Muon Port Card, Optical Link, Muon Sorter Upgrade Status - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Muon Port Card, Optical Link, Muon Sorter Upgrade Status

Description:

QPLL2-based custom clock daughter board sitting on top of SP to ... Straightforward evolutional design of the new MPC and optolink ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:103
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: mmat70
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Muon Port Card, Optical Link, Muon Sorter Upgrade Status


1
Muon Port Card, Optical Link,
Muon Sorter Upgrade Status
  • M.Matveev
  • Rice University
  • December 17, 2009

2
Present Optical Link System
  • Present optical links to CSC Track Finder run at
    1.6Gbps (one link per LCT)

3
New Optical Link Requirements
  • 18..24 LCTs from MPC to SP per 1 or 2 bunch
    crossings
  • - 21 (24) LCTs from 24 peripheral crates
    with the new TMBs
  • - 18 LCTs from all other crates
  • Preserve and enhance sorting capabilities of the
    Port Card
  • 32-bit LCT (present format)
  • Same link partitioning at the SP input
    (ME1/ME1/ME2/ME3/ME4)
  • All optical links should fit single Track Finder
    crate
  • Radiation tolerant serializer
  • Use existing TTC components and clock
    distribution paths

4
Use of the 2nd Bunch Crossing
  • Introduces the dead time. How critical is it?
  • How to determine that the extra LCT belongs to
    the previous BX?
  • - Use unique Wire Group ID255 (valid values
    are 0..159)
  • arriving from TMB in the first frame ?

5
Proposed Link Architecture
  • Use discrete Texas Instruments TLK2501 serializer
    on MPC
  • ? Space and power consumption are not a
    problem on MPC
  • ? Well understood and proven device
  • ? Dont need to change anything in the
    synchronization procedure
  • ? Better radiation tolerance than embedded
    FPGA SERDES
  • ? Coupled with 12-channel parallel optical
    transmitter
  • Use embedded deserializers in the front FPGA on
    SP
  • ? Solves the problem of limited space and
    excessive heat dissipation
  • ? Inexpensive XC5VLX50T could be a good
    choice for the front FPGA
  • ? Deserializer core compatible with the
    TLK2501 needs to be created
  • Increase transmission frequency from 80MHz to
    120MHz
  • ? QPLL2 ASIC delivers either 40/80/160MHz
    (default) or 40/60/120MHz
  • low-jitter clocks, depending on quartz.
    We can use QPLL2-produced clean
  • 120MHz clock on MPC board to drive the
    SER. We can use the present
  • QPLL2-based custom clock daughter board
    sitting on top of SP to
  • produce the 120MHz clock for the DESER
    and front FPGA.

6
Muon Port Card Block Diagram
7
Sector Processors Front Section
8
Clock Options
  • 3 old TLK2501 links
  • - 80MHz from the CCB or internal QPLL
  • 12 new TLK2501 links
  • - 80MHz or 120MHz from internal QPLL
  • - At 80MHz the MPC may deliver 12 LCTs in one
    bunch crossing or 24 LCTs in two bunch crossings
  • - At 120MHz the MPC may deliver 18 LCTs in
    one bunch crossing or up to 36 LCTs in two bunch
    crossings

9
Latency
  • TLK2501 latency
  • TxRx (34..38 bit times)(76..107 bit
    times) 110..145 bit times
  • Min/Max transmitter latency at 80MHz
    21..24 ns
  • Min/Max transmitter latency at 120MHz
    14..16 ns
  • Xilinx Virtex-5LXT latency
  • Tx 4-9.5T (T period of TXUSRCLK)
  • Rx 8.5-13.5T (T period of RXUSRCLK)
  • Rx latency 106..169 ns _at_ 80MHz
  • 70..112 ns _at_ 120MHz
  • Need to take into account the max number
    which includes the 8B/10B encoding/decoding delay
  • Total latency for TLK2501 V5LXT would be
  • 190 ns at 80MHz, or 4.5BX larger than
    present link
  • 125 ns at 120MHz, or 3BX larger than
    present link

10
Optical Interface
  • 12-channel parallel optical transmitter/receiver,
    SNAP12 industry standard
  • - Pluggable package, 100 pin array
  • - 49 x 17 x 11 mm in size
  • - 2.5 Gbps/channel typical
  • (6.25Gbps available)
  • - 1.2W typical power dissipation
  • - Up to 500 m low-loss MMF
  • - Several vendors (Avago Technologies,
  • Reflex Photonics, Emcore, Zarlink)

11
TMB Interface
  • Same backplane pin assignment as MPC2004
  • Replace National GTLP18T612 receivers with Texas
    Instruments SN74GTLPH16912 (same as ones on Muon
    Sorter)
  • Minor improvements in schematic design and layout
  • TMB2005 uses 2 Fairchild GTLP16612 transmitters
    to send LCTs to Port Card. This part seems to be
    obsolete. Do we have 160 spares for new TMBs to
    assure the same delays?
  • Use 2 frames of 2 BX to deliver winner bits
    back to TMB
  • On a firmware level the TMB-to-MPC timing should
    be the same for the old and new TMBs

12
VME Interface
  • Use the same approach as existing MPC2004
  • - 1 main register and VME handshake in
    discrete logic
  • - all the rest in FPGA
  • Will be compatible with the MPC2004 as much as
    possible

13
Sorter 12 LCTs out of 18
  • Target device XC5VLX110-2FF1760
  • - Existing TF mezzanine board
  • - Middle speed grade
  • - lt 40 resource usage
  • - 5BX latency for sorter 12 out of 18
  • 3.5BX latency for sorter 3 out of 18

14
Sorter 12 LCTs out of 18 Simulation

3.5BX 87 ns
33 ns
Old outputs 3 best out of 18 are multiplexed
at 80MHz New outputs 12 best out of 18 are
multiplexed at 120MHz
15
FPGA Pin Count
  • 9TMB x 32 bit _at_ 80MHz 9 winners 297
    inputs/outputs
  • VME CCB interfaces gt 150 inputs/outputs
  • 12 TLK2501 x 16 bits 192 outputs (12 new links)
  • 3 TLK2501 x 16 bits 48 outputs (3 old links)

  • Total 700 inputs/outputs
  • Existing Track Finder Virtex-5 Mezzanine
    card (780 i/o pins) should be
    OK.

16
MPC2010 Design Status
  • Schematic design is almost complete
  • One Virtex-5 mezzanine in hand (thanks to Alex
    Madorsky)
  • Two pairs of Zarlink ZL60101/102 12-channel
    optical transmitters/receivers (405/368 each)
    and mating sockets (16 each) are in hand
  • Optical fibers can be ordered from
    Dataaccessories.com or CablesToGo.com (530..900
    per 100 m)
  • Custom components needed (common with the new TMB
    and SP?)
  • - CERN designed QPLL2 ASIC
  • - 120.24MHz and 160.32MHz quartz oscillator
    (CERN)
  • - email from Jan Troska
  • We have the QPLL chips in the quantities
    that you mention (few dozens to few hundreds).
     Their cost is 10CHF each. The crystals have to
    be ordered from an outside manufacturer for
    quantities exceeding 10, on a 16-18 week lead
    time with MOQ 200.  For prototyping I can provide
    you with a few (lt10) that work at 160MHz (cost
    16CHF each).  We have never produced large
    quantities of 120MHz crystals, so there you take
    a risk and might have trouble ordering small
    quantities.

17
Proposed RD Plan
  • Build a full size prototype of the Muon Port Card
    in 2010
  • SNAP12 transmitter and receiver are electrically
    incompatible
  • - same 100-pin receptacle/socket, but
    different pin assignment
  • Future MPC wont be able to accommodate the
    SNAP12 receiver for testing purposes due to lack
    of i/os
  • Options for the optolink receiver
  • - Full size SP prototype with five SNAP12
    receivers
  • - Smaller 6U prototype with one SNAP12
    receiver, FPGA and
  • VME interface
  • - Small mezzanine board with one SNAP12
    receiver and one
  • front FPGA

18
Muon Sorter Upgrade
  • According to our RD Proposal submitted in
    October 2007, the Muon Sorter upgrade is
    envisaged for phase 1, along with the Sector
    Processor
  • SP-to-MS Interface
  • - Stay with 3 muons/SP, 36 muons/CSCTF?
  • - Same backplane?
  • MS-to-GMT interface
  • - GMT upgrade plans are unknown, but likely
    will follow the CMS trigger upgrade path
  • - 4 muons per CSC system?
  • MS processing logic
  • - Upgrade to existing V5 mezzanine FPGA?
  • May reduce sorting latency from 2 BX to
    1 BX
  • Connection to/from Tracker Trigger?

19
Conclusion
  • - Straightforward evolutional design of the
    new MPC and optolink
  • - Proven clock sources and synchronization
    procedure
  • - 12-channel parallel Tx/Rx will allow to
    reduce the number of
  • optical cables from three to one per MPC
    and greatly relax
  • the SP front panel
  • - 3..5 BX latency increase for the optolink
  • - Discrete SER is more robust solution for
    radiation environment
  • - Can use existing mezzanine board with
    Virtex-5 FPGA
  • - All components are available
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com