Aligning Hospital Quality Incentive Programs

1 / 45
About This Presentation
Title:

Aligning Hospital Quality Incentive Programs

Description:

... medical experts in the states we serve to determine Anthem's medical policy. ... We are now developing expert academic and specialty panels in genetics and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: anthe5

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Aligning Hospital Quality Incentive Programs


1
Aligning Hospital Quality Incentive Programs
  • Virginians Improving Patient Care
    SafetyAnnual MeetingMay 15, 2003

Sam Nussbaum, M.D. Executive Vice President and
Chief Medical Officer Anthem Blue Cross Blue
Shield
2
Agenda
  • Drivers of of Health Care Costs
  • Physician Partnerships
  • Quality of Care in Hospitals
  • Anthem Midwest Hospital Quality Program
  • Virginia Quality-In-Sights Hospital Incentive
    Program
  • Recognizing and Improving Clinical Performance

3
Shift in Expectation of Health Care Delivery and
Financing
Managing Overall Health Status and Chronic
Illness
Managing Components of Illness
Current
Evolving
  • Episode of Care
  • Clinical efficacy at time of intervention reacts
    to medical event
  • Hospital at center of delivery system
  • Quality through the eye of the patient and
    provider viewed as service quality
  • Consumer and employer view access and amount of
    health care as the gold standard
  • Population health and a system of care for
    chronic illnesses
  • Clinical efficacy driven by disease prevention,
    minimal interventionist methods, and on basis of
    economic and clinical aspects of disease
  • Pro-active primary care, well integrated with
    specialty services. Hospitals care for
    increasingly ill population
  • Quality and outcomes that are evidence-based,
    measurable and improve health and the quality of
    life
  • Consumer and employer are actively engaged in
    health promotion and informed decision-making

4
Drivers of Health Care Costs
  • Population dynamics an aging population with
    chronic diseases
  • Medical technology and treatment advances
  • Healthcare delivery model - failure of
    evidence-based care, medical errors, reactive
    interventions
  • Litigation and risk management
  • Health professional shortages
  • Navigating the complex system
  • Unnecessary care duplication of medical
    services
  • Protecting the medical commons failure to
    ration care
  • Administrative costs hospitals, insurers,
    medical practices
  • Physician and hospital compensation incentives

5
Ensuring Quality Health Care and Managing Costs
In Search of the Holy Grail
  • 1980s
  • Staff model HMOs (Kaiser, Group Health, Harvard)
  • Gatekeeper medical delivery
  • Full risk capitation (PacifiCare)
  • 1990s
  • Physician management companies (MedPartners,
    PhyCor, Pediatrix)
  • Vertically integrated health care delivery
    systems
  • 2000s
  • Benefit design solutions most recently defined
    contribution accountability and cost shifting to
    consumers
  • Tiered networks with cost/quality information
  • Disease management programs
  • Pay for clinical performance

6
Reduction in Health Care costs The First
Journey for Health Plans
  • Overcapacity in the health care system ? lower
    unit costs
  • Risk sharing models with providers - cost
    shifting and significant negative financial
    impact for health systems and physicians who did
    not have infrastructure to manage risk
  • Rigorous utilization management
  • viewed as intrusive
  • limitations in network and access
  • Did not address marked variation in cost,
    quality, or address chronic disease

7
Distribution of Medical Expenses

Diagnosis Driven
Cost Driven
Medical Costs
Membership
Membership
Medical Costs
Chronic diseases include coronary artery disease,
asthma/COPD, CHF and diabetes
8
The Medical Profession Is Changing
  • Historically, a craft-based practice
  • Individual physicians, working alone, putting
    patients health first
  • Handcraft a customized solution for each patient
  • Vast personal knowledge gained from training and
    experience
  • lt50 of care is evidence-based and there is wide
    variation in practice (Wennberg, Dartmouth Atlas)
  • Transformation to profession-based practice
  • Plan coordinated care delivery processes
  • Clinical information is available at the point of
    care and directs appropriate services and
    therapies drugs, imaging
  • This approach leads to fewer quality gaps, better
    patient outcomes and optimizes cost
  • Physician scientists advance the science of
    medicine clinicians generate new medical
    knowledge as they practice medicine

9
Physician Relationships Building a Partnership
1. Physician and hospital collaboration is the
foundation for programs in health care delivery
to serve our members, improve health status and
optimize medical cost management 2. Engage
physicians and hospitals in meaningful ways to
enhance health care delivery, the practice of
evidence-based medicine and the quality and
safety of care 3. Invest in technologies that
improve clinical care and remove administrative
and transactional burdens 4. Reshape medical
management to better establish collaborative
medical management approach with physicians and
members, moving to programs that improve clinical
care and help patients navigate the complex
health care system 5. Create better understanding
of the health insurance industry, including the
business case for health care clinical
performance and cost management
10
Anthem Medical Policy A Model Collaborative
Approach for Physicians
  • Rapidly changing science and more complex
    technology (e.g. stem cell transplantation)
  • Increased availability, marketing and consumer
    demand for unproven technologies
  • Guides the safe introduction of beneficial new
    technology
  • Establishes a scientific basis for medical
    necessity determinations and a foundation for
    benefit coverage
  • Provides a basis for consistent utilization
    management practices and decisions
  • Optimizes claims expense by directing care from
    ineffective technologies
  • Supports patient safety by directing care away
    from unsafe interventions

11
Anthem Medical Policy A Model Collaborative
Approach for Physicians (Cont.)
  • The medical policy group engages the viewpoints
    of academic and community medical experts in the
    states we serve to determine Anthems medical
    policy.
  • This policy is available to all physicians on the
    Anthem website
  • We are now developing expert academic and
    specialty panels in genetics and oncology and
    working with the American College of Radiology
    for imaging technology evaluation

12
Introduction of New Medical Technologies and
Therapies
  • If a technology has been demonstrated to be
    effective, through clinical trials, promote it as
    a consistent best practice.
  • If a medical technology has conclusively shown to
    not be effective, dont do it.
  • If we have insufficient evidence that it is
    effective, assess its clinical value in the
    setting of a clinical trial VA, NH, ME, CT
  • Who should support clinical trials?
    (Pharmaceutical companies, NIH, device
    manufacturers, health plans)

The Great Unknown
Supported by Clinical Evidence
Ineffective
13
The Institute of Medicines Definition of Quality
Quality of care is the degree to which health
services for individuals and populations increase
the likelihood of desired health outcomes and are
consistent with current professional knowledge.
14
Healthcare Quality Defect Rates Occur at Alarming
Rates

Breast cancer screening (65-69)
Outpatient ABX for colds
Hospital acquired infections
Hospitalized patients injured through negligence
Post-MI ?-blockers
Defects per million
Airline baggage handling
Detection treatment of depression
Adverse drug events
Anesthesia-related fatality rate
U.S. Industry Best-in-Class
1 (69)
2 (31)
3 (7)
4 (.6)
5 (.002)
6 (.00003)
? level ( defects)
15
Adverse Events in Hospitalized Patients Harvard
Medical Practice Study - HMPS
  • New York State 1984
  • 30,151 randomly selected discharges
  • Chart-based, two-stage review
  • Assessed adverse events and role of errors and
    negligence
  • Results
  • Overall incidence 3.7 of patients
  • Proportion resulting in
  • death 13.6
  • permanent disability 6.5
  • Significant number related to drugs and surgery

Preventable
58
Not
Negligent
Not
30.4
Preventable
42
Negligent
27.6
Source Brennan, et al. N Engl J Med.
1991324370-376
16
Adverse Events in Hospitalized PatientsMost
Common Types of Events - HMPS
25
Non-operative
Operative
20
15
10
5
0
Drug-
Wound
Tech.
Late
Diag.
Therap.
Nontech.
Proc.
related
infect.
comp.
comp.
mishap
mishap
comp.
related
Source Brennan, et al. N Engl J Med.
1991324377-384
17
Causes of Underuse in Health Care
  • Barriers to accessing care
  • Lack of insurance
  • Co-payments/deductibles
  • Restricted benefits
  • Clinician knowledge deficits
  • Rapid accumulation of medical knowledge
  • Inadequate supporting processes
  • Medical records
  • Information technology
  • Processes of care

18
Proven Effective InterventionsThat Are Underused
  • Heart attack care
  • Breast cancer care
  • Hypertension detection and treatment
  • Anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation
  • Immunizations
  • Inhaled steroids
  • Depression detection and treatment
  • ACE inhibitors in heart failure
  • Diabetic retinal exam
  • Prenatal care
  • Mammography

19
Underuse of Secondary Prevention Strategies
Following Acute Myocardial Infarction
  • Four therapies save about 80 lives per thousand
    patients treated for heart attacks
  • We reach no more than half of eligible patients
  • Over 750,000 Americans suffer heart attacks each
    year
  • Therefore, 18,000 preventable deaths occur each
    year in the U.S.

20
Anthem Hospital Quality ProgramGoal and Overview
  • The goal of Anthems Hospital Quality Program is
    to continuously improve the quality of health
    care delivered in Anthem network hospitals
  • A broad and comprehensive set of metrics that
    address quality of care, clinical outcomes,
    patient safety, processes of care and
    organizational management structure. These
    measures are based upon best hospital practices
    and are developed through an interactive process
    with hospitals. Reporting is for all hospital
    patients and based on an honor system.

21
Anthem Hospital Quality ProgramCore Indicators
  • Board and Management Involvement
  • JCAHO/Licensure
  • Obstetrical Care
  • Patient Safety
  • Cardiac Care including coronary artery bypass
    grafts, PTCA, acute myocardial infarction and
    congestive heart failure
  • Asthma Care
  • Emergency Department Care
  • Joint Replacement
  • Breast Cancer Care
  • Distinct Childrens Hospital Programs

22
Anthem Hospital Quality Program Clinical Metrics
  • Data is all payer data, including Medicare
  • Data is self reported with CEO sign-off and can
    be audited
  • Cardiology and C-Section data is risk adjusted
  • Indicator selection determined by
  • high volume and high risk procedures
  • KY, IN and OH Hospital Associations
  • Epidemiologist, statistician, KY Medical
    Association, other
  • Contractual agreement that data will be kept
    confidential
  • Over 340 participating hospitals in OH, KY, IN

23
Anthem Hospital Quality Program How the Program
Works
  • Hospitals submit data on selected quality metrics
  • Anthem produces a scorecard from submitted
    all-patient data
  • Peer comparison
  • Site visits
  • Minimum score to participate in the Coronary
    Services Network
  • Action plans for institutions not achieving
    threshold results

24
Anthem Coronary Services Network
  • Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts (CABG)
  • number of procedures
  • mortality
  • return to OR
  • saphenous vein use
  • infections
  • Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Arteriography
    (PTCA)
  • number of procedures
  • repeat PTCA
  • failed PTCAs which go onto CABG within 24 hours
  • primary PTCA for acute myocardial infarction

25
Anthem Coronary Services Network
  • Myocardial Infarction (MI)
  • number of patients with MI
  • time to PTCA
  • time to thrombolytic therapy from ER (door to
    drug)
  • aspirin use in 24 hours
  • mortality
  • ß-blocker use
  • critical pathway use
  • number with LVEF lt 40 prescribed ACE inhibitors

26
Anthem Hospital Quality Program Patient Safety
Indiana Kentucky Ohio Patient safety as a
89/96 93 86/94 94 138/143 97 strategic
goal Encourage error 76/77 99 87/92
95 137/143 96 reporting Safety
Committee 69/73 95 84/93 90 129/137
94 Electronic physician 2/77 3 5/91
5 10/141 7 order entry Pharmacist dedicated
23/69 33 25/81 31 52/137 38 to ICU reviews
all medication orders Pharmacist makes patient
17/69 25 13/79 17 37/137 27 rounds with
physicians
27
Hospital Quality Indicators for Childrens
Hospitals
  • Quality of Care
  • Clinical guidelines for asthma emergency room
    and inpatient
  • Asthma treatment with steroids
  • Cystic fibrosis clinical pathways (also
    accreditation by CF Foundation)
  • Appendectomy clinical pathway
  • Tonsillectomy/adenoidectomy clinical pathways
  • Processes of Care
  • Emergency room wait time
  • Appendectomy consultation time/decision time

28
Hospital Quality Indicators for Childrens
Hospitals
  • Outcomes of Care
  • Low and Very Low Birth Weight (VLBW) Infants
  • Infant Mortality for VLBW Infants
  • Appendectomy Ruptured/perforated Appendix
  • Tonsillectomy/Adenoidectomy Operative
    hemorrhage, readmissions (dehydration/bleeding)
  • Standards for Care
  • Emergency Room Nurses Certified With Pediatric
    Advanced Life Support
  • Neonatal ICU Nurses With Neonatal Resuscitation
    Program Training
  • JCAHO Scores

29
Anthem Hospital Quality Program Creating Value
with Hospitals
  • Identify variation in outcomes
  • Enhanced communication
  • Benchmarking best practices
  • Convening and sharing clinical successes
  • Improved clinical outcomes
  • Workgroups for engagement on indicators and
    program improvement
  • Investment in infrastructure vs. structure
  • Provide ongoing results on performance
  • Hospitals believe that care has improved as a
    result of Anthem program

30
Lessons on Metric Selection
Source Advisory Board, 2002
31
Crossing the Quality Chasm A New Health Care
System for the 21st Century
Recommendation 10Private and public purchasers
should examine their current payment methods to
remove barriers that currently impede quality
improvement, and to build in stronger incentives
for quality enhancement.
32
Improving Health Care Financial Incentives for
Quality
  • Dominant methods of payment today dont achieve
    goal of clinical quality.
  • Fee-for-service payments encourage overuse
  • Capitated payments encourage underuse
  • Neither systematically rewards excellence in
    quality
  • Strategy is undercut by difficulties in measuring
    quality and adjusting for risk in a way that
    means something to consumers.
  • Some early experiments in rewarding quality with
    more favorable payments, but very limited.

33
Improvement on Clinical EfficiencyImpact on Net
Income to Hospitals
Payment Mechanism
Discounted FFS
Per Case (DRG)
Per Diem
Shared Risk
Improvement to Cost Structure
  • Decrease unit cost
  • Decrease of units per admission
  • Decrease length of stay
  • Decrease of admissions
  • Improve quality outcomes
  • i.e. decrease hospital infection rates

34
Anthem Hospital Quality Program 2002 Hospital
Quality Program Scorecard
Possible Percent of Section Points Total
Score Hospital QI Plan and Program 29 20
Joint Commission Grid Score 10 7
ED/Asthma/Pneumonia 24 17 Cardiac Care 22 15
Joint Replacement Care 22 15 Obstetrical
Care 16 11 Cancer Care 8 6 Acute MI/Congestive
Heart Failure 8 6 Patient Safety 6 4 TOTAL 145
100
35
Rewarding High Scores Creates a Tangible
Incentive for Progress
Reimbursement Increase Schedule
Relative Reimbursement Rate
Proportion of rate increase based on clinical
quality
Base increase in hospital contract rate
36
Virginia Quality-In-Sights Hospital Incentive
Program
  • 3-year collaborative program centered on
  • Incentive Component
  • patient safety 30
  • patient outcomes 55
  • patient satisfaction 15

37
Virginia Quality-In-Sights Hospital Incentive
Program
  • Patient Safety - 30
  • Meet 6 JCAHCO patient safety goals
  • Improve the accuracy of patient identification
  • Improve the safety of using high-alert
    medications
  • Eliminate wrong-site, wrong-patient and
    wrong-procedure surgery
  • Improve the safety of using infusion pumps
  • Improve the effectiveness of clinical alarm
    systems
  • Improve the effectiveness of communication among
    caregivers
  • Implement 3 patient safety initiatives
  • Computerized Physician Order Entry
  • ICU staffing standards
  • Automated pharmaceutical dispensing devices
  • Report 2 patient safety indicators
  • Anesthesia complications, post-operative
    bleeding, etc.

38
Virginia Quality-In-Sights Hospital Incentive
Program
  • Patient Outcomes - 55
  • Improve indicators of care for patients with
    heart disease
  • Participation in ACC cardiovascular data registry
  • Cardiac Catheterization and Percutaneous Coronary
    Intervention indicators
  • Acute MI or heart failure indicators
  • Administer aspirin, beta blockers at ER arrival,
    discharge
  • Smoking cessation
  • CABG indicators
  • Pregnancy-related or community acquired pneumonia
    indicators
  • Patient Satisfaction - 15
  • Survey of Anthem members
  • Link between improvement in care processes
    outcomes and patient satisfaction

39
Anthem East Clinical Quality Program
  • In the hospital
  • Reducing adverse drug events and nosocomial
    (hospital acquired) infections, and implementing
    intensivist programs in the ICU.
  • In the physician group practices
  • Improving the health of, and lowering the cost of
    treating, patients with chronic illnesses,
    especially diabetes
  • Appropriate use of imaging procedures

40
Quality Performance Incentives for Primary Care
Physicians
  • New Hampshire program for primary care physicians
    serving 370,000 Anthem members
  • Quality measures breast and cervical cancer
    screening, immunizations, retinal exam for
    diabetes, referral to disease management programs
  • Incentives provided at the practice level.
    Awards of 20 per member for top quartile
    performance, 10 per member for second quartile
    performance
  • Improvement in clinical performance

41
Quality Performance Incentives for Primary Care
Physicians
Not measured
42
Obstetrics and GynecologyPayment for Clinical
Performance and Quality The Columbus, Ohio Pilot
Program
  • Approach
  • Preventive care mammography, pap smear
  • Patient satisfaction
  • American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologys
    guidelines for hysterectomy
  • Generic index for pharmaceuticals
  • Recognition and reward
  • No precertification or concurrent review
    requirements
  • Positive adjustment in reimbursement

43
Obstetrics and GynecologyPayment for Clinical
Performance and Quality The Columbus, Ohio Pilot
Program

44
Medical Management A Changing Landscape

Traditional precertification, referral
authorization, utilization review
ProgressiveDisease management, advanced care
management
  • Hospital Utilization - manage hospital
    utilization through appropriateness of admission
    and length of stay
  • Focus - one size fits all utilization
  • Clinical Management - wide variation in regional
    clinical practice pattern
  • Financials ROI minimal
  • Members view as barriers to care
  • Physicians consider these approaches
    administrative hassles that increase office costs
    and personal intervention
  • Partnership Approaches add cost and create
    dynamic tension
  • Manage hospital admissions by preventing
    deterioration in health status
  • Targeted at high impact members
  • Evidence-based care models more consistent
    approaches to care
  • ROI analyses incomplete promising early results
  • View care navigation positively, gt90 acceptance
  • Viewed as promoting the delivery of quality care
    and helping them manage challenging patients
  • Models are collaborative

45
Summary Anthems Pay for Clinical Performance
Program
  • By collaborating with hospitals and physician
    groups and hospitals, we will
  • Improve the health of our members and the
    community
  • Identify and promote best quality and safety
    practices
  • Pay providers a premium for quality and safety
    improvements
  • Reduce the costs associated with medical errors
    and quality defects
  • We have identified opportunities for
    collaborative relationships that enable us to
    measure and improve quality and safety, implement
    care processes, and optimize quality-based care
    management
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)