An Empirical Relationship Between Interplanetary Conditions and Dst - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

An Empirical Relationship Between Interplanetary Conditions and Dst

Description:

... Dst was slower than the predicted one. Example 2. Example 3 ... The empirical model predicted lower minimum of the Dst than the observed one. ... Discussion ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: xianz6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: An Empirical Relationship Between Interplanetary Conditions and Dst


1
An Empirical Relationship Between Interplanetary
Conditions and Dst
Burton, R. K., R. L. McPherron and C. T. Russell,
JGR, 1975.
Journal Club ---- Winter 2007 01/17/2007
2
  • Dst index is a direct measure of the H-
    component of the magnetic perturbations at
    mid-latitude ground stations.
  • At low to mid latitudes the H (northward)
    component of the magnetic perturbation is
    dominated by the intensity of the magnetospheric
    ring current. Dst then is proportional to the
    total energy of the drifting particles in the
    ring current.

Sudden Enhancement
Main phase
Recovery phase
3
1. Objective Develop an empirical
relationship for the rate of change of Dst in
terms of the dawn-dusk electric field and the
dynamic pressure in the solar wind. 2.
Algorithm a) H Hmp Hrc (here, the tail
current is included in the Hrc ) b)
c) Determine the parameters
4
Example 1
  • A dynamic pressure pulse around 1200UT produced
    the sudden enhancement in Dst.
  • The following postive Ey generated the main phase
    of the storm.
  • The subsequent reduction in Ey initiated the
    recovery phase.

5
Example 2
  • The dynamic pressure enhancement produced the
    variation in Dst between 0000 and 0008UT. No
    injection due to the negateive Ey.
  • Additional ring current injection retarded the
    decay of Dst between 0014 and 0019UT.
  • The decay of the measured Dst was slower than
    the predicted one.

6
Example 3
  • Highly variable Ey and overestimated dynamic
    pressure effect possibly caused the discrepancy
    between the predicted and measured Dst.
  • The choice of quiet day can affect the
    prediction and produce the deviations.

7
Example 3
  • The empirical model predicted lower minimum of
    the Dst than the observed one. The injection to
    the ring current F(Esw) seemed to be
    overestimated.

8
Discussion
  • The derived functional relationship and the
    optimum parameters depend on the state of the
    magnetosphere and its previous history. Here the
    paper assumes that this dependence is relatively
    small.
  • The deviation of the predicted Dst from the
    measured Dst could be due to the computation of
    the ground Dst. It involves the issue of how to
    select the quiet days.
  • The predicted sudden enhancement sometimes also
    deviate from the measured Dst. It is possibly due
    to the accuracy of the solar wind density and
    velocity measurements .
  • This study only calculated the storms with the
    Dst minima gt -120 nT. For larger storms (Dst lt
    -300 nT) this model should also be able to
    predict the Dst if the ring current injection
    rate is high, i.e. strong dawn-dusk electric
    fields (high solar wind velocity and strong
    southward IMF) and sustain for longer periods.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com