Interaction%20Region%20Upgrade%20Options - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Interaction%20Region%20Upgrade%20Options

Description:

There is always some local synchrotron radiation from bending magnets. PEP-II generates a large amount of local SR in order to make head-on collisions. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: Sull86
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Interaction%20Region%20Upgrade%20Options


1
Interaction Region Upgrade Options
M. Sullivan for the SLAC B-day March 20, 2003
2
Outline
  • General B-factory parameters and constraints
  • Present B-factory IRs
  • Upgrades to PEP-II
  • Super B-factory IR
  • Summary

3
Some Issues and Constraints
  • There is always some local synchrotron radiation
    from bending magnets
  • PEP-II generates a large amount of local SR in
    order to make head-on collisions.
  • KEKB also generates a lot of SR even though they
    have a large crossing angle because they designed
    for on-axis incoming beams. This shifts all of
    the bending SR to the downstream side and
    consequently increases the power levels of the
    fans striking the nearby vacuum chambers.

4
Constraints...
  • The Q1 magnet is always going to be shared
  • At least one beam is always bent in this magnet
    generating SR bending fans.
  • The Q2 magnet must be a septum magnet
  • If this magnet is shared by both beams then one
    loses most of the beam separation because it is
    x-focusing.
  • Making this magnet a septum magnet forces a
    certain amount of beam separation at the face of
    the Q2 magnet (about 100 mm between beam center
    lines).

5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
Detector requirements
  • Maximum solid angle
  • Try to keep all accelerator components far enough
    away from the IP to maximize the detector
    acceptance
  • This conflicts with accelerator requirements to
    minimize the spot size by pushing in the final
    focus magnets
  • Adequate shielding from local SR
  • The collision beam pipe (usually Be) must be
    shielded from locally generated SR and lost beam
    particles at least well enough to avoid swamping
    the detectors.

8
More detector requirements
  • Minimum amount of material in the detector
    beampipe
  • This conflicts with having enough SR shielding
    (usually a thin coating of Au) to keep detector
    occupancy at acceptable levels
  • Minimum radius for the beam pipe
  • This must be balanced with the requested thinness
    of the beam pipe. The smaller the beam pipe the
    more power it must be able to handle (kW).

9
Still more detector requirements
  • Large high-field solenoid
  • This forces the final shared magnet (Q1) to be
    either permanent magnet or super-conducting
    (maybe also Q2)
  • Adequate shielding from beam backgrounds
  • Collimators and shield walls are needed to
    protect the detector from backgrounds generated
    around the ring
  • Low pressure vacuum system near the IP
  • This minimizes lost beam particles generated near
    the IP that can not be collimated out

10
Machine Parameters that are Important for the IR
PEP-II KEKB LER energy 3.1 3.5 GeV HER
energy 9.0 8.0 GeV LER current 1.8 1.5 A HER
current 1.0 1.0 A ? y 12.5
6.5 mm ?x 35 60 cm X emittance 50 20 n
m-rad Estimated sy 5 3 mm Bunch spacing 1.89
2.4 m Number of bunches 921 1184 Collision
angle head-on ?11 mrads Beam pipe
radius 2.5 2.0 cm Luminosity 5?1033
8?1033 cm-2 sec-1
11
PEP-II Upgrade Plans
  • Now Projected Upgrade
  • LER energy 3.1 3.1 3.1? GeV
  • HER energy 9.0 9.0 9.0? GeV
  • LER current 1.8 2.4 3.3 A
  • HER current 1.0 1.4 1.5 A
  • y 12.5 9.0 5.0 mm
  • ?x 35 35 35 cm
  • X emittance 50 50 50 nm-rad
  • Estimated sy 5 4.3 3 mm
  • Bunch spacing 1.89 1.89 1.26 m
  • Number of bunches 921 1130 1700
  • Collision angle head-on head-on ?3.25 mrads
  • Beam pipe radius 2.5 2.5 2.5 cm
  • Luminosity 5?1033 8?1033
    2?1034 cm-2 sec-1

12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
Beam Parameters for a PEP-III 1?1036 Luminosity
Accelerator
15
PEP-III Super B
  • Now Projected Upgrade Super B
  • LER energy 3.1 3.1 3.1? 3.5
    GeV
  • HER energy 9.0 9.0 9.0? 8.0
    GeV
  • LER current 1.8 2.4 3.3
    22.2 A
  • HER current 1.0 1.4
    1.5 9.7 A
  • y 12.5 9.0 5.0 1.5
    mm
  • ?x 35 35 35 15
    cm
  • X emittance 50 50 50 70
    nm-rad
  • Estimated sy 5 4.3 3 1.7
    mm
  • Bunch spacing 1.89 1.89
    1.26 0.63 m
  • Number of bunches 921 1130
    1700 3400
  • Collision angle head-on head-on
    ?3.25 ?12 mrads
  • Beam pipe radius 2.5 2.5
    2.5 1.5-2.0? cm
  • Luminosity 5?1033 1?1034
    2?1034 1?1036 cm-2 sec-1

16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
2 cm radius and 1 cm radius beam pipes
The 1 cm radius beam pipe intercepts about 5 kW
of power from the LER and nearly the same amount
of power from the HER
23
KEKB Upgrade Plans
  • Now Upgrades SuperKEKB
  • LER energy 3.5 3.5 3.5 GeV
  • HER energy 8.0 8.0 8.0 GeV
  • LER current 1.4 2.0 9.4 A
  • HER current 0.95 1.1 4.1 A
  • y 6.5 6.5 3.0 mm
  • ?x 60 60 15 cm
  • X emittance 20 20 33 nm-rad
  • Estimated sy 3 3 2 mm
  • Bunch spacing 2.4 2.4 0.6 m
  • Number of bunches 1184 1184 5018
  • Collision angle ?11 crab ?15
    (crab) mrads
  • Beam pipe radius 2.0 1.5 1-2 cm
  • Luminosity 8?1033 1-2?1034
    1-3?1035 cm-2 sec-1

24
(No Transcript)
25
Summary
The Interaction Region of a B-Factory has many
conflicting requirements. The trick is to
achieve a kind of best balance between these
requirements that maximizes the luminosity for a
given B-factory design.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com