuter Connection-Enfrente Road (Class I)
  • Los Ranchitos Connector (Class II)
  • Alameda del Prado (Class II)
  • Northgate Gap Closure (Class II and III)
  • Puerto Suello to Transit Center Connector (Class
    I)
  • Mahon Creek Path to Transit Center (Class I)

18
Funding Categories
  • Local/Feeder Network infrastructure
    improvements connecting neighborhoods and
    community facilities with each other and the
    Primary Network
  • Funded projects include
  • Tennessee Valley Pathway (Class I)
  • Doherty Drive Pathway (Class I)
  • Terra Linda/North San Rafael Improvements (Class
    II/III)
  • Medway Improvements (Class II/III/Sidewalks)
  • County Health and Wellness Center (facility
    access)

19
Funding Categories
  • Planning Project ideas which, with additional
    study and planning, could be sufficiently scoped
    to be competitive for future funding
    opportunities.
  • Funded projects include
  • Central Marin Ferry Connection
  • Mill Valley-Corte Madera Bikeway
  • San Rafael-Fairfax Corridor Study
  • Bridgeway Path
  • Francisco Blvd. East Improvements
  • Miller Creek/Las Gallinas Improvements

20
Funding Categories
  • Programs Educational and outreach programs to
    encourage bicycling and walking
  • Funded Programs include
  • Street Smarts
  • Personal Travel Planning
  • Engineers bike/ped facility design training
    courses
  • Share the Road
  • Booths at Events
  • Safety Campaign
  • Community Walking and Biking Maps

21
(No Transcript)
22
Next Steps
  • Project design and program development/
    implementation under way
  • Countywide project category ideas solicited,
    prioritized, and implemented Fall of 2007
  • Compilation of survey data collected September,
    2007
  • Construction of major capital projects begins
    Summer, 2008

23
Next Steps (contd)
  • Construction of infrastructure completed by the
    end of 2009
  • Second travel habits survey and project-focused
    survey conducted Fall, 2010
  • Reports submitted to Congress Fall, 2007 Fall
    2010 and Spring, 2011.

24
www.walkbikemarin.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com