Conditional Probability and Independence - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Conditional Probability and Independence

Description:

Suppose that one of the cards is randomly selected and put down on the ground. ... This shows how to extend the concept of independence to a sequence of events. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:63
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: michaele98
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Conditional Probability and Independence


1
Conditional Probability and Independence
  • If A and B are events in sample space S and P(B)
    gt 0, then the conditional probability of A given
    B is denoted P(AB) and
  • Example. A coin is flipped twice.
    Let S (H,H),(H,T),(T,H),(T,T) and assume all
    four outcomes are equally likely. Let A be the
    event that both flips land on heads and let B be
    the event that at least one flip lands on heads.
    Since A (H,H) and B (H,H), (H,T),
    (T,H), we have

2
Reduced Sample Space
  • When working with conditional probability P(AB),
    it is often easier to treat B as the new sample
    space.
  • Example. A coin is flipped twice (continued).
    Let S (H,H),(H,T),(T,H),(T,T),
    A (H,H), B (H,H), (H,T),
    (T,H). Now, think
    of B as the sample space, where all outcomes are
    equally likely. Clearly, P(AB) 1/3, which
    agrees with the calculation on the previous
    slide.

3
The Law of Multiplication
  • If we multiply through the conditional
    probability of A given B by P(B), we obtain the
    law of multiplication This rule can
    be generalized (see the textbook).
  • Problem. Let an urn contain 8 red balls and 4
    white balls. We draw 2 balls from the urn
    without replacement. If we assume that at each
    draw each ball in the urn is equally likely to be
    chosen, what is the probability that both balls
    are red? Solution. Let R1 and R2 denote, resp.,
    the events that the first and second balls are
    red. Using the multiplication rule, we have
    Of course, we could
    solve this problem by a direct count without the
    use of conditional probability.

4
Probability of no king on four draws without
replacement
  • Draw from an ordinary deck of 52 cards
  • Let Ai be the event that no king is drawn on the
    ith draw.
  • This is the same result we previously obtained by
    counting.

5
Law of Total Probability
  • Let B be an event with P(B) gt 0 and P(Bc) gt 0.
    Then for any event A,
    This law may also be generalized--see textbook.
  • Example. An insurance company rents 35 of the
    cars for its customers from agency I and 65 from
    agency II. If 8 of the cars of agency I and 5
    of the cars of agency II break down during the
    rental periods, what is the probability that a
    car rented by this insurance company breaks down?
  • A tree diagram is often useful for the law of
    total probability.

6
Bayes Formula--see text for a generalization
  • Suppose F1, F2, and F3 are pairwise disjoint and
    SF1?F2 ?F3.
  • Now,
  • If event E is known to have occurred, then we can
    update the probabilities that the events Fj (the
    hypotheses) will occur by using Bayes formula.
    P(Fj) is called the prior probability of Fj and
    the conditional probability P(Fj E) is the
    posterior probability of Fj after the occurrence
    of E.

7
Example for Bayes formula
  • Suppose we have 3 cards which are identical in
    form. The first card has both sides red, the
    second card has both sides black, and the third
    card has one red side and one black side.
    Suppose that one of the cards is randomly
    selected and put down on the ground. If the
    upturned side of the chosen card is red, what is
    the probability that the other side is black?
  • Let R2, B2, and M denote the events that the
    chosen card is, resp., all red, all black, and
    mixed (red-black). Letting R be the event that
    the upturned side of the chosen card is red, we
    have

8
Independent events
  • In general, P(EF) and P(E) are different. That
    is, knowing that F has occurred generally changes
    the probability of Es occurrence. This leads to
    the following definition.
  • Events E and F are independent in case
    If E and F are not independent, we say they
    are dependent.
  • Example. Two coins are flipped and all 4
    outcomes are assumed to be equally likely. If E
    is the event that the first coin lands heads and
    F is the event that the second coin lands tails,
    then E and F are independent since

9
More on independent events
  • If E and F are independent, so are E and Fc. See
    proof in textbook. What can you say about the
    independence of Ec and Fc?
  • Assuming P(EFG) P(E)P(F)P(G) for three events
    E, F, G does not imply pairwise independence.
    See Example 3.29 in the textbook.
  • We say E1, E2, , En is independent if for every
    subset
  • Example. Suppose we conceive of an experiment
    involving an infinite number of coin flips.
    Suppose Ei is the event that the ith flip turns
    up heads. We believe that these events are
    independent, and this means that all equations of
    type will hold (without the restriction that
    subscripts are n). This shows how to extend
    the concept of independence to a sequence of
    events.

10
ExampleAn experiment with independent
subexperiments
  • Independent trials, consisting of rolling a pair
    of dice are performed. What is the probability
    of the event E that we get a sum of 5 before we
    get a sum of 7?
  • Let En denote the event that no 5 or 7 appears on
    the first n1 trials and a 5 appears on the nth
    trial. The desired probability is
  • Since P(5 on any trial) 4/36 and P(7 on any
    trial) 6/36, by the independence of trials,
    P(En) (1 10/36)n-1(4/36) and thus the desired
    probability is 2/5 using the result of Appendix
    2.
  • Let F be event that a 5 occurs on 1st trial, G be
    event that a 7 occurs on 1st trial, and H be
    event that neither 5 nor 7 occurs on 1st trial.
    P(E) P(EF)P(F)P(EG)P(G)P(EH)P(H). Now
    P(EF) 1 and P(EG) 0. P(EH) P(E) since H
    has no effect. We have, P(E) 1/9
    P(E)(13/18) or P(E) 2/5. This is the same
    result as before.

Do you see why ?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com