Definitions of noninteger dimensions and mathematical formalisms - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Definitions of noninteger dimensions and mathematical formalisms

Description:

For non-fractals, however, such properties are of little interest they are ... Fractals are non-regular geometric shapes that have the same degree of non ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:67
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: atelierinf
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Definitions of noninteger dimensions and mathematical formalisms


1
Definitions of non-integer dimensions and
mathematical formalisms
  • Edith Perrier, IRD France,
  • Visiting scientist at UCT,
  • Applied Maths Dept., room 417.1, Ext. 3205,
  • E-mail edith_at_maths.uct.ac.za
  • Web site where to download previous lectures
    lect.ppt (or lect.zip if links included)
    http//www.mth.uct.ac.za/Affiliations/BioMaths/Ind
    ex.html

2
The Von Koch Curve
3
The middle third Cantor Set
4
  • A fractal is by definition a set for which the
    Hausdorff-Besicovitch dimension strictly exceeds
    the topological dimension (Mandelbrot,1975)

5
Fractal Geometry. Mathematical foundations and
applications (Kenneth Falconer, 1990, Ed. Wiley,
UK)
  • My personal feeling is that the definition of a
    fractal should be regarded in the same way as
    the biologist regards the definition of life .
    There is no hard and fast definition, but just a
    list of properties characteristic of a living
    thing, such as the ability to reproduce or to
    move or to exist to some extent independently of
    the environment. Most living beings have most of
    the characteristics on the list, though there are
    living objects that are exceptions to each of
    them. In the same way, it seems best to regard a
    fractal as a set that has properties such as
    those listed below, rather than to look for a
    precise definition which will almost certainly
    exclude some interesting cases. From the
    mathematicians point of view, this approach is
    no bad thing. It is difficult to avoid developing
    properties of dimension other than in a way that
    applies to fractal and non-fractal sets
    alike. For non-fractals, however, such properties
    are of little interest they are generally
    almost obvious and could be obtained more easily
    by other methods.
  • When we refer to a set F as a fractal, therefore,
    we will typically have the following in mind.
  • (i) F has a fine structure, i.e. detail on
    arbitrarily small scales.
  • (ii) F is too irregular to be described in
    traditional geometrical language both locally and
    globally
  • (iii) Often F has some form of self-similarity,
    perhaps approximate or statistical
  • (iv) Usually, the fractal dimension of F
    (defined in some way) is greater than its
    topological dimension
  • (v) In most cases of interest F is defined in a
    very simple way, perhaps recursively

6
Fractal dimension (1)
  • Topological dimension DT
  • Hausdorff dimension DH
  • Exercise 1 Assuming that the geometrically
    defined middle cantor fractal set is a fractal of
    finite dimension, proof that this dimension is

7
Solutions Exercice 1
  • Easy assuming that at sdimHF, Hs(F) is finite
    and non-zero
  • Hs(F) Hs(FL) Hs(FR) (1/3)s Hs(F) (1/3)s
    Hs(F)
  • 12 (1/3)s and sLog2/Log3
  • Rigorous calculation Falconer p.31-32

8
An illustration from number theory
  • Almost all numbers (in the sense of Lebesgue
    measure) are normal to all bases . That is they
    have base-m expansions containing equal
    proportions of the digits 0,1,..,m-1 for all m.
    If F(p0,p1,pm) is the set of numbers x in 0,1
    with base-m expansions containing the digits
    0,1,..,m-1 in proportions (p0,p1,pm) ,
    F(1/m,1/m,.1/m) has Lebesgue measure 1 thus
    dimension 1 for all m
  • If the pj are not equal one can show that
  • Application to another definition for the Cantor
    set no digit 1 in base 3 expansions

9
  • Fractal if and only if?
  • Cantor set
  • Von Koch curve
  • The fractal dimension may be a non
    integer whereas (The Hausdorff
    dimension of the space filling Peano Curve
    equals 2)

10
  • On the wide variety of fractal dimension in
    use, the definition of Haussdorff (1919) based on
    a construction of Carathéodory (1914), is the
    oldest and probably the more important. Hausdorff
    dimension has the advantage of being defined for
    any set, and is mathematically convenient, as it
    is based on measures, which are relatively easy
    to manipulate. A major disadvantage is that in
    many cases it is hard to calculate or to estimate
    by computational methods.
  • Properties of Hausdorff measures have been
    developped during the XXth century, largely by
    Besicovitch and his students.

11
Fractal dimensions (2)
  • Box Counting dimension (Kolmogorov entropy,
    entropy dimension, logarithmic density,
    information dimension, Minkowski variant)
  • Examples

12
Fractal dimensions
  • discussion .

13
Numerical calculations
  • (Example from the Web at http//www.msci.memphi
    s.edu/giri/BIP/)
  • Since there is no consensus on a definition of
    the Fractal Dimension of a plane curve, our
    program computes it in eleven different ways. The
    merits and demerits of the different methods of
    computing the fractal dimension were studied.
    There are no widely accepted definitions of FD.
    The software BIP computes it in 11 different
    ways. The methods include Euclidean Distance Map
    (EDM), Minkowski Sausage Method (Dilation), Box
    Counting Method, Corner Method (Counting and
    Perimeter), Fast Method (Regular and Hybrid),
    Parallel Lines Method, Cumulative Intersection
    Method, and Mass Radius (Short and Long).
  • On the whole, (biofilm) images are about as
    fractal as can be expected within the
    variabilities in nature. The most stable and
    reliable methods are EDM, Minkowski Sausage
    Method, and Box Counting Method

14
Words
  • The term "fractal" was coined by Benoit
    Mandelbrot in 1975 in his book Les Objets
    Fractals . It comes from the Latin fractus,
    meaning an irregular surface like that of a
    broken stone. Fractals are non-regular geometric
    shapes that have the same degree of
    non-regularity on all scales. Just as a stone at
    the base of a foothill can resemble in miniature
    the mountain from which it originally tumbled
    down, so are fractals self-similar whether you
    view them from close up or very far away.
    Fractals are the kind of shapes we see in nature.
    We can describe a right triangle by the
    Pythagorean theorem, but finding a right triangle
    in nature is a different matter altogether. We
    find trees, mountains, rocks and cloud formations
    in nature, but what is the geometrical formula
    for a cloud? How can we determine the shape of a
    dollup of cream in a cup of coffee? Fractal
    geometry, chaos theory, and complex mathematics
    attempt to answer questions like these. Science
    continues to discover an amazingly consistent
    order behind the universe's most seemingly
    chaotic phenomena. .

15
Lecture series
  • Lecture 1. March. 3rd. Introduction to fractal
    geometry . Measures and power laws.
  • Lecture 2. March 5th. Definitions of non-integer
    dimensions and mathematical formalisms
  • Lecture 3. March 10th. Iteration of functions and
    fractal patterns
  • Lecture 4. March 12th. Extensions Self-similar
    and self-affine sets . Multifractals.
  • Lecture 5. March 17th. Fractals / Geostatistics
    / Time series analysis
  • Lecture 6. March 19th. Dynamical processes
    Fractal and random walks
  • Lecture 7. March 24th. Dynamical processes
    Fractal and Percolation
  • Lecture 8. March 26th. Dynamical processes
    Fractal and Chaos
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com