Title: The Economic Crisis and Flexible EmploymentIntermediaries: What Are the Implications for Employment
1The Economic Crisis and Flexible
Employment/Intermediaries What Are the
Implications for Employment and Social Policy?
- Paul Swaim
- Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social
Affairs - OECD
- FlexWorkResearch Centre and eurociett Conference
- 26-27 November 2009, Brussels
2Outline of Talk
- The labour market impact of the crisis
- Impact so far and short-term outlook
- Have flexible employment and intermediaries made
a difference? - Employment and social policy responses
- Policy responses to date
- Are flexible employment and intermediaries making
a difference?
3Part I Labour market impact
- Impact of the crisis on the unemployment rate
(UR) and the short-term outlook - Which workers have been hardest hit?
- Which countries have been hardest hit?
- Have flexible employment and intermediaries made
a difference?
4Labour market impact and short-term outlook
- Last years financial crisis turned into a jobs
crisis - OECD area UR rose from 25-year low at 5.6 in
2007 to a post-war high of 8.6 in September
(nearly 17 million more unemployed) - No group spared, but men, youth, immigrants and,
especially, workers in temporary jobs hardest hit - UR up in all OECD countries this year, but large
differences in how sharply (e.g. Germany versus
Spain) - Latest OECD projections (19 November)
- Economic recovery now spreading (the worst was
averted) - But it is still too timid to halt rising
unemployment - Project a peak of 9.2 in mid-2010, then a slow
decline - Nearly a two-thirds rise in under 3 years
- Previous post-war worst were 50 increases
following the first 2 oil shock
5The unemployment impact so far differs greatly
across countries
Percent of the labour force
6Recessions not only hurt lots of people, but
also take a long time to fix
Unemployment rates, Finland
7Already disadvantaged groups bear the brunt of
falling labour demand
8A similar pattern holds in the current downturn
Percentage change of employment over 2008 Q2 to
2009 Q2
9Have flexible employment and intermediaries made
a difference?
- Implications for the evolution of overall
unemployment - More shock amplification, but less shock
persistence (in theory) - Might fit the Spanish case so far, but not the
German case - Other factors can dominate (e.g. kurzarbeit)
- Implications for the distribution of the social
costs of recessions - Very strong concentration of job losses on
temporary workers - Contributes to vulnerability of youth,
low-skilled and immigrants - But other factors also matter (e.g. industry mix
explains why men are harder hit than women) - Is the combination of partial EPL reform and
short-time schemes increasing labour market
segmentation? Danger of a lost generation of
youth?
10Part II Labour market policy challenges
- Short-term challenges
- Should labour demand policies play a major role?
- Are social security systems appropriate? Should
unemployment benefits (UBs) be expanded? - Is the work-first approach recession-proof? How
to activate the unemployed when labour demand is
weak? - Long-term challenges
- How to avoid allowing high unemployment from
persisting? - How to avoid undermining long-run labour supply?
- How to avoid undermining labour market
efficiency?
11Resources available for LM policies differ
across OECD countries
- On average, 1.5 of GDP of which 0.9 passive
and 0.6 active - But large differences across countries e.g.
from 0.4 in US to 4.5 in DEN - Spending on UBs exceeds spending on ALMPs in
almost all countries
12Governments have taken many types of measures in
response to the jobs crisis
Number of OECD countries that have taken
different types of measures
13Discretionary funds for ALMPs limited with some
notable exceptions
Average annual planned additional expenditure in
response to the economic downturn
14Supporting labour demand
- Vigorous macro-economic policy response,
including large fiscal packages, to boost AD - Estimated to save 3.2 to 5.5 jobs in 2010 in the
19 OECD included in the analysis - Important not to withdraw too soon, but also to
restore fiscal balance - Most OECD countries have introduced targeted
measures to support labour demand - Reduction in social security contributions
(estimated cost per additional job 1.7 times
average job costs in SR 7 times in LR ) - Short-time work schemes (e.g. Kurzarbeit in
Germany counts more than 1.4 million participants
corresponding to about 1 of LF) - LD measures play a positive role, but have to be
temporary and well-targeted
15Reinforcing social safety nets
- Crisis leads to longer average unemployment
spells - Where UB durations are short, temporary extension
during the crisis helps reducing the poverty risk
among the long-term unemployed - Countries that have temporarily extended benefits
durations are Canada, Finland, Japan, Portugal
and United States - Increasing numbers of ineligible jobseekers due
to the increase in non-standard work in some
countries - Make sure social assistance is adequate and
accessible - Consider extending coverage if adequate
enforcement can be provided - Countries that have extended coverage are
Finland, France, Japan and United States - Any extensions should be temporary and targeted
to the most vulnerable and not undermine
job-search requirements
16Unemployment benefits are only one element of
safety nets for job losersAverage net
replacement rates over a 5-year unemployment spell
17Helping job-seekers find a job
- Maintain core jobs-search assistance to help
jobseekers - Even in recessions firms continue to create many
new jobs - Cost of job loss increases due to longer expected
unemployment duration and loss of human capital - Many countries have made good progress in recent
years in implementing back-to-work policies - For those at risk of long-term unemployment,
re-employment services need to be adapted to low
labour demand - Shift in emphasis from work-first approach to
train-first approach through training and
work-experience programmes - Negative effects of programme participation on
job-search less of an issue in recessions - Helps provide jobseekers with the new skills for
the new jobs in the recovery
18How do flexible employment and intermediaries fit
in?
- A growing role for private intermediaries in
providing back-to-work services - EC endorsement for PES to cooperate with private
employment agencies (PEAs), especially around the
job placement function - Country examples of good practices (growing list)
- NLD local cooperative agreements (e.g. post
intermediaries in WERKplein offices) - GER national agreement under which e.g. job
listings are shared - DNK sharing vacancies candidates, PES
outsourcing tasks to PEAs - Social protection systems need to be adapted to
flexible and other non-standard forms of
employment - Modernising UI/UB entitlement rules
- Concerns about too little coverage for temporary
workers - But also about subsidising erratic working
patterns (e.g. voluntary vacations) - Assuring that SA is an adequate backstop
19Thank you