Title: Aspasia and Aristotle: The First Lady and the Father of Greek Rhetoric
1Aspasia and AristotleThe First Lady and the
Father of Greek Rhetoric
- November 6, 2006
- Grace Bernhardt and Shreelina Ghosh
2Aspasias Background
- Non-Athenian Greek female
- From Miletus, one of the Greek colonies in Ionia
- it is logical to assume that she came in contact
with early philosophical thought in some form
(JO, 10) - Arrived in Athens in mid-440s B.C.E.
Sources Aspasia Rhetoric, Gender, and Colonial
Ideology by Susan Jarratt and Rory OngAspasia,
pages 56-66 of Bizzell and Herzberg
3Aspasias Background
- Companion of Pericles, the democratic leader of
Athens - As foreigner, forbidden from marrying Pericles
- Jarrat and Ong claim she did not fit categories
for Athenian women of wives, concubines,
hetaerae, or prostitutes often mislabeled a
mistress or courtesan - Did she run a house of prostitution? Was she a
courtesan or hetaera? Does it matter?
4Aspasias Background
- Teacher of Rhetoric
- Helped Pericles compose Funeral Oration
- Kennedy makes no reference to Aspasias influence
when describing the Funeral Oration attributed to
Pericles (204) - Taught Socrates (?)
- Developed the Socratic method (?)
- It is easy to imagine that such an indirect
method originated with a woman who was legally
powerless, in a compromised and vulnerable
position, but who attempted to advise and
influence men of great power. (BH, 59) - None of her texts have survived
5Aspasia in Classical Sources
- Several paragraphs of narrative in Plutarchs
life of Pericles - Oration attributed to her in Platos dialogue
Menexenus - Allusions to Aspasia also made by four of
Socrates pupils - In works by Athenaeus
- Dialogue attributed to her by Xenophon
6Jarratt and Ongs Purposes
- To reconstruct Aspasia as a rhetorician of
fifth-century B.C.E. (9) - Part of a larger goal of recovering women in the
history of rhetoric (10) - To argue that Aspasia marks the intersection of
discourses on gender and colonialism, production
and reproduction, rhetoric and philosophy (JO,
10)
7Bizzell and Herzbergs Purposes
- To explore the complexity of the role of women in
ancient Greece - To explore and present historical texts which
reference Aspasia - To question how Aspasia, a woman with no
surviving texts, can be included in a history of
rhetoric (while acknowledging that no texts of
Socrates exist either!)
8Jarratt and Ongs Motivating Questions
- Did Aspasia exist?
- If so, can she be known?
- And then, is that knowledge communicable? (9)
9Bizzell and Herzbergs Motivating Questions
- How can we explain the existence of a woman such
as Aspasia in a Greek society that limited women
to the home? - Was Aspasia a hetaera when Pericles met her?
- How plausible is it that a woman could have
possessed the skills that Aspasia did?
10Jarratt and Ongs Methods
- A review of the classic sources
- An overview of the current commentary
- An undertaking of interpretive histiographical
tasks
11Bizzell and Herzbergs Methods
- Presentation and analysis of historical texts
referencing Aspasia
12Aspasia in Platos Menexenus
- Dialogue between Socrates and Menexenus
- Socrates acknowledges that Aspasia was his
teacher and that she composed funeral orations - The oration attributed to Aspasia is exaggerated
in style, with just the sorts of embellishments
that Socrates elsewhere condemns, and full of
historical errors that create an absurdly
positive view of Athens. (BH, 58)
13Interpreting Platos Representation
- Bloedow sees Aspasia as representative of
rhetoric and democracy (JO, 17) - Jarratt and Ong look at Aspasia as at the
intersection of the axes of gender and
colonialism (JO, 18)
14Gender in Menexenus
- Reading the literary text against the social
text, we find Plato giving voice to a woman at a
time when women were mostly denied public voice,
and fixed most effectively in the role of
reproduction. (JO, 18) - On one level, Plato seems to expand conception of
female - Closer reading shows reversal
15Gender in Menexenus
- Platos attribution of epitaphios to a female
author emphasizes the purpose of women to
reproduce warriors (JO, 18) - Autochthony the conception that men were born
directly from the soil of Athens - Aspasias oration talks at length about
autochthonyPlato forces her to testify to her
own devaluation as a female. (BH, 58)
16Gender in Menexenus
- Jarratt and Ong contend that Platos choice to
include Aspasia as author of oration serves to
downplay womans power and creativity - Bizzell and Herzberg present alternative view
Other scholars, however propose that Socrates
really did admire Aspasia and that Plato is doing
no more than poking fun at this admiration.
(58-59)
17Colonial Ideology in Menexenus
- Plato emphasizes autochthony
- True mother for Athenians (whole) and
stepmother for others (fractured) - Ideology hides unequal power relations between
men and women and the power of cultural dominance
18Colonial Ideology in Menexenus
- Defining the norm through a polar opposition
wipes out difference within each pole,
differences that, in this case, expose the
relations of production in an imperialist
economy. (JO, 21) - Aspasia represents the stranger, sojourner,
and woman all at once
19Questions to Ponder
- Bizzell and Herzberg conclude that
- If indeed she did teach Socrates the so-called
Socratic method, her contribution to the history
of both philosophy and rhetoric is far-ranging.
At the very least, recognizing her activity here
erects a monument to the rhetorical labors of
Aspasia and other classical women and marks the
spot where a more substantial edifice may be
built if the search for textual remains succeeds.
(59) - Is it necessary for a rhetorician or philosopher
to contribute a method or theory in order to be
included in history? - Are textual remains necessary for understanding a
persons role in history? - How might we piece together the contributions of
women to Greek rhetoric in light of the fact that
few, if any, artifacts have survived?
20Pandoras Box The Roles of Women in Ancient
Greece
- Lecturer Ellen B. Reeder, curator of the Walters
Art Gallery in Baltimore - Fall of 1995 exhibit with accompanying catalogue
- Reviews the lives of Greek women and their
portrayal in art (mostly pottery)
21Aristotle
- 384-322 B.C.E.
- Born to Greek parents in the Macedonian town of
Stagira around the time Plato opened the Academy
in Athens - Entered Academy at 17 years old
- Stayed on as teacher, leaving 20 years later upon
Platos death
Sources Aristotle, pages 169-240 of Bizzell and
Herzberg, Chapter 9 Rhetoric in Greece and Rome,
Kennedy
22Aristotles Rhetorical Theory
- Artistic proofs
- Logos
- Enthymeme
- Maxim
- Example
- Pathos
- Ethos
- Inartistic proofs
23Inventio
- Topoi
- Special group
- Common group
- Stasis
- Conjectural
- Definitional
- Quantitative
- Translative
24Aristotles Three Types of Speeches
- Forensic speeches
- Deliberative speeches
- Epideictic or ceremonial speeches
25The Five Canons
- Invention
- Arrangement
- Style
- Memory
- Delivery
26Aristotles Rhetoric
- Never published in Aristotles lifetime
- Most likely not intended for publication
- Began as notes for rhetoric classes in the
Academy - Divided into three books
- Published (hand-copied) for the first time by
Andronicus of Rhodes around 83 B.C.E. - First printed edition published in 1475 B.C.E. by
George of Trebizond
27Three Books of RHETORIC
Book One Definition and Kinds of Rhetoric Book
Two Kinds of Proofs Book Three Delivery
28Questions for Discussion
- Rhetoric is a productive knowledge in that it
does " 'produce' persuasion, speeches, and
texts' but as a discipline concerned with "
'seeing' the available means of persuasion (thus
not necessarily of using them),' rhetoric also
maintains a theoretical aspect. -
- Janet Atwills review of Classical Rhetoric
Its Christian and Secular Tradition (U of North
Carolina P, 1980) by George A. Kennedy - Discussion Prompt Practical, Theoretical and
Productive aspects of Rhetoric
Episteme Praxis Poiesis
29Aristotles eudaimonia
- Eudaimonia translates as happiness or the good
life - For Aristotle, distribution of eudaimonia is not
equal - Aristotle wrestles over whether eudaimonia is an
activity or a state
Sources Aristotle and the Boundaries of the Good
Life and Aristotles Rhetoric and the
Theory/Practice Binary by Janet M. Atwill
30Aristotles Taxonomy of Knowledge
- Theoretical knowledge
- Philosophy
- Metaphysics, math, natural sciences
- Highest knowledge
- Actual knowledge that is identical with its
object - Contemplation of the notion of an end, or telos
- Pursued for no practical or utilitarian end
31Aristotles Taxonomy of Knowledge
- Practical knowledge
- Study of ethics and politics
- Directed toward the end of eudaimonia
- Concerned with action and human behavior
32Aristotles Taxonomy of Knowledge
- Productive knowledge
- Technai of architecture, navigation, medicine,
and rhetoric (?) - Concerned with the contingent or what can be
otherwise (173) - Implicated in social and economic exchange
- Purposeful knowledge resistant to determinate
ends - Productive knowledge always remains in exchange
because its end is in the user as opposed to the
artistic construct. (174)
33Where does rhetoric fit?
- Atwill argues that it is easy to exclude rhetoric
from theoretical knowledge because such knowledge
is concerned with day-to-day functions of the
state - It is harder to separate rhetoric from practical
knowledge because that means saying rhetoric is
distinct from ethics and an aim at the good life
(163)
34Atwills Placement of Rhetoric
- Atwill argues we should place rhetoric in
productive knowledge - while it may seem strange to praise rhetoric for
failing either to consist of the highest
knowledge or to be driven by the end of the good
life, Aristotles greatest contribution to
rhetoric may have been his willingness to allow
it these two failures. (164)
35Theory/Practice Binary
- Atwill states that the greatest barrier to
understanding productive knowledge is the modern
opposition of theory to practice (164) - This binary causes thought to have only two
formstheoretical and practical - Binary then overshadows the triad and productive
knowledge gets left out
36The Theory/Practice Binary
- Gayatri Spivak writes in Explanation and Culture
Marginalia JAC 10.2 (1990), Aristotles techne
is a dynamic and undecidable middle term
between theory and practice. - Can writing bridge the binary?
37Productive knowledge and rhetoric
- Cope art must be a form of productive knowledge,
but rhetoric is more of a practical knowledge - Lobkowicz notes that rhetoric is compared to
medicine as a kind of productive knowledge - Grimaldi dismisses domain of productive
knowledge and puts rhetoric in theoretical domain
38Grimaldi and Rhetoric as Theoretical Knowledge
- Rhetorics relationship to philosophy and ethics
strongly indebted to structural linguistics - Enthymeme is the general method of reasoning
and unites the three rhetorical proofs of ethos,
pathos and logos. - Probabilities can be sufficiently rooted to
object reality to make an inference from eikos. - Aristotles 28 koinoi topoi are ways in which the
mind naturally and readily reasons.
39Aristotles Application of Criteria
- Aristotles definition of rhetoric emphasizes
that rhetorical knowledge is contingent on
context, time, and history (175) - rhetoric must conform to the key criterion of
productive knowledgethe capacity to be
otherwise (175) - Aristotles triangular relationship between the
speaker, subject and audience makes clear
relationship of rhetoric and productive knowledge
with social exchange
40Subjects of Productive Knowledge
- Subjects of productive knowledge are redefined by
their use of techne and act of social exchange - Techne can never be private property therefore,
users and makers of techne cannot be private,
stable entities (185) - Subjects exist at point of competition
- Productive knowledge crosses boundaries of
knowledge and subjectivity
41Robyns Journal Comment
- Anyway, I also think this quote contradicts
Kennedy's general belief that rhetoric is
conservative. I guess Atwill is not specifically
talking about rhetoric, but she is saying that
rhetoric is a techne and so it has these
features, right? Anyway, it seems she is saying
the opposite of Kennedy any techne, including
rhetoric, is not in the business of "securing
boundaries," but of "transgression and
renegotiation." Subjects of productive knowledge
are always crossing boundaries, always
questioning.
42Philosophy Isocrates v. Aristotle
- Isocrates emphasizes the organizing power of
philosophy and its ability to help us understand
life does not separate philosophy from the art
of discourse - Aristotle philosophy is a higher order thinking
available when necessities of life are fulfilled
places rhetoric in the domain of techne rather
than philosophy
43Aristotle wins!
- Philosophy has taken Aristotles definition
- Aristotles taxonomy left room for art and placed
rhetoric in the domain of techne rather than
philosophy - Atwill states that What is lost in the taxonomy,
however, is the sense of the art of rhetoric as a
valued mode of intervention into existing
conditions and a means for the invention of new
possibilities. (189)
44Ideal States Plato v. Aristotle
- Both are confronted with problem of how to
distribute rights, benefits and honors in a state
in which both order and value are defined by
class function. (178) - For Aristotle, distribution of eudaimonia is not
equal. Aristotle wrestles over whether eudaimonia
is an - activity or a state
Aristotle and Plato School of Athens by Raphael
45Ideal States Plato v. Aristotle
- Plato believes the philosopher/king rules in
ideal republic compromise state is ruled by laws - Aristotles ideal is aristocracy compromise
state is a polity (mixed constitution that gives
political responsibility to the middle class) - Plato relies on technai to define hierarchy of
state - Aristotle relies on eudaimonia as basis for
states order
46Analyzing Orators
47Questions to Guide your Analysis
- What appeals or strategies does the orator use in
their speech to convince their audience? - What topoi does the orator use?
- What type of speech is this, according to
Aristotles three types of speeches? - In what ways could the orator strengthen their
speech in Aristotles opinion?