Integrate Your Infrastructure presented by Oracular and IBM - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 49
About This Presentation
Title:

Integrate Your Infrastructure presented by Oracular and IBM

Description:

Jim Glynn, Manager of J.D. Edwards Practice. Nancy Pellowski, Business Planning, Finance and Process ... 3M, Kawasaki, Shopko. North Dakota Legislative Council ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 50
Provided by: incora9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Integrate Your Infrastructure presented by Oracular and IBM


1
Integrate Your Infrastructurepresented by
Oracular and IBM
  • Thursday
  • September 26, 2002

2
Agenda
  • Welcome and introductions
  • Becky Carson, Documentation and Training
    Specialist
  • WebSphere overview
  • Dan Marshall, IBM-WebSphere Specialist
  • WebSphere success story Xcel Energy
  • Jim Glynn, Manager of J.D. Edwards Practice
  • Nancy Pellowski, Business Planning, Finance and
    Process Consultant
  • Lunch and drawing for gift certificate

3
General Info
  • Breakfast snacks, coffee and juice in next room,
    help yourself
  • Bathrooms located
  • Seminar expected to last until 1130-noon
  • Lunch following presentation
  • Drawing for Oracular polo shirts, a wind jacket
    and a 100 gift certificate for Best Buy held
    during lunch
  • Oracular mugs, calculators and pens, please take!

4
Oracular, Inc.
  • Since 1988, serving as Midwest IT services
    partner to manufacturers, distributors, service
    companies, and government
  • Offices in Minneapolis, Oshkosh and Milwaukee
  • Services through five practices
  • IBM-WebSphere/Lotus
  • J.D. Edwards
  • PeopleSoft
  • Oracle
  • e-Business, including custom application
    development

5
Consulting Services
  • Strategic leadership and ongoing support in
  • Project management
  • Software implementation
  • Application development
  • Network and systems design
  • Training / support
  • Web services including development, design
  • Hosting (high security 24/7 availability)
  • Software Reseller

6
Oracular Customers
  • Xcel Energy
  • 3M, Kawasaki, Shopko
  • North Dakota Legislative Council
  • South Dakota State University, CyberStudy101
  • LeFebvre Trucking, Lakeville Motor Express
  • Oshkosh Truck Corp., Pierce McNeilus
  • Plexus, Weisman Enterprises
  • Stora-Enso, Appleton Coated, Georgia-Pacific
  • Trek Bicycle

7
Oracular Solutions
  • Oracular provides
  • Knowledgeable technical architects
  • Experienced Business Analysts
  • Skilled Programmers
  • Creative front end designers
  • Dedicated Professionals
  • End to end, cost effective solutions

8
WebSphere Expert
  • Dan Marshall of IBM
  • See Inserted packet to follow along

9
SLU Tracking and Reporting System
10
What is an SLU?
  • Xcel Energy formed by the merger of Northern
    States Power and New Century Energies
  • Organizational structure includes new Shared
    Services business unit

11
What is an SLU?
  • Merger includes multiple legal entities now
    managed under five Operating Business Units
  • Retail
  • Delivery
  • Energy Supply
  • Energy Markets
  • Enterprises

12
What is an SLU?
  • Shared Services business unit provides the
    following to the five Operating Business Units
  • Corporate Communications
  • Property Services
  • Human Resources Services
  • Strategic Sourcing

13
What is an SLU?
  • The Service Level Understanding (SLU) is an
    agreement between the Shared Services Business
    Unit and the Operating Business Unit.
  • Service to be performed by Shared Services
  • Sets forth optional vs. required services
  • Aids in budgeting for services

14
The project
  • Why this project?
  • Two different business needs
  • Service Billing view of financial information
    which conforms to SEC regulations
  • The SLU view of charges to Xcel Energy Operating
    Business Units for services provided

15
Service Billing
  • Designed to support SEC regulations and view of
    Legal Entity
  • Some Legal Entities cross Operating Business Unit
    lines
  • NSP-MN
  • NSP-WI
  • PSCo
  • SPS
  • CLFP

16
SLU View
  • Delivery
  • Retail
  • Energy Supply
  • Energy Markets
  • Enterprises
  • Total BU View Across Legal Entities
  • PLUS Corporate BUs
  • CFO
  • General Counsel

17
Whats the difference?
  • Service Billing
  • Charges by DEPARTMENT (JDE Business Unit)
  • Service Level Understanding
  • Charges by SERVICE PERFORMED

18
Why not just use the G/L?
  • As information progresses through the G/L
    processing
  • Detail (Service/Service Component) is lost
  • Transactions are rolled together (prior to JDE
    and within JDE)
  • JDE BU ? Service Component (not a 11
    relationship)

19
The Burning Question
  • BU wants to know
  • What specific services did we receive?
  • How much (volume)?
  • What was the total cost per unit?
  • Answer with the old system
  • We dont knowwe can only answer Who

20
The Problem
Where did A come from?
21
The Solution
  • Service Level Understanding
  • Tracking
  • And
  • Reporting
  • System

STARS
22
Objective of STARS
  • Track and report information to support a view
    based on Service Component as laid out on the SLU
    Agreement between the Operating Business Unit and
    Shared Services

23
Project Constraints
  • Detailed Information is lost through the JDE
    process, therefore the detail cannot be extracted
    solely by manipulating the existing data
  • Current Labor Entry (PTRS) does not support ease
    of entry on the Service Component level.
  • Not allowed to have modifications to the existing
    Service Billing/Allocation processes

24
Philosophy of the Solution
  • Retain DETAIL plus the info sent to JDE
  • Use the same RULES to predict the destination of
    the dollars
  • Report on the Operating BU view using the above
    detail and predictions

25
Nuts and Bolts
  • Data Feed
  • Labor Reporting
  • Integration with mainframe Time system
  • Cost Calculations
  • Reporting

26
Data Feed
  • Non-Labor Data Feed
  • Five Feeder Systems Identified
  • Passport (non-labor invoices)
  • Concur (employee expenses)
  • Aperture Realms (lease/imputed rent)
  • Aviation (flight charges)
  • Manual JDE Journal entries

27
Data Feed
  • Feeder System Information imported to the STARS
    Repository
  • Detailed service component retained
  • Charge destination (JDE BU, 8-digit WO, or
    Subledger) identified on detailed record

28
Labor Reporting
  • Business requirements indicated a need to replace
    PTRS Labor Entry system.
  • Enter Time by Service Component
  • Assign Time to one or more
  • Legal Entity/Entities and
  • Operating Business Unit(s)Or
  • Specific JDE BU or tracking work order
  • SEC Implications
  • Easier to be accurate
  • Uses existing approved methodologies
  • No filings!

29
Integration with TIME
  • Information is stored in the STARS repository (as
    its own record type)
  • Transmit information to TIME (mainframe)
  • Exact information as is transmitted today in a
    flat file format
  • Extract Loaded Costs from TIME
  • TIME processes detailed entry and returns loaded
    cost as a flat file

30
Recap so far
  • Available information in STARS Repository
  • Detailed information from non-labor feeder
    systems with Service Component and JDE
    BU/Obj/Subl/WO/etc.
  • Labor details with Service Component and JDE
    BU/Obj/Subl/WO/etc.
  • So what next???

31
Cost Calculations
  • Goal Assign the Service Component Dollars to
    the correct bucket.
  • Two ways
  • Direct charges to the BU
  • One to one
  • Allocated charges to the BU
  • Simulate the final outcome
  • May require simulation of LE allocation first

32
Cost Calculations
  • Simulating the outcome
  • Use the logic and rules in the Allocation tables
    and Service Billing AAIs to calculate the
    correct bucket

33
Cost Calculations
  • Overview of the logic
  • Charges may be allocated among several legal
    entities
  • The charges to each legal entity may then be
    allocated among several Operating Business Units

34
Cost Calculations
  • Our task
  • Allocate each transaction to the Operating
    Business Unit level

35
Reporting
  • Each transaction, once the allocation is
    simulated, is added to a reporting workfile.
  • Records are grouped for reporting
  • Operating BU
  • Portfolio
  • Service
  • Service Component

36

37
The Technical Side
  • Tools and Programs

38
Development Tools
  • Oracle
  • Database tables
  • PLSQL Flat file import/export
  • Error reports
  • Employee refresh from PeopleSoft
  • Automated e-mail error notification to users
  • DOS
  • Scheduled .BAT files to control Oracle processes
  • FTP scripts

39
Development Tools
  • WebSphere
  • User Interface applications
  • Time Entry
  • Setup and Matrix Maintenance applications
  • JD Edwards OneWorld
  • Detail data repository table
  • Allocation simulation by reading JDE tables
  • Reporting workfile with calculated data
  • SLU Monthly Detail and Summary Statements

40
Development Objects
  • New Tables
  • Oracle
  • STARS Master Repository of Data
  • Labor Reporting Account Matrix
  • Feeder System Conversion Table
  • JD Edwards
  • Replicated Master Repository
  • Statement Workfile

41
Development Objects
  • Data Integration
  • Oracle
  • Flat file import from conversion table (feeder
    system data) to Repository
  • Flat file export to TIME
  • Flat file import of loaded cost data from TIME
  • Flat file export to JDE Repository

42
Development Objects
  • Data Integration
  • Feeder systems
  • Flat file Export of loaded costs from TIME
  • Flat file Export of Concur data
  • Flat file Export of Aviation data
  • Flat file Export of Passport data

43
Development Objects
  • Interactive Applications
  • WebSphere
  • Time Entry application
  • Matrix maintenance application (to maintain
    account designations for charges)
  • User maintenance application
  • Setup tables maintenance applications

44
Development Objects
  • Batch Applications
  • JD Edwards OneWorld
  • Batch jobs to simulate allocations, populate
    reporting workfile and print Operating BU
    statements

45
Objects Schematic
46
Impact on JD Edwards
  • No impact on upgrades
  • No impact on standard or modified JDE code
  • Objects created are not linked to any existing
    JDE process

47
Project Summary
  • Planning and Design phase allowed the
    architecting of the best possible solution
  • Project objectives met without intruding on
    existing processes and systems
  • WebSphere tool allowed the development of
    web-based applications with complex logic and
    functionality
  • Close working relationship between Xcel Energy
    team and Oracular team assured mutual success on
    the project

48
  • Q A

49
Wrap Up
  • Feedback forms to fill out inside your folders
  • Lunch in next room
  • Drawing for prizes
  • To enter - drop business card in jar in back of
    room
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com