Persuasion - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 63
About This Presentation
Title:

Persuasion

Description:

A: That's what you studied in college, and you know ... Tupperware parties. peer solicitation. good cop / bad cop. eating together. celebrity endorsements ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:63
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 64
Provided by: loy5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Persuasion


1
Persuasion
  • Dale Walker
  • University of Wyoming
  • College of Arts Sciences
  • ALADN 2005 New Orleans

2
Persuasion
  1. Social Psychology
  2. Ethos
  3. Myth

3
Persuasion
  • Q What about logic and reason?
  • A Thats what you studied in college, and you
    know thats only a small part. So lets look at
    other things.

4
Persuasion
  1. Social Psychology
  2. Ethos
  3. Myth

5
I. Social Psychology
  • Reciprocity
  • Consistency
  • Social proof
  • Authority
  • Likeability
  • Scarcity

Robert B. Cialdini, Influence The Psychology of
Persuasion (revised New York Quill, 1993)
6
Robert B. Cialdini, Influence The Psychology
of Persuasion (revised New York Quill, 1993)
7
1. Reciprocity
One of the most potent weapons of influence and
compliance We want to repay, in kind, what
another person has provided us
Cialdini
8
1. Reciprocity
One of the most potent weapons of influence and
compliance We want to repay, in kind, what
another person has provided us
Cialdini
9
1. Reciprocity
I.e. We want to repay, in kind, what
another person has provided us E.g
  • give a flower then ask for a donation
  • LBJ called in favors Carter had none to call in
    political patronage
  • send prospect pre-printed return address labels
    with solicitation letter
  • small gifts and comped meals

Cialdini
10
1. Reciprocity
  • I.e. We want to repay, in kind, what another
    person has provided us
  • Technique 1 If someone makes a concession, we
    are obligated to respond with a concession
  • Making a concession gives the other party a
    feeling of responsibility for the outcome and
    greater satisfaction with resolution

Cialdini
11
1. Reciprocity
  • I.e. We want to repay, in kind, what another
    person has provided us
  • Technique 1 If someone makes a concession, we
    are obligated to respond with a concession
  • Making a concession gives the other party a
    feeling of responsibility for the outcome and
    greater satisfaction with resolution
  • Technique 2 Rejection then retreat exaggerated
    request rejected, desired lesser request acceded
    to

Cialdini
12
1. Reciprocity
  • I.e. We want to repay, in kind, what another
    person has provided us
  • Technique 1 If someone makes a concession, we
    are obligated to respond with a concession
  • Making a concession gives the other party a
    feeling of responsibility for the outcome and
    greater satisfaction with resolution
  • Technique 2 Rejection then retreat exaggerated
    request rejected, desired lesser request acceded
    to
  • Technique 3 Contrast principle sell the costly
    item first or present the undesirable option
    first

Cialdini
13
1. Reciprocity
  • I.e. We want to repay, in kind, what another
    person has provided us
  • Technique 1 If someone makes a concession, we
    are obligated to respond with a concession
  • Making a concession gives the other party a
    feeling of responsibility for the outcome and
    greater satisfaction with resolution
  • Technique 2 Rejection then retreat exaggerated
    request rejected, desired lesser request acceded
    to
  • Technique 3 Contrast principle sell the costly
    item first present undesirable option first

Cialdini
14
2. Consistency
  • Our nearly obsessive desire to be (and to appear)
    consistent with what we have already done
  • Consistency is usually associated with strength,
    inconsistency as weak we want to look virtuous

Cialdini
15
2. Consistency
  • Our nearly obsessive desire to be (and to appear)
    consistent with what we have already done
  • Consistency is usually associated with strength,
    inconsistency as weak we want to look virtuous

Cialdini
16
2. Consistency
  • Technique 1 Elicit a commitment, then expect
    consistency
  • Technique 2 Public, active, effortful
    commitments tend to be lasting commitments
  • Technique 3 Get a large favor by first getting a
    small one (small commitments manipulate a
    persons self-image and position them for large
    commitment)

Cialdini
17
2. Consistency
  • Technique 1 Elicit a commitment, then expect
    consistency
  • Technique 2 Public, active, effortful
    commitments tend to be lasting commitments
  • Technique 3 Get a large favor by first getting a
    small one (small commitments manipulate a
    persons self-image and position them for large
    commitment)

Cialdini
18
2. Consistency
  • Technique 1 Elicit a commitment, then expect
    consistency
  • Technique 2 Public, active, effortful
    commitments tend to be lasting commitments
  • Technique 3 Get a large favor by first getting a
    small one (small commitments begin to shape a
    persons self-image and position them for large
    commitment)

Cialdini
19
2. Consistency
  • Outcome 1 Commitments people own, take inner
    responsibility for, are profound
  • Outcome 2 Commitments lead to inner change and
    grow their own legs

Cialdini
20
2. Consistency
  • Outcome 1 Commitments people own, take inner
    responsibility for, are profound
  • Outcome 2 Commitments lead to inner change and
    grow their own legs

Cialdini
21
2. Consistency
Examples
  • negotiating a car price
  • Hi, how are you?
  • Howard Deans campaign (meet ups and volunteers
    writing letters)
  • have customers not salespeople fill out sale
    agreements
  • testimonials
  • campaign leadership

Cialdini
22
3. Social Proof
  • One means we use to determine what is correct is
    to find out what other people think is correct.
  • The greater number of people who find an idea
    correct, the more the idea will be correct.
  • Pluralistic ignorance each person decides that
    since nobody is concerned, nothing is wrong
  • Similarity social proof operates most powerfully
    when we observe people just like us

Cialdini
23
3. Social Proof
  • One means we use to determine what is correct is
    to find out what other people think is correct.
  • The greater number of people who find an idea
    correct, the more the idea will be correct.
  • Pluralistic ignorance each person decides that
    since nobody is concerned, nothing is wrong
  • Similarity social proof operates most powerfully
    when we observe people just like us

Cialdini
24
3. Social Proof
Examples
  • laugh tracks
  • faith communities
  • mob behavior
  • inaction toward crime or emergency
  • Jonestown
  • applause
  • testimonials

Cialdini
25
4. Authority
  • We have a deep-seated sense of duty to authority
  • Tests demonstrate that adults will do extreme
    things when instructed to do so by an authority
    figure

Cialdini
26
4. Authority
  • We have a deep-seated sense of duty to authority
  • Tests demonstrate that adults will do extreme
    things when instructed to do so by an authority
    figure

Cialdini
27
4. Authority
  • Titles
  • Uniforms
  • Clothes
  • Trappings of status

Cialdini
28
5. Likeability
  • We prefer to say yes to someone we know and like

Cialdini
29
5. Likeability
  • We prefer to say yes to someone we know and like

Cialdini
30
5. Likeability
Compliance factors
  • similarity of opinion, life-style, background,
    personality traits
  • familiarity and contact
  • cooperation in shared goals

Cialdini
31
5. Likeability
Compliance factors
  • physical attractiveness
  • compliments
  • association with positive things (beauty, whats
    hip, food)
  • success
  • smile

Cialdini
32
5. Likeability
Examples
  • Tupperware parties
  • peer solicitation
  • good cop / bad cop
  • eating together
  • celebrity endorsements

Cialdini
33
6. Scarcity
  • Opportunities seem more valuable to us when their
    availability is limited
  • We want it even more when we are in competition
    for it
  • E.g. final 4.4 million in matching funds
    disappeared in one week

Cialdini
34
6. Scarcity
  • Opportunities seem more valuable to us when their
    availability is limited
  • We want it even more when we are in competition
    for it
  • E.g. final 4.4 million in matching funds
    disappeared in one week

Cialdini
35
I. Social Psychology
  • Reciprocity
  • Consistency
  • Social proof
  • Authority
  • Likeability
  • Scarcity

Robert B. Cialdini, Influence The Psychology of
Persuasion (revised New York Quill, 1993)
36
I. Social Psychology
  1. Reciprocity we want to repay, in kind, what
    another person has provided us
  2. Consistency
  3. Social proof
  4. Authority
  5. Likeability
  6. Scarcity

Robert B. Cialdini, Influence The Psychology of
Persuasion (revised New York Quill, 1993)
37
I. Social Psychology
  • Reciprocity we want to repay, in kind, what
    another person has provided us
  • Consistency desire to be (and to appear)
    consistent with what we have already done
  • Social proof
  • Authority
  • Likeability
  • Scarcity

Robert B. Cialdini, Influence The Psychology of
Persuasion (revised New York Quill, 1993)
38
I. Social Psychology
  • Reciprocity we want to repay, in kind, what
    another person has provided us
  • Consistency desire to be (and to appear)
    consistent with what we have already done
  • Social proof to determine what is correct find
    out what other people think is correct
  • Authority
  • Likeability
  • Scarcity

Robert B. Cialdini, Influence The Psychology of
Persuasion (revised New York Quill, 1993)
39
I. Social Psychology
  • Reciprocity we want to repay, in kind, what
    another person has provided us
  • Consistency desire to be (and to appear)
    consistent with what we have already done
  • Social proof to determine what is correct find
    out what other people think is correct
  • Authority deep-seated sense of duty to authority
  • Likeability
  • Scarcity

Robert B. Cialdini, Influence The Psychology of
Persuasion (revised New York Quill, 1993)
40
I. Social Psychology
  1. Reciprocity we want to repay, in kind, what
    another person has provided us
  2. Consistency desire to be (and to appear)
    consistent with what we have already done
  3. Social proof to determine what is correct find
    out what other people think is correct
  4. Authority deep-seated sense of duty to authority
  5. Likeability we say yes to someone we like
  6. Scarcity

Robert B. Cialdini, Influence The Psychology of
Persuasion (revised New York Quill, 1993)
41
I. Social Psychology
  • Reciprocity we want to repay, in kind, what
    another person has provided us
  • Consistency desire to be (and to appear)
    consistent with what we have already done
  • Social proof to determine what is correct find
    out what other people think is correct
  • Authority deep-seated sense of duty to authority
  • Likeability we say yes to someone we like
  • Scarcity limitation enhances desirability

Robert B. Cialdini, Influence The Psychology of
Persuasion (revised New York Quill, 1993)
42
I. Social Psychology
  • Reciprocity we want to repay, in kind, what
    another person has provided us
  • Consistency desire to be (and to appear)
    consistent with what we have already done
  • Social proof to determine what is correct find
    out what other people think is correct
  • Authority deep-seated sense of duty to authority
  • Likeability we say yes to someone we like
  • Scarcity limitation enhances desirability

Robert B. Cialdini, Influence The Psychology of
Persuasion (revised New York Quill, 1993)
43
Persuasion
  1. Social Psychology
  2. Ethos
  3. Myth

44
Ethos
  • The type of person that a writer or speaker
    projects.
  • Goal credibility
  • Personae expert, friend, genuine

45
Ethos
  • Definition the type of person that a writer or
    speaker projects
  • Aristotle demonstrate trustworthiness within
    ones speech

46
Ethos
  • Definition the type of person that a writer or
    speaker projects
  • Aristotle demonstrate trustworthiness within
    ones speech

47
Ethos
  • Definition The type of person that a writer or
    speaker projects.
  • Lysias provide words appropriate to the speaker
  • E.g., the simple rustic

48
Ethos
  • Definition The type of person that a writer or
    speaker projects.
  • Lysias provide words appropriate to the speaker
  • E.g., the simple rustic

49
Ethos
50
Ethos
51
Ethos
52
Ethos
53
Ethos
Comedy thrives on personality types.
  • the absentminded professor
  • the overbearing school principal
  • the precocious child
  • the immature father
  • the rich snob
  • the bimbo

54
Ethos
Variable elements of institutional ethos
  • simplicity or sophistication
  • elitism or egalitarianism
  • emphasis on faculty or students, research or
    teaching
  • careers and professionalism or the liberal arts
  • athletics or academics
  • regional or national or global

55
Ethos
56
Ethos
Common elements of institutional ethos
  • diversity, tolerance, and openness
  • inquiry and discovery
  • heritage and history
  • location, region and campus
  • community
  • sports

57
Ethos
  • The type of person that a writer or speaker
    projects.
  • What is the ethos of your school? Its defining
    characteristics and values?
  • What is the ethos you bring to your writing and
    speaking?
  • What is the ethos you wish to project?

58
Persuasion
  1. Social Psychology
  2. Ethos
  3. Myth

59
Myth
  • Popular meaning lies
  • Greek muqo? (mythos) story
  • Greek muqo? (mythos) opposes ????? (logos), i.e.,
    reason
  • Goal frame or define a situation to create
    common ground
  • Benefit enliven rhetoric

60
Myth
  • some myths / stories explain why and how we do
    the things we do (the first Thanksgiving)
  • some reinforce the values we share in common
    (Horatio Alger)
  • some frame the way we view the world (manifest
    destiny)

61
What is your story?
  • Help your donors see themselves in a story,
    especially a meaningful story
  • Touch big ideas
  • Make the story sensory
  • Fill it with shared values (ethos)
  • Provide meaning to your donors lives and their
    philanthropy
  • Create their self-image as donors

62
Persuasion
  1. Social Psychology
  2. Ethos
  3. Myth

63
Persuasion
  • ddwalker_at_uwyo.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com