Aspasia and Aristotle: The First Lady and the Father of Greek Rhetoric - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 47
About This Presentation
Title:

Aspasia and Aristotle: The First Lady and the Father of Greek Rhetoric

Description:

Aristotle wrestles over whether eudaimonia is an activity or a state ... For Aristotle, distribution of eudaimonia is not equal. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:181
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: msu87
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Aspasia and Aristotle: The First Lady and the Father of Greek Rhetoric


1
Aspasia and AristotleThe First Lady and the
Father of Greek Rhetoric
  • November 6, 2006
  • Grace Bernhardt and Shreelina Ghosh

2
Aspasias Background
  • Non-Athenian Greek female
  • From Miletus, one of the Greek colonies in Ionia
  • it is logical to assume that she came in contact
    with early philosophical thought in some form
    (JO, 10)
  • Arrived in Athens in mid-440s B.C.E.

Sources Aspasia Rhetoric, Gender, and Colonial
Ideology by Susan Jarratt and Rory OngAspasia,
pages 56-66 of Bizzell and Herzberg
3
Aspasias Background
  • Companion of Pericles, the democratic leader of
    Athens
  • As foreigner, forbidden from marrying Pericles
  • Jarrat and Ong claim she did not fit categories
    for Athenian women of wives, concubines,
    hetaerae, or prostitutes often mislabeled a
    mistress or courtesan
  • Did she run a house of prostitution? Was she a
    courtesan or hetaera? Does it matter?

4
Aspasias Background
  • Teacher of Rhetoric
  • Helped Pericles compose Funeral Oration
  • Kennedy makes no reference to Aspasias influence
    when describing the Funeral Oration attributed to
    Pericles (204)
  • Taught Socrates (?)
  • Developed the Socratic method (?)
  • It is easy to imagine that such an indirect
    method originated with a woman who was legally
    powerless, in a compromised and vulnerable
    position, but who attempted to advise and
    influence men of great power. (BH, 59)
  • None of her texts have survived

5
Aspasia in Classical Sources
  • Several paragraphs of narrative in Plutarchs
    life of Pericles
  • Oration attributed to her in Platos dialogue
    Menexenus
  • Allusions to Aspasia also made by four of
    Socrates pupils
  • In works by Athenaeus
  • Dialogue attributed to her by Xenophon

6
Jarratt and Ongs Purposes
  • To reconstruct Aspasia as a rhetorician of
    fifth-century B.C.E. (9)
  • Part of a larger goal of recovering women in the
    history of rhetoric (10)
  • To argue that Aspasia marks the intersection of
    discourses on gender and colonialism, production
    and reproduction, rhetoric and philosophy (JO,
    10)

7
Bizzell and Herzbergs Purposes
  • To explore the complexity of the role of women in
    ancient Greece
  • To explore and present historical texts which
    reference Aspasia
  • To question how Aspasia, a woman with no
    surviving texts, can be included in a history of
    rhetoric (while acknowledging that no texts of
    Socrates exist either!)

8
Jarratt and Ongs Motivating Questions
  • Did Aspasia exist?
  • If so, can she be known?
  • And then, is that knowledge communicable? (9)

9
Bizzell and Herzbergs Motivating Questions
  • How can we explain the existence of a woman such
    as Aspasia in a Greek society that limited women
    to the home?
  • Was Aspasia a hetaera when Pericles met her?
  • How plausible is it that a woman could have
    possessed the skills that Aspasia did?

10
Jarratt and Ongs Methods
  • A review of the classic sources
  • An overview of the current commentary
  • An undertaking of interpretive histiographical
    tasks

11
Bizzell and Herzbergs Methods
  • Presentation and analysis of historical texts
    referencing Aspasia

12
Aspasia in Platos Menexenus
  • Dialogue between Socrates and Menexenus
  • Socrates acknowledges that Aspasia was his
    teacher and that she composed funeral orations
  • The oration attributed to Aspasia is exaggerated
    in style, with just the sorts of embellishments
    that Socrates elsewhere condemns, and full of
    historical errors that create an absurdly
    positive view of Athens. (BH, 58)

13
Interpreting Platos Representation
  • Bloedow sees Aspasia as representative of
    rhetoric and democracy (JO, 17)
  • Jarratt and Ong look at Aspasia as at the
    intersection of the axes of gender and
    colonialism (JO, 18)

14
Gender in Menexenus
  • Reading the literary text against the social
    text, we find Plato giving voice to a woman at a
    time when women were mostly denied public voice,
    and fixed most effectively in the role of
    reproduction. (JO, 18)
  • On one level, Plato seems to expand conception of
    female
  • Closer reading shows reversal

15
Gender in Menexenus
  • Platos attribution of epitaphios to a female
    author emphasizes the purpose of women to
    reproduce warriors (JO, 18)
  • Autochthony the conception that men were born
    directly from the soil of Athens
  • Aspasias oration talks at length about
    autochthonyPlato forces her to testify to her
    own devaluation as a female. (BH, 58)

16
Gender in Menexenus
  • Jarratt and Ong contend that Platos choice to
    include Aspasia as author of oration serves to
    downplay womans power and creativity
  • Bizzell and Herzberg present alternative view
    Other scholars, however propose that Socrates
    really did admire Aspasia and that Plato is doing
    no more than poking fun at this admiration.
    (58-59)

17
Colonial Ideology in Menexenus
  • Plato emphasizes autochthony
  • True mother for Athenians (whole) and
    stepmother for others (fractured)
  • Ideology hides unequal power relations between
    men and women and the power of cultural dominance

18
Colonial Ideology in Menexenus
  • Defining the norm through a polar opposition
    wipes out difference within each pole,
    differences that, in this case, expose the
    relations of production in an imperialist
    economy. (JO, 21)
  • Aspasia represents the stranger, sojourner,
    and woman all at once

19
Questions to Ponder
  • Bizzell and Herzberg conclude that
  • If indeed she did teach Socrates the so-called
    Socratic method, her contribution to the history
    of both philosophy and rhetoric is far-ranging.
    At the very least, recognizing her activity here
    erects a monument to the rhetorical labors of
    Aspasia and other classical women and marks the
    spot where a more substantial edifice may be
    built if the search for textual remains succeeds.
    (59)
  • Is it necessary for a rhetorician or philosopher
    to contribute a method or theory in order to be
    included in history?
  • Are textual remains necessary for understanding a
    persons role in history?
  • How might we piece together the contributions of
    women to Greek rhetoric in light of the fact that
    few, if any, artifacts have survived?

20
Pandoras Box The Roles of Women in Ancient
Greece
  • Lecturer Ellen B. Reeder, curator of the Walters
    Art Gallery in Baltimore
  • Fall of 1995 exhibit with accompanying catalogue
  • Reviews the lives of Greek women and their
    portrayal in art (mostly pottery)

21
Aristotle
  • 384-322 B.C.E.
  • Born to Greek parents in the Macedonian town of
    Stagira around the time Plato opened the Academy
    in Athens
  • Entered Academy at 17 years old
  • Stayed on as teacher, leaving 20 years later upon
    Platos death

Sources Aristotle, pages 169-240 of Bizzell and
Herzberg, Chapter 9 Rhetoric in Greece and Rome,
Kennedy
22
Aristotles Rhetorical Theory
  • Artistic proofs
  • Logos
  • Enthymeme
  • Maxim
  • Example
  • Pathos
  • Ethos
  • Inartistic proofs

23
Inventio
  • Topoi
  • Special group
  • Common group
  • Stasis
  • Conjectural
  • Definitional
  • Quantitative
  • Translative

24
Aristotles Three Types of Speeches
  • Forensic speeches
  • Deliberative speeches
  • Epideictic or ceremonial speeches

25
The Five Canons
  • Invention
  • Arrangement
  • Style
  • Memory
  • Delivery

26
Aristotles Rhetoric
  • Never published in Aristotles lifetime
  • Most likely not intended for publication
  • Began as notes for rhetoric classes in the
    Academy
  • Divided into three books
  • Published (hand-copied) for the first time by
    Andronicus of Rhodes around 83 B.C.E.
  • First printed edition published in 1475 B.C.E. by
    George of Trebizond

27
Three Books of RHETORIC
Book One Definition and Kinds of Rhetoric Book
Two Kinds of Proofs Book Three Delivery
28
Questions for Discussion
  • Rhetoric is a productive knowledge in that it
    does " 'produce' persuasion, speeches, and
    texts' but as a discipline concerned with "
    'seeing' the available means of persuasion (thus
    not necessarily of using them),' rhetoric also
    maintains a theoretical aspect.
  • Janet Atwills review of Classical Rhetoric
    Its Christian and Secular Tradition (U of North
    Carolina P, 1980) by George A. Kennedy
  • Discussion Prompt Practical, Theoretical and
    Productive aspects of Rhetoric

Episteme Praxis Poiesis
29
Aristotles eudaimonia
  • Eudaimonia translates as happiness or the good
    life
  • For Aristotle, distribution of eudaimonia is not
    equal
  • Aristotle wrestles over whether eudaimonia is an
    activity or a state

Sources Aristotle and the Boundaries of the Good
Life and Aristotles Rhetoric and the
Theory/Practice Binary by Janet M. Atwill
30
Aristotles Taxonomy of Knowledge
  • Theoretical knowledge
  • Philosophy
  • Metaphysics, math, natural sciences
  • Highest knowledge
  • Actual knowledge that is identical with its
    object
  • Contemplation of the notion of an end, or telos
  • Pursued for no practical or utilitarian end

31
Aristotles Taxonomy of Knowledge
  • Practical knowledge
  • Study of ethics and politics
  • Directed toward the end of eudaimonia
  • Concerned with action and human behavior

32
Aristotles Taxonomy of Knowledge
  • Productive knowledge
  • Technai of architecture, navigation, medicine,
    and rhetoric (?)
  • Concerned with the contingent or what can be
    otherwise (173)
  • Implicated in social and economic exchange
  • Purposeful knowledge resistant to determinate
    ends
  • Productive knowledge always remains in exchange
    because its end is in the user as opposed to the
    artistic construct. (174)

33
Where does rhetoric fit?
  • Atwill argues that it is easy to exclude rhetoric
    from theoretical knowledge because such knowledge
    is concerned with day-to-day functions of the
    state
  • It is harder to separate rhetoric from practical
    knowledge because that means saying rhetoric is
    distinct from ethics and an aim at the good life
    (163)

34
Atwills Placement of Rhetoric
  • Atwill argues we should place rhetoric in
    productive knowledge
  • while it may seem strange to praise rhetoric for
    failing either to consist of the highest
    knowledge or to be driven by the end of the good
    life, Aristotles greatest contribution to
    rhetoric may have been his willingness to allow
    it these two failures. (164)

35
Theory/Practice Binary
  • Atwill states that the greatest barrier to
    understanding productive knowledge is the modern
    opposition of theory to practice (164)
  • This binary causes thought to have only two
    formstheoretical and practical
  • Binary then overshadows the triad and productive
    knowledge gets left out

36
The Theory/Practice Binary
  • Gayatri Spivak writes in Explanation and Culture
    Marginalia JAC 10.2 (1990), Aristotles techne
    is a dynamic and undecidable middle term
    between theory and practice.
  • Can writing bridge the binary?

37
Productive knowledge and rhetoric
  • Cope art must be a form of productive knowledge,
    but rhetoric is more of a practical knowledge
  • Lobkowicz notes that rhetoric is compared to
    medicine as a kind of productive knowledge
  • Grimaldi dismisses domain of productive
    knowledge and puts rhetoric in theoretical domain

38
Grimaldi and Rhetoric as Theoretical Knowledge
  • Rhetorics relationship to philosophy and ethics
    strongly indebted to structural linguistics
  • Enthymeme is the general method of reasoning
    and unites the three rhetorical proofs of ethos,
    pathos and logos.
  • Probabilities can be sufficiently rooted to
    object reality to make an inference from eikos.
  • Aristotles 28 koinoi topoi are ways in which the
    mind naturally and readily reasons.

39
Aristotles Application of Criteria
  • Aristotles definition of rhetoric emphasizes
    that rhetorical knowledge is contingent on
    context, time, and history (175)
  • rhetoric must conform to the key criterion of
    productive knowledgethe capacity to be
    otherwise (175)
  • Aristotles triangular relationship between the
    speaker, subject and audience makes clear
    relationship of rhetoric and productive knowledge
    with social exchange

40
Subjects of Productive Knowledge
  • Subjects of productive knowledge are redefined by
    their use of techne and act of social exchange
  • Techne can never be private property therefore,
    users and makers of techne cannot be private,
    stable entities (185)
  • Subjects exist at point of competition
  • Productive knowledge crosses boundaries of
    knowledge and subjectivity

41
Robyns Journal Comment
  • Anyway, I also think this quote contradicts
    Kennedy's general belief that rhetoric is
    conservative. I guess Atwill is not specifically
    talking about rhetoric, but she is saying that
    rhetoric is a techne and so it has these
    features, right? Anyway, it seems she is saying
    the opposite of Kennedy any techne, including
    rhetoric, is not in the business of "securing
    boundaries," but of "transgression and
    renegotiation." Subjects of productive knowledge
    are always crossing boundaries, always
    questioning.

42
Philosophy Isocrates v. Aristotle
  • Isocrates emphasizes the organizing power of
    philosophy and its ability to help us understand
    life does not separate philosophy from the art
    of discourse
  • Aristotle philosophy is a higher order thinking
    available when necessities of life are fulfilled
    places rhetoric in the domain of techne rather
    than philosophy

43
Aristotle wins!
  • Philosophy has taken Aristotles definition
  • Aristotles taxonomy left room for art and placed
    rhetoric in the domain of techne rather than
    philosophy
  • Atwill states that What is lost in the taxonomy,
    however, is the sense of the art of rhetoric as a
    valued mode of intervention into existing
    conditions and a means for the invention of new
    possibilities. (189)

44
Ideal States Plato v. Aristotle
  • Both are confronted with problem of how to
    distribute rights, benefits and honors in a state
    in which both order and value are defined by
    class function. (178)
  • For Aristotle, distribution of eudaimonia is not
    equal. Aristotle wrestles over whether eudaimonia
    is an
  • activity or a state

Aristotle and Plato School of Athens by Raphael
45
Ideal States Plato v. Aristotle
  • Plato believes the philosopher/king rules in
    ideal republic compromise state is ruled by laws
  • Aristotles ideal is aristocracy compromise
    state is a polity (mixed constitution that gives
    political responsibility to the middle class)
  • Plato relies on technai to define hierarchy of
    state
  • Aristotle relies on eudaimonia as basis for
    states order

46
Analyzing Orators
47
Questions to Guide your Analysis
  • What appeals or strategies does the orator use in
    their speech to convince their audience?
  • What topoi does the orator use?
  • What type of speech is this, according to
    Aristotles three types of speeches?
  • In what ways could the orator strengthen their
    speech in Aristotles opinion?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com