The EPRI Bayesian Mmax Approach for Stable Continental Regions SCR Johnston et al' 1994 Robert Young - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The EPRI Bayesian Mmax Approach for Stable Continental Regions SCR Johnston et al' 1994 Robert Young

Description:

mmax-obs is the most likely value of mu ... Likelihood function integrates to infinity and cannot be used to define a distribution for mu ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: byou4
Learn more at: https://pubs.usgs.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The EPRI Bayesian Mmax Approach for Stable Continental Regions SCR Johnston et al' 1994 Robert Young


1
The EPRI Bayesian Mmax Approach for Stable
Continental Regions (SCR)(Johnston et al.
1994)Robert YoungsAMEC Geomatrix
Figure A61
  • USGS Workshop on Maximum Magnitude Estimation
  • September 8, 2008

2
Statistical Estimation of mu (Mmax)
Figure A62
  • Assumption - earthquake size distribution in a
    source zone conforms to a truncated exponential
    distribution between m0 and mu
  • Likelihood of mu given observation of N
    earthquakes between m0 and maximum observed,
    mmax-obs

3
Plots of Likelihood Function for mmax-obs 6
Figure A63
4
Results of Applying Likelihood Function
Figure A64
  • mmax-obs is the most likely value of mu
  • Relative likelihood of values larger than
    mmax-obs is a strong function of sample size and
    the difference mmax-obs m0
  • Likelihood function integrates to infinity and
    cannot be used to define a distribution for mu
  • Hence the need to combine likelihood with a prior
    to produce a posterior distribution

5
Approach for EPRI (1994) SCR Priors
Figure A65
  • Divided SCR into domains based on
  • Crustal type (extended or non-extended)
  • Geologic age
  • Stress regime
  • Stress angle with structure
  • Assessed mmax-obs for domains from catalog of SCR
    earthquakes

6
Bias Adjustment (1 of 2)
Figure A66
  • bias correction from mmax-obs to mu based on
    distribution for mmax-obs given mu
  • For a given value of mu and N estimate the median
    value of mmax-obs ,
  • Use to adjust from mmax-obs
    to mu

7
Bias Adjustment (2 of 2)
Figure A67
  • Example
  • mmax-obs 5.7
  • N(m 4.5) 10
  • mu 6.3 produces 5.7

8
Domain Pooling
Figure A68
  • Obtaining usable estimates of bias adjustment
    necessitated pooling like domains (trading
    space for time)
  • Super Domains created by combining domains with
    the same characteristics
  • Extended crust - 73 domains become 55 super
    domains, average N 30
  • Non-extended crust 89 domains become 15 super
    domains, average N 120

9
EPRI (1994) Category Priors
Figure A69
  • Compute statistics of mmax-obs for extended and
    non extended crust
  • Use average sample size to adjust to mu

10
EPRI (1994) Regression Prior
Figure A610
  • Regress mmax-obs against domain characterization
    variables
  • Default region is non-extended Cenozoic crust
  • Dummy variables indicating other crustal types,
    ages, stress conditions, and a continuous
    variable for ln( activity rate ) indicate
    departure from default.
  • Model has low r2 of 0.29 not very effective in
    explaining variations

11
Example Application Using Category Prior
Figure A611
12
Summary
Figure A612
  • Bayesian approach provides a means of using
    observed earthquakes to assess distribution for
    mu
  • Requires an assessment of a prior distribution
    for mu
  • Johnston et al. (1994) developed two types
  • crustal type category extended or non-extended
  • a regression model (low r2 and high correlation
    between predictor variables)
  • Bayesian approach is not limited to the Johnston
    et al. (1994) priors, any other prior may be used
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com